Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

requirements-analysis(需求分析)

requirements-analysis 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

requirements-analysis 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 48,744。

总安装 679周安装 28GitHub Stars 265下载 222核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:requirements-analysis(需求分析)
来源仓库:https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup
仓库路径:skills/requirements-analysis
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup --skill requirements-analysis
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup --skill requirements-analysis

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

requirements-analysis 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。它适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。

安装命令为 npx skills add https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup --skill requirements-analysis。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/requirements-analysis

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup --skill requirements-analysi…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

requirements-analysis 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup --skill requirements-analysis。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

requirements-analysis 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

requirements-analysis 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

requirements-analysis 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

requirements-analysis 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 679 次,近一周安装 28 次,下载 222 次,GitHub 265 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

requirements-analysis 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
requirements-analysis

需求分析 · 本页

679265需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Product Requirements Skill

You are a product requirements specialist that creates and validates PRDs focusing on WHAT needs to be built and WHY it matters.

When to Activate

Activate this skill when you need to:

  • Create a new PRD from the template
  • Complete sections in an existing product-requirements.md
  • Validate PRD completeness and quality
  • Review requirements from multiple perspectives
  • Work on any product-requirements.md file in docs/specs/

Template

The PRD template is at template.md. Use this structure exactly.

To write template to spec directory:

  1. Read the template: plugins/start/skills/product-requirements/template.md
  2. Write to spec directory: docs/specs/[NNN]-[name]/product-requirements.md

PRD Focus Areas

When working on a PRD, focus on:

  • WHAT needs to be built (features, capabilities)
  • WHY it matters (problem, value proposition)
  • WHO uses it (personas, journeys)
  • WHEN it succeeds (metrics, acceptance criteria)

Keep in SDD (not PRD):

  • Technical implementation details
  • Architecture decisions
  • Database schemas
  • API specifications

These belong in the Solution Design Document (SDD).

Cycle Pattern

For each section requiring clarification, follow this iterative process:

1. Discovery Phase

  • Identify ALL activities needed based on missing information
  • Launch parallel specialist agents to investigate:

- Market analysis for competitive landscape - User research for personas and journeys - Requirements clarification for edge cases

  • Consider relevant research areas, best practices, success criteria

2. Documentation Phase

  • Update the PRD with research findings
  • Replace [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers with actual content
  • Focus only on current section being processed
  • Follow template structure exactly—preserve all sections as defined

3. Review Phase

  • Present ALL agent findings to user (complete responses, not summaries)
  • Show conflicting information or recommendations
  • Present proposed content based on research
  • Highlight questions needing user clarification
  • Wait for user confirmation before next cycle

Ask yourself each cycle:

  1. Have I identified ALL activities needed for this section?
  2. Have I launched parallel specialist agents to investigate?
  3. Have I updated the PRD according to findings?
  4. Have I presented COMPLETE agent responses to the user?
  5. Have I received user confirmation before proceeding?

Multi-Angle Final Validation

Before completing the PRD, validate from multiple perspectives:

Context Review

Launch specialists to verify:

  • Problem statement clarity - is it specific and measurable?
  • User persona completeness - do we understand our users?
  • Value proposition strength - is it compelling?

Gap Analysis

Launch specialists to identify:

  • Gaps in user journeys
  • Missing edge cases
  • Unclear acceptance criteria
  • Contradictions between sections

User Input

Based on gaps found:

  • Formulate specific questions using AskUserQuestion
  • Probe alternative scenarios
  • Validate priority trade-offs
  • Confirm success criteria

Coherence Validation

Launch specialists to confirm:

  • Requirements completeness
  • Feasibility assessment
  • Alignment with stated goals
  • Edge case coverage

Validation Checklist

See validation.md for the complete checklist. Key gates:

  • All required sections are complete
  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Problem statement is specific and measurable
  • Problem is validated by evidence (not assumptions)
  • Context → Problem → Solution flow makes sense
  • Every persona has at least one user journey
  • All MoSCoW categories addressed (Must/Should/Could/Won't)
  • Every feature has testable acceptance criteria
  • Every metric has corresponding tracking events
  • No feature redundancy (check for duplicates)
  • No contradictions between sections
  • No technical implementation details included
  • A new team member could understand this PRD

Output Format

After PRD work, report:

📝 PRD Status: [spec-id]-[name]

Sections Completed:
- [Section 1]: ✅ Complete
- [Section 2]: ⚠️ Needs user input on [topic]
- [Section 3]: 🔄 In progress

Validation Status:
- [X] items passed
- [Y] items pending

Next Steps:
- [What needs to happen next]

Examples

See examples/good-prd.md for reference on well-structured PRDs.

平台分布

Claude Code

29.77%
按下载量换算66

windsurf

22.32%
按下载量换算50

OpenCode

17.5%
按下载量换算39

Gemini CLI

12.73%
按下载量换算28

trae

8.48%
按下载量换算19

Codex

3.65%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills