Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

research-ideation研究构思

Agent Skill

research-ideation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

2,301

周安装

94

GitHub Stars

375

下载量

737
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:research-ideation(研究构思)
来源仓库:https://github.com/meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff
仓库路径:skills/research-ideation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff --skill research-ideation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff --skill research-ideation

简介

research-ideation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。

  • 适用于创意启发、灵感来源挖掘或创新点子生成的场景。
  • 通过安装命令 npx skills add https://github.com/meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff --skill research-ideation 添加到宿主环境。
  • 建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写后再使用。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Research Ideation

Purpose

This skill helps economists generate and refine research questions by applying economic thinking frameworks. It guides the process from observing phenomena to formulating testable hypotheses.

When to Use

  • Starting a new research project
  • Brainstorming dissertation topics
  • Finding angles for policy analysis
  • Developing extensions of existing work

Instructions

Step 1: Understand the Starting Point

Ask the user:

  1. Do you have a phenomenon, puzzle, or data source in mind?
  2. What field/subfield of economics?
  3. What's your methodological preference? (Theory, empirical, structural)
  4. Any constraints? (Data access, timeline, etc.)

Step 2: Apply Ideation Frameworks

Use these approaches:

1. The Puzzle Approach

  • What's surprising about current patterns?
  • What contradicts conventional economic wisdom?
  • Where do standard models fail?

2. The Policy Approach

  • What policies lack rigorous evaluation?
  • What natural experiments remain unexploited?
  • What interventions might solve important problems?

3. The Data Approach

  • What new data sources have become available?
  • What can existing data tell us that hasn't been explored?
  • What linkages between datasets are possible?

4. The Extension Approach

  • How can seminal papers be extended?
  • What mechanisms remain unexplored?
  • Can methods from one field apply to another?

Step 3: Evaluate and Refine

For each idea, assess:

  • Feasibility: Can this be done with available data/methods?
  • Contribution: What's new here?
  • Interest: Who cares about this question?
  • Identification: Can effects be credibly estimated?

Example Interaction

User Query: "I'm interested in labor economics and have access to LinkedIn data"

Generated Response:

Research Ideas: LinkedIn Data × Labor Economics

1. Network Effects in Job Search

Question: How do professional networks affect job transitions and wage changes?

Puzzle: Standard search models assume random matching, but most jobs come through networks. How much do networks matter for outcomes?

Approach:

  • Track profile updates signaling job changes
  • Measure network overlap between current/future employers
  • Instrument with exogenous network shocks (school alumni connections)

Contribution: Quantify the causal role of networks vs. unobserved ability


2. Skill Signaling and Returns

Question: Do workers who list specific skills on profiles earn wage premiums?

Puzzle: Are listed skills signals of ability, or just cheap talk? What's the return to skill acquisition vs. skill signaling?

Approach:

  • Compare wages before/after workers add skills
  • Use skill endorsements as validation
  • Exploit skill assessment features as quasi-experiments

3. Gender Gaps in Self-Promotion

Question: Do men and women describe equivalent achievements differently?

Puzzle: Lab evidence shows women understate accomplishments. Does this appear in real profiles and affect outcomes?

Approach:

  • NLP analysis of profile language (adjectives, quantification)
  • Compare language for workers in same role/company
  • Link to recruiter contact rates if available

4. Remote Work and Labor Market Geography

Question: How has remote work changed the geographic reach of job matching?

Approach:

  • Compare pre/post-2020 job applications by distance
  • Measure changes in location signals on profiles
  • Study wage convergence across cities

Evaluation Matrix

IdeaData FeasibilityIdentificationPolicy Relevance
Network effectsHighMedium (need IV)High
Skill signalingHighMediumMedium
Gender languageHighHigh (descriptive)High
Remote geographyHighHigh (COVID natural experiment)High

Recommended Next Steps

  1. For empirical work: Start with Idea #4 (clearest identification)
  2. For policy impact: Idea #1 has most implications for job matching platforms
  3. For methodological novelty: Idea #3 combines NLP with quasi-experimental methods

Frameworks for Generating Questions

The "5 Whys" for Economics

Start with an observation and drill down:

  1. GDP growth is slowing → Why?
  2. Productivity is stagnant → Why?
  3. Investment is low → Why?
  4. Uncertainty is high → Why?
  5. Policy is unpredictable → Testable: Does policy uncertainty cause low investment?

The "What If" Generator

  • What if [policy X] were implemented?
  • What if [technology Y] became widespread?
  • What if [assumption Z] were relaxed?

The Cross-Field Pollinator

Take a method from one field and apply to another:

  • IO techniques → Labor markets (how do firms choose wages like prices?)
  • Finance models → Education (returns to schooling as asset pricing)
  • Macro shocks → Micro outcomes (firm-level effects of exchange rate changes)

Common Pitfalls

  • ❌ Questions that are too broad ("What causes inequality?")
  • ❌ Questions without clean identification ("Does education cause income?")
  • ❌ Questions without data ("Were medieval peasants happy?")
  • ❌ Questions already well-answered

References

Changelog

v1.0.0

  • Initial release with ideation frameworks

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

33.22%
按下载量换算245

Claude

31.05%
按下载量换算229

Cursor

20.2%
按下载量换算149

Gemini CLI

9.68%
按下载量换算71

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills