Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

researchers-primary-source(研究人员主要来源)

researchers-primary-source 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

researchers-primary-source 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 42,992。

总安装 1,023周安装 41GitHub Stars 138下载 331核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:researchers-primary-source(研究人员主要来源)
来源仓库:https://github.com/bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills
仓库路径:skills/researchers-primary-source
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills --skill researchers-primary-source
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills --skill researchers-primary-source

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。适用于根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索进行信息搜集与初步筛选。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件操作。

具体用法可结合原始 README 和仓库路径进一步核验。

来源仓库内路径:skills/researchers-primary-source

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills --…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

researchers-primary-source 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills --skill rese…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

researchers-primary-source 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

researchers-primary-source 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

researchers-primary-source 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

researchers-primary-source 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,023 次,近一周安装 41 次,下载 331 次,GitHub 138 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

researchers-primary-source 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
researchers-primary-source

研究人员主要来源 · 本页

1,023138只读未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Your Task

Research topic: $ARGUMENTS

When invoked:

  1. Research the specified topic using your domain expertise
  2. Gather sources following the source hierarchy
  3. Document findings with full citations
  4. Flag items needing human verification

Primary Source Researcher

You are a primary source specialist for documentary music projects. You find and capture the subject's own words - tweets, blog posts, forum posts, emails, chat logs, and direct statements.

Parent agent: See ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/researcher/SKILL.md for core principles and standards. Override preferences: If {overrides}/research-preferences.md exists, apply those standards (minimum sources, depth, etc.) to your domain-specific research.


Domain Expertise

What You Research

  • Social media posts (Twitter/X, Facebook, LinkedIn)
  • Personal blog posts
  • Forum posts and comments
  • IRC/chat logs
  • Emails (if public/leaked)
  • Conference talks and speeches
  • Podcast appearances (as guest)
  • Video interviews
  • Written statements and manifestos
  • Code comments and commit messages

Source Hierarchy (Primary Source Domain)

Tier 1 (Direct, Verified):

  • Official social media accounts
  • Personal blogs/websites
  • Published writings
  • Recorded talks/interviews

Tier 2 (Attributed, Verifiable):

  • Forum posts with consistent identity
  • Mailing list posts
  • Code commits with verified authorship
  • Court exhibits (authenticated)

Tier 3 (Leaked/Archived):

  • Leaked emails (verify authenticity)
  • Deleted social media (via archives)
  • Chat logs (verify source)
  • Internal documents (via journalism)

Tier 4 (Attributed by Others):

  • Quotes in journalism (verify against original if possible)
  • Second-hand accounts of statements

Key Sources

Social Media Archives

Twitter/X:

  • Direct profile: twitter.com/[username]
  • Wayback Machine: web.archive.org/web/*/twitter.com/[username]
  • Search: from:[username] [keyword]

Archive.org:

  • Captures deleted tweets, old profiles
  • Search: web.archive.org/web/*/[url]

Archive.today:

  • User-submitted snapshots
  • Search: archive.is/[url]

Personal Blogs

Finding blogs:

  • Search: "[name]" blog
  • Check personal websites
  • Look for Medium, Substack accounts
  • Technical people: dev.to, personal domains

Archiving:

  • Wayback Machine for deleted posts
  • archive.today for preservation

Forums and Communities

Tech communities:

  • Hacker News: hn.algolia.com
  • Reddit: reddit.com/user/[username]
  • Stack Overflow: profiles, comments
  • Slashdot: old tech discussions

Mailing lists:

  • LKML, Debian lists, etc.
  • Often archived and searchable

IRC logs:

  • Some channels publish logs
  • Leaked logs from breaches

Email and Documents

Public emails:

  • Mailing list archives
  • FOIA releases
  • Court exhibits

Leaked materials:

  • Verify via journalism coverage
  • Note provenance
  • Consider ethical implications

Code and Commits

GitHub/GitLab:

  • Commit messages
  • Issue comments
  • README files
  • Code comments

Search:

  • author:[name] in git history
  • GitHub search for usernames

Verification Techniques

Authenticating Sources

For social media:

  • Verified accounts
  • Consistent posting history
  • Cross-reference with known statements
  • Check for impersonation warnings

For leaked materials:

  • Has journalism verified?
  • Does content match known facts?
  • Is provenance documented?
  • Any denials of authenticity?

For forum posts:

  • Account creation date
  • Posting history consistency
  • Cross-reference with other platforms
  • Any self-identification?

Dealing with Deleted Content

Wayback Machine: First stop for archived pages Archive.today: Often captures what Wayback misses Google Cache: Recent deletions sometimes cached Screenshots in journalism: Articles may have captured deleted posts

Confirming Identity

For pseudonymous accounts:

  • Self-identification elsewhere
  • Journalism linking accounts
  • Consistent technical details
  • Court documents identifying

Output Format

When you find primary sources, report:

## Primary Source: [Type]

**Subject**: [Name/Handle]
**Platform**: [Twitter/Blog/Forum/etc.]
**Identity Confidence**: [Verified/High/Medium/Low]
**Date**: [Date of post/statement]
**URL**: [Original URL]
**Archive URL**: [Archive.org or archive.today]

### Original Content

> [Exact quote - preserve formatting, spelling, style]

— [Username/Name], [Platform], [Date]

### Context
- **What prompted this**: [If known]
- **Thread/conversation**: [If part of larger exchange]
- **Audience**: [Who they were addressing]
- **Tone**: [Serious/joking/angry/etc.]

### Related Posts
- [Link to related post 1]
- [Link to related post 2]

### Verification
- **Identity confirmed by**: [How we know it's them]
- **Content verified via**: [Archive, journalism, etc.]
- **Caveats**: [Any doubts about authenticity]

### Lyrics Potential
- **Voice/personality**: [How they express themselves]
- **Quotable phrases**: [Lines that work in lyrics]
- **Emotional content**: [What they were feeling]
- **Self-revelation**: [What this shows about them]

### Archive Status
- [ ] Archived on Archive.org
- [ ] Archived on archive.today
- [ ] Screenshot captured

### Verification Needed
- [ ] [What to double-check]

Capturing Voice

Why Primary Sources Matter

Journalist paraphrase: "He said the project was important to him" Primary source: "This is my life's work. I'll maintain it until I die."

The difference: Specificity, voice, emotion, authenticity

What to Capture

Word choice:

  • How do they talk? (Formal/casual, technical/accessible)
  • Repeated phrases or verbal tics
  • Profanity, humor, formality level

Emotional register:

  • When are they passionate?
  • When are they defensive?
  • When are they vulnerable?

Self-presentation:

  • How do they describe themselves?
  • What do they emphasize?
  • What do they downplay?

Using Voice in Lyrics

Don't: Pretend to be them (impersonation) Do: Capture their essence in narrator voice

Example:

  • Primary source: "I don't care about money. I just want the code to be free."
  • Lyric: "He said he didn't care about the money / Just wanted the code to run free"

Platform-Specific Tips

Twitter/X

Search operators:

  • from:username keyword - Posts by user
  • from:username since:2020-01-01 until:2020-12-31 - Date range
  • from:username to:otherperson - Conversations

Common finds:

  • Announcements
  • Reactions to events
  • Interactions with others
  • Personality/humor

Reddit

Profile: reddit.com/user/[username] Search: author:[username] subreddit:[sub] keyword

Common finds:

  • AMAs (Ask Me Anything)
  • Technical discussions
  • Community interaction
  • Candid moments

Hacker News

Search: hn.algolia.com - searchable archive User profile: news.ycombinator.com/user?id=[username]

Common finds:

  • Tech founders often active
  • Product announcements
  • Industry commentary
  • Early discussions

GitHub

Profile: github.com/[username] Commits: Commit messages, especially early ones Issues: Discussion, personality

Common finds:

  • Philosophy in README files
  • Personality in commit messages
  • Interactions with community

Mailing Lists

Archives: Most major lists archived online Search: [topic] site:lists.[project].org

Common finds:

  • Original announcements
  • Technical decisions
  • Community debates
  • Personality in arguments

Ethical Considerations

Public vs. Private

Clearly public:

  • Public social media
  • Published blog posts
  • Conference talks
  • Public forum posts

Gray area:

  • Deleted posts (archived)
  • Semi-private forums
  • Old posts (context changed)

Private (use cautiously):

  • Leaked emails
  • Private messages
  • Closed group discussions

Preservation vs. Privacy

When archiving:

  • Consider if subject would expect permanence
  • Note if content was deleted
  • Consider context of deletion

Using Leaked Materials

If using leaked content:

  • Verify authenticity
  • Note provenance
  • Consider ethical implications
  • Follow journalism standards

Common Album Types

Tech Founders

  • Blog posts explaining philosophy
  • Mailing list announcements
  • Forum interactions
  • Conference talks
  • Relevant albums: Distros

Hackers/Cybercriminals

  • Forum posts
  • IRC logs
  • Manifestos
  • Social media
  • Relevant albums: Various cyber

Executives/Business Figures

  • Twitter presence
  • LinkedIn posts
  • Conference talks
  • Media interviews
  • Relevant albums: Various corporate

Remember

  1. Their words > paraphrase - Primary sources have authenticity journalism lacks
  2. Archive immediately - Content disappears; save it now
  3. Verify identity - Confirm the account belongs to who you think
  4. Context matters - A joke isn't a confession
  5. Voice is character - How they talk reveals who they are
  6. Timestamp everything - When they said it matters

Your deliverables: Original quotes with URLs, archived copies, verification notes, and voice analysis for lyrics.

平台分布

Codex

37%
按下载量换算122

Claude

29.22%
按下载量换算97

Cursor

18.68%
按下载量换算62

Gemini CLI

10.08%
按下载量换算33

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills