Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ring%3aregulatory-templates-gate3(Ring%3a 监管模板 gate3)

ring%3aregulatory-templates-gate3 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ring%3aregulatory-templates-gate3 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 44,817。

总安装 890周安装 36GitHub Stars 180下载 279核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ring%3aregulatory-templates-gate3(Ring%3a 监管模板 gate3)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring
仓库路径:skills/ring%3Aregulatory-templates-gate3
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:regulatory-templates-gate3
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:regulatory-templates-gate3

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

ring%3aregulatory-templates-gate3 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。它适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中基于关键词或任务需求定位内容。可通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装,具体用法见原始文档。

使用前应评估权限边界、维护情况及潜在的系统级操作风险。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ring%3Aregulatory-templates-gate3

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:regulatory-temp…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

ring%3aregulatory-templates-gate3 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:regulatory-templates-gate…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ring%3aregulatory-templates-gate3 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ring%3aregulatory-templates-gate3 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

ring%3aregulatory-templates-gate3 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ring%3aregulatory-templates-gate3 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 890 次,近一周安装 36 次,下载 279 次,GitHub 180 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ring%3aregulatory-templates-gate3 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ring%3aregulatory-templates-gate3

Ring%3a 监管模板 gate3 · 本页

890180只读未明确未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Regulatory Templates - Gate 3: Template File Generation

Overview

This sub-skill executes Gate 3 of the regulatory template workflow: generating the complete.tpl template file with all validated mappings and transformations from Gates 1-2.

Parent skill: regulatory-templates

Prerequisites:

  • Gate 1 PASSED (field mappings complete)
  • Gate 2 PASSED (validations confirmed)
  • Context object with Gates 1-2 results

Output: Generated.tpl template file ready for use


Foundational Principle

Template generation is the final quality gate before production deployment.

Gate 3 transforms validated specifications into production artifacts:

  • Agent-based generation: finops-automation applies validated mappings consistently - manual creation introduces human error
  • Two-file separation: Clean.tpl (production code) +.tpl.docs (documentation) - inline comments bloat production artifacts
  • All mandatory fields: 100% inclusion required - 95% = 5% of regulatory data missing in BACEN submission
  • Correct transformations: Django filters applied per Gates 1-2 validation - errors here multiply in every submission
  • Valid syntax: Template must execute without errors - syntax failures block Reporter deployment

Skipping requirements in Gate 3 means:

  • Manual creation bypasses systematic validation (fatigue errors, missed transformations)
  • Single-file output mixes production code with documentation (maintenance nightmare)
  • Missing fields cause BACEN submission failures (compliance violations)
  • Invalid syntax blocks deployment (emergency fixes under pressure)

Gate 3 is not automation for convenience - it's the final verification layer.


When to Use

Called by: regulatory-templates skill after Gate 2 passes

Purpose: Create the final Django/Jinja2 template file with all field mappings, transformations, and validation logic


NO EXCEPTIONS - Generation Requirements Are Mandatory

Gate 3 template generation requirements have ZERO exceptions. This is the final artifact that goes to production.

Common Pressures You Must Resist

PressureYour ThoughtReality
Fatigue"Manual creation is faster when tired"Fatigue increases error rate. Agent doesn't get tired. 10 min manual < 15 min validated
Simplicity"One file easier than two"Production artifacts must be clean. Documentation bloats.tpl files
Confidence"45/47 fields works for 99% cases"100% mandatory required. 95% = BACEN submission failures on edge cases
Experience"I can optimize agent output"Agent applies validated mappings systematically. Manual edits introduce drift

Generation Requirements (Non-Negotiable)

Agent-Based Generation:

  • ✅ REQUIRED: Use finops-automation agent for all template generation
  • ❌ FORBIDDEN: Manual.tpl creation, editing agent output
  • Why: Agent applies Gates 1-2 validations consistently, prevents fatigue errors

Two-File Output:

  • ✅ REQUIRED: Generate.tpl (clean code) +.tpl.docs (documentation)
  • ❌ FORBIDDEN: Single file with inline comments, merged documentation
  • Why: Production artifacts stay clean, documentation separate for maintenance

All Mandatory Fields:

  • ✅ REQUIRED: 100% mandatory fields in template (47/47)
  • ❌ FORBIDDEN: "45/47 is good enough", placeholder comments for missing
  • Why: Each missing field = potential regulatory compliance failure

Validated Output:

  • ✅ REQUIRED: Use exact agent output without manual "improvements"
  • ❌ FORBIDDEN: Refactoring for optimization, rewriting for clarity
  • Why: Agent output validated against Gates 1-2, edits create drift

The Bottom Line

Manual shortcuts in final artifact = production regulatory failures.

Gate 3 is the last checkpoint. All previous gates' work culminates here. Bypassing agent generation defeats the entire 3-gate validation process.

If you're tempted to skip agent generation, ask yourself: Am I willing to debug production BACEN submission failures from manual template errors?


Rationalization Table - Know the Excuses

ExcuseWhy It's WrongCorrect Response
"Manual creation same output, faster"Agent validates systematically, manual risks errorsUse agent completely
"10 min vs 15 min, I'm tired"Fatigue increases manual error rateLet agent work
"Two files is over-engineering"Production code must be clean, no doc bloatGenerate TWO files
"One file easier to maintain"Mixing code and docs creates maintenance burdenSeparate concerns
"45/47 works for 99% cases"100% mandatory required, edge cases matterInclude ALL fields
"I can optimize agent output"Optimization creates drift from validated specUse exact output
"Agent code is verbose"Verbose but validated > concise but wrongTrust validation
"Skip for now, add fields later"Template is final artifact, can't patch BACENComplete now

If You Find Yourself Making These Excuses

STOP. You are rationalizing.

Gate 3 is where 5+ hours of Gates 1-2 work becomes a production artifact. Shortcuts here waste all previous validation effort.


Gate 3 Process

Agent Dispatch

Dispatch: Task(subagent_type: "ring:finops-automation")

Prompt includes:

SectionContent
Contexttemplate_name, template_code, authority, field_mappings.length, validation_rules.length
Field MappingsPer field: code, name, source, transformation, confidence%, required
Validation RulesPer rule: rule_id, description, formula
Tasks1. Generate clean.tpl 2. Include all mappings 3. Apply Django syntax 4. Structure per regulatory spec 5. Conditional logic 6. Minimal comments

CRITICAL - Naming Convention:

  • ALL fields in snake_case (already converted by Gate 1)
  • Examples: legal_document, operation_route, opening_date, natural_person

CRITICAL - Data Sources:

  • midaz_onboarding: organization, account (cadastral)
  • midaz_transaction: operation_route, balance, operation (transactional)
  • Format: {{data_source.entity.index.field|filter}}
  • Example: {{midaz_onboarding.organization.0.legal_document|slice:':8'}}

Expected Output

FileContent
{code}_preview.tplClean Django/Jinja2 template code, production-ready, minimal comments
{code}_preview.tpl.docsFull documentation: field mappings, transformations, troubleshooting

Red Flags - STOP Immediately

If you catch yourself thinking ANY of these, STOP and re-read the NO EXCEPTIONS section:

Manual Shortcuts

  • "Create.tpl manually, faster"
  • "Edit agent output for optimization"
  • "I can write cleaner code"
  • "Agent is too verbose"

File Structure Violations

  • "One file easier to maintain"
  • "Inline comments instead of.docs"
  • "Merge documentation into.tpl"
  • "Two files is over-engineering"

Partial Completion

  • "45/47 fields works for most cases"
  • "Skip edge case fields"
  • "Add missing fields later"
  • "99% is good enough"

Justification Language

  • "Being pragmatic"
  • "I'm too tired for agent wait"
  • "Manual is faster"
  • "Over-engineering"
  • "Optimization is better"

If You See These Red Flags

  1. Acknowledge rationalization ("I'm trying to skip agent generation")
  2. Read NO EXCEPTIONS (understand why agent is required)
  3. Read Rationalization Table (see excuse refuted)
  4. Use agent completely (no manual shortcuts)

Template generation shortcuts waste all Gates 1-2 validation work.



Severity Calibration

MUST classify template generation issues using these severity levels:

SeverityDefinitionExamplesGate Impact
CRITICALBLOCKS template deployment OR causes regulatory rejection- Mandatory field missing from template- Invalid Django/Jinja2 syntax- Template file generation failed- Output format violates regulatory specHARD BLOCK - Cannot deploy template
HIGHREQUIRES fix before production use- Transformation applied incorrectly- Optional but commonly-used field missing- Filter chain produces wrong output- Template structure doesn't match specMUST fix before deployment
MEDIUMSHOULD fix to improve template quality- Template > 100 lines (could be simpler)- Redundant transformations- Missing comments in.tpl.docs- Suboptimal loop structureSHOULD fix - document if deferred
LOWMinor improvements possible- Variable naming improvements- Whitespace formatting- Documentation enhancementsOPTIONAL - note in report

Classification Rules:

CRITICAL = ANY of:

  • Any mandatory field NOT in generated template
  • Template syntax error (cannot execute)
  • Output format violates BACEN/RFB specification
  • Agent generation completely failed

HIGH = ANY of:

  • Transformation differs from Gates 1-2 specification
  • Filter produces wrong output type/format
  • Field ordering wrong per regulatory spec
  • Missing validation logic defined in Gate 2

Cannot Be Overridden

NON-NEGOTIABLE requirements (no exceptions, no user override):

RequirementWhy NON-NEGOTIABLEVerification
Agent-Based GenerationManual creation bypasses Gates 1-2 validationtemplate.generated_by == "finops-automation"
Two-File OutputProduction code must be clean, docs separateBoth.tpl and.tpl.docs exist
100% Mandatory FieldsBACEN/RFB submission requires ALL mandatory datatemplate.fields_included == spec.mandatory_count
Valid SyntaxTemplate must execute without errorsTemplate passes syntax validation
Exact TransformationsGates 1-2 validated each transformationAll transformations match specification

User CANNOT:

  • Skip agent generation ("manual is faster" = NO)
  • Merge docs into single file ("one file easier" = NO)
  • Accept 95% mandatory fields ("45/47 is good enough" = NO)
  • Edit agent output ("I can optimize" = NO)
  • Deploy template with syntax errors ("fix in production" = NO)

Your Response to Override Attempts:

"I CANNOT [request]. Gate 3 requires [specific requirement] which is NON-NEGOTIABLE. Template generation through finops-automation agent ensures Gates 1-2 validations are applied consistently. We MUST [required action]."

Pass/Fail Criteria

PASS Criteria

  • ✅ Template file generated successfully
  • ✅ All mandatory fields included
  • ✅ Transformations correctly applied
  • ✅ Django/Jinja2 syntax valid
  • ✅ Output format matches specification
  • ✅ File saved with correct extension

FAIL Criteria

  • ❌ Missing mandatory fields
  • ❌ Invalid template syntax
  • ❌ Transformation errors
  • ❌ File generation failed

State Tracking

PASS: SKILL: regulatory-templates-gate3 | GATE: 3 | STATUS: PASSED ✅ | FILE: {filename} | FIELDS: {n}/{total} | NEXT: Template ready for use

FAIL: SKILL: regulatory-templates-gate3 | GATE: 3 | STATUS: FAILED ❌ | ERROR: {error} | BLOCKERS: {description}


Output to Parent Skill

Return: gate3_passed, template_file (filename, path, size_bytes, fields_included), ready_for_use, next_action (template_complete | fix_and_regenerate)


Common Template Patterns

PatternSyntax
Field access{{organization.legal_document}} (snake_case)
Collection loop{% for item in collection %}{{item.field}}{% endfor %}
Conditional{% if condition %}<field>{{value}}</field>{% endif %}
Nested{{parent.child.grandchild}}
Filter chain`{{value\slice:':8'\upper}}`

Remember: Use exact Gate 1 paths, snake_case only, apply Gate 2 transformations, follow regulatory format exactly.

平台分布

Codex

37.63%
按下载量换算105

Claude

29.03%
按下载量换算81

Cursor

19.52%
按下载量换算54

Gemini CLI

8.7%
按下载量换算24

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills