Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

review-agents-md(审查 Agent 人 MD)

review-agents-md 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

review-agents-md 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 50,488。

总安装 612周安装 26GitHub Stars 56下载 214核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:review-agents-md(审查 Agent 人 MD)
来源仓库:https://github.com/richtabor/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/review-agents-md
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/richtabor/agent-skills --skill review-agents-md
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/richtabor/agent-skills --skill review-agents-md

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

review-agents-md 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词快速定位候选结果。支持多文档交叉比对与内容一致性检查。通过关键词或主题输入触发,返回相关段落与修订建议。安装前应核实权限范围,避免越权访问私有文档。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/review-agents-md

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/richtabor/agent-skills --skill review-agents-m…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

review-agents-md 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/richtabor/agent-skills --skill review-agents-md。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

review-agents-md 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

review-agents-md 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

review-agents-md 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

review-agents-md 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 612 次,近一周安装 26 次,下载 214 次,GitHub 56 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

review-agents-md 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
review-agents-md

审查 Agent 人 MD · 本页

61256需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

AGENTS.md Skill

Overview

Creates and refactors AGENTS.md files following progressive disclosure principles. Keeps files minimal and focused—avoiding the "ball of mud" that hurts agent performance.

When to Use

  • Proactively when a project has no AGENTS.md at the root — check for this when starting work in a new project
  • Creating a new AGENTS.md from scratch
  • Refactoring a bloated AGENTS.md
  • Reviewing an existing file for best practices
  • Setting up AGENTS.md for a monorepo
  • When AGENTS.md exists but CLAUDE.md is missing (should be symlinked)

Core Principles

  1. Minimal by default: Only include what's relevant to every single task
  2. Progressive disclosure: Point to separate files, external docs, or agent skills for domain-specific rules
  3. Never document file structure: It goes stale fast and poisons agent context
  4. Describe capabilities, not locations: "Auth uses JWT" not "Auth is in src/auth/"

The Instruction Budget

Frontier LLMs can follow ~150-200 instructions with reasonable consistency. Every token in AGENTS.md loads on every request, regardless of relevance. The ideal file should be as small as possible.

Why Files Get Bloated

Agent does something wrong → you add a rule → repeat hundreds of times → "ball of mud." Different developers add conflicting opinions. Nobody does a full style pass. Auto-generated files make this worse by prioritizing comprehensiveness over restraint.

Stale Docs Poison Context

Humans can be skeptical of outdated docs. Agents can't — they trust what they read on every request. File paths are especially dangerous since they change constantly. Describe capabilities and domain concepts instead.

Process

Phase 0: Detect Missing Files

Check the project root for AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md:

  1. If neither exists, offer to create AGENTS.md and symlink CLAUDE.md to it
  2. If AGENTS.md exists but CLAUDE.md does not, create the symlink: ln -s AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md
  3. If CLAUDE.md exists but AGENTS.md does not, rename it to AGENTS.md and create a symlink: mv CLAUDE.md AGENTS.md && ln -s AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md
  4. If both exist but CLAUDE.md is not a symlink to AGENTS.md, merge any unique content into AGENTS.md, remove the standalone CLAUDE.md, and create the symlink

Phase 1: Assess Current State

For new projects:

  • Ask about the project's purpose (one sentence)
  • Ask about package manager (if not npm)
  • Ask about non-standard build commands

For existing files:

  • Read the current AGENTS.md
  • Count lines and estimate token cost
  • Identify content that belongs elsewhere

Phase 2: Apply the Essential Test

Only these belong in root AGENTS.md:

IncludeWhy
One-sentence project descriptionAnchors every agent decision
Package manager (if not npm)Prevents wrong commands
Non-standard build/test commandsSaves trial and error
Links to domain-specific docsProgressive disclosure

Everything else goes in separate files or gets deleted.

Phase 3: Identify Anti-Patterns

Flag these for removal or relocation:

  • File tree structures: Always go stale, waste tokens
  • Obvious instructions: "Write clean code", "Use meaningful names"
  • Contradictory rules: Often from multiple contributors
  • Language-specific conventions: Move to docs/TYPESCRIPT.md etc.
  • Workflow instructions: Move to docs/GIT.md or docs/TESTING.md

Phase 4: Create Progressive Disclosure Structure

For content that shouldn't be deleted:

docs/
├── TYPESCRIPT.md    # TS conventions
├── TESTING.md       # Test patterns
├── API.md           # API design rules
└── GIT.md           # Commit/PR conventions

Reference these from AGENTS.md with light-touch pointers. Keep the tone conversational — no "ALWAYS," no all-caps forcing:

For TypeScript conventions, see docs/TYPESCRIPT.md

Each file can reference the next — agents walk the tree on demand, only loading what's relevant.

Link to external docs when they're the authoritative source rather than restating them:

For database migrations, follow the Prisma migration guide.

Agent skills are another layer of progressive disclosure. Instead of embedding procedures in AGENTS.md, package them as skills the agent pulls in when needed. The root file stays focused on *what* and *where*; skills handle *how*.

Phase 5: Handle Monorepos

For monorepos, use nested AGENTS.md files:

Root AGENTS.md:

Monorepo for [purpose]. Uses [pnpm/yarn] workspaces.
See each package's AGENTS.md for specifics.

Package AGENTS.md (e.g., packages/api/AGENTS.md):

GraphQL API using Prisma. See docs/API_CONVENTIONS.md for patterns.

Phase 6: Output

Provide:

  1. The new/refactored AGENTS.md content
  2. Any new files created for progressive disclosure
  3. List of removed content with reasoning

Output Format

When creating a new AGENTS.md:

# [Project Name]

[One-sentence description of what this project does.]

[Package manager if not npm]

[Non-standard commands if any]

[Light-touch pointers to separate docs if needed]

Example: Minimal AGENTS.md

# Acme Dashboard

React admin dashboard for managing customer accounts and billing.

Uses pnpm. Run `pnpm check` for type checking.

For API conventions, see docs/API.md
For component patterns, see docs/COMPONENTS.md

That's 6 lines. Every token earns its place.

Refactoring Prompt

When refactoring an existing bloated file, follow these steps:

  1. Find contradictions: Identify conflicting instructions. Ask which to keep.
  2. Identify essentials: Extract only what belongs in root — project description, package manager, non-standard commands, content relevant to every task.
  3. Group the rest: Organize into logical categories. Create separate files.
  4. Create structure: Output minimal root AGENTS.md with links to separate files.
  5. Flag for deletion: Identify instructions that are redundant, vague, or obvious.

Decision Framework

Before adding anything to AGENTS.md:

LocationWhen to use
Root AGENTS.mdRelevant to every single task
Separate fileRelevant to one domain
Nested docsFits hierarchical organization
Delete itObvious, redundant, or vague

Cross-Tool Compatibility

AGENTS.md is an open standard supported by 20+ tools including:

  • GitHub Copilot (Coding Agent)
  • Cursor
  • Codex (OpenAI)
  • Gemini CLI (Google)
  • Windsurf, Devin (Cognition)
  • Zed, Warp, VS Code
  • Aider, goose, RooCode

Claude Code uses CLAUDE.md instead. AGENTS.md is always the source of truth. CLAUDE.md must always be a symlink pointing to it:

ln -s AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md

Never create a standalone CLAUDE.md. Never put content in CLAUDE.md that isn't in AGENTS.md.

Resources

平台分布

Codex

33.8%
按下载量换算72

Claude

29.48%
按下载量换算63

Cursor

21.79%
按下载量换算47

Gemini CLI

9.48%
按下载量换算20

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills