Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

retrospective-facilitator(回顾促进者)

retrospective-facilitator 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

retrospective-facilitator 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 8,444。

总安装 16,351周安装 772GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 7,991核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:retrospective-facilitator(回顾促进者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/eddiebe147/claude-settings
仓库路径:skills/retrospective-facilitator
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/eddiebe147/claude-settings --skill 'Retrospective Facilitator'
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/eddiebe147/claude-settings --skill 'Retrospective Facilitator'

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

retrospective-facilitator 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/retrospective-facilitator

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/eddiebe147/claude-settings --skill 'Retrospect…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

retrospective-facilitator 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/eddiebe147/claude-settings --skill 'Retrospective Facili…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

retrospective-facilitator 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

retrospective-facilitator 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

retrospective-facilitator 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

retrospective-facilitator 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 16,351 次,近一周安装 772 次,下载 7,991 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

retrospective-facilitator 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
retrospective-facilitator

回顾促进者 · 本页

16,351—只读MIT未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Retrospective Facilitator

The Retrospective Facilitator skill helps teams conduct effective retrospectives that drive continuous improvement. It provides structured formats, facilitation techniques, and follow-through mechanisms to ensure retrospectives generate actionable insights rather than just venting sessions.

This skill excels at creating psychological safety, guiding productive discussions, synthesizing patterns from team feedback, facilitating prioritization of improvements, and ensuring action items are tracked and completed.

Retrospective Facilitator follows the Agile principle of continuous improvement: regularly reflect on what's working, what's not, and commit to specific improvements. The goal is learning and action, not blame or complaint.

Core Workflows

Workflow 1: Prepare for Retrospective

Before the meeting:

  1. Choose Retro Format

- Consider team mood and context - Vary format to keep it fresh (don't repeat same format every time) - Match format to situation: - Struggling team: Sailboat, Speed Car - Good velocity: Start/Stop/Continue, 4 L's - After incident: Timeline, Fishbone - New team: Hot Air Balloon, Mad/Sad/Glad - Prepare format-specific materials

  1. Review Data

- Sprint metrics (velocity, burndown) - Completed vs. committed work - Bug counts and quality metrics - Team happiness/satisfaction scores - Previous retro action items (were they done?)

  1. Set Up Space

- Book meeting room or set up virtual board (Miro, Mural, FigJam) - Prepare timers and collaboration tools - Create sections for chosen format - Ensure everyone can participate equally

  1. Remind Team

- Send reminder with time and location - Share retro format in advance - Ask team to come prepared with thoughts - Emphasize psychological safety and respect

Output: Prepared retro environment with chosen format and data review.

Workflow 2: Facilitate Retrospective Session

Time-box: 60 minutes for 2-week sprint

Phase 1: Set the Stage (5 min)

Purpose: Create safe space and focus attention

  1. Welcome team and state purpose
  2. Review retro norms:

- Vegas rule: What's said here, stays here - No blame, focus on learning - Everyone's input matters equally - Assume good intent

  1. Brief check-in: One word to describe sprint
  2. Review previous action items (were they done?)
Phase 2: Gather Data (15 min)

Purpose: Collect team's observations and feelings

  1. Introduce retro format and sections
  2. Silent writing (5-10 min):

- Each person adds sticky notes to board - Encourage specific examples, not generalizations - Quantity over quality at this stage

  1. Read and cluster (5 min):

- Quick readout of all items (no discussion yet) - Group similar themes together - Facilitator or team members can cluster

Formats include:

  • Start/Stop/Continue
  • Mad/Sad/Glad
  • 4 L's (Liked/Learned/Lacked/Longed For)
  • Sailboat (Wind/Anchor/Rocks/Island)
  • Plus/Delta
  • Timeline
Phase 3: Generate Insights (15 min)

Purpose: Find patterns and understand root causes

  1. Identify themes:

- Which clusters have most items? - What patterns emerge? - Any surprises or new insights?

  1. Discussion:

- Dive deeper into top 3-5 themes - Ask "why" to get to root causes (5 Whys technique) - Ensure all voices heard - Facilitator keeps discussion productive

  1. Vote on priorities (optional):

- Each person gets 3-5 votes - Vote on issues most important to address - Focuses improvement efforts

Phase 4: Decide What to Do (15 min)

Purpose: Commit to specific improvements

  1. Choose 1-3 improvements:

- Based on voting and discussion - Must be specific and actionable - Achievable within next sprint

  1. Create action items:

- For each improvement: - What specifically will we do? - Who will own it? - When will it be done? - How will we know it worked? - Use SMART criteria (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound)

  1. Commitment:

- Team agrees to action items - Add to sprint backlog or tracking system - Set reminder to check progress

Phase 5: Close (10 min)

Purpose: End on positive note and confirm next steps

  1. Summarize:

- Recap key insights - Confirm action items and owners - Appreciate participation and candor

  1. Retro the retro:

- Quick feedback: "On scale of 1-5, how useful was this retro?" - What worked well about this format? - What would improve future retros?

  1. Appreciations:

- Invite team to appreciate each other - Recognize contributions and efforts - End on positive, forward-looking note

Output: 1-3 concrete action items with owners and due dates.

Workflow 3: Follow Up on Action Items

During sprint:

  1. Add action items to sprint backlog
  2. Track in standup or project board
  3. Check progress mid-sprint
  4. Remove blockers if action items stuck

At next retro:

  1. Review previous action items first
  2. Celebrate completed items
  3. Discuss why any items weren't completed
  4. Decide: continue, discard, or modify incomplete items

Monthly:

  1. Review trend of action items completed vs. created
  2. Assess if improvements are having impact
  3. Adjust retro approach if low completion rate

Workflow 4: Handle Difficult Situations

Conflict or tension emerges:

  • Acknowledge the emotion
  • Remind team of retro norms
  • Refocus on learning, not blame
  • Park heated topics for separate discussion

Team is silent or disengaged:

  • Check in: "What's going on?"
  • Try different activity (e.g., timeline, drawing)
  • Make it safe: share your own observation first
  • Consider anonymous submission

Same issues appear every retro:

  • Acknowledge the pattern explicitly
  • Deeper root cause analysis
  • Escalate to management if team can't resolve
  • Question if previous action items were right approach

Blame or finger-pointing:

  • Reframe to system/process issue
  • "What conditions allowed this to happen?"
  • Shift focus to future: "How can we prevent this?"

Quick Reference

ActionCommand/Trigger
Run retrospective"facilitate retrospective"
Choose format"suggest retro format"
Review action items"check retro action items"
Retro template"create retro board for [format]"
Handle conflict"retro facilitation help"

Best Practices

  • Vary the format: Don't use same format every time; keeps it fresh and surfaces different insights
  • Psychological safety first: Without safety, you get polite agreement not honest feedback
  • Time-box strictly: Respect people's time; focused 60 min better than rambling 90 min
  • Review previous actions: If action items never get done, why create more?
  • 1-3 improvements max: Can't fix everything; focus creates momentum
  • Make it specific: "Better communication" is vague; "Daily standup by 10 AM" is actionable
  • No skipping: Regular cadence builds trust and habit; don't skip even if "nothing to discuss"
  • Rotate facilitator: Different facilitators bring fresh perspective and energy
  • Data not opinions: Use metrics to ground discussion in reality
  • Focus on learning: "What did we learn?" not "Who screwed up?"
  • Appreciate the good: Don't only focus on problems; recognize wins and strengths
  • Follow through: If action items are never completed, team stops trusting the process

Retro Formats

1. Start/Stop/Continue

Best for: General-purpose, works for any team

Categories:

  • Start: What should we start doing?
  • Stop: What should we stop doing?
  • Continue: What should we keep doing?

Facilitator tips:

  • "Continue" often forgotten; actively solicit positive practices
  • Look for items in "Start" that directly address items in "Stop"

2. Mad/Sad/Glad

Best for: High emotion, after difficult sprint

Categories:

  • Mad: What frustrated or angered us?
  • Sad: What disappointed us?
  • Glad: What made us happy?

Facilitator tips:

  • Validates emotions while channeling toward improvement
  • Ensure "Glad" gets equal attention; don't only focus on negative

3. 4 L's

Best for: Learning-focused teams, after new initiative

Categories:

  • Liked: What went well?
  • Learned: What did we learn?
  • Lacked: What was missing?
  • Longed For: What do we wish we had?

Facilitator tips:

  • "Learned" surfaces insights for knowledge sharing
  • "Longed For" uncovers team needs and aspirations

4. Sailboat

Best for: Strategic thinking, longer-term planning

Categories:

  • Island: Our goal
  • Wind: What's helping us move forward?
  • Anchor: What's holding us back?
  • Rocks: What risks are ahead?

Facilitator tips:

  • Start with Island (shared goal) for alignment
  • Visual metaphor helps creative thinking

5. Speed Car

Best for: Team moving fast but maybe recklessly

Categories:

  • Engine: What's driving us forward?
  • Parachute: What's slowing us down?
  • Bridge: What's helping us move forward?
  • Wall: What obstacles are in our way?

Facilitator tips:

  • Highlights both accelerators and decelerators
  • Good for discussing pace and sustainability

6. Plus/Delta

Best for: Simple, quick retros

Categories:

  • Plus (+): What went well?
  • Delta (Δ): What should we change?

Facilitator tips:

  • Fast and straightforward
  • Use when time is limited
  • Delta is less negative-sounding than "minus"

7. Timeline

Best for: After major event, incident, or complex sprint

Process:

  1. Draw timeline of sprint/event
  2. Each person adds significant moments
  3. Identify patterns and turning points
  4. Discuss what to learn and change

Facilitator tips:

  • Helps reconstruct complex situations
  • Reveals different perspectives on same events

8. Hot Air Balloon

Best for: New teams or after major changes

Categories:

  • Hot Air: What lifts us up? (strengths, opportunities)
  • Sandbags: What weighs us down? (challenges, obstacles)
  • Storm Clouds: What external threats exist?
  • Clear Skies: What opportunities lie ahead?

Facilitator tips:

  • Good for team building and shared vision
  • Balances internal and external factors

5 Whys Technique

Use for root cause analysis:

  1. State the problem
  2. Ask "Why did this happen?" → Answer
  3. Ask "Why did [answer] happen?" → Answer
  4. Repeat 3-5 times until root cause emerges
  5. Create action item addressing root cause

Example:

  • Problem: Tests failed in production
  • Why? → Code wasn't tested in staging
  • Why? → Staging environment was down
  • Why? → No monitoring to detect outage
  • Why? → We haven't prioritized infrastructure monitoring
  • Action: Implement infrastructure monitoring and alerts

Action Item Template

**Improvement**: [Brief description]

**Action**: [Specific thing we will do]
**Owner**: [Name of person responsible]
**Due Date**: [When will this be complete]
**Success Criteria**: [How we'll know it worked]

**Example**:
Improvement: Reduce context switching during sprint
Action: Implement "No meeting Thursdays" for deep work
Owner: Sarah (Engineering Manager)
Due Date: Start next sprint (Feb 15)
Success Criteria: Team reports 4+ hour uninterrupted work blocks on Thursdays

Facilitation Anti-Patterns

Avoid these common mistakes:

  • Facilitator dominating: Your job is to guide, not provide all answers
  • Skipping action items: Retro without actions is just venting
  • No follow-up: If actions never reviewed, team stops trying
  • Same format every time: Becomes stale and predictable
  • Letting discussions run over: Time-boxing shows respect
  • Not addressing elephants: Ignoring obvious issues kills trust
  • Making it personal: Focus on systems and processes, not people
  • Too many actions: 1-3 is realistic; 10 is overwhelming
  • Vague improvements: "Communicate better" isn't actionable
  • Skipping when busy: "No time for retro" signals improvement isn't valued

Psychological Safety Checklist

Before and during retro, ensure:

  • Team knows feedback is confidential
  • All voices are heard equally
  • Disagreement is welcome and safe
  • Blame and judgment are absent
  • Failures are treated as learning opportunities
  • Leadership models vulnerability and openness
  • Retaliating for honesty has consequences
  • Anonymous input is option if needed

Integration Points

  • Sprint Planner: Schedule retro at end of every sprint
  • Task Manager: Track retro action items as tasks
  • Project Planner: Feed learnings into future planning
  • Team Metrics: Use data to inform discussion
  • Knowledge Base: Document key learnings and patterns
  • Continuous Improvement: Trends across retros inform process changes

平台分布

Claude Code

28.51%
按下载量换算2,278

OpenCode

22.94%
按下载量换算1,833

Gemini CLI

16.66%
按下载量换算1,331

Antigravity

10.86%
按下载量换算868

windsurf

7.65%
按下载量换算611

Cursor

3.03%
按下载量换算242

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills