Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ring%3adocumentation-structure(ring%3a 文档结构)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

ring%3adocumentation-structure 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 45,630。

总安装 838周安装 36GitHub Stars 180下载 294核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ring%3adocumentation-structure(ring%3a 文档结构)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring
仓库路径:skills/ring%3Adocumentation-structure
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:documentation-structure
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:documentation-structure

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助文档、README 和 Markdown 内容的整理与改写,适合规划章节结构与层级。支持将零散材料组织成清晰可读的文档格式。需保留项目原有命令与路径信息,不添加未确认内容。通过 GitHub 仓库获取技能定义,需结合原始 README 确认具体用法。

ring%3adocumentation-structure 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ring%3Adocumentation-structure

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:documentation-s…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ring%3adocumentation-structure 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:documentation-structure。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ring%3adocumentation-structure 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ring%3adocumentation-structure 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

ring%3adocumentation-structure 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ring%3adocumentation-structure 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 838 次,近一周安装 36 次,下载 294 次,GitHub 180 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ring%3adocumentation-structure 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ring%3adocumentation-structure

ring%3a 文档结构 · 本页

838180需要联网未明确未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Documentation Structure

Good structure helps users find what they need quickly. Organize content by user tasks and mental models, not by internal system organization.

Content Hierarchy

Documentation/
├── Welcome/              # Entry point, product overview
├── Getting Started/      # First steps, quick wins
├── Guides/              # Task-oriented documentation
│   ├── Understanding X   # Conceptual
│   ├── Use Cases        # Real-world scenarios
│   └── Best Practices   # Recommendations
├── API Reference/       # Technical reference
│   ├── Introduction     # API overview
│   └── Endpoints/       # Per-resource documentation
└── Updates/             # Changelog, versioning

Page Structure Patterns

Page TypeStructure
OverviewBrief description → "In this section you will find:" → Linked list of child pages
ConceptualLead paragraph → Key characteristics (bullets) → How it works → Subtopics with --- dividers → Related concepts
Task-OrientedBrief context → Prerequisites → Numbered steps → Verification → Next steps

Section Dividers

Use --- between major sections for visual separation.

When to use:

  • Between major topic changes
  • Before "Related" or "Next steps" sections
  • After introductory content
  • Before prerequisites in guides

Don't overuse: Not every heading needs a divider.


Navigation Patterns

PatternUsage
BreadcrumbShow hierarchy: Guides > Core Entities > Accounts
Prev/NextConnect sequential content: `[Previous: Assets] \[Next: Portfolios]`
On-this-pageFor long pages, show section links at top

Information Density

Scannable content:

  1. Lead with key point in each section
  2. Use bullet points for 3+ items
  3. Use tables for comparing options
  4. Use headings every 2-3 paragraphs
  5. Bold key terms on first use

Progressive disclosure:

  • Essential info (80% of users need) first
  • Advanced configuration in separate section
  • Edge cases and rare scenarios last

Tables vs Lists

Use tables when: Comparing items across same attributes, showing structured data (API fields), displaying options with consistent properties

Use lists when: Items don't have comparable attributes, sequence matters (steps), items have varying detail levels


Code Examples Placement

TypeWhen
Inline codeShort references: "Set the assetCode field..."
Code blocksComplete, runnable examples

Rules:

  1. Show example immediately after explaining it
  2. Keep examples minimal but complete
  3. Use realistic data (not "foo", "bar")
  4. Show both request and response for API docs

Cross-Linking Strategy

  • Link first mention of a concept in each section
  • Don't over-link – once per section is enough
  • Link destinations: Concept → conceptual docs, API action → endpoint, "Learn more" → deeper dive

Page Length Guidelines

Page TypeTargetReasoning
Overview1-2 screensQuick orientation
Concept2-4 screensThorough explanation
How-to1-3 screensTask completion
API endpoint2-3 screensComplete reference
Best practices3-5 screensMultiple recommendations

If >5 screens, consider splitting.


Quality Checklist

  • Content organized by user task, not system structure
  • Overview pages link to all child content
  • Section dividers separate major topics
  • Headings create scannable structure
  • Tables used for comparable items
  • Code examples follow explanations
  • Cross-links connect related content
  • Page length appropriate for type
  • Navigation connects sequential content

Standards Loading (MANDATORY)

Before planning documentation structure:

  1. Understand content types - What documents will exist (conceptual, how-to, API reference)
  2. Load writing skills - ring:writing-functional-docs and ring:writing-api-docs
  3. Review existing structure - Understand current documentation hierarchy

HARD GATE: CANNOT reorganize documentation without understanding content and audience.


Blocker Criteria - STOP and Report

ConditionDecisionAction
Content inventory incompleteSTOPReport: "Need complete list of documentation topics"
User tasks undefinedSTOPReport: "Need user task list to organize around"
Information architecture undefinedSTOPReport: "Need IA decisions before structuring"
Navigation requirements unclearSTOPReport: "Need navigation pattern decisions"

Cannot Be Overridden

These requirements are NON-NEGOTIABLE:

  • MUST organize by user tasks (not system structure)
  • MUST include overview pages that link to children
  • MUST use section dividers (---) between major topics
  • MUST keep page length appropriate for document type
  • CANNOT nest deeper than H3 without good reason
  • CANNOT create orphan pages (must be linked)

Severity Calibration

SeverityCriteriaExamples
CRITICALCompletely disorganized, no navigationNo hierarchy, orphan pages everywhere
HIGHOrganized by system, not user tasks"Database tables" instead of "Managing accounts"
MEDIUMMissing links, poor scannabilityNo cross-links, walls of text
LOWStructure works but could be optimizedCould improve navigation, add dividers

Pressure Resistance

User SaysYour Response
"Organize by our system components""MUST organize by user tasks. System structure ≠ mental model. I'll structure around what users do."
"One long page is fine""Long pages overwhelm users. MUST split by document type guidelines. I'll organize appropriately."
"Skip the overview pages""Overview pages are REQUIRED for navigation. I'll create overview pages linking to children."
"Cross-links are extra work""Cross-links enable discovery. MUST connect related content. I'll add appropriate links."
"Flat structure is simpler""Flat structure makes finding content harder. MUST use appropriate hierarchy."

Anti-Rationalization Table

RationalizationWhy It's WRONGRequired Action
"Mirrors our codebase structure"Users don't know your codebaseMUST organize by user tasks
"Everything on one page is convenient"Convenience for whom? Not usersSplit per page length guidelines
"Deep nesting shows thoroughness"Deep nesting hides contentKeep hierarchy shallow (H3 max)
"Users will search anyway"Search supplements, not replaces structureMUST provide clear navigation
"Links can be added later"Orphan pages are lost pagesAdd links during creation
"Structure is aesthetic, not functional"Structure IS functionalityStructure enables findability

When This Skill is Not Needed

Signs that documentation structure is already correct:

  • Content organized around user tasks and goals
  • Clear hierarchy with appropriate depth
  • Overview pages link to all child content
  • Section dividers separate major topics
  • Navigation connects sequential content
  • Cross-links connect related topics
  • Page lengths appropriate for document type
  • No orphan pages

If all above are true: Structure is correct, no reorganization needed.

平台分布

Codex

34.75%
按下载量换算102

Claude

32.34%
按下载量换算95

Cursor

18.89%
按下载量换算56

Gemini CLI

8.78%
按下载量换算26

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills