Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

ring%3adefense-in-depth(环%3 纵深防御)

ring%3adefense-in-depth 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ring%3adefense-in-depth 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 15,006。

总安装 636周安装 26GitHub Stars 180下载 206核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ring%3adefense-in-depth(环%3 纵深防御)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring
仓库路径:skills/ring%3Adefense-in-depth
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:defense-in-depth
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:defense-in-depth

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合整理仓库状态与变更事项。支持围绕代码协作流程进行信息组织与问题排查。通过 GitHub 仓库获取技能定义,需结合原始 README 确认具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件操作。

ring%3adefense-in-depth 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ring%3Adefense-in-depth

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:defense-in-dept…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ring%3adefense-in-depth 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:defense-in-depth。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ring%3adefense-in-depth 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ring%3adefense-in-depth 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

ring%3adefense-in-depth 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ring%3adefense-in-depth 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 636 次,近一周安装 26 次,下载 206 次,GitHub 180 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ring%3adefense-in-depth 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
ring%3adefense-in-depth

环%3 纵深防御 · 本页

636180需要联网未明确未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Defense-in-Depth Validation

Overview

When you fix a bug caused by invalid data, adding validation at one place feels sufficient. But that single check can be bypassed by different code paths, refactoring, or mocks.

Core principle: Validate at EVERY layer data passes through. Make the bug structurally impossible.

Why Multiple Layers

Single validation: "We fixed the bug" Multiple layers: "We made the bug impossible"

Different layers catch different cases:

  • Entry validation catches most bugs
  • Business logic catches edge cases
  • Environment guards prevent context-specific dangers
  • Debug logging helps when other layers fail

The Four Layers

LayerPurposeExample
1. Entry PointReject invalid input at API boundary`if (!workingDir \\!existsSync(workingDir)) throw new Error(...)`
2. Business LogicEnsure data makes sense for operationif (!projectDir) throw new Error('projectDir required')
3. Environment GuardsPrevent dangerous ops in contextsif (NODE_ENV === 'test' &&!path.startsWith(tmpdir())) throw...
4. Debug InstrumentationCapture context for forensicslogger.debug('About to git init', {directory, cwd, stack})

Applying the Pattern

Steps: (1) Trace data flow (origin → error) (2) Map all checkpoints (3) Add validation at each layer (4) Test each layer (try to bypass layer 1, verify layer 2 catches it)

Example

Bug: Empty projectDir caused git init in source code

Flow: Test setup ('') → Project.create(name, '') → WorkspaceManager.createWorkspace('') → git init in process.cwd()

Layers added: L1: Project.create() validates not empty/exists/writable | L2: WorkspaceManager validates not empty | L3: Refuse git init outside tmpdir in tests | L4: Stack trace logging

Result: 1847 tests passed, bug impossible to reproduce

Key Insight

All four layers necessary - each caught bugs others missed: different code paths bypassed entry validation | mocks bypassed business logic | edge cases needed environment guards | debug logging identified structural misuse.

Don't stop at one validation point. Add checks at every layer.

Blocker Criteria

STOP and report if:

Decision TypeBlocker ConditionRequired Action
Data flow analysisCannot trace data from origin to error pointSTOP and map complete data flow first
Layer identificationCannot identify all checkpoint layersSTOP and document entry, business, environment, and debug layers
Validation coverageSingle validation point without layer analysisSTOP and identify remaining layers
Test verificationCannot test each layer independentlySTOP and design layer isolation tests

Cannot Be Overridden

The following requirements CANNOT be waived:

  • MUST evaluate all four layers - entry, business logic, environment guards, debug instrumentation
  • MUST test each layer independently to prove it catches bypasses of other layers
  • MUST trace data flow from origin to error before adding validation
  • MUST have environment guards that prevent dangerous operations in test/production contexts
  • MUST have debug instrumentation that captures context for forensics even when other layers fail

Severity Calibration

SeverityConditionRequired Action
CRITICALSingle validation point with no layer analysisMUST identify and validate all layers
CRITICALNo environment guard for dangerous operationsMUST add context-specific protections
HIGHMissing entry point validationMUST add validation at API boundary
HIGHNo debug logging for validation failuresMUST add forensic instrumentation
MEDIUMLayer cannot be tested independentlyShould refactor for testability
LOWDebug logging lacks stack traceFix in next iteration

Pressure Resistance

User SaysYour Response
"Entry validation is enough, we don't need all layers""Single validation can be bypassed. MUST validate at every layer to make bug structurally impossible."
"Adding validation everywhere is overkill""Each layer catches bugs others miss. All four layers are REQUIRED for defense-in-depth."
"Just fix the bug, don't add all this validation""Fixing one instance doesn't prevent the category. MUST add multi-layer validation."
"We can skip environment guards, it's just internal code""Environment guards prevent context-specific dangers. CANNOT skip - test vs production matters."

Anti-Rationalization Table

RationalizationWhy It's WRONGRequired Action
"We already have validation at the entry point"Entry validation can be bypassed by different code pathsMUST add validation at all layers
"This is just a simple fix, layers are excessive"Simple fixes recur; multi-layer prevents the bug categoryMUST implement all four layers
"Mocks bypass this validation anyway"That's why business logic layer exists - catches mock bypassesMUST add business logic validation
"We'll add more validation later"Later never comes; bugs ship without defenseMUST add all layers now
"Debug logging is noise"Debug logging is forensic evidence when layers failMUST add debug instrumentation

平台分布

Codex

31.85%
按下载量换算66

Claude

31.65%
按下载量换算65

Cursor

16.97%
按下载量换算35

Gemini CLI

9.59%
按下载量换算20

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills