Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

review-analyst-agent(审查分析师 Agent)

review-analyst-agent 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

review-analyst-agent 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 46,467。

总安装 776周安装 33GitHub Stars 10下载 272核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:review-analyst-agent(审查分析师 Agent)
来源仓库:https://github.com/michaelboeding/skills
仓库路径:skills/review-analyst-agent
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/michaelboeding/skills --skill review-analyst-agent
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/michaelboeding/skills --skill review-analyst-agent

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

review-analyst-agent 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词快速定位候选结果。支持数据分析流程回溯与结论验证。通过任务背景或数据集描述输入,返回关键指标与逻辑链条复核建议。需确保输入数据真实有效,避免基于错误前提生成结论。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/review-analyst-agent

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/michaelboeding/skills --skill review-analyst-a…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

review-analyst-agent 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/michaelboeding/skills --skill review-analyst-agent。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

review-analyst-agent 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

review-analyst-agent 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

review-analyst-agent 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

review-analyst-agent 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 776 次,近一周安装 33 次,下载 272 次,GitHub 10 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

review-analyst-agent 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
review-analyst-agent

审查分析师 Agent · 本页

77610操作浏览器未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Review Analyst Agent

Analyze product reviews to find issues and prioritize improvements.

This skill uses 4 specialized agents that analyze reviews from different angles, then synthesizes into actionable recommendations.

What It Produces

OutputDescription
Sentiment OverviewOverall sentiment breakdown (positive/neutral/negative)
Top ComplaintsPrioritized list of issues by frequency and severity
Top PraiseWhat customers love (to protect/emphasize)
Feature RequestsWhat customers want that doesn't exist
Priority MatrixCritical/Important/Nice-to-have improvements
Action PlanSpecific recommendations with expected impact

Prerequisites

  • Web access for scraping reviews
  • No API keys required

Workflow

Step 1: Identify Product and Sources (REQUIRED)

⚠️ DO NOT skip this step. Use interactive questioning — ask ONE question at a time.

Question Flow

⚠️ Use the AskUserQuestion tool for each question below. Do not just print questions in your response — use the tool to create interactive prompts with the options shown.

Q1: Product

"I'll analyze reviews for your product! First — what's the product? *(Product name or URL)*"

*Wait for response.*

Q2: Sources

"Where should I look for reviews? - Amazon - App Store / Google Play - G2 / Capterra - Reddit - All of the above - Or specify"

*Wait for response.*

Q3: Context

"Is this your product or a competitor's? *(Helps frame the analysis)*"

*Wait for response.*

Q4: Issues

"Any known issues you want me to validate or explore? - Yes — describe them - No — find all issues"

*Wait for response.*

Quick Reference
QuestionDetermines
ProductWhat to analyze
SourcesWhere to scrape reviews
ContextFraming of recommendations
IssuesFocus areas for analysis

Step 2: Collect Reviews

Use browser tools to scrape reviews from:

Source TypePlatforms
E-commerceAmazon, Walmart, Target, Best Buy
SoftwareG2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Product Hunt
AppsApp Store, Google Play Store
GeneralTrustpilot, BBB, Yelp
SocialReddit, Twitter/X, YouTube comments
ForumsProduct-specific communities

Collect for each review:

  • Rating (if available)
  • Date
  • Review text
  • Helpful votes (if available)

Step 3: Run Specialized Analysis Agents in Parallel

Deploy 4 agents, each analyzing from a different perspective:

Agent 1: Review Scraper

Focus: Find and collect reviews from multiple sources

Tasks:
- Navigate to review platforms
- Extract review text and ratings
- Collect metadata (date, helpful votes)
- Handle pagination
- De-duplicate reviews
Agent 2: Sentiment Analyzer

Focus: Analyze sentiment and emotional patterns

Analyze:
- Overall sentiment (positive/neutral/negative)
- Emotional intensity
- Frustration indicators
- Satisfaction indicators
- Sentiment trends over time
Agent 3: Issue Identifier

Focus: Categorize complaints and find patterns

Identify:
- Common complaint themes
- Frequency of each issue
- Severity indicators
- Specific quotes as evidence
- Root cause patterns
Agent 4: Improvement Recommender

Focus: Prioritize and recommend fixes

Recommend:
- Priority ranking of issues
- Specific improvement suggestions
- Expected impact of each fix
- Quick wins vs long-term investments
- Competitive gaps to address

Step 4: Synthesize into Analysis Report

Combine all agent outputs into a structured report:

{
  "product": {
    "name": "Product Name",
    "sources_analyzed": ["Amazon (342 reviews)", "Reddit (89 posts)", "G2 (56 reviews)"],
    "total_reviews": 487,
    "date_range": "Jan 2025 - Jan 2026",
    "analysis_date": "2026-01-04"
  },
  "sentiment": {
    "overall_score": 3.8,
    "breakdown": {
      "positive": 62,
      "neutral": 18,
      "negative": 20
    },
    "trend": "Improving (up from 3.5 six months ago)",
    "net_promoter_estimate": 32
  },
  "top_complaints": [
    {
      "rank": 1,
      "issue": "Battery drains too fast",
      "frequency": 47,
      "percentage": "23% of negative reviews",
      "severity": "High",
      "sample_quotes": [
        "Battery only lasts 2 hours, not the 8 advertised",
        "Have to charge it 3x per day",
        "Battery life is a dealbreaker"
      ],
      "root_cause": "Hardware limitation or software optimization needed",
      "recommendation": "Improve battery capacity or optimize power consumption",
      "expected_impact": "Could improve rating by 0.3-0.5 stars"
    },
    {
      "rank": 2,
      "issue": "App crashes frequently",
      "frequency": 32,
      "percentage": "16% of negative reviews",
      "severity": "High",
      "sample_quotes": [
        "App crashes every time I try to sync",
        "Lost all my data after app crashed"
      ],
      "root_cause": "Sync functionality stability",
      "recommendation": "Stability audit of mobile app, fix crash on sync",
      "expected_impact": "Could reduce 1-star reviews by 15%"
    }
  ],
  "top_praise": [
    {
      "feature": "Build quality",
      "frequency": 89,
      "percentage": "45% of positive reviews",
      "sample_quotes": [
        "Feels premium in hand",
        "Solid construction, very durable"
      ],
      "recommendation": "Emphasize in marketing, protect in future versions"
    }
  ],
  "feature_requests": [
    {
      "request": "Water resistance",
      "frequency": 23,
      "sample_quotes": [
        "Wish I could use it in the rain",
        "Would pay extra for waterproof version"
      ],
      "recommendation": "Consider for v2 or premium tier"
    }
  ],
  "competitor_mentions": [
    {
      "competitor": "Competitor X",
      "context": "Switching from",
      "frequency": 15,
      "sentiment": "Mixed - some prefer us, some prefer them"
    }
  ],
  "priority_matrix": {
    "critical": [
      {"issue": "Battery life", "reason": "Top complaint, high severity"},
      {"issue": "App crashes", "reason": "Causes data loss, drives 1-star reviews"}
    ],
    "important": [
      {"issue": "Water resistance", "reason": "Frequent request, competitive gap"}
    ],
    "nice_to_have": [
      {"issue": "Color options", "reason": "Low frequency, low impact"}
    ]
  },
  "action_plan": [
    {
      "priority": 1,
      "action": "Fix app crash on sync",
      "effort": "Medium",
      "impact": "High",
      "expected_outcome": "Reduce 1-star reviews by 15%"
    },
    {
      "priority": 2,
      "action": "Improve battery life or set realistic expectations",
      "effort": "High",
      "impact": "High",
      "expected_outcome": "Improve rating by 0.3-0.5 stars"
    },
    {
      "priority": 3,
      "action": "Add water resistance to roadmap for v2",
      "effort": "High",
      "impact": "Medium",
      "expected_outcome": "Address top feature request"
    }
  ]
}

Step 5: Deliver Actionable Insights

Delivery message:

"✅ Review analysis complete!

Product: [Name] Reviews Analyzed: [Count] from [Sources] Overall Sentiment: [Score] ([Positive]% positive)

Top 3 Issues (by frequency):

  1. 🔴 [Issue 1] - [X]% of complaints
  2. 🔴 [Issue 2] - [X]% of complaints
  3. 🟡 [Issue 3] - [X]% of complaints

What Customers Love: ✅ [Praised feature 1] ✅ [Praised feature 2]

Priority Action: → Fix [Top Issue] first - expected to improve rating by [X]

Want me to:

  • Deep dive on any issue?
  • Compare to competitor reviews?
  • Track changes over time?
  • Create improvement roadmap?"

Integration with Other Agents

review-analyst-agent
    ↓ "Battery is top complaint"
product-engineer-agent
    ↓ "Design better battery solution"
patent-lawyer-agent
    ↓ "Check if solution is patentable"
copywriter-agent
    ↓ "Update marketing to address concern"
AgentHow It Uses Review Data
product-engineer-agentInform what to fix/improve
competitive-intel-agentCompare to competitor reviews
market-researcher-agentValidate market needs
copywriter-agentAddress concerns in marketing
pitch-deck-agentShow customer-centric improvements
media-utilsGenerate PDF report from analysis

Generate PDF Report

After completing the analysis, offer to generate a PDF:

"Would you like me to generate a PDF report of this review analysis?"
python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/media-utils/scripts/report_to_pdf.py \
  --input review_analysis.md \
  --output review_analysis.pdf \
  --title "Customer Review Analysis" \
  --style business

Agents

AgentFileFocus
Review Scraperreview-scraper.mdFind and collect reviews
Sentiment Analyzersentiment-analyzer.mdAnalyze sentiment patterns
Issue Identifierissue-identifier.mdCategorize complaints
Improvement Recommenderimprovement-recommender.mdPrioritize and recommend

Example Prompts

Your product:

"Analyze reviews for our Bluetooth headphones on Amazon"

Competitor:

"What are people complaining about with Notion?"

Comparison:

"Compare reviews of our product vs Competitor X"

Feature focus:

"Find feature requests for our mobile app from App Store and Reddit"

Priority:

"What should we fix first based on customer feedback?"

Trend:

"How has sentiment changed over the last 6 months?"

平台分布

Codex

40.06%
按下载量换算109

Claude

27.68%
按下载量换算75

Cursor

19.09%
按下载量换算52

Gemini CLI

9.18%
按下载量换算25

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills