Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

review-history(回顾历史)

review-history 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

review-history 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 66,030。

总安装 269周安装 11GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 86核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:review-history(回顾历史)
来源仓库:https://github.com/nielsmadan/agentic-coding
仓库路径:skills/review-history
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/nielsmadan/agentic-coding --skill review-history
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/nielsmadan/agentic-coding --skill review-history

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

review-history 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于信息调研、资料整理和知识发现等研究检索类任务场景。通过关键词匹配和来源仓库筛选,提供相关信息的候选列表供进一步分析。

安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 文档核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/review-history

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/nielsmadan/agentic-coding --skill review-histo…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

review-history 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/nielsmadan/agentic-coding --skill review-history。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

review-history 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

review-history 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

review-history 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

review-history 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 269 次,近一周安装 11 次,下载 86 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

review-history 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
review-history

回顾历史 · 本页

269—需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Review History

Investigate how code evolved over time to understand current behavior or find regressions.

Usage

/review-history src/auth/login.ts
/review-history the authentication flow
/review-history UserProfile component

Gotchas

  • git log -S finds commits where the string was added OR removed. A commit that deleted a function surfaces as equally relevant to the one that added it — verify the direction of change.
  • Squash merges erase commit-level traceability. git reflog only works locally and expires — if another contributor squashed and force-pushed, the original commits are unrecoverable.

Workflow

Step 1: Identify Target Files

From the provided topic, identify the relevant files:

  • If a file path is given, use it directly
  • If a feature/function name, locate relevant files using this strategy:

1. Grep for the exact function/class name to find where it is defined and used 2. Glob for files with the feature name in the path (e.g., **/*payment*) 3. Prioritize source files over test files; include tests only if investigating test behavior 4. Limit to the 5 most relevant files to keep the analysis focused

Step 2: Git History Analysis

Run these in parallel:

Recent commits touching the area:

git log --oneline -20 -- <file_or_directory>

Detailed blame for key sections:

# For files > 200 lines: target the specific function or section under investigation.
# Use Grep to find the line range first, then:
git blame -L <start>,<end> <file>

# For files ≤ 200 lines: blame the entire file:
git blame <file>

Find when specific code was introduced:

git log -S "<search_term>" --oneline -- <file>

Check for recent refactors:

git log --oneline --since="3 months ago" -- <file_or_directory>

Adjust the time window based on context:

  • Investigating a recent regression: use --since="2 weeks ago"
  • Understanding a feature's evolution: use --since="6 months ago" or omit --since entirely
  • If the initial window returns fewer than 3 commits, double the window and retry once

Step 3: Search Past Issue Logs

Check if this problem occurred before:

  1. List past issue logs:

- Glob pattern: docs/log/*.md

  1. Search logs for relevant keywords:

- Grep pattern: {keywords} path: docs/log/

Look for:

  • Similar error messages
  • Same file/function names
  • Related symptoms

Step 4: Synthesize Findings

Populate the report using these methods:

  • Recent Changes: List commits from git log, most recent first. Include only commits that touch the target code.
  • Key Code Introduction: Use git log -S results to identify when the function/feature first appeared and its last substantive change (skip formatting-only commits).
  • Related Past Issues: Direct matches from Step 3. If none found, state "None found in docs/log/".
  • Regression Risk: Compare current behavior against commit history. If code worked before a specific commit and broke after, name that commit. If no clear regression point, state "No clear regression identified — behavior may be by design."

Report:

## History Analysis: {target}

### Recent Changes
| Date | Commit | Author | Summary |
|------|--------|--------|---------|
| {date} | {hash} | {author} | {message} |

### Key Code Introduction
- `{function/feature}` introduced in {commit} on {date}
- Last modified: {commit} by {author}

### Related Past Issues
{any matching docs/log entries, or "None found"}

### Regression Risk
{assessment: was this working before? when did it break?}

Examples

Trace when a payment bug was introduced:

/review-history processPayment

Uses git log -S and git blame to trace the payment processing function, identifies the commit that changed the rounding logic three weeks ago, and cross-references with past issue logs to confirm this is when the billing discrepancy started.

Understand why validation works a certain way:

/review-history src/validators/address.ts

Analyzes the git history of the address validator, surfaces the original commit that added the unusual postal code regex along with its commit message explaining a partner API requirement, and checks past issue logs for related context.

Troubleshooting

Relevant commit was squashed or rebased away

Solution: Use git reflog to find the original commit before the squash or rebase. If the reflog has expired, search for the change using git log -S "<code_snippet>" --all to locate it in any branch or dangling commit.

History is too large to analyze effectively

Solution: Narrow the scope by passing a specific file path or function name instead of a broad directory. Use --since with git log to limit the time window, or focus on a single author's contributions with --author.

Notes

  • Focus on commits from the last 3-6 months unless investigating older issues
  • Pay attention to refactors, dependency updates, and merge commits
  • If a past issue log matches, read it fully - it may contain the solution

平台分布

Codex

35.89%
按下载量换算31

Claude

30.57%
按下载量换算26

Cursor

18.78%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

9.92%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills