Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计未展示

ring%3adefense-in-depth环%3 纵深防御

Agent Skill

ring%3adefense-in-depth 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

636

周安装

26

GitHub Stars

180

下载量

206
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ring%3adefense-in-depth(环%3 纵深防御)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring
仓库路径:skills/ring%3Adefense-in-depth
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:defense-in-depth
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:defense-in-depth

简介

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合整理仓库状态与变更事项。

  • 支持围绕代码协作流程进行信息组织与问题排查。
  • 通过 GitHub 仓库获取技能定义,需结合原始 README 确认具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件操作。
  • ring%3adefense-in-depth 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Defense-in-Depth Validation

Overview

When you fix a bug caused by invalid data, adding validation at one place feels sufficient. But that single check can be bypassed by different code paths, refactoring, or mocks.

Core principle: Validate at EVERY layer data passes through. Make the bug structurally impossible.

Why Multiple Layers

Single validation: "We fixed the bug" Multiple layers: "We made the bug impossible"

Different layers catch different cases:

  • Entry validation catches most bugs
  • Business logic catches edge cases
  • Environment guards prevent context-specific dangers
  • Debug logging helps when other layers fail

The Four Layers

LayerPurposeExample
1. Entry PointReject invalid input at API boundary`if (!workingDir \\!existsSync(workingDir)) throw new Error(...)`
2. Business LogicEnsure data makes sense for operationif (!projectDir) throw new Error('projectDir required')
3. Environment GuardsPrevent dangerous ops in contextsif (NODE_ENV === 'test' &&!path.startsWith(tmpdir())) throw...
4. Debug InstrumentationCapture context for forensicslogger.debug('About to git init', {directory, cwd, stack})

Applying the Pattern

Steps: (1) Trace data flow (origin → error) (2) Map all checkpoints (3) Add validation at each layer (4) Test each layer (try to bypass layer 1, verify layer 2 catches it)

Example

Bug: Empty projectDir caused git init in source code

Flow: Test setup ('') → Project.create(name, '')WorkspaceManager.createWorkspace('')git init in process.cwd()

Layers added: L1: Project.create() validates not empty/exists/writable | L2: WorkspaceManager validates not empty | L3: Refuse git init outside tmpdir in tests | L4: Stack trace logging

Result: 1847 tests passed, bug impossible to reproduce

Key Insight

All four layers necessary - each caught bugs others missed: different code paths bypassed entry validation | mocks bypassed business logic | edge cases needed environment guards | debug logging identified structural misuse.

Don't stop at one validation point. Add checks at every layer.

Blocker Criteria

STOP and report if:

Decision TypeBlocker ConditionRequired Action
Data flow analysisCannot trace data from origin to error pointSTOP and map complete data flow first
Layer identificationCannot identify all checkpoint layersSTOP and document entry, business, environment, and debug layers
Validation coverageSingle validation point without layer analysisSTOP and identify remaining layers
Test verificationCannot test each layer independentlySTOP and design layer isolation tests

Cannot Be Overridden

The following requirements CANNOT be waived:

  • MUST evaluate all four layers - entry, business logic, environment guards, debug instrumentation
  • MUST test each layer independently to prove it catches bypasses of other layers
  • MUST trace data flow from origin to error before adding validation
  • MUST have environment guards that prevent dangerous operations in test/production contexts
  • MUST have debug instrumentation that captures context for forensics even when other layers fail

Severity Calibration

SeverityConditionRequired Action
CRITICALSingle validation point with no layer analysisMUST identify and validate all layers
CRITICALNo environment guard for dangerous operationsMUST add context-specific protections
HIGHMissing entry point validationMUST add validation at API boundary
HIGHNo debug logging for validation failuresMUST add forensic instrumentation
MEDIUMLayer cannot be tested independentlyShould refactor for testability
LOWDebug logging lacks stack traceFix in next iteration

Pressure Resistance

User SaysYour Response
"Entry validation is enough, we don't need all layers""Single validation can be bypassed. MUST validate at every layer to make bug structurally impossible."
"Adding validation everywhere is overkill""Each layer catches bugs others miss. All four layers are REQUIRED for defense-in-depth."
"Just fix the bug, don't add all this validation""Fixing one instance doesn't prevent the category. MUST add multi-layer validation."
"We can skip environment guards, it's just internal code""Environment guards prevent context-specific dangers. CANNOT skip - test vs production matters."

Anti-Rationalization Table

RationalizationWhy It's WRONGRequired Action
"We already have validation at the entry point"Entry validation can be bypassed by different code pathsMUST add validation at all layers
"This is just a simple fix, layers are excessive"Simple fixes recur; multi-layer prevents the bug categoryMUST implement all four layers
"Mocks bypass this validation anyway"That's why business logic layer exists - catches mock bypassesMUST add business logic validation
"We'll add more validation later"Later never comes; bugs ship without defenseMUST add all layers now
"Debug logging is noise"Debug logging is forensic evidence when layers failMUST add debug instrumentation

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

31.85%
按下载量换算66

Claude

31.65%
按下载量换算65

Cursor

16.97%
按下载量换算35

Gemini CLI

9.59%
按下载量换算20

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills