Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

research-planner(研究规划师)

research-planner 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

research-planner 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 15,309。

总安装 7,950周安装 338GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 2,785核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:research-planner(研究规划师)
来源仓库:https://github.com/nkz55/research-planner
安装命令:
openclaw skills install research-planner
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install research-planner

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

research-planner 设计市场和用户研究计划框架。重点关注研究方法选择与材料创作指导。包含筛选标准、调查问卷、访谈指南等工具。适用于产品团队开展前期调研工作。research-planner 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。提供可用性任务设计与执行方案建议。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install research-planner;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

research-planner 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install research-planner。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

research-planner 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

research-planner 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

research-planner 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

research-planner 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 7,950 次,近一周安装 338 次,下载 2,785 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

research-planner 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
research-planner

研究规划师 · 本页

7,950—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
research-planner
description
>

Installation

Via Clawdhub:

clawdhub install research-planner

Manual Installation:

npx skills add https://github.com/NKZ55/research-planner/tree/main/skills/research-planner

Research Planner

Market and user research planning skill focused on research design and documentation, not on data analysis.

This skill is inspired by systematic frameworks from:

  • User/UX research books

- Erika Hall, *Just Enough Research* (research strategy, scoping, stakeholder alignment) - Steve Portigal, *Interviewing Users* (study design and interview materials) - C. J. Hoefflich & Jeff Sauro, *Quantifying the User Experience* (quantitative UX measures and study design – used here for planning, not analysis)

  • Market research and consulting

- Naresh Malhotra, *Marketing Research* (problem definition → research design → data collection plan) - McKinsey-style hypothesis-driven, MECE research framing (issue trees, key questions, assumptions)

  • Online frameworks

- Nielsen Norman Group research-planning guidance (research plans, research methods overview) - Practice-oriented UX research strategy guides such as The Ultimate Guide to Research Strategy

This skill helps the agent:

  • Select appropriate research methods given the user's goal, constraints, and audience
  • Turn a chosen method into concrete research artifacts (screeners, questionnaires, discussion guides, task lists, etc.)
  • Structure research projects into clear phases and deliverables

Data analysis (qualitative coding, statistical analysis, report writing) is explicitly out of scope and should be delegated to analysis-focused skills (for example, interview-analysis skills such as Interview Analyst).

Scope

  • In scope

- Clarifying research objectives and hypotheses - Choosing suitable research methods (e.g., in-depth interviews, usability tests, surveys, diary studies, field research, concept tests) - Designing multi-method research plans (mixed methods) - Drafting all research materials needed to run the study: - Recruitment screeners and eligibility criteria - Participant invitation text and consent wording - Interview and discussion guides - Usability test task scripts and success criteria - Survey questionnaires and question wording - Moderator notes and observation templates - Structuring timelines, milestones, and required roles for execution

  • Out of scope

- Cleaning, transforming, or aggregating collected data - Coding qualitative data or running statistical tests - Creating insights decks, final research reports, or recommendations - Any task that belongs to the separate analysis/reporting skills

Phase Model

Use this phase model for every project. This skill covers only the planning and documentation phases.

Problem framing
   ↓
Research strategy & method selection
   ↓
Study plan & logistics
   ↓
Research materials (screeners, guides, surveys, scripts)
   ↓
Fieldwork / data collection  [OUT OF SCOPE]
   ↓
Analysis & reporting         [OUT OF SCOPE – use analysis skills]

How to Use This Skill

For each user request:

  1. Clarify the research need
  2. Choose appropriate research approach(es)
  3. Turn the approach into a concrete study plan
  4. Generate the necessary research materials
  5. Package everything into an execution-ready bundle

Always keep analysis out of scope and gently point users to analysis skills once data is collected.


Step 1: Clarify the Research Need

Before suggesting methods, derive a clear, consulting-style problem framing.

  • Clarify business and research goals

- What decision will this research inform? - What would success look like for stakeholders? - What hypotheses or assumptions are we testing?

  • Define target users and context

- Which segment(s), roles, geographies, or usage patterns matter? - In what context does the behavior occur (device, channel, environment)?

  • Map constraints

- Timeframe, budget, required sample size or coverage - Access to participants (existing users, prospects, internal staff)

Output for this step:

  • A short Problem Statement
  • 3–7 Key Questions (MECE where possible)
  • A list of Assumptions / Hypotheses to probe

Step 2: Choose Research Approach(es)

Use a small set of canonical user and market research methods. Combine methods when appropriate (mixed methods).

Method-Selection Matrix

Primary goalTypical method(s)Notes
Explore unknown problem space1:1 in-depth interviews, contextual inquiry, diaryDiscovery / generative research
Evaluate usability of an experienceModerated usability tests, unmoderated remote testsTask-based, scenario-driven
Measure attitudes or behaviors at scaleStructured survey, poll, simple experimentRequires clear constructs and metrics
Compare concepts or ideasConcept testing sessions, preference tests, card sortsMay combine with interview or survey
Understand real-world contextField visits, observation, shadowing, diary studyHigher logistics cost

Method choice should balance:

  • Stage (discovery vs validation vs evaluation)
  • Decision type (go/no-go, prioritization, design iteration, positioning)
  • Practical constraints (timeline, recruiting, tools already in use)

When recommending methods:

  • Propose 1–2 primary methods plus any lightweight secondary methods
  • Briefly justify each method in terms of the user’s goals and constraints

Step 3: Turn the Approach into a Study Plan

Following both classic marketing-research texts and NN/g research-plan guidance, every study plan should cover at least:

  • Background & Objectives

- Context, problem statement, business goals - Research objectives and key questions

  • Methodology Overview

- Chosen methods and rationale - Study type (exploratory, descriptive, causal; formative vs summative)

  • Participants

- Target population and segments - Inclusion / exclusion criteria - Planned sample size and justification

  • Procedure

- Study phases (pilot, main fieldwork) - Session format (remote vs in-person, moderated vs unmoderated) - High-level flow or timeline

  • Roles and Responsibilities

- Researcher, moderator, note-taker, stakeholders

  • Risks and Ethical Considerations

- Consent, privacy, incentives, sensitive topics

When the user asks for a plan, structure your answer in these sections and keep wording concise enough that it can be copy-pasted into a research plan document.


Step 4: Generate Research Materials

For each chosen method, generate concrete artifacts. Keep templates modular so they can be reused across projects.

4.1 Recruitment Screener

Structure:

  • Study title and short purpose (participant-facing)
  • Eligibility questions

- Must-have criteria (knock-out logic) - Nice-to-have criteria (for quota balancing)

  • Disqualification rules (e.g., professional researchers, competitors)
  • Demographic / firmographic questions only as necessary

Make the screener:

  • Simple enough for non-researchers to administer
  • Explicit about inclusion/exclusion logic

4.2 Participant Invitation & Consent Wording

Include:

  • Plain-language description of the study’s purpose
  • What participation involves (time, activities, recording)
  • Incentive and payment process
  • Privacy and confidentiality statement
  • Contact for questions or withdrawal

Ensure consent text is non-legalistic but clear; defer to the user’s legal or compliance team for final approval.

4.3 Interview / Discussion Guide

For qualitative interviews, base structure on best practices from interview-focused texts:

  • Introduction and warm-up
  • Core sections aligned to key questions or themes
  • Probing prompts and follow-ups (avoid leading questions)
  • Wrap-up, closing questions, and thanks

Organize the guide as:

  • Section headings (themes)
  • Bullet-point questions and probes
  • Optional timing guidance per section

4.4 Usability Test Script

Components:

  • Study intro (purpose, disclaimers, think-aloud instructions)
  • Task list

- Realistic scenarios framed in user language - Clear success criteria per task - Space for observers to note observations

  • Closing questions (short interview or satisfaction questions)

Include simple moderator cues (what to read verbatim, when to stay silent, when to probe).

4.5 Survey Questionnaire

When planning surveys, follow quantitative UX and survey-design guidance:

  • Map each construct (e.g., satisfaction, trust, task success) to specific items
  • Prefer simple, unambiguous wording
  • Choose scale types consistently (e.g., 5- or 7-point Likert, yes/no, NPS)
  • Keep survey as short as possible while still answering key questions

Output:

  • Ordered list of questions
  • Response options and scale labels
  • Any skip logic or branching described in plain language

Step 5: Package an Execution-Ready Output

Default response format for this skill:

# Research Plan Overview

## 1. Background & Objectives
[Problem statement, context, objectives]

## 2. Research Approach
- Primary method(s): [...]
- Secondary method(s): [...]
- Rationale: [...]

## 3. Participants
- Target: [...]
- Inclusion / exclusion: [...]
- Sample size and rationale: [...]

## 4. Procedure & Timeline
[Study phases, session format, key milestones]

## 5. Risks & Ethics
[Key ethical considerations, data handling notes]

## 6. Research Materials
- Recruitment screener
- Invitation & consent text
- Interview / test script / survey questions

Populate each section with concrete, copy-paste-ready content tailored to the user’s situation.


Phases Overview

For more detailed step-by-step guidance, this skill includes phase files under phases/:

  • phases/01-clarify-need.md

- Use when you need to deeply clarify the research need, decisions, target users, and constraints. - Expands Step 1 into a full workflow for: - Business context and decisions. - Research objectives and key questions. - Target users and context. - Constraints and a one-page Phase 1 summary.

  • phases/02-method-selection-and-plan.md

- Use when moving from clarified need to method selection and a full research plan. - Expands Steps 2–3 into: - Mapping objectives to research types (exploratory, descriptive, evaluative, causal). - Selecting single or mixed methods. - Drafting a structured research plan (background, methodology, participants, procedure, risks).

  • phases/03-materials-and-logistics.md

- Use when turning the approved plan into research materials and an operational schedule. - Expands Steps 4–5 into: - Mapping plan components to required artifacts (screener, guide, script, survey, etc.). - Drafting and refining materials using the templates. - Creating timelines, roles, and operational checklists.

When a user task is complex (e.g., multi-method study, multiple stakeholders, long timeline), prefer:

  1. Following the relevant phases/ file(s) for process and structure.
  2. Using the templates/ files for concrete artifact formats.

Templates Overview

This skill is bundled with detailed templates under templates/. Use them as follows:

  • Research planning and alignment

- When the user asks for a research plan or study proposal, read: - templates/research-plan-template.md - When the user needs stakeholder alignment or a kickoff agenda, read: - templates/stakeholder-kickoff-template.md - templates/stakeholder-walkthrough-template.md - When scoping what is out of scope and defining future research needs, read: - templates/out-of-scope-and-research-needs-template.md - When grounding a study in existing knowledge with a desk/literature review, read: - templates/literature-review-template.md

  • Consent and ethics

- For any study involving human participants (interviews, usability tests, diary studies, etc.), read: - templates/uxr-consent-form-template.md

  • Interview- and workshop-based methods

- For qualitative interviews or discussions, read: - templates/interview-guide-template.md - For focus groups, read: - templates/focus-group-template.md - For persona workshops and persona documentation, read: - templates/persona-workshop-and-template.md - For stakeholder discovery sessions, read: - templates/stakeholder-walkthrough-template.md - For brainstorming/ideation sessions, read: - templates/brainstorming-template.md

  • Usability and UX evaluation

- For moderated usability testing, read: - templates/usability-test-script-template.md - For expert reviews of flows or UI, read: - templates/expert-review-template.md - For heuristic evaluations, read: - templates/heuristic-evaluation-template.md - For rapid iterative testing (RITE), read: - templates/rapid-iterative-testing-rite-template.md - For eye-tracking studies, read: - templates/eye-tracking-template.md - For A/B tests / online experiments, read: - templates/ab-test-template.md

  • Information architecture and navigation

- For card sorting (mental models, IA exploration), read: - templates/card-sorting-template.md - For tree testing (validating IA structure), read: - templates/tree-testing-template.md

  • Surveys and satisfaction measurement

- For customer satisfaction surveys (CSAT, NPS + drivers), read: - templates/customer-satisfaction-surveys-template.md - For recruitment screeners and survey structures, read: - templates/screener-and-survey-template.md

  • Contextual and longitudinal methods

- For contextual inquiry / field visits, read: - templates/contextual-inquiry-template.md - For diary studies, read: - templates/diary-study-template.md - For shadowing and associated note-taking, read: - templates/shadowing-template.md - templates/shadowing-notes-template.md - For ethnographic or deep contextual work, read: - templates/ethnography-template.md

  • Strategy, jobs, and journeys

- For Jobs to Be Done (JTBD) framing, read: - templates/jobs-to-be-done-template.md - For gap analyses (current vs desired experience or capability), read: - templates/gap-analysis-template.md - For user journeys / experience maps, read: - templates/journey-map-template.md - For competitive or comparative analysis, read: - templates/competitive-analysis-template.md - For Kano analysis of feature satisfaction, read: - templates/kano-analysis-template.md

  • Visualization and empathy tools

- For empathy maps, read: - templates/empathy-map-template.md - For storyboards to visualize key moments, read: - templates/storyboard-template.md

When generating any concrete artifact (plan, screener, guide, script, survey, etc.), first:

  1. Identify the relevant method(s) based on the user’s goal.
  2. Read the corresponding template file(s) from templates/.
  3. Adapt the structure and fill in project-specific details.

Future Extensions

To keep SKILL.md concise, move heavier content into separate files when needed:

  • phases/ directory for more detailed, phase-by-phase instructions (similar to interview-analysis skills)
  • templates/ for long-form templates and examples

Link to those files from this skill when they exist, and keep this core document focused on the high-level framework and standard response structures.

平台分布

OpenClaw

97.08%
按下载量换算2,704

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills