Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

research-ideation(研究构思)

research-ideation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

research-ideation 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 33,850。

总安装 2,301周安装 94GitHub Stars 375下载 737核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:research-ideation(研究构思)
来源仓库:https://github.com/meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff
仓库路径:skills/research-ideation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff --skill research-ideation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff --skill research-ideation

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

research-ideation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于创意启发、灵感来源挖掘或创新点子生成的场景。

通过安装命令 npx skills add https://github.com/meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff --skill research-ideation 添加到宿主环境。建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写后再使用。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/research-ideation

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff --skill rese…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

research-ideation 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/meleantonio/awesome-econ-ai-stuff --skill research-ideat…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

research-ideation 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

research-ideation 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

research-ideation 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

research-ideation 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,301 次,近一周安装 94 次,下载 737 次,GitHub 375 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

research-ideation 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
research-ideation

研究构思 · 本页

2,301375需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Research Ideation

Purpose

This skill helps economists generate and refine research questions by applying economic thinking frameworks. It guides the process from observing phenomena to formulating testable hypotheses.

When to Use

  • Starting a new research project
  • Brainstorming dissertation topics
  • Finding angles for policy analysis
  • Developing extensions of existing work

Instructions

Step 1: Understand the Starting Point

Ask the user:

  1. Do you have a phenomenon, puzzle, or data source in mind?
  2. What field/subfield of economics?
  3. What's your methodological preference? (Theory, empirical, structural)
  4. Any constraints? (Data access, timeline, etc.)

Step 2: Apply Ideation Frameworks

Use these approaches:

1. The Puzzle Approach

  • What's surprising about current patterns?
  • What contradicts conventional economic wisdom?
  • Where do standard models fail?

2. The Policy Approach

  • What policies lack rigorous evaluation?
  • What natural experiments remain unexploited?
  • What interventions might solve important problems?

3. The Data Approach

  • What new data sources have become available?
  • What can existing data tell us that hasn't been explored?
  • What linkages between datasets are possible?

4. The Extension Approach

  • How can seminal papers be extended?
  • What mechanisms remain unexplored?
  • Can methods from one field apply to another?

Step 3: Evaluate and Refine

For each idea, assess:

  • Feasibility: Can this be done with available data/methods?
  • Contribution: What's new here?
  • Interest: Who cares about this question?
  • Identification: Can effects be credibly estimated?

Example Interaction

User Query: "I'm interested in labor economics and have access to LinkedIn data"

Generated Response:

Research Ideas: LinkedIn Data × Labor Economics

1. Network Effects in Job Search

Question: How do professional networks affect job transitions and wage changes?

Puzzle: Standard search models assume random matching, but most jobs come through networks. How much do networks matter for outcomes?

Approach:

  • Track profile updates signaling job changes
  • Measure network overlap between current/future employers
  • Instrument with exogenous network shocks (school alumni connections)

Contribution: Quantify the causal role of networks vs. unobserved ability


2. Skill Signaling and Returns

Question: Do workers who list specific skills on profiles earn wage premiums?

Puzzle: Are listed skills signals of ability, or just cheap talk? What's the return to skill acquisition vs. skill signaling?

Approach:

  • Compare wages before/after workers add skills
  • Use skill endorsements as validation
  • Exploit skill assessment features as quasi-experiments

3. Gender Gaps in Self-Promotion

Question: Do men and women describe equivalent achievements differently?

Puzzle: Lab evidence shows women understate accomplishments. Does this appear in real profiles and affect outcomes?

Approach:

  • NLP analysis of profile language (adjectives, quantification)
  • Compare language for workers in same role/company
  • Link to recruiter contact rates if available

4. Remote Work and Labor Market Geography

Question: How has remote work changed the geographic reach of job matching?

Approach:

  • Compare pre/post-2020 job applications by distance
  • Measure changes in location signals on profiles
  • Study wage convergence across cities

Evaluation Matrix

IdeaData FeasibilityIdentificationPolicy Relevance
Network effectsHighMedium (need IV)High
Skill signalingHighMediumMedium
Gender languageHighHigh (descriptive)High
Remote geographyHighHigh (COVID natural experiment)High

Recommended Next Steps

  1. For empirical work: Start with Idea #4 (clearest identification)
  2. For policy impact: Idea #1 has most implications for job matching platforms
  3. For methodological novelty: Idea #3 combines NLP with quasi-experimental methods

Frameworks for Generating Questions

The "5 Whys" for Economics

Start with an observation and drill down:

  1. GDP growth is slowing → Why?
  2. Productivity is stagnant → Why?
  3. Investment is low → Why?
  4. Uncertainty is high → Why?
  5. Policy is unpredictable → Testable: Does policy uncertainty cause low investment?

The "What If" Generator

  • What if [policy X] were implemented?
  • What if [technology Y] became widespread?
  • What if [assumption Z] were relaxed?

The Cross-Field Pollinator

Take a method from one field and apply to another:

  • IO techniques → Labor markets (how do firms choose wages like prices?)
  • Finance models → Education (returns to schooling as asset pricing)
  • Macro shocks → Micro outcomes (firm-level effects of exchange rate changes)

Common Pitfalls

  • ❌ Questions that are too broad ("What causes inequality?")
  • ❌ Questions without clean identification ("Does education cause income?")
  • ❌ Questions without data ("Were medieval peasants happy?")
  • ❌ Questions already well-answered

References

Changelog

v1.0.0

  • Initial release with ideation frameworks

平台分布

Codex

33.22%
按下载量换算245

Claude

31.05%
按下载量换算229

Cursor

20.2%
按下载量换算149

Gemini CLI

9.68%
按下载量换算71

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills