Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ring%3aroot-cause-tracing(环%3a 根本原因追踪)

ring%3aroot-cause-tracing 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ring%3aroot-cause-tracing 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 50,054。

总安装 630周安装 26GitHub Stars 180下载 206核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ring%3aroot-cause-tracing(环%3a 根本原因追踪)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring
仓库路径:skills/ring%3Aroot-cause-tracing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:root-cause-tracing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:root-cause-tracing

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

ring%3aroot-cause-tracing 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。它适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词或任务需求定位内容。可通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装,具体功能需结合原始文档确认。

使用前应评估权限范围、维护情况及是否触发联网或命令执行。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ring%3Aroot-cause-tracing

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:root-cause-trac…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

ring%3aroot-cause-tracing 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:root-cause-tracing。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ring%3aroot-cause-tracing 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ring%3aroot-cause-tracing 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

ring%3aroot-cause-tracing 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ring%3aroot-cause-tracing 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 630 次,近一周安装 26 次,下载 206 次,GitHub 180 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ring%3aroot-cause-tracing 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ring%3aroot-cause-tracing

环%3a 根本原因追踪 · 本页

630180权限未标注未明确未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Root Cause Tracing

Overview

Bugs often manifest deep in the call stack (git init in wrong directory, file created in wrong location, database opened with wrong path). Your instinct is to fix where the error appears, but that's treating a symptom.

Core principle: Trace backward through the call chain until you find the original trigger, then fix at the source.

When to Use

Use root-cause-tracing when:

  • Error happens deep in execution (not at entry point)
  • Stack trace shows long call chain
  • Unclear where invalid data originated
  • systematic-debugging Phase 1 leads you here

Relationship with systematic-debugging:

  • root-cause-tracing is a SUB-SKILL of systematic-debugging
  • Use during systematic-debugging Phase 1, Step 5 (Trace Data Flow)
  • Can also use standalone if you KNOW bug is deep-stack issue
  • After tracing to source, return to systematic-debugging Phase 2

When NOT to use:

  • Bug appears at entry point → Use systematic-debugging Phase 1 directly
  • You haven't started systematic-debugging yet → Start there first
  • Root cause is obvious → Just fix it
  • Still gathering evidence → Continue systematic-debugging Phase 1

The Tracing Process

  1. Observe Symptom: Error: git init failed in /Users/jesse/project/packages/core
  2. Find Immediate Cause: await execFileAsync('git', ['init'], {cwd: projectDir})
  3. Ask: What Called This? WorktreeManager.createSessionWorktree(projectDir) → Session.initializeWorkspace() → Session.create() → test at Project.create()
  4. Keep Tracing Up: projectDir = '' (empty!) → resolves to process.cwd() → source code directory!
  5. Find Original Trigger: const context = setupCoreTest() returns {tempDir: ''} → accessed before beforeEach!

Adding Stack Traces

When you can't trace manually, add instrumentation before the problematic operation:

console.error('DEBUG git init:', { directory, cwd: process.cwd(), stack: new Error().stack });

Critical: Use console.error() in tests (logger may not show). Run: npm test 2>&1 | grep 'DEBUG'

Analyze: Look for test file names, line numbers, patterns (same test? same parameter?).

Finding Which Test Causes Pollution

If something appears during tests but you don't know which test:

Use the bisection script: @find-polluter.sh

./find-polluter.sh '.git' 'src/**/*.test.ts'

Runs tests one-by-one, stops at first polluter. See script for usage.

Real Example: Empty projectDir

Symptom: .git in packages/core/ (source code) Trace chain: git init in process.cwd() ← empty cwd ← WorktreeManager ← Session.create() ← test accessed context.tempDir before beforeEach ← setupCoreTest() returns {tempDir: ''} Root cause: Top-level variable initialization accessing empty value Fix: Made tempDir a getter that throws if accessed before beforeEach Defense-in-depth: (1) Project.create() validates (2) WorkspaceManager validates (3) NODE_ENV guard (4) Stack trace logging

Key Principle

Flow: Found immediate cause → Can trace up? (yes → trace backwards) → Is this source? (no → keep tracing | yes → fix at source) → Add validation at each layer → Bug impossible

NEVER fix just where the error appears. Trace back to find the original trigger.

Stack Trace Tips

  • In tests: console.error() not logger (may be suppressed)
  • Before operation: Log before dangerous op, not after fail
  • Include context: Directory, cwd, env vars, timestamps
  • Capture stack: new Error().stack shows complete chain

Real-World Impact

5-level trace → fixed at source (getter validation) → 4 layers defense → 1847 tests, zero pollution


Blocker Criteria

STOP and report if:

Decision TypeBlocker ConditionRequired Action
Incomplete traceCannot trace call chain back to original triggerSTOP and add instrumentation before proceeding
Missing source accessCannot access code that calls problematic functionSTOP and report missing context
Complex async flowCall chain involves async/event-driven code that breaks linear traceSTOP and instrument with timestamps before continuing
External dependencyRoot cause appears to be in external library or serviceSTOP and report external dependency issue

Cannot Be Overridden

The following requirements CANNOT be waived:

  • MUST trace backward through call chain to find original trigger
  • MUST NOT fix where error appears without finding true source
  • MUST add instrumentation when manual tracing is insufficient
  • MUST use defense-in-depth: validate at multiple layers after finding root cause
  • MUST verify fix eliminates the symptom completely

Severity Calibration

SeverityConditionRequired Action
CRITICALError causes data corruption or test pollution across suiteMUST trace to source immediately, cannot proceed until resolved
HIGHError affects multiple call sites or componentsMUST complete full trace before any fix attempt
MEDIUMError isolated to single execution pathMUST trace at least 3 levels up before fixing
LOWError is cosmetic or easily reproducibleShould trace to source, can fix incrementally

Pressure Resistance

User SaysYour Response
"Just fix it where the error appears""MUST NOT fix at symptom location. Tracing to root cause prevents the bug from manifesting elsewhere."
"We don't have time for full tracing""CANNOT skip tracing. Fixing symptoms creates whack-a-mole debugging that takes longer overall."
"The fix works in my test""MUST verify fix eliminates root cause, not just masks symptom in one scenario."
"Add a try-catch and move on""CANNOT suppress errors without tracing. Error indicates invalid state that will cause problems elsewhere."

Anti-Rationalization Table

RationalizationWhy It's WRONGRequired Action
"The error message tells us enough"Error location ≠ error source. Message describes symptom, not cause.MUST trace call chain backward
"I know this code, the fix is obvious"Familiarity breeds assumptions. Obvious fixes often mask deeper issues.MUST verify with actual tracing
"Tracing is overkill for this simple bug"Simple symptoms often have complex causes. Skipping trace leads to regression.MUST trace regardless of apparent simplicity
"Adding logging slows things down"Temporary instrumentation is cheap. Untraced bugs cause expensive debugging sessions.MUST add instrumentation when needed
"The stack trace shows the problem"Stack trace shows where, not why. Original invalid data may be layers above.MUST trace data flow, not just call stack

平台分布

Codex

37.62%
按下载量换算77

Claude

29.96%
按下载量换算62

Cursor

20.41%
按下载量换算42

Gemini CLI

9.91%
按下载量换算20

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills