Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 效率

risk-management-iso14971(风险管理 ISO14971)

risk-management-iso14971 用于补充效率相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接效率相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

risk-management-iso14971 是效率类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在效率类的 21,003 个 Skill 里排第 7,611。

总安装 7,935周安装 321GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 2,491核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:risk-management-iso14971(风险管理 ISO14971)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ayangai/risk-management-iso14971
安装命令:
openclaw skills install risk-management-iso14971
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install risk-management-iso14971

这个 Skill 是做什么的

效率类 Skill 把重复的整理、汇总、转换工作交给助手完成,减少手工复制粘贴。

risk-management-iso14971 实施医疗器械全生命周期的 ISO 14971 风险管理。适用于 OpenClaw 中医疗产品开发、注册申报与临床安全评估场景。提供危害分析、风险控制与可追溯性矩阵生成功能。安装通过 clawhub,需确认是否符合医疗设备软件开发规范。

输出为合规草案,需经法规专家审核后方可用于正式提交。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install risk-management-iso14971;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

risk-management-iso14971 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install risk-management-iso14971。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

risk-management-iso14971 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

risk-management-iso14971 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

risk-management-iso14971 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

risk-management-iso14971 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 7,935 次,近一周安装 321 次,下载 2,491 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

risk-management-iso14971 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理效率类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

效率类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
github

GitHub 代码协作 · OpenClaw

7,632,918545需要联网MIT-0通过
nano-pdf

Nano PDF 文档 · OpenClaw

4,249,476231需要联网MIT-0通过
auto-updater

自动更新程序 · OpenClaw

2,964,063386操作浏览器MIT-0通过
video-frames

视频帧 · OpenClaw

2,621,304112需要联网MIT-0通过
gemini

Gemini 助手 · OpenClaw

2,547,39648需要联网MIT-0有提醒
risk-management-iso14971

风险管理 ISO14971 · 本页

7,935—只读MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
risk-management-specialist
description
Medical device risk management specialist implementing ISO 14971 throughout product lifecycle. Provides risk analysis, risk evaluation, risk control, and post-production information analysis. Use when user mentions risk management, ISO 14971, risk analysis, FMEA, fault tree analysis, hazard identification, risk control, risk matrix, benefit-risk analysis, residual risk, risk acceptability, or post-market risk.

Risk Management Specialist

ISO 14971:2019 risk management implementation throughout the medical device lifecycle.


Table of Contents


Risk Management Planning Workflow

Establish risk management process per ISO 14971.

Workflow: Create Risk Management Plan

  1. Define scope of risk management activities:

- Medical device identification - Lifecycle stages covered - Applicable standards and regulations

  1. Establish risk acceptability criteria:

- Define probability categories (P1-P5) - Define severity categories (S1-S5) - Create risk matrix with acceptance thresholds

  1. Assign responsibilities:

- Risk management lead - Subject matter experts - Approval authorities

  1. Define verification activities:

- Methods for control verification - Acceptance criteria

  1. Plan production and post-production activities:

- Information sources - Review triggers - Update procedures

  1. Obtain plan approval
  2. Establish risk management file
  3. Validation: Plan approved; acceptability criteria defined; responsibilities assigned; file established

Risk Management Plan Content

SectionContentEvidence
ScopeDevice and lifecycle coverageScope statement
CriteriaRisk acceptability matrixRisk matrix document
ResponsibilitiesRoles and authoritiesRACI chart
VerificationMethods and acceptanceVerification plan
Production/Post-ProductionMonitoring activitiesSurveillance plan

Risk Acceptability Matrix (5x5)

Probability \ SeverityNegligibleMinorSeriousCriticalCatastrophic
Frequent (P5)MediumHighHighUnacceptableUnacceptable
Probable (P4)MediumMediumHighHighUnacceptable
Occasional (P3)LowMediumMediumHighHigh
Remote (P2)LowLowMediumMediumHigh
Improbable (P1)LowLowLowMediumMedium

Risk Level Actions

LevelAcceptableAction Required
LowYesDocument and accept
MediumALARPReduce if practicable; document rationale
HighALARPReduction required; demonstrate ALARP
UnacceptableNoDesign change mandatory

Risk Analysis Workflow

Identify hazards and estimate risks systematically.

Workflow: Conduct Risk Analysis

  1. Define intended use and reasonably foreseeable misuse:

- Medical indication - Patient population - User population - Use environment

  1. Select analysis method(s):

- FMEA for component/function analysis - FTA for system-level analysis - HAZOP for process deviations - Use Error Analysis for user interaction

  1. Identify hazards by category:

- Energy hazards (electrical, mechanical, thermal) - Biological hazards (bioburden, biocompatibility) - Chemical hazards (residues, leachables) - Operational hazards (software, use errors)

  1. Determine hazardous situations:

- Sequence of events - Foreseeable misuse scenarios - Single fault conditions

  1. Estimate probability of harm (P1-P5)
  2. Estimate severity of harm (S1-S5)
  3. Document in hazard analysis worksheet
  4. Validation: All hazard categories addressed; all hazards documented; probability and severity assigned

Hazard Categories Checklist

CategoryExamplesAnalyzed
ElectricalShock, burns, interference☐
MechanicalCrushing, cutting, entrapment☐
ThermalBurns, tissue damage☐
RadiationIonizing, non-ionizing☐
BiologicalInfection, biocompatibility☐
ChemicalToxicity, irritation☐
SoftwareIncorrect output, timing☐
Use ErrorMisuse, perception, cognition☐
EnvironmentEMC, mechanical stress☐

Analysis Method Selection

SituationRecommended Method
Component failuresFMEA
System-level failureFTA
Process deviationsHAZOP
User interactionUse Error Analysis
Software behaviorSoftware FMEA
Early design phasePHA

Probability Criteria

LevelNameDescriptionFrequency
P5FrequentExpected to occur>10⁻³
P4ProbableLikely to occur10⁻³ to 10⁻⁴
P3OccasionalMay occur10⁻⁴ to 10⁻⁵
P2RemoteUnlikely10⁻⁵ to 10⁻⁶
P1ImprobableVery unlikely<10⁻⁶

Severity Criteria

LevelNameDescriptionHarm
S5CatastrophicDeathDeath
S4CriticalPermanent impairmentIrreversible injury
S3SeriousInjury requiring interventionReversible injury
S2MinorTemporary discomfortNo treatment needed
S1NegligibleInconvenienceNo injury

See: references/risk-analysis-methods.md


Risk Evaluation Workflow

Evaluate risks against acceptability criteria.

Workflow: Evaluate Identified Risks

  1. Calculate initial risk level from probability × severity
  2. Compare to risk acceptability criteria
  3. For each risk, determine:

- Acceptable: Document and accept - ALARP: Proceed to risk control - Unacceptable: Mandatory risk control

  1. Document evaluation rationale
  2. Identify risks requiring benefit-risk analysis
  3. Complete benefit-risk analysis if applicable
  4. Compile risk evaluation summary
  5. Validation: All risks evaluated; acceptability determined; rationale documented

Risk Evaluation Decision Tree

Risk Estimated
      │
      ▼
Apply Acceptability Criteria
      │
      ├── Low Risk ──────────► Accept and document
      │
      ├── Medium Risk ───────► Consider risk reduction
      │   │                    Document ALARP if not reduced
      │   ▼
      │   Practicable to reduce?
      │   │
      │   Yes──► Implement control
      │   No───► Document ALARP rationale
      │
      ├── High Risk ─────────► Risk reduction required
      │   │                    Must demonstrate ALARP
      │   ▼
      │   Implement control
      │   Verify residual risk
      │
      └── Unacceptable ──────► Design change mandatory
                               Cannot proceed without control

ALARP Demonstration Requirements

CriterionEvidence Required
Technical feasibilityAnalysis of alternative controls
ProportionalityCost-benefit of further reduction
State of the artComparison to similar devices
Stakeholder inputClinical/user perspectives

Benefit-Risk Analysis Triggers

SituationBenefit-Risk Required
Residual risk remains highYes
No feasible risk reductionYes
Novel deviceYes
Unacceptable risk with clinical benefitYes
All risks lowNo

Risk Control Workflow

Implement and verify risk control measures.

Workflow: Implement Risk Controls

  1. Identify risk control options:

- Inherent safety by design (Priority 1) - Protective measures in device (Priority 2) - Information for safety (Priority 3)

  1. Select optimal control following hierarchy
  2. Analyze control for new hazards introduced
  3. Document control in design requirements
  4. Implement control in design
  5. Develop verification protocol
  6. Execute verification and document results
  7. Evaluate residual risk with control in place
  8. Validation: Control implemented; verification passed; residual risk acceptable; no unaddressed new hazards

Risk Control Hierarchy

PriorityControl TypeExamplesEffectiveness
1Inherent SafetyEliminate hazard, fail-safe designHighest
2Protective MeasuresGuards, alarms, automatic shutdownHigh
3InformationWarnings, training, IFULower

Risk Control Option Analysis Template

RISK CONTROL OPTION ANALYSIS

Hazard ID: H-[XXX]
Hazard: [Description]
Initial Risk: P[X] × S[X] = [Level]

OPTIONS CONSIDERED:
| Option | Control Type | New Hazards | Feasibility | Selected |
|--------|--------------|-------------|-------------|----------|
| 1 | [Type] | [Yes/No] | [H/M/L] | [Yes/No] |
| 2 | [Type] | [Yes/No] | [H/M/L] | [Yes/No] |

SELECTED CONTROL: Option [X]
Rationale: [Justification for selection]

IMPLEMENTATION:
- Requirement: [REQ-XXX]
- Design Document: [Reference]

VERIFICATION:
- Method: [Test/Analysis/Review]
- Protocol: [Reference]
- Acceptance Criteria: [Criteria]

Risk Control Verification Methods

MethodWhen to UseEvidence
TestQuantifiable performanceTest report
InspectionPhysical presenceInspection record
AnalysisDesign calculationAnalysis report
ReviewDocumentation checkReview record

Residual Risk Evaluation

After ControlAction
AcceptableDocument, proceed
ALARP achievedDocument rationale, proceed
Still unacceptableAdditional control or design change
New hazard introducedAnalyze and control new hazard

Post-Production Risk Management

Monitor and update risk management throughout product lifecycle.

Workflow: Post-Production Risk Monitoring

  1. Identify information sources:

- Customer complaints - Service reports - Vigilance/adverse events - Literature monitoring - Clinical studies

  1. Establish collection procedures
  2. Define review triggers:

- New hazard identified - Increased frequency of known hazard - Serious incident - Regulatory feedback

  1. Analyze incoming information for risk relevance
  2. Update risk management file as needed
  3. Communicate significant findings
  4. Conduct periodic risk management review
  5. Validation: Information sources monitored; file current; reviews completed per schedule

Information Sources

SourceInformation TypeReview Frequency
ComplaintsUse issues, failuresContinuous
ServiceField failures, repairsMonthly
VigilanceSerious incidentsImmediate
LiteratureSimilar device issuesQuarterly
RegulatoryAuthority feedbackAs received
ClinicalPMCF dataPer plan

Risk Management File Update Triggers

TriggerResponse TimeAction
Serious incidentImmediateFull risk review
New hazard identified30 daysRisk analysis update
Trend increase60 daysTrend analysis
Design changeBefore implementationImpact assessment
Standards updatePer transition periodGap analysis

Periodic Review Requirements

Review ElementFrequency
Risk management file completenessAnnual
Risk control effectivenessAnnual
Post-market information analysisQuarterly
Risk-benefit conclusionsAnnual or on new data

Risk Assessment Templates

→ See references/risk-assessment-templates.md for details

Decision Frameworks

Risk Control Selection

What is the risk level?
        │
        ├── Unacceptable ──► Can hazard be eliminated?
        │                    │
        │                Yes─┴─No
        │                 │     │
        │                 ▼     ▼
        │            Eliminate  Can protective
        │            hazard     measure reduce?
        │                           │
        │                       Yes─┴─No
        │                        │     │
        │                        ▼     ▼
        │                   Add       Add warning
        │                   protection + training
        │
        └── High/Medium ──► Apply hierarchy
                            starting at Level 1

New Hazard Analysis

QuestionIf YesIf No
Does control introduce new hazard?Analyze new hazardProceed
Is new risk higher than original?Reject control optionAcceptable trade-off
Can new hazard be controlled?Add controlReject control option

Risk Acceptability Decision

ConditionDecision
All risks LowAcceptable
Medium risks with ALARPAcceptable
High risks with ALARP documentedAcceptable if benefits outweigh
Any Unacceptable residualNot acceptable - redesign

Tools and References

Scripts

ToolPurposeUsage
risk_matrix_calculator.pyCalculate risk levels and FMEA RPNpython risk_matrix_calculator.py --help

Risk Matrix Calculator Features:

  • ISO 14971 5x5 risk matrix calculation
  • FMEA RPN (Risk Priority Number) calculation
  • Interactive mode for guided assessment
  • Display risk criteria definitions
  • JSON output for integration

References

DocumentContent
iso14971-implementation-guide.mdComplete ISO 14971:2019 implementation with templates
risk-analysis-methods.mdFMEA, FTA, HAZOP, Use Error Analysis methods

Quick Reference: ISO 14971 Process

StageKey ActivitiesOutput
PlanningDefine scope, criteria, responsibilitiesRisk Management Plan
AnalysisIdentify hazards, estimate riskHazard Analysis
EvaluationCompare to criteria, ALARP assessmentRisk Evaluation
ControlImplement hierarchy, verifyRisk Control Records
ResidualOverall assessment, benefit-riskRisk Management Report
ProductionMonitor, review, updateUpdated RM File

Related Skills

SkillIntegration Point
quality-manager-qms-iso13485QMS integration
capa-officerRisk-based CAPA
regulatory-affairs-headRegulatory submissions
quality-documentation-managerRisk file management

平台分布

OpenClaw

96.59%
按下载量换算2,406

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills