Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

ring%3ausing-tw-team(环%3ausing tw 团队)

ring%3ausing-tw-team 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ring%3ausing-tw-team 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 13,743。

总安装 832周安装 35GitHub Stars 180下载 291核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ring%3ausing-tw-team(环%3ausing tw 团队)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring
仓库路径:skills/ring%3Ausing-tw-team
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:using-tw-team
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:using-tw-team

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。可结合来源仓库和安装命令核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围及是否会触发联网或文件读写。ring%3ausing-tw-team 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ring%3Ausing-tw-team

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:using-tw-team;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ring%3ausing-tw-team 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:using-tw-team。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ring%3ausing-tw-team 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ring%3ausing-tw-team 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

ring%3ausing-tw-team 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ring%3ausing-tw-team 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 832 次,近一周安装 35 次,下载 291 次,GitHub 180 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ring%3ausing-tw-team 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
ring%3ausing-tw-team

环%3ausing tw 团队 · 本页

832180需要联网未明确未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Using Ring Technical Writing Specialists

The ring-tw-team plugin provides specialized agents for technical documentation. Use them via Task tool with subagent_type:.

Remember: Follow the ORCHESTRATOR principle from ring:using-ring. Dispatch agents to handle documentation tasks; don't write complex documentation directly.

3 Documentation Specialists

AgentSpecializationUse When
ring:functional-writerConceptual docs, guides, tutorials, best practices, workflowsWriting product guides, tutorials, "how to" content
ring:api-writerREST API reference, endpoints, schemas, errors, field descriptionsDocumenting API endpoints, request/response examples
ring:docs-reviewerVoice/tone, structure, completeness, clarity, accuracyReviewing drafts, pre-publication quality check

Documentation Standards Summary

Voice and Tone

  • Assertive, but never arrogant – Say what needs to be said, clearly
  • Encouraging and empowering – Guide users through complexity
  • Tech-savvy, but human – Use technical terms when needed, prioritize clarity
  • Humble and open – Confident but always learning

Capitalization

  • Sentence case for all headings and titles
  • Only first letter and proper nouns capitalized
  • ✅ "Getting started with the API"
  • ❌ "Getting Started With The API"

Structure Patterns

  1. Lead with clear definition paragraph
  2. Use bullet points for key characteristics
  3. Separate sections with --- dividers
  4. Include info boxes and warnings where needed
  5. Link to related API reference
  6. Add code examples for technical topics

Dispatching Specialists

Parallel dispatch for comprehensive documentation (single message, multiple Tasks):

Task #1: functional-writer (write the guide)
Task #2: api-writer (write API reference)
(Both run in parallel)

Then:
Task #3: docs-reviewer (review both)

Available in This Plugin

Agents: functional-writer, api-writer, docs-reviewer

Skills:

  • using-tw-team: Plugin introduction
  • writing-functional-docs: Functional doc patterns
  • writing-api-docs: API reference patterns
  • documentation-structure: Hierarchy and organization
  • voice-and-tone: Voice guidelines
  • documentation-review: Quality checklist
  • api-field-descriptions: Field description patterns

Commands:

  • /write-guide: Start functional guide
  • /write-api: Start API documentation
  • /review-docs: Review existing docs

Integration with Other Plugins

PluginUse For
ring:using-ring (default)ORCHESTRATOR principle
ring:using-dev-teamDeveloper agents for technical accuracy
ring:using-pm-teamPre-dev planning before documentation

ORCHESTRATOR Principle

  • You're the orchestrator – Dispatch specialists, don't write directly
  • Let specialists apply standards – They know voice, tone, structure
  • Combine with other plugins – API writers + backend engineers for accuracy
✅ "I need documentation for the new feature. Let me dispatch functional-writer." ❌ "I'll manually write all the documentation myself."

Standards Loading (MANDATORY)

Before dispatching any documentation agent:

  1. Understand the documentation type - Functional guide vs API reference
  2. Load relevant skills - Writing patterns for the document type
  3. Verify prerequisites - Product knowledge, terminology, audience

HARD GATE: MUST dispatch appropriate specialist (not write directly).


Blocker Criteria - STOP and Report

ConditionDecisionAction
Documentation type unclearSTOPReport: "Need to clarify functional guide vs API reference"
No subject matter sourceSTOPReport: "Need source material or SME access"
Audience undefinedSTOPReport: "Need target audience definition"
Product not yet definedSTOPReport: "Cannot document undefined features"

Cannot Be Overridden

These requirements are NON-NEGOTIABLE:

  • MUST dispatch specialist agents (not write directly)
  • MUST use appropriate agent for document type
  • MUST follow ORCHESTRATOR principle
  • CANNOT skip documentation review before publication
  • CANNOT mix agent responsibilities

Severity Calibration

SeverityCriteriaExamples
CRITICALWriting directly instead of dispatchingOrchestrator writes full documentation
HIGHWrong agent for document typeUsing api-writer for conceptual guide
MEDIUMSkipping review stepPublishing without docs-reviewer check
LOWSuboptimal agent combinationCould parallelize dispatches

Pressure Resistance

User SaysYour Response
"Just write the docs quickly, no need for specialists""MUST dispatch specialists. They apply consistent standards. I'll dispatch the appropriate agent."
"Skip the review, we're in a hurry""Documentation review is REQUIRED before publication. I'll dispatch docs-reviewer."
"One agent can do it all""Each agent has specialized knowledge. I'll dispatch the correct specialist for each document type."
"README is enough documentation""README is an entry point, not complete documentation. I'll dispatch agents for proper docs."
"Developers can figure it out from the code""Code is NOT documentation. MUST create proper documentation. I'll dispatch the appropriate writers."

Anti-Rationalization Table

RationalizationWhy It's WRONGRequired Action
"Simple docs, I can write directly"Simple ≠ no standards. Specialists ensure consistencyMUST dispatch specialist
"Faster to write myself"Speed without quality creates tech debtDispatch agents, ensure quality
"Already know the product well"Knowledge ≠ documentation skillUse specialists for writing
"Review takes too long"Review catches issues before users doMUST include review step
"Documentation isn't critical path"Documentation IS part of the featureTreat docs as required deliverable
"Internal docs don't need standards"Internal users deserve quality tooApply same standards everywhere

When This Skill is Not Needed

Signs that documentation workflow is already correct:

  • Appropriate specialist dispatched for each document type
  • ORCHESTRATOR principle followed (not writing directly)
  • Documentation review included in workflow
  • Parallel dispatch used for efficiency
  • Clear handoffs between agents

If all above are true: Workflow is correct, proceed with dispatches.

平台分布

Codex

35.08%
按下载量换算102

Claude

32.61%
按下载量换算95

Cursor

18.92%
按下载量换算55

Gemini CLI

10.23%
按下载量换算30

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills