Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

ring%3afinishing-a-development-branch(Ring%3a 正在完成开发分支)

ring%3afinishing-a-development-branch 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ring%3afinishing-a-development-branch 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 15,356。

总安装 606周安装 25GitHub Stars 180下载 198核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ring%3afinishing-a-development-branch(Ring%3a 正在完成开发分支)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring
仓库路径:skills/ring%3Afinishing-a-development-branch
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:finishing-a-development-branch
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:finishing-a-development-branch

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

ring%3afinishing-a-development-branch 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。它适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。

可通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装,具体功能需参考原始 README 文档。使用前应确认权限边界、维护情况,避免触发不必要的联网或文件操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ring%3Afinishing-a-development-branch

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:finishing-a-dev…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

ring%3afinishing-a-development-branch 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:finishing-a-development-b…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ring%3afinishing-a-development-branch 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ring%3afinishing-a-development-branch 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

ring%3afinishing-a-development-branch 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ring%3afinishing-a-development-branch 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 606 次,近一周安装 25 次,下载 198 次,GitHub 180 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ring%3afinishing-a-development-branch 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
ring%3afinishing-a-development-branch

Ring%3a 正在完成开发分支 · 本页

606180只读未明确未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Finishing a Development Branch

Overview

Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow.

Core principle: Verify tests → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.

Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."

The Process

Step 1: Verify Tests

Run npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test./... If tests fail: Show failures, stop. Cannot proceed until tests pass.

Step 2: Determine Base Branch

git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null

Step 3: Present Options

Present exactly these 4 options (no explanation):

  1. Merge back to locally
  2. Push and create a Pull Request
  3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
  4. Discard this work

Step 4: Execute Choice

OptionCommands
1. Merge Locallygit checkout <base> → git pull → git merge <feature> → verify tests → git branch -d <feature> → Cleanup worktree
2. Create PRgit push -u origin <feature> → gh pr create --title "..." --body "## Summary..." → Cleanup worktree
3. Keep As-IsReport: "Keeping branch. Worktree preserved at." Don't cleanup.
4. DiscardConfirm first: "Type 'discard' to confirm." → git checkout <base> → git branch -D <feature> → Cleanup worktree

Step 5: Cleanup Worktree

Options 1, 2, 4: git worktree list | grep $(git branch --show-current) → if in worktree: git worktree remove <path> Option 3: Keep worktree.

Quick Reference

OptionMergePushKeep WorktreeCleanup Branch
1. Merge locally✓--✓
2. Create PR-✓✓-
3. Keep as-is--✓-
4. Discard---✓ (force)

Common Mistakes

MistakeProblemFix
Skipping test verificationMerge broken code, create failing PRAlways verify tests before offering options
Open-ended questions"What should I do next?" → ambiguousPresent exactly 4 structured options
Automatic worktree cleanupRemove worktree when might need itOnly cleanup for Options 1 and 4
No confirmation for discardAccidentally delete workRequire typed "discard" confirmation

Red Flags

Never:

  • Proceed with failing tests
  • Merge without verifying tests on result
  • Delete work without confirmation
  • Force-push without explicit request

Always:

  • Verify tests before offering options
  • Present exactly 4 options
  • Get typed confirmation for Option 4
  • Clean up worktree for Options 1 & 4 only

Integration

Called by:

  • ring:subagent-driven-development (Step 7) - After all tasks complete
  • ring:executing-plans (Step 5) - After all batches complete

Pairs with:

  • ring:using-git-worktrees - Cleans up worktree created by that skill

Blocker Criteria

STOP and report if:

Decision TypeBlocker ConditionRequired Action
Test VerificationTests fail or test command not foundSTOP and report - CANNOT proceed until tests pass
Base BranchCannot determine base branch (main or master)STOP and ask user which branch to merge into
Git StateUncommitted changes exist in working directorySTOP and report - MUST commit or stash changes first
Merge ConflictGit merge results in conflictsSTOP and report conflicts - user MUST resolve

Cannot Be Overridden

The following requirements CANNOT be waived:

  • MUST verify tests pass before offering any completion options
  • MUST present exactly 4 options - no improvised alternatives
  • MUST require typed "discard" confirmation for Option 4 - no shortcuts
  • CANNOT force-push without explicit user request and confirmation

Severity Calibration

SeverityConditionRequired Action
CRITICALTests failing in feature branchMUST fix tests before any merge/PR option
HIGHMerge to base branch introduces test failuresMUST abort merge and report - tests must pass post-merge
MEDIUMWorktree cleanup fails after successful mergeShould report warning but consider completion successful
LOWBranch deletion fails after mergeFix in next iteration - code is already merged

Pressure Resistance

User SaysYour Response
"Just merge it, I'll fix the tests later""CANNOT proceed with failing tests. Tests MUST pass before offering merge options. This prevents broken code from reaching the base branch."
"Skip the test verification, I know it works""I MUST run test verification. 'Knowing it works' is not evidence - actual test output is required before proceeding."
"Delete the branch without confirmation""CANNOT delete work without typed 'discard' confirmation. Type 'discard' to confirm you want to permanently delete this branch."

Anti-Rationalization Table

RationalizationWhy It's WRONGRequired Action
"Tests were passing earlier, skip verification"Tests can break between commits. Current state must be verified, not assumed.MUST run tests before offering options
"User is experienced, skip the 4-option prompt"Structured options prevent mistakes. User experience doesn't justify skipping workflow.MUST present exactly 4 options
"Small change, discard confirmation is overkill"Size doesn't determine value. Any work deserves explicit discard confirmation.MUST require typed 'discard' for Option 4
"Worktree cleanup failed but merge succeeded"Cleanup failure leaves orphan state. Report it even if merge completed.MUST report cleanup failures

平台分布

Codex

36.82%
按下载量换算73

Claude

29.24%
按下载量换算58

Cursor

19.87%
按下载量换算39

Gemini CLI

10.77%
按下载量换算21

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills