Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

review-scoring-docx(审查 scoring DOCX)

review-scoring-docx 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

review-scoring-docx 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 65,084。

总安装 288周安装 12GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 96核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:review-scoring-docx(审查 scoring DOCX)
来源仓库:https://github.com/timlai666/skills
仓库路径:skills/review-scoring-docx
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/timlai666/skills --skill review-scoring-docx
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/timlai666/skills --skill review-scoring-docx

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

review-scoring-docx 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词快速定位候选结果时使用。它适用于 Word 文档分析、评分标准和线索筛选等研究检索类任务场景。

通过关键词、任务场景或来源线索调用,可结合仓库 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。可通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。

来源仓库内路径:skills/review-scoring-docx

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/timlai666/skills --skill review-scoring-docx;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

review-scoring-docx 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/timlai666/skills --skill review-scoring-docx。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

review-scoring-docx 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

review-scoring-docx 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

review-scoring-docx 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

review-scoring-docx 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 288 次,近一周安装 12 次,下载 96 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

review-scoring-docx 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
review-scoring-docx

审查 scoring DOCX · 本页

288—需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Review Scoring → Word Document

Converts raw product review files into a formatted Word document with two deliverables:

  1. Attribute catalog — a minimum of 30 product attributes inferred from the full review corpus, each anchored to a Maslow need tier and accompanied by an evaluation dimension statement.
  2. Product × attribute score matrix — every product scored 0–10 on every attribute, colour-coded by performance band, with per-attribute averages and per-product totals.

For a worked example using real Amazon reviews, see references/worked-example.md.


Concepts and definitions

Review corpus

All text written by customers about a product, collected across one or more files. A valid review is any entry whose body text exceeds 15 characters after stripping whitespace. No language filter is applied; multilingual corpora are treated identically to monolingual ones.

Attribute

A distinct, evaluable dimension of product quality or experience that surfaces — positively or negatively — across multiple reviews. An attribute is not a feature; it is the *customer's lived experience* of that feature. For example, "anti-fog coating" is a feature; "fog resistance in practice" is an attribute.

Each attribute has four required fields:

FieldDefinition
idZero-padded sequential number (01, 02 … 30+)
labelConcise display name; language matches the user's preference
dimensionOne sentence stating exactly what reviewers say when this attribute is good or bad
maslow_tierWhich Maslow tier this attribute primarily satisfies (see table below)

Maslow tier mapping

Attributes must collectively cover all five tiers. The tiers and their characteristic questions are:

TierNeed typeCore question the attribute answers
1PhysiologicalDoes the product function as the body requires? (sensory, physical comfort)
2SafetyDoes the product reliably protect and hold up over time?
3BelongingDoes the product connect the user to a group, relationship, or shared identity?
4EsteemDoes the product make the user feel valued, seen, and not deceived?
5Self-actualisationDoes the product help the user fully achieve their goal or potential?

Minimum per-tier attribute counts: 5 for tiers 1 and 2, 4 for tiers 3 and 4, 5 for tier 5. Adjust upward if the corpus warrants richer coverage; never go below these floors.

Score

An integer from 0 to 10 expressing the net sentiment signal for one product on one attribute, derived from the entire review set for that product.

BandRangeSignal
Critical failure0–2Near-universal negative; serious liability
Predominantly negative3–4Majority of mentions are complaints
Neutral / insufficient5Mixed signals, or attribute rarely mentioned
Mostly positive6–7Clear majority satisfied; occasional complaints
Strong positive8–9Consistently praised; very few negatives
Near-universal praise10Effectively no negative signal found

Absence rule: if an attribute is never mentioned in any review for a product, assign 5.


Workflow

Step 0 — Locate required skills

Before writing any code, check the available skills listed in your context. You need a docx skill (any skill covering .docx or Word document creation). Read its SKILL.md fully before Step 4.

Step 1 — Ingest reviews

  1. Identify all uploaded review files from the conversation.
  2. For each file, auto-detect the text-bearing column (common names: body, Body, review, text, content).
  3. Load all valid reviews — no sampling, no row limit.
  4. Print a per-product count summary before proceeding.
import csv

def load_reviews(filepath):
    text_col_candidates = ['body', 'Body', 'review', 'Review', 'text', 'content']
    with open(filepath, encoding='utf-8', errors='replace') as f:
        reader = csv.DictReader(f)
        col = next((c for c in text_col_candidates if c in reader.fieldnames), None)
        if col is None:
            raise ValueError(f"No text column found. Headers: {reader.fieldnames}")
        return [r[col].strip() for r in reader
                if r[col].strip() and len(r[col].strip()) > 15]

Step 2 — Discover and freeze the attribute catalog

  1. Read through all reviews across all products to build a holistic picture of the corpus.
  2. Identify recurring themes, complaint patterns, praise patterns, and unmet needs.
  3. Formulate attributes bottom-up from the corpus — do not start from a fixed template.
  4. Ensure all five Maslow tiers are covered at or above minimum floor counts.
  5. Write out the complete catalog with all four required fields before scoring begins.
  6. Freeze it. The catalog must not change after scoring starts.

Attribute discovery heuristics:

  • Recurring noun phrases → candidate attributes
  • Adjective + noun complaints (e.g. "flimsy arms", "blurry vision") → negative-pole definitions
  • Absence evidence (e.g. "wish it came with a case") → packaging / completeness attribute
  • Cross-language mentions count equally — translate and tally together
  • After a first pass, check each Maslow tier for gaps; tier 3 (belonging) is most commonly under-represented

Step 3 — Score every product

For each product:

  1. Read through all its valid reviews.
  2. For each attribute in the frozen catalog, tally the direction and intensity of reviewer mentions.
  3. Weight by frequency (how many reviews mention it) and intensity (how strongly positive or negative).
  4. Assign a single integer 0–10 per the scale defined above.

Store as: scores: dict[product_id, list[int]] — list length equals catalog size, ordered identically to the catalog.

Step 4 — Build the Word document

Consult the docx skill you located in Step 0 for the full API reference. The document has two sections:

Section 1 — Portrait orientation: Attribute catalog table

Columns: id | attribute label | evaluation dimension | Maslow tier

  • Differentiate tiers visually with distinct cell fill colours (one colour per tier, applied consistently to label and tier cells).
  • Dark header row with white bold text.
  • Consistent font throughout; body text 16–18 pt.
Section 2 — Landscape orientation: Product × attribute matrix

Columns: id | attribute label | one column per product | row average

  • Include a review-count sub-header row directly below the product-ID header.
  • Insert tier separator rows (full-width band in the tier's accent colour, bold tier label) before each tier group.
  • Colour-code score cells by band: low → warm red; neutral → warm yellow; good → light green; excellent → strong green. Use a matching text colour within each band.
  • Add a legend row above the matrix explaining the colour bands.
  • Add a product total-average row at the bottom in a distinct dark header colour.
Docx layout rules (apply regardless of docx library)
  • Use absolute units for all table widths — never percentage widths (they break in Google Docs).
  • Set width on both the table-level column-widths array and on every individual cell.
  • Use clear/transparent shading type, not solid fill, to prevent black-background rendering bugs.
  • Landscape section: pass portrait dimensions plus an orientation flag.
  • Never encode newlines as \n in text runs; use separate paragraph elements.

Step 5 — Output

Write the .docx to the working directory, copy to the outputs directory, then call present_files.

Accompany the file with a prose summary stating:

  • Total reviews per product and grand total
  • Languages present in the corpus
  • Top and bottom performers overall
  • The two or three attributes with the widest score variance across products

Hard rules

  1. Never truncate. Every valid review (length > 15 chars) is read for scoring. No sampling.
  2. All languages count. Non-English reviews carry equal weight.
  3. Freeze before scoring. The catalog is finalised before any product is scored.
  4. Minimum 30 attributes. Exception: corpus < 50 total reviews → 20 is acceptable; state the reason.
  5. Integer scores only. Individual scores are whole numbers 0–10.
  6. Absolute table widths. Percentage widths corrupt layout.
  7. Present with present_files. Never ask the user to navigate to the file manually.

平台分布

Codex

34.34%
按下载量换算33

Claude

30.88%
按下载量换算30

Cursor

20.97%
按下载量换算20

Gemini CLI

10.32%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills