Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

review-intelligence-digest(审查情报文摘)

review-intelligence-digest 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

review-intelligence-digest 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 72,323。

总安装 188周安装 8GitHub Stars 630下载 66核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:review-intelligence-digest(审查情报文摘)
来源仓库:https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills
仓库路径:skills/review-intelligence-digest
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill review-intelligence-digest
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill review-intelligence-digest

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

review-intelligence-digest 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于情报分析、行业动态追踪和竞品研究等研究检索类任务场景。

通过摘要式信息聚合支持对复杂内容的快速筛选与提炼。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或命令执行。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 文档核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/review-intelligence-digest

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill review-inte…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

review-intelligence-digest 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills --skill review-intelligence-d…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

review-intelligence-digest 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

review-intelligence-digest 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

review-intelligence-digest 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

review-intelligence-digest 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 188 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 66 次,GitHub 630 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

review-intelligence-digest 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
review-intelligence-digest

审查情报文摘 · 本页

188630接触敏感数据未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Review Intelligence Digest

Scrape reviews for your product and top competitors, then extract what actually matters for marketing: the exact language customers use, recurring pain points, proof points that convert, and objections to pre-empt.

Core principle: Your best marketing copy is already written — by your customers, in their reviews. This skill surfaces it.

When to Use

  • "What are customers saying about us vs competitors?"
  • "Find proof points and objections from our G2 reviews"
  • "What language do our customers use to describe the problem we solve?"
  • "Run a review audit for [client]"
  • "What are [competitor]'s customers complaining about?"

Phase 0: Intake

  1. Your product name + review page URLs (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot — any/all)
  2. Competitor names + their review page URLs (1-3 competitors recommended)
  3. What are you trying to learn? (Pick primary focus or do all):

- Messaging mining — extract ICP language and proof points - Competitive displacement — find competitor pain points to exploit - Objection mapping — identify what's stopping people from buying/staying - Feature gaps — what do customers wish existed?

  1. Time range: last 3 months (default), last 6 months, or all time?

Phase 1: Scrape Reviews

Run review-site-scraper for your product and each competitor:

# Your product
python3 skills/capabilities/review-site-scraper/scripts/scrape_reviews.py \
  --platform g2 \
  --url "<your_g2_url>" \
  --days 90 \
  --output json

# Competitor
python3 skills/capabilities/review-site-scraper/scripts/scrape_reviews.py \
  --platform g2 \
  --url "<competitor_g2_url>" \
  --days 90 \
  --output json

Repeat for Capterra and Trustpilot as needed.

Collect for each review: rating (1-5), title, body text, pros, cons, reviewer role/company (if available), date.

Phase 2: Categorize & Cluster

Analyze all reviews through these five lenses:

Lens 1: Proof Points (5-star reviews)

Extract specific outcomes and metrics customers mention:

  • Time saved / speed improvements
  • Revenue or pipeline impact
  • Headcount equivalent replaced
  • Process improvements
  • Before/after comparisons

Flag reviews with numbers — these are the highest-value proof points.

Lens 2: Core Pain Language

What words and phrases do customers use to describe the problem they had before using the product? This is gold for cold email hooks and ad copy.

Patterns to extract:

  • "Before [product], we were..."
  • "We used to [manual process]..."
  • "The biggest frustration was..."
  • "We couldn't [thing] until..."

Lens 3: Objection Mapping (3-4 star reviews, negative cons)

What do customers wish was different? What almost stopped them from buying?

  • Price/value concerns
  • Onboarding friction
  • Missing features
  • Integration issues
  • Support quality

Group by theme. Count frequency.

Lens 4: Competitive Displacement Signals (competitor reviews)

In competitor reviews, look for:

  • Specific pain points your product doesn't have
  • Features they're missing that you offer
  • Complaints about price, support, or reliability
  • Mentions of switching ("we switched to X")

These are your competitive displacement angles.

Lens 5: Buyer Language Patterns

How do customers categorize and search for your type of product?

  • What category words do they use?
  • What comparison phrases appear? (e.g., "compared to Salesforce", "vs HubSpot")
  • What role/title wrote the reviews? (validates ICP)

Phase 3: Output Format

# Review Intelligence Digest — [DATE]
Products analyzed: [your product], [competitors]
Reviews analyzed: [N] total | Period: [date range]

---

## Proof Points Library (use in copy directly)

### With Metrics (highest value)
- "[Exact quote with number]" — [Reviewer role], [Platform], [Date]
- "[Exact quote with number]" — ...

### Process/Experience Wins
- "[Exact quote]" — [Reviewer role], [Platform]
- ...

---

## Customer Pain Language

Words and phrases customers use to describe the problem you solve:

**Verbatim phrases (use in hooks and subject lines):**
- "[Exact phrase]" (appeared in [N] reviews)
- "[Exact phrase]" (appeared in [N] reviews)
- ...

**Paraphrased themes:**
1. [Theme] — [N] reviews mention this | Example: "[quote]"
2. [Theme] — ...

---

## Objection Map

| Objection | Frequency | Verbatim example | How to address |
|-----------|-----------|-----------------|----------------|
| [Objection] | [N] reviews | "[quote]" | [suggested response] |
| ... | | | |

---

## Competitive Displacement Intel

### [Competitor Name]

**Top complaints (use as outreach hooks):**
1. [Complaint] — "[Verbatim quote]" | Appeared [N] times
2. ...

**What their customers want that we offer:**
- [Feature/capability] — "[review evidence]"

**Suggested displacement angle:**
> "[Pitch sentence targeting their unhappy customers]"

---

## SEO / Messaging Vocabulary

Words and phrases to incorporate in website copy, ads, and content:

**High-frequency ICP vocabulary:**
- "[word/phrase]" — used in [N] reviews
- ...

**Category comparison terms:**
- Customers compare you to: [list]
- Customers search for: [list]

---

## Recommended Actions

### Immediate (use this week)
1. Add "[proof point quote]" to homepage or outbound sequences
2. Address "[top objection]" in onboarding flow or sales deck
3. Use "[pain phrase]" as hook in next cold email batch

### Strategic
1. [Feature gap mentioned in reviews — prioritize or address in messaging]
2. [Competitive weakness to build a campaign around]

Save to review-digest-[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current working directory.

Scheduling

Run monthly (reviews don't change fast enough to warrant weekly):

0 8 1 * * python3 run_skill.py review-intelligence-digest --client <client-name>

Cost

ComponentCost
G2 reviews (per product)Free tier available (Apify)
Capterra reviews (per product)~$0.20-0.50 (Apify, pay-per-result)
Trustpilot reviews (per product)~$0.20/1k reviews
Total per monthly run (you + 2 competitors)~$1-3

Tools Required

  • Apify API token — APIFY_API_TOKEN env var
  • Upstream skill: review-site-scraper

Trigger Phrases

  • "Mine our reviews for proof points and messaging"
  • "What are [competitor]'s customers complaining about?"
  • "Run review intelligence for [client]"
  • "Give me customer language I can use in copy"

平台分布

Codex

35.25%
按下载量换算23

Claude

30.85%
按下载量换算20

Cursor

18.97%
按下载量换算13

Gemini CLI

8.81%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills