Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

review-mining(回顾挖掘)

review-mining 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

review-mining 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 43,703。

总安装 964周安装 41GitHub Stars 114下载 338核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:review-mining(回顾挖掘)
来源仓库:https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills
仓库路径:skills/review-mining
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill review-mining
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill review-mining

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

review-mining 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于数据挖掘、信息抽取和市场机会识别等研究检索类任务场景。通过关键词匹配和来源筛选支持对非结构化数据的初步处理。

安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或命令执行。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 文档核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/review-mining

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill revie…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

review-mining 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/shawnpang/startup-founder-skills --skill review-mining。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

review-mining 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

review-mining 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

review-mining 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

review-mining 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 964 次,近一周安装 41 次,下载 338 次,GitHub 114 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

review-mining 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
review-mining

回顾挖掘 · 本页

964114只读未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Review Mining

When to Use

  • Founder wants to understand real user pain points for a market or competitor product
  • Founder wants voice-of-customer language to use in copy, emails, or pitch decks
  • Founder wants to validate a product idea by finding recurring complaints
  • Founder wants to identify gaps competitors aren't solving
  • Founder wants to build a feature comparison based on what users actually care about

Context Required

  • Competitor names or product category to research
  • Review platforms to mine (Trustpilot, G2, Capterra, Product Hunt, App Store, Play Store, Reddit)
  • What the founder is trying to learn (pain points, switching triggers, feature gaps, use cases)
  • The founder's own product positioning (to identify opportunities)

Workflow

  1. Define research scope — identify 3-5 competitors or products to analyze and which platforms have the most relevant reviews for the category (B2B → G2/Capterra, B2C → Trustpilot/App Store, developer tools → Reddit/HN).
  2. Collect reviews — gather 1-3 star reviews (pain points) and 4-5 star reviews (what users love and would miss). Focus on reviews from the last 12 months for relevance. Aim for 50-100 reviews per competitor.
  3. Extract pain point themes — categorize complaints into recurring themes. For each theme, capture:

- The pain point in the user's own words (verbatim quotes) - Frequency (how many reviews mention it) - Severity (annoyance vs. deal-breaker vs. switching trigger) - Which competitor(s) it applies to

  1. Extract switching triggers — find reviews where users explicitly say why they left or are considering leaving. These are gold for positioning and outreach.
  2. Extract "jobs to be done" — from positive reviews, identify what users are actually hiring the product to do (often different from what the product markets itself as).
  3. Map to opportunities — cross-reference pain points against your product's capabilities. Identify where you solve problems competitors don't.
  4. Generate artifacts — produce the pain point report, voice-of-customer swipe file, and positioning recommendations.

Output Format

## Review Mining Report: [Category/Competitors]

### Research Scope
- Competitors analyzed: [list]
- Platforms: [list]
- Reviews analyzed: [count]
- Date range: [range]

### Top Pain Points (ranked by frequency x severity)

#### 1. [Pain Point Theme] — mentioned in [X]% of negative reviews
- **Severity:** [Annoyance / Frustration / Deal-breaker / Switching trigger]
- **Competitors affected:** [list]
- **User quotes:**
  - "[verbatim quote]" — [platform], [star rating]
  - "[verbatim quote]" — [platform], [star rating]
- **Your opportunity:** [how your product addresses or could address this]

#### 2. [Pain Point Theme] ...

### Switching Triggers
| Trigger | Frequency | From → To | Quote |
|---------|-----------|-----------|-------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

### Voice of Customer Swipe File
**Words users use for the problem:** [list of exact phrases]
**Words users use for the desired outcome:** [list of exact phrases]
**Emotional language:** [frustration words, relief words]

### Positioning Opportunities
- [Opportunity 1]: [what you can claim based on competitor weakness]
- [Opportunity 2]: [underserved use case you can own]

Frameworks & Best Practices

Where to mine by product type:

Product TypeBest Sources
B2B SaaSG2, Capterra, TrustRadius
B2C / ConsumerTrustpilot, App Store, Play Store
Developer ToolsReddit, Hacker News, GitHub Issues
E-commerce / DTCTrustpilot, Amazon reviews
AnyTwitter/X complaints, Reddit threads

Review analysis principles:

  • 1-2 star reviews reveal deal-breakers and switching triggers
  • 3 star reviews reveal "good enough but frustrated" — the most persuadable users
  • 4-5 star reviews reveal what users truly value (defend these in your product)
  • Recent reviews (last 6-12 months) matter more than old ones
  • Verified purchase/user reviews carry more weight

Verbatim language is the output. The exact words users use to describe their pain are more valuable than your summary. These become headlines, email subject lines, ad copy, and landing page copy.

Common mistakes:

  • Only reading negative reviews (you miss what users actually value)
  • Summarizing instead of quoting (you lose the authentic language)
  • Treating all complaints equally (frequency x severity matters)
  • Ignoring the context of who's reviewing (enterprise vs SMB, power user vs casual)
  • Mining once and never returning (do this quarterly)

Related Skills

  • competitive-analysis — for broader competitor research beyond reviews
  • user-research-synthesis — for synthesizing your own customer interviews
  • feedback-synthesis — for analyzing feedback from your own users
  • cold-outreach — use voice-of-customer language in prospecting emails

Examples

Prompt: "I'm building a project management tool. What are the biggest pain points people have with Asana and Monday.com?"

Good output includes: Mining Trustpilot, G2, and Capterra for Asana and Monday.com, extracting the top 5-7 pain points with verbatim quotes, identifying switching triggers, and mapping them to positioning opportunities.

Prompt: "We're a Trustpilot alternative. Help me understand what businesses hate about Trustpilot."

Good output includes: Mining Trustpilot's own reviews (meta!), G2, and Reddit for complaints about Trustpilot, extracting themes like review gating, pricing, fake review handling, and producing a voice-of-customer swipe file the founder can use in outreach.

平台分布

Codex

33.46%
按下载量换算113

Claude

31.98%
按下载量换算108

Cursor

17.8%
按下载量换算60

Gemini CLI

10.36%
按下载量换算35

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills