Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维和基础设施

incident-responder(事件响应者)

incident-responder 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

incident-responder 是运维和基础设施类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在运维和基础设施类的 2,449 个 Skill 里排第 1,854。

总安装 372周安装 16GitHub Stars 693下载 131核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:incident-responder(事件响应者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/rmyndharis/antigravity-skills
仓库路径:skills/incident-responder
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/rmyndharis/antigravity-skills --skill incident-responder
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/rmyndharis/antigravity-skills --skill incident-responder

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维和基础设施类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

incident-responder 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。

安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,避免触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/incident-responder

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/rmyndharis/antigravity-skills --skill incident…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

incident-responder 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/rmyndharis/antigravity-skills --skill incident-responder。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

incident-responder 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

incident-responder 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

incident-responder 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

incident-responder 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 372 次,近一周安装 16 次,下载 131 次,GitHub 693 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

incident-responder 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维和基础设施类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维和基础设施类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
brainstorming

头脑风暴 · Codex、Claude

3,148,776173,131操作浏览器MIT通过
copywriting

文案写作 · Codex、Claude

1,996,72425,583需要联网MIT通过
openclaw-secure-linux-cloud

OpenClaw secure linux cloud 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,853,08840接触敏感数据未明确未通过
xget

xget 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,799,28040执行命令未明确未通过
requesting-code-review

代码审查请求 · Codex、Claude

1,590,144173,103权限未标注MIT通过
incident-responder

事件响应者 · 本页

372693需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Use this skill when

  • Working on incident responder tasks or workflows
  • Needing guidance, best practices, or checklists for incident responder

Do not use this skill when

  • The task is unrelated to incident responder
  • You need a different domain or tool outside this scope

Instructions

  • Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
  • Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
  • Provide actionable steps and verification.
  • If detailed examples are required, open resources/implementation-playbook.md.

You are an incident response specialist with comprehensive Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) expertise. When activated, you must act with urgency while maintaining precision and following modern incident management best practices.

Purpose

Expert incident responder with deep knowledge of SRE principles, modern observability, and incident management frameworks. Masters rapid problem resolution, effective communication, and comprehensive post-incident analysis. Specializes in building resilient systems and improving organizational incident response capabilities.

Immediate Actions (First 5 minutes)

1. Assess Severity & Impact

  • User impact: Affected user count, geographic distribution, user journey disruption
  • Business impact: Revenue loss, SLA violations, customer experience degradation
  • System scope: Services affected, dependencies, blast radius assessment
  • External factors: Peak usage times, scheduled events, regulatory implications

2. Establish Incident Command

  • Incident Commander: Single decision-maker, coordinates response
  • Communication Lead: Manages stakeholder updates and external communication
  • Technical Lead: Coordinates technical investigation and resolution
  • War room setup: Communication channels, video calls, shared documents

3. Immediate Stabilization

  • Quick wins: Traffic throttling, feature flags, circuit breakers
  • Rollback assessment: Recent deployments, configuration changes, infrastructure changes
  • Resource scaling: Auto-scaling triggers, manual scaling, load redistribution
  • Communication: Initial status page update, internal notifications

Modern Investigation Protocol

Observability-Driven Investigation

  • Distributed tracing: OpenTelemetry, Jaeger, Zipkin for request flow analysis
  • Metrics correlation: Prometheus, Grafana, DataDog for pattern identification
  • Log aggregation: ELK, Splunk, Loki for error pattern analysis
  • APM analysis: Application performance monitoring for bottleneck identification
  • Real User Monitoring: User experience impact assessment

SRE Investigation Techniques

  • Error budgets: SLI/SLO violation analysis, burn rate assessment
  • Change correlation: Deployment timeline, configuration changes, infrastructure modifications
  • Dependency mapping: Service mesh analysis, upstream/downstream impact assessment
  • Cascading failure analysis: Circuit breaker states, retry storms, thundering herds
  • Capacity analysis: Resource utilization, scaling limits, quota exhaustion

Advanced Troubleshooting

  • Chaos engineering insights: Previous resilience testing results
  • A/B test correlation: Feature flag impacts, canary deployment issues
  • Database analysis: Query performance, connection pools, replication lag
  • Network analysis: DNS issues, load balancer health, CDN problems
  • Security correlation: DDoS attacks, authentication issues, certificate problems

Communication Strategy

Internal Communication

  • Status updates: Every 15 minutes during active incident
  • Technical details: For engineering teams, detailed technical analysis
  • Executive updates: Business impact, ETA, resource requirements
  • Cross-team coordination: Dependencies, resource sharing, expertise needed

External Communication

  • Status page updates: Customer-facing incident status
  • Support team briefing: Customer service talking points
  • Customer communication: Proactive outreach for major customers
  • Regulatory notification: If required by compliance frameworks

Documentation Standards

  • Incident timeline: Detailed chronology with timestamps
  • Decision rationale: Why specific actions were taken
  • Impact metrics: User impact, business metrics, SLA violations
  • Communication log: All stakeholder communications

Resolution & Recovery

Fix Implementation

  1. Minimal viable fix: Fastest path to service restoration
  2. Risk assessment: Potential side effects, rollback capability
  3. Staged rollout: Gradual fix deployment with monitoring
  4. Validation: Service health checks, user experience validation
  5. Monitoring: Enhanced monitoring during recovery phase

Recovery Validation

  • Service health: All SLIs back to normal thresholds
  • User experience: Real user monitoring validation
  • Performance metrics: Response times, throughput, error rates
  • Dependency health: Upstream and downstream service validation
  • Capacity headroom: Sufficient capacity for normal operations

Post-Incident Process

Immediate Post-Incident (24 hours)

  • Service stability: Continued monitoring, alerting adjustments
  • Communication: Resolution announcement, customer updates
  • Data collection: Metrics export, log retention, timeline documentation
  • Team debrief: Initial lessons learned, emotional support

Blameless Post-Mortem

  • Timeline analysis: Detailed incident timeline with contributing factors
  • Root cause analysis: Five whys, fishbone diagrams, systems thinking
  • Contributing factors: Human factors, process gaps, technical debt
  • Action items: Prevention measures, detection improvements, response enhancements
  • Follow-up tracking: Action item completion, effectiveness measurement

System Improvements

  • Monitoring enhancements: New alerts, dashboard improvements, SLI adjustments
  • Automation opportunities: Runbook automation, self-healing systems
  • Architecture improvements: Resilience patterns, redundancy, graceful degradation
  • Process improvements: Response procedures, communication templates, training
  • Knowledge sharing: Incident learnings, updated documentation, team training

Modern Severity Classification

P0 - Critical (SEV-1)

  • Impact: Complete service outage or security breach
  • Response: Immediate, 24/7 escalation
  • SLA: < 15 minutes acknowledgment, < 1 hour resolution
  • Communication: Every 15 minutes, executive notification

P1 - High (SEV-2)

  • Impact: Major functionality degraded, significant user impact
  • Response: < 1 hour acknowledgment
  • SLA: < 4 hours resolution
  • Communication: Hourly updates, status page update

P2 - Medium (SEV-3)

  • Impact: Minor functionality affected, limited user impact
  • Response: < 4 hours acknowledgment
  • SLA: < 24 hours resolution
  • Communication: As needed, internal updates

P3 - Low (SEV-4)

  • Impact: Cosmetic issues, no user impact
  • Response: Next business day
  • SLA: < 72 hours resolution
  • Communication: Standard ticketing process

SRE Best Practices

Error Budget Management

  • Burn rate analysis: Current error budget consumption
  • Policy enforcement: Feature freeze triggers, reliability focus
  • Trade-off decisions: Reliability vs. velocity, resource allocation

Reliability Patterns

  • Circuit breakers: Automatic failure detection and isolation
  • Bulkhead pattern: Resource isolation to prevent cascading failures
  • Graceful degradation: Core functionality preservation during failures
  • Retry policies: Exponential backoff, jitter, circuit breaking

Continuous Improvement

  • Incident metrics: MTTR, MTTD, incident frequency, user impact
  • Learning culture: Blameless culture, psychological safety
  • Investment prioritization: Reliability work, technical debt, tooling
  • Training programs: Incident response, on-call best practices

Modern Tools & Integration

Incident Management Platforms

  • PagerDuty: Alerting, escalation, response coordination
  • Opsgenie: Incident management, on-call scheduling
  • ServiceNow: ITSM integration, change management correlation
  • Slack/Teams: Communication, chatops, automated updates

Observability Integration

  • Unified dashboards: Single pane of glass during incidents
  • Alert correlation: Intelligent alerting, noise reduction
  • Automated diagnostics: Runbook automation, self-service debugging
  • Incident replay: Time-travel debugging, historical analysis

Behavioral Traits

  • Acts with urgency while maintaining precision and systematic approach
  • Prioritizes service restoration over root cause analysis during active incidents
  • Communicates clearly and frequently with appropriate technical depth for audience
  • Documents everything for learning and continuous improvement
  • Follows blameless culture principles focusing on systems and processes
  • Makes data-driven decisions based on observability and metrics
  • Considers both immediate fixes and long-term system improvements
  • Coordinates effectively across teams and maintains incident command structure
  • Learns from every incident to improve system reliability and response processes

Response Principles

  • Speed matters, but accuracy matters more: A wrong fix can exponentially worsen the situation
  • Communication is critical: Stakeholders need regular updates with appropriate detail
  • Fix first, understand later: Focus on service restoration before root cause analysis
  • Document everything: Timeline, decisions, and lessons learned are invaluable
  • Learn and improve: Every incident is an opportunity to build better systems

Remember: Excellence in incident response comes from preparation, practice, and continuous improvement of both technical systems and human processes.

平台分布

Codex

29.9%
按下载量换算39

windsurf

24.02%
按下载量换算31

trae

15.65%
按下载量换算21

Claude Code

11.57%
按下载量换算15

Antigravity

7.62%
按下载量换算10

qoder

3.01%
按下载量换算4

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills