Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

skillkit(skillkit 搜索)

skillkit 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

skillkit 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 39,204。

总安装 1,448周安装 58GitHub Stars 95下载 469核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:skillkit(skillkit 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/rfxlamia/claude-skillkit
仓库路径:skills/skillkit
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/rfxlamia/claude-skillkit --skill skillkit
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/rfxlamia/claude-skillkit --skill skillkit

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

skillkit 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。适用于基于关键词或任务场景的信息聚合场景。可通过 npx 命令从 claude-skillkit 仓库安装,建议查看原始 README 了解具体用法。

使用前需确认权限范围和维护状态,警惕可能的联网或文件读写行为。输出内容应以原始 README 和项目事实为依据,不直接作为最终结论。

来源仓库内路径:skills/skillkit

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/rfxlamia/claude-skillkit --skill skillkit;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

skillkit 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/rfxlamia/claude-skillkit --skill skillkit。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

skillkit 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

skillkit 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

skillkit 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

skillkit 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,448 次,近一周安装 58 次,下载 469 次,GitHub 95 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

skillkit 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
skillkit

skillkit 搜索 · 本页

1,44895只读未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Section 1: Intent Detection & Routing

Detect user intent, route to appropriate workflow.

IntentKeywordsRoute To
Full skill creation"create skill", "build skill", "new skill"Section 2
Subagent creation"create subagent", "build subagent", "new subagent"Section 6
Validation"validate", "check quality"Section 3
Decision"Skills vs Subagents", "decide", "which to use"Section 4
Migration"convert", "migrate doc"Section 5
Single tool"validate only", "estimate tokens", "scan"Section 7

PROCEED to corresponding section after intent detection.

Stop Condition (Mandatory):

  • If multiple routes match or intent is ambiguous: stop, ask user to choose one route.
  • Do not proceed until user confirms the route.

Workflow Value: Research-driven approach validates design before building. Sequential steps with checkpoints produce 9.0/10+ quality vs ad-hoc creation.


Section 2: Creation Workflows (Dual Mode)

Prerequisites: Skill description provided, workspace available.

Mode Selection (Required at Start)

Detect or prompt for workflow mode before running the creation flow.

Stop Condition (Mandatory):

  • If mode is not explicitly provided: stop and ask "Do you want fast or full mode?"
  • Do not continue until user confirms the mode.
ModeStepsValidationQuality TargetTime
fast10Structural only>=9.0/10<10 min
full14Structural + Behavioral>=9.0/10 and behavioral >=7.0<20 min

No implicit default mode is allowed when mode is not explicitly known.

Workflow A: Fast Mode (10 Steps)

Use when .skillkit-mode contains fast or marker does not exist.

→ READ references/section-2-fast-creation-workflow.md IN FULL before starting. Create a task for each step listed in that file, then follow them in order. The outline below is a summary only — the reference file is authoritative.

Phase 1: Decision & Research

  • Step 0: Decide approach (decision_helper.py)
  • Step 1: Research and proposals
  • Step 2: User validation
  • Stop Condition: Stop and request user approval before continuing to Step 3.

Phase 2: Creation

  • Step 3: Initialize skill (init.py skill <name> --mode fast)
  • Step 4: Create content

Phase 3: Structural Validation

  • Step 5: Validate skill (validate_skill.py) — runs structure + security + tokens in one call

Phase 4: Packaging

  • Step 6: Progressive disclosure check
  • Step 7: Generate tests (test_generator.py)
  • Step 8: Quality assessment (quality_scorer.py)
  • Step 9: Package (package_skill.py)

Workflow B: Full Mode (14 Steps)

Use when .skillkit-mode contains full.

→ READ references/section-2-full-creation-workflow.md IN FULL before starting. Create a task for each step listed in that file, then follow them in order. The outline below is a summary only — the reference file is authoritative.

Phase 1: Decision and Research

  • Step 0: Decide approach (decision_helper.py)
  • Step 1: Research and proposals
  • Step 2: User validation
  • Stop Condition: Stop and request user approval before continuing to Step 3.

Phase 2: Behavioral Baseline (extra vs fast)

  • Step 3 (RED): Run pressure scenarios without skill → Load references/section-2-full-creation-workflow.md → section "Full Mode Behavioral Testing Protocol" (mandatory)
  • Step 4: Document baseline failures

Phase 3: Creation

  • Step 5: Initialize skill (init.py skill <name> --mode full)
  • Step 6: Create content addressing baseline failures

Phase 4: Behavioral Verification (extra vs fast)

  • Step 7 (GREEN): Run scenarios with skill → Load references/section-2-full-creation-workflow.md → section "Full Mode Behavioral Testing Protocol" (mandatory)
  • Step 8: Fix gaps

Phase 5: Structural Validation

  • Step 9: Validate skill (validate_skill.py) — runs structure + security + tokens in one call

Phase 6: Refinement (extra vs fast)

  • Step 10 (REFACTOR): Combined pressure tests → Load references/section-2-full-creation-workflow.md → section "Full Mode Behavioral Testing Protocol" (mandatory)
  • Step 11: Close loopholes

Phase 7: Packaging

  • Step 12: Quality assessment (quality_scorer.py --format json) — behavioral score derived from Steps 3/7/10 subagent results, not from --behavioral flag
  • Step 13: Package (package_skill.py)

Mode Detection

Priority order:

  1. Explicit flag: --mode fast or --mode full
  2. Skill marker: .skillkit-mode file content
  3. If unknown: stop and ask user to choose fast or full

Section 3: Validation Workflow (Overview)

Use when: Validating existing skill

Steps: Execute validation subset (Steps 3-6)

  1. Validate skill — structure + security + tokens (validate_skill.py, no flags needed)
  2. Progressive disclosure check
  3. Test generation (optional)
  4. Quality assessment (quality_scorer.py)

Note: --security-only and --tokens-only flags are available for Section 7 individual tool use, not for workflow validation steps.

For detailed workflow: See references/section-3-validation-workflow-existing-skill.md


Section 4: Decision Workflow (Overview)

Use when: Uncertain if Skills is right approach

CRITICAL: Agent MUST create a temp JSON file first. The decision_helper.py script does NOT accept inline JSON strings - it requires a file path to a JSON file.

Step-by-step invocation: See references/section-4-decision-workflow-skills-vs-subagents.md

Accuracy: Highest (90-95% confidence).

Process:

  1. Run decision_helper.py with json file.
  2. Answer interactive questions
  3. Receive recommendation with confidence score
  4. Proceed if Skills recommended (confidence >=75%)
  5. If confidence <75% or recommendation is uncertain, stop and ask user whether to continue, switch route, or refine inputs.

For detailed workflow: See references/section-4-decision-workflow-skills-vs-subagents.md


Section 6: Subagent Creation Workflow (Overview)

Use when: Creating new subagent (user explicitly asks or decision workflow recommends)

Prerequisites: Role definition clear, workspace available Quality Target: Clear role, comprehensive workflow, testable examples Time: <15 min with template

8-Step Process:

STEP 0: Requirements & Role Definition

  • Answer: Primary role? Trigger conditions? Tool requirements?
  • Choose subagent_type from predefined list

STEP 1: Initialize Subagent File

  • Tool: python scripts/init.py subagent subagent-name --path ~/.claude/agents
  • Creates: ~/.claude/agents/subagent-name.md with template
  • Important: Subagents are individual .md files (not directories)
  • Stop Condition: If target file already exists, stop and ask whether to overwrite, rename, or cancel.

STEP 2: Define Configuration

  • Edit YAML frontmatter (name, description, type, tools, skills)
  • Configure tool permissions (minimal but sufficient)

STEP 3: Define Role and Workflow

  • Role definition section
  • Trigger conditions (when to invoke)
  • Multi-phase workflow

STEP 4: Define Response Format

  • Output structure template
  • Tone and style guidelines
  • Error handling

STEP 5: Add Examples

  • At least 1 complete example
  • Input/Process/Output format

STEP 6: Validation

  • YAML validity check
  • Structure verification
  • Completeness review

STEP 7: Testing

  • Test invocation with Task tool
  • Iterate based on results

STEP 8: Documentation & Deployment

  • Create README.md
  • Register in system
  • Stop Condition: Ask for explicit user confirmation before register/deploy actions.

For detailed workflow: See references/section-6-subagent-creation-workflow.md


Section 5: Migration Workflow (Overview)

Use when: Converting document to skill

Process:

  1. Decision check (Step 0)
  2. Migration analysis (migration_helper.py)
  3. Structure creation
  4. Execute validation steps (5-8)
  5. Package (Step 9)

Stop Condition (Mandatory):

  • Before structure creation or any write/overwrite operation: ask user confirmation.
  • Do not modify files until user confirms.

For detailed workflow: See references/section-5-migration-workflow-doc-to-skill.md


Section 7: Individual Tool Usage

Use when: User needs single tool, not full workflow

Entry Point: User asks for specific tool like "estimate tokens" or "security scan"

Available Tools

Validation Tool:

python scripts/validate_skill.py skill-name/ --format json

Guide: knowledge/tools/14-validation-tools-guide.md

Token Estimator:

python scripts/validate_skill.py skill-name/ --tokens-only --format json

Guide: knowledge/tools/15-cost-tools-guide.md

Security Scanner:

python scripts/validate_skill.py skill-name/ --security-only --format json

Guide: knowledge/tools/16-security-tools-guide.md

Pattern Detector:

# Analysis mode with JSON output
python scripts/pattern_detector.py "convert PDF to Word" --format json

# List all patterns
python scripts/pattern_detector.py --list --format json

# Interactive mode (text only)
python scripts/pattern_detector.py --interactive

Guide: knowledge/tools/17-pattern-tools-guide.md

Decision Helper:

# Analyze use case (JSON output - agent-layer default)
python scripts/decision_helper.py --analyze "code review with validation"

# Show decision criteria (JSON output)
python scripts/decision_helper.py --show-criteria --format json

# Text mode for human reading (debugging)
python scripts/decision_helper.py --analyze "description" --format text

Guide: knowledge/tools/18-decision-helper-guide.md

Test Generator (v1.2: Parameter update):

python scripts/test_generator.py skill-name/ --test-format pytest --format json
  • --test-format: Test framework (pytest/unittest/plain, default: pytest)
  • --format: Output style (text/json, default: text)
  • Backward compatible: Old --output parameter still works (deprecated)

Guide: knowledge/tools/19-test-generator-guide.md

Split Skill:

python scripts/split_skill.py skill-name/ --format json

Guide: knowledge/tools/20-split-skill-guide.md

Quality Scorer:

python scripts/quality_scorer.py skill-name/ --format json

Guide: knowledge/tools/21-quality-scorer-guide.md

Migration Helper:

python scripts/migration_helper.py doc.md --format json

Guide: knowledge/tools/22-migration-helper-guide.md

Subagent Initializer (NEW):

python scripts/init.py subagent subagent-name --path /path/to/subagents

Guide: references/section-6-subagent-creation-workflow.md

Tool Output Standardization (v1.0.1+)

All 9 tools support --format json. Text mode still available via --format text (backward compatible). decision_helper defaults to JSON for automation.

JSON Output Structure:

{
  "status": "success" | "error",
  "tool": "tool_name",
  "timestamp": "ISO-8601",
  "data": { /* tool-specific results */ }
}

Quality Assurance Enhancements (v1.2+)

File & Reference Validation:

  • validate_skill.py now comprehensively checks file references (markdown links, code refs, path patterns)
  • package_skill.py validates references before packaging, detects orphaned files
  • Prevents broken references and incomplete files in deployed skills

Content Budget Enforcement (v1.2+):

  • Hard limits on file size: P0 ≤150 lines, P1 ≤100 lines, P2 ≤60 lines
  • Real-time token counting with progress indicators
  • Prevents file bloat that previously caused 4-9x target overruns

Execution Planning (v1.2+):

  • P0/P1/P2 prioritization prevents over-scoping
  • Token budget allocated per file to maintain efficiency
  • Research phase respects Verbalized Sampling probability thresholds (p>0.10)

Quality Scorer Context:

  • Scores calibrated for general skill quality heuristics
  • Target: 70%+ is good, 80%+ is excellent
  • Style scoring may not fit all skill types (educational vs technical)
  • Use as guidance, supplement with manual review for edge cases

Section 8: Mode Selection Guide

Skill TypeRecommended ModeWhy
TDD or discipline skillfullmust resist rationalization under pressure
Code pattern skillfaststructural checks are usually sufficient
API reference skillfastprimarily retrieval accuracy
Workflow orchestration skillfullcomplex flow benefits from pressure checks
Debugging technique skillfastconcise technique with clear method

Full mode adds behavioral testing (pressure scenarios). Use it when discipline enforcement is core to the skill's purpose.


Section 9: Knowledge Reference Map (Overview)

Strategic context loaded on-demand.

Foundation Concepts (Files 01-08):

  • Why Skills exist vs alternatives
  • Skills vs Subagents decision framework
  • Token economics and efficiency
  • Platform constraints and security
  • When NOT to use Skills

Application Knowledge (Files 09-13):

  • Real-world case studies (Rakuten, Box, Notion)
  • Technical architecture patterns
  • Adoption and testing strategies
  • Competitive landscape analysis

Tool Guides (Files 14-22):

  • One guide per automation script
  • Usage patterns and parameters
  • JSON output formats
  • Integration examples

For complete reference map: See references/section-7-knowledge-reference-map.md


Workflow Compliance

Follow workflows sequentially. Sequential steps with gates produce 9.0/10+ quality. Deviations are allowed with user justification.

Flexible entry points:

  • Single tool (Section 7): skip full workflow
  • Validation only (Section 3): run validation subset
  • Subagent (Section 6): streamlined 8-step workflow

Additional Resources

Load reference files on-demand from references/ when detailed implementation guidance is needed.

平台分布

Codex

37.21%
按下载量换算175

Claude

27.52%
按下载量换算129

Cursor

19.29%
按下载量换算90

Gemini CLI

9.58%
按下载量换算45

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills