Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

review-gate(审查门)

review-gate 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

review-gate 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 59,000。

总安装 396周安装 17GitHub Stars 6下载 139核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:review-gate(审查门)
来源仓库:https://github.com/troykelly/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/review-gate
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/troykelly/claude-skills --skill review-gate
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/troykelly/claude-skills --skill review-gate

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

review-gate 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,注意是否触发联网或文件操作。

建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/review-gate

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/troykelly/claude-skills --skill review-gate;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

review-gate 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/troykelly/claude-skills --skill review-gate。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

review-gate 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

review-gate 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

review-gate 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

review-gate 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 396 次,近一周安装 17 次,下载 139 次,GitHub 6 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

review-gate 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
review-gate

审查门 · 本页

3966需要联网MIT有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Review Gate

Overview

Hard compliance gate that BLOCKS PR creation until review requirements are satisfied.

Core principle: No PR without proof of review. No exceptions.

This is enforced by hooks. Even if you attempt to skip this skill, the PreToolUse hook on gh pr create will block the action.

Gate Requirements

ALL must be satisfied to create a PR:

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                           REVIEW GATE                                     │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  [ ] Review artifact posted to issue (<!-- REVIEW:START --> format)      │
│  [ ] Review status is COMPLETE (not BLOCKED or IN_PROGRESS)              │
│  [ ] Unaddressed findings = 0                                            │
│  [ ] All deferred findings have tracking issues (linked in artifact)     │
│  [ ] Security review complete (if security-sensitive code changed)       │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  ALL SATISFIED → PR CREATION ALLOWED                                     │
│  ANY MISSING → PR CREATION BLOCKED                                       │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Verification Process

Step 1: Check Review Artifact Exists

# Query issue comments for review artifact
ISSUE_NUMBER=123
REPO=$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner --jq '.nameWithOwner')
REVIEW_EXISTS=$(gh api "/repos/$REPO/issues/$ISSUE_NUMBER/comments" \
  --jq '[.[] | select(.body | contains("<!-- REVIEW:START -->"))] | length')

if [ "$REVIEW_EXISTS" -eq 0 ]; then
  echo "BLOCKED: No review artifact found"
fi

Step 2: Parse Review Status

Extract from the latest review artifact:

# Get latest review comment
REVIEW_BODY=$(gh api "/repos/$REPO/issues/$ISSUE_NUMBER/comments" \
  --jq '[.[] | select(.body | contains("<!-- REVIEW:START -->"))] | last | .body')

# Check status
if echo "$REVIEW_BODY" | grep -q "Review Status.*COMPLETE"; then
  echo "Review status: COMPLETE"
elif echo "$REVIEW_BODY" | grep -q "Review Status.*BLOCKED"; then
  echo "BLOCKED: Review status is BLOCKED_ON_DEPENDENCIES"
fi

Step 3: Verify No Unaddressed Findings

# Extract unaddressed count
UNADDRESSED=$(echo "$REVIEW_BODY" | grep -oP 'Unaddressed[:\s|]+\K\d+' | head -1)

if [ "$UNADDRESSED" != "0" ]; then
  echo "BLOCKED: $UNADDRESSED unaddressed findings"
fi

Step 4: Verify Deferred Findings Have Tracking Issues

For each deferred finding, verify a tracking issue exists and is linked:

# Each deferred finding must have format: | Finding | ... | #NNN | ...
DEFERRED_WITHOUT_ISSUE=$(echo "$REVIEW_BODY" | grep -i "DEFERRED" | grep -cv "#[0-9]" || echo "0")

if [ "$DEFERRED_WITHOUT_ISSUE" -gt 0 ]; then
  echo "BLOCKED: $DEFERRED_WITHOUT_ISSUE deferred findings without tracking issues"
fi

Step 5: Security Review (Conditional)

If files matching security-sensitive patterns were changed:

# Check if security-sensitive files changed
SECURITY_FILES=$(git diff --name-only HEAD~1 | grep -E '(auth|security|middleware|api|password|token|secret)')

if [ -n "$SECURITY_FILES" ]; then
  # Verify security review section exists in artifact
  if ! echo "$REVIEW_BODY" | grep -q "Security-Sensitive.*YES"; then
    echo "BLOCKED: Security-sensitive files changed but no security review"
  fi
fi

Review Artifact Format

The review artifact MUST follow this exact format for machine parsing:

<!-- REVIEW:START -->
## Code Review Complete

| Property | Value |
|----------|-------|
| Worker | `[WORKER_ID]` |
| Issue | #[ISSUE_NUMBER] |
| Scope | [MINOR|MAJOR] |
| Security-Sensitive | [YES|NO] |
| Reviewed | [ISO_TIMESTAMP] |

### Criteria Results

| # | Criterion | Status | Findings |
|---|-----------|--------|----------|
| 1 | Blindspots | [✅ PASS|✅ FIXED|⚠️ DEFERRED] | [N] |
| 2 | Clarity | [✅ PASS|✅ FIXED|⚠️ DEFERRED] | [N] |
| 3 | Maintainability | [✅ PASS|✅ FIXED|⚠️ DEFERRED] | [N] |
| 4 | Security | [✅ PASS|✅ FIXED|⚠️ DEFERRED|N/A] | [N] |
| 5 | Performance | [✅ PASS|✅ FIXED|⚠️ DEFERRED] | [N] |
| 6 | Documentation | [✅ PASS|✅ FIXED|⚠️ DEFERRED] | [N] |
| 7 | Style | [✅ PASS|✅ FIXED|⚠️ DEFERRED] | [N] |

### Findings Fixed in This PR

| # | Severity | Finding | Resolution |
|---|----------|---------|------------|
| 1 | [SEVERITY] | [DESCRIPTION] | [HOW_FIXED] |

### Findings Deferred (With Tracking Issues)

| # | Severity | Finding | Tracking Issue | Justification |
|---|----------|---------|----------------|---------------|
| 1 | [SEVERITY] | [DESCRIPTION] | #[ISSUE] | [WHY] |

### Summary

| Category | Count |
|----------|-------|
| Fixed in PR | [N] |
| Deferred (with tracking) | [N] |
| Unaddressed | 0 |

**Review Status:** [✅ COMPLETE|⏸️ BLOCKED_ON_DEPENDENCIES]
<!-- REVIEW:END -->

Blocked Scenarios

Missing Review Artifact

REVIEW GATE BLOCKED

Reason: No review artifact found in issue #123

Required Action:
1. Perform comprehensive-review
2. Post review artifact to issue #123 using standard format
3. Address all findings or create tracking issues
4. Retry PR creation

Hint: Use the code-reviewer subagent to perform review.

Unaddressed Findings

REVIEW GATE BLOCKED

Reason: 3 unaddressed findings in review artifact

Required Action:
1. Fix the unaddressed findings, OR
2. Create tracking issues and update artifact with links
3. Ensure "Unaddressed: 0" in artifact summary
4. Retry PR creation

Missing Security Review

REVIEW GATE BLOCKED

Reason: Security-sensitive files changed without security review

Files detected:
- src/auth/login.ts
- src/middleware/authenticate.ts

Required Action:
1. Invoke security-reviewer subagent
2. Update review artifact with "Security-Sensitive: YES"
3. Document security review findings
4. Retry PR creation

Checklist

Before attempting PR creation:

  • comprehensive-review skill completed
  • Review artifact posted to issue (exact format)
  • All findings either FIXED or DEFERRED
  • All DEFERRED findings have tracking issues created
  • Tracking issue numbers in artifact
  • Security review if security-sensitive files changed
  • "Unaddressed: 0" in summary
  • "Review Status: COMPLETE"

Integration

This skill is enforced by:

  • PreToolUse hook on Bash (filters gh pr create)

This skill is called after:

  • comprehensive-review
  • apply-all-findings
  • security-review (if applicable)

This skill precedes:

  • pr-creation

平台分布

Claude Code

28.01%
按下载量换算39

Antigravity

22.4%
按下载量换算31

Gemini CLI

18.71%
按下载量换算26

Cursor

12.48%
按下载量换算17

kiro-cli

8.27%
按下载量换算11

windsurf

3.01%
按下载量换算4

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills