Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维和基础设施

risk-management-specialist(风险管理专家)

risk-management-specialist 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

risk-management-specialist 是运维和基础设施类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在运维和基础设施类的 2,449 个 Skill 里排第 445。

总安装 4,353周安装 187GitHub Stars 13,217下载 1,526核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:risk-management-specialist(风险管理专家)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/risk-management-specialist
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill risk-management-specialist
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill risk-management-specialist

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维和基础设施类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。适用于 GitHub 仓库管理、代码审查和团队协作场景。

通过 GitHub 仓库安装,使用 npx skills add 命令添加指定技能。需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。risk-management-specialist 属于运维和基础设施类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/risk-management-specialist

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill risk-mana…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

risk-management-specialist 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill risk-management-spe…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

risk-management-specialist 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

risk-management-specialist 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

risk-management-specialist 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

risk-management-specialist 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 4,353 次,近一周安装 187 次,下载 1,526 次,GitHub 13,217 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

risk-management-specialist 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 来源仓库有 13,217 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维和基础设施类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维和基础设施类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
brainstorming

头脑风暴 · Codex、Claude

3,148,776173,131操作浏览器MIT通过
copywriting

文案写作 · Codex、Claude

1,996,72425,583需要联网MIT通过
openclaw-secure-linux-cloud

OpenClaw secure linux cloud 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,853,08840接触敏感数据未明确未通过
xget

xget 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,799,28040执行命令未明确未通过
requesting-code-review

代码审查请求 · Codex、Claude

1,590,144173,103权限未标注MIT通过
risk-management-specialist

风险管理专家 · 本页

4,35313,217只读MIT有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Risk Management Specialist

ISO 14971:2019 risk management implementation throughout the medical device lifecycle.


Table of Contents


Risk Management Planning Workflow

Establish risk management process per ISO 14971.

Workflow: Create Risk Management Plan

  1. Define scope of risk management activities:

- Medical device identification - Lifecycle stages covered - Applicable standards and regulations

  1. Establish risk acceptability criteria:

- Define probability categories (P1-P5) - Define severity categories (S1-S5) - Create risk matrix with acceptance thresholds

  1. Assign responsibilities:

- Risk management lead - Subject matter experts - Approval authorities

  1. Define verification activities:

- Methods for control verification - Acceptance criteria

  1. Plan production and post-production activities:

- Information sources - Review triggers - Update procedures

  1. Obtain plan approval
  2. Establish risk management file
  3. Validation: Plan approved; acceptability criteria defined; responsibilities assigned; file established

Risk Management Plan Content

SectionContentEvidence
ScopeDevice and lifecycle coverageScope statement
CriteriaRisk acceptability matrixRisk matrix document
ResponsibilitiesRoles and authoritiesRACI chart
VerificationMethods and acceptanceVerification plan
Production/Post-ProductionMonitoring activitiesSurveillance plan

Risk Acceptability Matrix (5x5)

Probability \ SeverityNegligibleMinorSeriousCriticalCatastrophic
Frequent (P5)MediumHighHighUnacceptableUnacceptable
Probable (P4)MediumMediumHighHighUnacceptable
Occasional (P3)LowMediumMediumHighHigh
Remote (P2)LowLowMediumMediumHigh
Improbable (P1)LowLowLowMediumMedium

Risk Level Actions

LevelAcceptableAction Required
LowYesDocument and accept
MediumALARPReduce if practicable; document rationale
HighALARPReduction required; demonstrate ALARP
UnacceptableNoDesign change mandatory

Risk Analysis Workflow

Identify hazards and estimate risks systematically.

Workflow: Conduct Risk Analysis

  1. Define intended use and reasonably foreseeable misuse:

- Medical indication - Patient population - User population - Use environment

  1. Select analysis method(s):

- FMEA for component/function analysis - FTA for system-level analysis - HAZOP for process deviations - Use Error Analysis for user interaction

  1. Identify hazards by category:

- Energy hazards (electrical, mechanical, thermal) - Biological hazards (bioburden, biocompatibility) - Chemical hazards (residues, leachables) - Operational hazards (software, use errors)

  1. Determine hazardous situations:

- Sequence of events - Foreseeable misuse scenarios - Single fault conditions

  1. Estimate probability of harm (P1-P5)
  2. Estimate severity of harm (S1-S5)
  3. Document in hazard analysis worksheet
  4. Validation: All hazard categories addressed; all hazards documented; probability and severity assigned

Hazard Categories Checklist

CategoryExamplesAnalyzed
ElectricalShock, burns, interference☐
MechanicalCrushing, cutting, entrapment☐
ThermalBurns, tissue damage☐
RadiationIonizing, non-ionizing☐
BiologicalInfection, biocompatibility☐
ChemicalToxicity, irritation☐
SoftwareIncorrect output, timing☐
Use ErrorMisuse, perception, cognition☐
EnvironmentEMC, mechanical stress☐

Analysis Method Selection

SituationRecommended Method
Component failuresFMEA
System-level failureFTA
Process deviationsHAZOP
User interactionUse Error Analysis
Software behaviorSoftware FMEA
Early design phasePHA

Probability Criteria

LevelNameDescriptionFrequency
P5FrequentExpected to occur>10⁻³
P4ProbableLikely to occur10⁻³ to 10⁻⁴
P3OccasionalMay occur10⁻⁴ to 10⁻⁵
P2RemoteUnlikely10⁻⁵ to 10⁻⁶
P1ImprobableVery unlikely<10⁻⁶

Severity Criteria

LevelNameDescriptionHarm
S5CatastrophicDeathDeath
S4CriticalPermanent impairmentIrreversible injury
S3SeriousInjury requiring interventionReversible injury
S2MinorTemporary discomfortNo treatment needed
S1NegligibleInconvenienceNo injury

See: references/risk-analysis-methods.md


Risk Evaluation Workflow

Evaluate risks against acceptability criteria.

Workflow: Evaluate Identified Risks

  1. Calculate initial risk level from probability × severity
  2. Compare to risk acceptability criteria
  3. For each risk, determine:

- Acceptable: Document and accept - ALARP: Proceed to risk control - Unacceptable: Mandatory risk control

  1. Document evaluation rationale
  2. Identify risks requiring benefit-risk analysis
  3. Complete benefit-risk analysis if applicable
  4. Compile risk evaluation summary
  5. Validation: All risks evaluated; acceptability determined; rationale documented

Risk Evaluation Decision Tree

Risk Estimated
      │
      ▼
Apply Acceptability Criteria
      │
      ├── Low Risk ──────────► Accept and document
      │
      ├── Medium Risk ───────► Consider risk reduction
      │   │                    Document ALARP if not reduced
      │   ▼
      │   Practicable to reduce?
      │   │
      │   Yes──► Implement control
      │   No───► Document ALARP rationale
      │
      ├── High Risk ─────────► Risk reduction required
      │   │                    Must demonstrate ALARP
      │   ▼
      │   Implement control
      │   Verify residual risk
      │
      └── Unacceptable ──────► Design change mandatory
                               Cannot proceed without control

ALARP Demonstration Requirements

CriterionEvidence Required
Technical feasibilityAnalysis of alternative controls
ProportionalityCost-benefit of further reduction
State of the artComparison to similar devices
Stakeholder inputClinical/user perspectives

Benefit-Risk Analysis Triggers

SituationBenefit-Risk Required
Residual risk remains highYes
No feasible risk reductionYes
Novel deviceYes
Unacceptable risk with clinical benefitYes
All risks lowNo

Risk Control Workflow

Implement and verify risk control measures.

Workflow: Implement Risk Controls

  1. Identify risk control options:

- Inherent safety by design (Priority 1) - Protective measures in device (Priority 2) - Information for safety (Priority 3)

  1. Select optimal control following hierarchy
  2. Analyze control for new hazards introduced
  3. Document control in design requirements
  4. Implement control in design
  5. Develop verification protocol
  6. Execute verification and document results
  7. Evaluate residual risk with control in place
  8. Validation: Control implemented; verification passed; residual risk acceptable; no unaddressed new hazards

Risk Control Hierarchy

PriorityControl TypeExamplesEffectiveness
1Inherent SafetyEliminate hazard, fail-safe designHighest
2Protective MeasuresGuards, alarms, automatic shutdownHigh
3InformationWarnings, training, IFULower

Risk Control Option Analysis Template

RISK CONTROL OPTION ANALYSIS

Hazard ID: H-[XXX]
Hazard: [Description]
Initial Risk: P[X] × S[X] = [Level]

OPTIONS CONSIDERED:
| Option | Control Type | New Hazards | Feasibility | Selected |
|--------|--------------|-------------|-------------|----------|
| 1 | [Type] | [Yes/No] | [H/M/L] | [Yes/No] |
| 2 | [Type] | [Yes/No] | [H/M/L] | [Yes/No] |

SELECTED CONTROL: Option [X]
Rationale: [Justification for selection]

IMPLEMENTATION:
- Requirement: [REQ-XXX]
- Design Document: [Reference]

VERIFICATION:
- Method: [Test/Analysis/Review]
- Protocol: [Reference]
- Acceptance Criteria: [Criteria]

Risk Control Verification Methods

MethodWhen to UseEvidence
TestQuantifiable performanceTest report
InspectionPhysical presenceInspection record
AnalysisDesign calculationAnalysis report
ReviewDocumentation checkReview record

Residual Risk Evaluation

After ControlAction
AcceptableDocument, proceed
ALARP achievedDocument rationale, proceed
Still unacceptableAdditional control or design change
New hazard introducedAnalyze and control new hazard

Post-Production Risk Management

Monitor and update risk management throughout product lifecycle.

Workflow: Post-Production Risk Monitoring

  1. Identify information sources:

- Customer complaints - Service reports - Vigilance/adverse events - Literature monitoring - Clinical studies

  1. Establish collection procedures
  2. Define review triggers:

- New hazard identified - Increased frequency of known hazard - Serious incident - Regulatory feedback

  1. Analyze incoming information for risk relevance
  2. Update risk management file as needed
  3. Communicate significant findings
  4. Conduct periodic risk management review
  5. Validation: Information sources monitored; file current; reviews completed per schedule

Information Sources

SourceInformation TypeReview Frequency
ComplaintsUse issues, failuresContinuous
ServiceField failures, repairsMonthly
VigilanceSerious incidentsImmediate
LiteratureSimilar device issuesQuarterly
RegulatoryAuthority feedbackAs received
ClinicalPMCF dataPer plan

Risk Management File Update Triggers

TriggerResponse TimeAction
Serious incidentImmediateFull risk review
New hazard identified30 daysRisk analysis update
Trend increase60 daysTrend analysis
Design changeBefore implementationImpact assessment
Standards updatePer transition periodGap analysis

Periodic Review Requirements

Review ElementFrequency
Risk management file completenessAnnual
Risk control effectivenessAnnual
Post-market information analysisQuarterly
Risk-benefit conclusionsAnnual or on new data

Risk Assessment Templates

→ See references/risk-assessment-templates.md for details

Decision Frameworks

Risk Control Selection

What is the risk level?
        │
        ├── Unacceptable ──► Can hazard be eliminated?
        │                    │
        │                Yes─┴─No
        │                 │     │
        │                 ▼     ▼
        │            Eliminate  Can protective
        │            hazard     measure reduce?
        │                           │
        │                       Yes─┴─No
        │                        │     │
        │                        ▼     ▼
        │                   Add       Add warning
        │                   protection + training
        │
        └── High/Medium ──► Apply hierarchy
                            starting at Level 1

New Hazard Analysis

QuestionIf YesIf No
Does control introduce new hazard?Analyze new hazardProceed
Is new risk higher than original?Reject control optionAcceptable trade-off
Can new hazard be controlled?Add controlReject control option

Risk Acceptability Decision

ConditionDecision
All risks LowAcceptable
Medium risks with ALARPAcceptable
High risks with ALARP documentedAcceptable if benefits outweigh
Any Unacceptable residualNot acceptable - redesign

Tools and References

Scripts

ToolPurposeUsage
risk_matrix_calculator.pyCalculate risk levels and FMEA RPNpython risk_matrix_calculator.py --help

Risk Matrix Calculator Features:

  • ISO 14971 5x5 risk matrix calculation
  • FMEA RPN (Risk Priority Number) calculation
  • Interactive mode for guided assessment
  • Display risk criteria definitions
  • JSON output for integration

References

DocumentContent
iso14971-implementation-guide.mdComplete ISO 14971:2019 implementation with templates
risk-analysis-methods.mdFMEA, FTA, HAZOP, Use Error Analysis methods

Quick Reference: ISO 14971 Process

StageKey ActivitiesOutput
PlanningDefine scope, criteria, responsibilitiesRisk Management Plan
AnalysisIdentify hazards, estimate riskHazard Analysis
EvaluationCompare to criteria, ALARP assessmentRisk Evaluation
ControlImplement hierarchy, verifyRisk Control Records
ResidualOverall assessment, benefit-riskRisk Management Report
ProductionMonitor, review, updateUpdated RM File

Related Skills

SkillIntegration Point
quality-manager-qms-iso13485QMS integration
capa-officerRisk-based CAPA
regulatory-affairs-headRegulatory submissions
quality-documentation-managerRisk file management

平台分布

Claude Code

30.13%
按下载量换算460

OpenCode

20.05%
按下载量换算306

Gemini CLI

17.73%
按下载量换算271

Codex

12.27%
按下载量换算187

Cursor

7.02%
按下载量换算107

Antigravity

3.05%
按下载量换算47

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills