Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ring%3apre-dev-dependency-map(ring%3apre 开发依赖关系图)

ring%3apre-dev-dependency-map 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ring%3apre-dev-dependency-map 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 45,481。

总安装 847周安装 36GitHub Stars 180下载 297核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ring%3apre-dev-dependency-map(ring%3apre 开发依赖关系图)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring
仓库路径:skills/ring%3Apre-dev-dependency-map
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:pre-dev-dependency-map
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:pre-dev-dependency-map

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

ring%3apre-dev-dependency-map 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。它适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中基于关键词或场景快速定位结果。可通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装,实际功能以原始文档为准。

使用前应评估权限范围和潜在的网络、命令执行风险。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ring%3Apre-dev-dependency-map

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:pre-dev-depende…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ring%3apre-dev-dependency-map 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:pre-dev-dependency-map。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ring%3apre-dev-dependency-map 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ring%3apre-dev-dependency-map 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

ring%3apre-dev-dependency-map 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ring%3apre-dev-dependency-map 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 847 次,近一周安装 36 次,下载 297 次,GitHub 180 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ring%3apre-dev-dependency-map 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ring%3apre-dev-dependency-map

ring%3apre 开发依赖关系图 · 本页

847180需要联网未明确未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Dependency Map - Explicit Technology Choices

Foundational Principle

Every technology choice must be explicit, versioned, validated against Ring Standards, and justified.

Using vague or "latest" dependencies creates:

  • Unreproducible builds across environments
  • Hidden incompatibilities discovered during implementation
  • Security vulnerabilities from unvetted versions

The Dependency Map answers: WHAT specific products, versions, packages, and infrastructure we'll use. The Dependency Map never answers: HOW to implement features (that's Tasks/Subtasks).


⛔ HARD BLOCK: Standards Loading (Step 0)

This is a HARD GATE. Do NOT proceed without loading Ring Standards and TRD decisions.

Step 0.1: Read Technology Decisions from TRD

Read docs/pre-dev/{feature-name}/trd.md and extract: deployment.model, tech_stack.primary, project_technologies[]

If TRD metadata missing: BLOCKER → Go back to TRD (Gate 3) and complete Step 0.4

Step 0.2: Load Ring Standards via WebFetch

StandardURLPurpose
golang.mdhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/LerianStudio/ring/main/dev-team/docs/standards/golang.mdGo coding patterns
typescript.mdhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/LerianStudio/ring/main/dev-team/docs/standards/typescript.mdTypeScript patterns
frontend.mdhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/LerianStudio/ring/main/dev-team/docs/standards/frontend.mdFrontend patterns
devops.mdhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/LerianStudio/ring/main/dev-team/docs/standards/devops.mdDevOps patterns
sre.mdhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/LerianStudio/ring/main/dev-team/docs/standards/sre.mdObservability, logging

Ring Standards = coding patterns, observability, logging, error handling (shared across ALL projects) PROJECT_RULES.md = specific technologies, versions, database choices (specific to THIS project)

Step 0.3: Generate PROJECT_RULES.md (OUTPUT)

Using TRD project_technologies[], create docs/PROJECT_RULES.md with: deployment model, tech stack, per-category decisions (PRD requirement, technology, version, rationale, cloud service, on-premise alternative), version matrix, security/compliance.

Pressure Resistance for Step 0

PressureResponse
"TRD doesn't have technology decisions""Go back to TRD (Gate 3) and complete Step 0.4 (PRD analysis)."
"Ring Standards are optional""Ring Standards define coding patterns. PROJECT_RULES.md defines technologies. Both needed."
"Just use defaults""Defaults come from PRD analysis in TRD. Read TRD first."
"Skip to save time""PROJECT_RULES.md is the output. Cannot skip the output."

Mandatory Workflow

PhaseActivities
1. EvaluationRing Standards loaded (Step 0); PROJECT_RULES.md loaded; Data Model (Gate 5), API Design (Gate 4), TRD (Gate 3) passed; map TRD components to tech candidates; validate against Ring Standards; map Data Model to storage; map API contracts to protocols; check team expertise; estimate costs
2. SelectionPer technology: check Ring Standards (mandatory/prohibited), check PROJECT_RULES.md overrides, specify exact version, list alternatives with trade-offs, verify compatibility, check security (CVEs), validate licenses, calculate costs
3. Gate 6 ValidationAll dependencies explicit, no conflicts, no critical CVEs, licenses compliant, team expertise, costs documented, all components mapped

Explicit Rules

✅ DO Include

Exact package names with versions (go.uber.org/zap@v1.27.0), tech stack with constraints (Go 1.24+, PostgreSQL 16), infrastructure specs (Valkey 8, MinIO), external SDKs, dev tools, security deps, monitoring tools, compatibility matrices, license summary, cost analysis

❌ NEVER Include

Implementation code, how to use dependencies, task breakdowns, setup instructions, architectural patterns (TRD), business requirements (PRD)

Version Rules

  1. Explicit: @v1.27.0 not @latest or ^1.0.0
  2. Justified ranges: If using >=, document why
  3. Lock file referenced: go.mod, package-lock.json, etc.
  4. Upgrade constraints: Document why locked/capped
  5. Compatibility: Document known conflicts

Rationalization Table

ExcuseReality
"Latest version is always best"Latest is untested in your context. Pick specific, validate.
"I'll use flexible version ranges"Ranges cause non-reproducible builds. Lock versions.
"Version numbers don't matter much"They matter critically. Specify or face build failures.
"We can update versions later"Document constraints now. Future you needs context.
"The team knows the stack already"Document it anyway. Teams change, memories fade.
"Security scanning can happen in CI"Security analysis must happen before committing. Do it now.
"We'll figure out costs in production"Costs must be estimated before building. Calculate now.
"Compatibility issues will surface in tests"Validate compatibility NOW. Don't wait for failures.
"License compliance is legal's problem"You're responsible for your dependencies. Check licenses.
"I'll just use what the project template has"Templates may be outdated/insecure. Validate explicitly.

Red Flags - STOP

If you catch yourself writing any of these in a Dependency Map, STOP:

  • Version placeholders: @latest, @next, ^X.Y.Z without justification
  • Vague descriptions: "latest stable", "current version", "newest"
  • Missing version numbers: Just package names without versions
  • Unchecked compatibility: Not verifying version conflicts
  • Unvetted security: Not checking vulnerability databases
  • Unknown licenses: Not documenting license types
  • Estimated costs as "TBD" or "unknown"
  • "We'll use whatever is default" (no default without analysis)

When you catch yourself: Stop and specify the exact version after proper analysis.

Gate 6 Validation Checklist

CategoryRequirements
Standards Compliance (HARD BLOCK)Ring Standards loaded; PROJECT_RULES.md loaded; mandatory deps included (or justified); no prohibited choices (or justified); version constraints respected; deviations documented
CompatibilityAll deps have explicit versions; version matrix complete; no known conflicts; runtime requirements specified; upgrade path documented
SecurityAll deps scanned for vulnerabilities; no critical (9.0+) or high (7.0-8.9) CVEs; security update policy documented; supply chain verified
FeasibilityTeam has expertise or learning path; tools available; licensing allows commercial use; costs fit budget
CompletenessEvery TRD component mapped; dev environment specified; CI/CD deps documented; monitoring stack complete
DocumentationLicense summary; cost analysis; known constraints; alternatives with rationale

Gate Result: ✅ PASS (all checked) → Task Breakdown | ⚠️ CONDITIONAL (standards not loaded) → Complete Step 0 | ❌ FAIL (critical CVEs, incompatibilities, standards not loaded)

Common Violations

ViolationWrongCorrect
Vague VersionsFiber (latest), PostgreSQL (current), Zap (newest stable)gofiber/fiber/v2@v2.52.0 with purpose, alternatives considered, trade-offs; lib/pq@v1.10.9 with constraint; go.uber.org/zap@v1.27.0 with rationale
Missing SecurityJWT Library: golang-jwt/jwt@v5.0.0 (no analysis)Package + purpose + security (CVE check date, OWASP compliance, update history) + alternatives
Undefined InfrastructureSome database (probably Postgres), Cache (Redis or Valkey), Storage for filesPer component: product + version + rationale + configuration + cost (managed vs self-hosted)

Dependency Resolution Patterns

Standards-Driven Validation

If language cannot be auto-detected, use AskUserQuestion with tech stack options (Go Backend, TypeScript Backend, TypeScript Frontend, Full-Stack TypeScript).

SelectionStandards to Load
Go Backendgolang.md + devops.md + sre.md
TypeScript Backendtypescript.md + devops.md + sre.md
TypeScript Frontendfrontend.md + devops.md
Full-Stack TypeScripttypescript.md + frontend.md + devops.md + sre.md

Validation Flow: Standards loaded → Extract mandatory/prohibited/constraints → Check PROJECT_RULES.md → Validate each selection → Document compliance or justified deviations

Best Practices

Prefer: Semantic versioned packages, well-maintained (commits within 6 months), minimal dependency trees, standard library when sufficient Avoid: Deprecated packages (>1 year unmaintained), single-maintainer critical deps, >100 transitive deps, GPL unless compliance certain

Authentication Dependencies (Mandatory for Auth Features)

If TRD specifies authentication/authorization requirements, include these dependencies:

Tech StackAuth RequirementMandatory DependencyReference
Go BackendUser authenticationgithub.com/LerianStudio/lib-auth/v2golang.md → Access Manager Integration
Go BackendService-to-service authgithub.com/LerianStudio/lib-auth/v2golang.md → Access Manager Integration
Go BackendUser + permissions (RBAC)github.com/LerianStudio/lib-auth/v2golang.md → Access Manager Integration

For Go services, the dependency entry MUST include:

### Authentication

**Package:** `github.com/LerianStudio/lib-auth/v2@vX.Y.Z`
**Purpose:** Integration with Lerian Access Manager (plugin-auth + identity)
**Rationale:** Standard authentication library for all Lerian Go services
**Environment Variables:** PLUGIN_AUTH_ADDRESS, PLUGIN_AUTH_ENABLED
**Additional (if S2S):** CLIENT_ID, CLIENT_SECRET
**Reference:** See `golang.md` → Access Manager Integration for implementation patterns

CRITICAL: Go services MUST use lib-auth for authentication. Direct integration with plugin-auth is FORBIDDEN.

Implementation Requirement (from TRD):

  • Every protected endpoint MUST have route middleware: auth.Authorize(applicationName, resource, action)
  • Middleware is applied per-route, not globally
  • See golang.md → Access Manager Integration → Router Setup for patterns

Licensing Dependencies (Mandatory for Licensed Products)

If TRD specifies this is a licensed product/plugin, include these dependencies:

Tech StackLicense RequirementMandatory DependencyReference
Go BackendSingle-org (global) licensegithub.com/LerianStudio/lib-license-go/v2golang.md → License Manager Integration
Go BackendMulti-org licensegithub.com/LerianStudio/lib-license-go/v2golang.md → License Manager Integration

For Go services, the dependency entry MUST include:

### Licensing

**Package:** `github.com/LerianStudio/lib-license-go/v2/middleware@vX.Y.Z`
**Purpose:** Integration with Lerian License Manager for product licensing
**Rationale:** Standard licensing library for all Lerian licensed Go services
**Environment Variables:** LICENSE_KEY, ORGANIZATION_IDS
**Mode:** Global (ORGANIZATION_IDS=global) or Multi-org (comma-separated org IDs)
**Reference:** See `golang.md` → License Manager Integration for implementation patterns

CRITICAL: Go services MUST use lib-license-go for licensing. Custom license validation is FORBIDDEN.

Implementation Requirement (from TRD):

  • License middleware applied GLOBALLY: f.Use(lc.Middleware())
  • Middleware applied early in chain (first after Fiber creation)
  • Graceful shutdown MUST include: licenseClient.GetLicenseManagerShutdown()
  • See golang.md → License Manager Integration → Router Setup for patterns

License & Cost Templates

License Summary: Document count by type (MIT, Apache 2.0, BSD-3-Clause, Commercial), compliance actions (attribution file, legal notification, GPL verification)

Cost Analysis: Monthly breakdown by category (Compute: containers × cost, Storage: managed DB + cache + object, Network: transfer + load balancer, Third-Party: auth + email + monitoring), grand total, scaling cost per additional users, budget validation

Confidence Scoring

FactorPointsCriteria
Technology Familiarity0-30Used before: 30, Similar: 20, Novel: 10
Compatibility Verification0-25All verified: 25, Most checked: 15, Limited: 5
Security Assessment0-25Full CVE scan: 25, Basic check: 15, No review: 5
Cost Analysis0-20Detailed breakdown: 20, Rough estimates: 12, None: 5

Action: 80+ autonomous generation | 50-79 present alternatives | <50 ask about expertise/constraints

Output & After Approval

Output to: docs/pre-dev/{feature-name}/dependency-map.md

  1. ✅ Lock all versions - update only with documented justification
  2. 🎯 Create lock files (go.mod, package-lock.json, etc.)
  3. 🔒 Set up Dependabot or equivalent for security updates
  4. 📋 Proceed to task breakdown with full stack context

The Bottom Line

If you skipped loading Ring Standards, STOP and go back to Step 0.

If you wrote a Dependency Map without explicit versions, add them now or start over.

Two non-negotiable requirements:

  1. Ring Standards MUST be loaded - Technology choices validated against organizational baseline
  2. Every dependency MUST be explicit - No @latest, no vague versions, no "we'll figure it out"

Load standards first. Be explicit. Be specific. Lock your versions.


Blocker Criteria - STOP and Report

ConditionActionSeverity
Data Model (Gate 5) not validatedSTOP and complete Gate 5 firstCRITICAL
Ring Standards not loaded via WebFetchSTOP and load required standardsCRITICAL
TRD metadata missing technology decisionsSTOP and complete TRD Step 0.4CRITICAL
Version uses @latest or vague rangeSTOP and specify exact versionHIGH
Critical CVE (9.0+) found in dependencySTOP and find alternative or document riskCRITICAL
License incompatible with commercial useSTOP and find compliant alternativeHIGH

Cannot Be Overridden

These requirements are NON-NEGOTIABLE:

  • MUST complete Step 0 (Standards Loading) before selecting technologies
  • MUST NOT use @latest, @next, or vague version ranges
  • MUST specify exact versions for ALL dependencies
  • MUST scan for CVEs before finalizing selections
  • MUST verify license compatibility for commercial use
  • MUST include lib-auth for Go services requiring authentication
  • MUST include lib-license-go for Go services requiring licensing
  • CANNOT proceed to Gate 7 with missing versions or unresolved CVEs

Severity Calibration

SeverityDefinitionExample
CRITICALCannot proceed with dependency selectionStandards not loaded, critical CVE found
HIGHDependency violates explicitness rules@latest used, license unclear
MEDIUMDependency incomplete but acceptableMissing alternative documentation
LOWMinor documentation gapsCost analysis could be more detailed

Pressure Resistance

User SaysYour Response
"Latest version is always best""Cannot use @latest. Latest is untested in this context. I'll specify exact version after validation."
"Flexible version ranges are fine""Cannot use ranges. Ranges cause non-reproducible builds. I'll lock to specific versions."
"Security scanning can happen in CI""Cannot defer security. CVE analysis must happen before committing. I'll scan now."
"Skip Ring Standards, we know our stack""Cannot skip standards. Standards validate against organizational baseline. I'll load them first."
"License compliance is legal's problem""Cannot ignore licenses. You're responsible for your dependencies. I'll verify now."

When This Skill Is Not Needed

  • Small Track workflow (skip to Task Breakdown)
  • Technologies already locked and validated
  • Data Model (Gate 5) not validated → complete Gate 5 first
  • Dependency Map already exists and versions are current
  • No new technology decisions needed for this feature

平台分布

Codex

36.16%
按下载量换算107

Claude

32.25%
按下载量换算96

Cursor

17.81%
按下载量换算53

Gemini CLI

8.46%
按下载量换算25

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills