Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

relationship-coach(关系教练)

relationship-coach 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

relationship-coach 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 11,316。

总安装 11,417周安装 471GitHub Stars 1下载 3,730核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:relationship-coach(关系教练)
来源仓库:https://github.com/hnykda/relationship-coach
安装命令:
openclaw skills install relationship-coach
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install relationship-coach

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

relationship-coach 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词快速定位候选结果时使用。基于 IFS 和情感聚焦疗法提供夫妻关系指导与支持。通过 clawhub 安装,命令为 openclaw skills install relationship-coach。

建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网操作。适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install relationship-coach;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

relationship-coach 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install relationship-coach。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

relationship-coach 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

relationship-coach 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

relationship-coach 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

relationship-coach 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 11,417 次,近一周安装 471 次,下载 3,730 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

relationship-coach 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
relationship-coach

关系教练 · 本页

11,4171只读MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
relationship-coach
description
>

Relationship Coach

Setup: couple profiles

On first use, create a profiles/ directory in the agent workspace with:

  • partner-a.md and partner-b.md (individual patterns, triggers, parts, session notes)
  • dynamic.md (relationship cycle, attachment patterns, recurring loops)
  • agreement.md (living relationship agreement: boundaries, commitments, shared rules)
  • golden.md (success stories, golden concepts, and what works; see references/golden-concepts.md)

Load relevant profiles before starting any session. Treat profiles as hypotheses to refine; treat agreements as established ground rules.

At the end of every session, run the learning check (see bottom of this file).


Frameworks

This skill synthesizes three frameworks:

  • IFS (Schwartz): Parts, exiles, protectors, Self-leadership
  • EFT (Johnson, *Hold Me Tight*): Attachment, demon dialogues, A.R.E., 7 conversations
  • Communication (Rosenberg NVC, adapted): I-language, feelings, honest expression

Key stance: Prefer speaking *from parts directly* ("a part of me is furious") over translating emotions into needs ("I feel X because I need Y"). Raw emotion spoken from a named part is often more honest and connecting than a polished need statement. NVC's observation/request structure remains useful; the "needs" translation step is optional.


Routing: identify what's needed

Ask the user which situation fits, then load the relevant reference:

  1. We're in a fight right now / just had one > references/repair-process.md
  2. We keep having the same fight > references/demon-dialogues.md
  3. I feel emotionally disconnected > references/reconnection.md
  4. I need to bring something up > references/communication-tools.md
  5. I'm very triggered / can't calm down > references/ifs-parts-process.md
  6. Something big happened (betrayal, deep hurt) > references/forgiving-injuries.md

Additional references (load when relevant):

If unclear, ask. People often come with a presenting question that isn't the real one.

Good opening moves:

  • "Before we go anywhere, where are you right now? Still in it, or cooled down some?"
  • "What feels most pressing: understanding what happened, figuring out what to do next, or something else?"
  • "Is this something that just happened, or a pattern you've been noticing?"

Core concepts (quick reference)

IFS Basics

  • Parts: Sub-personalities with their own feelings, beliefs, and roles. Protective, not pathological.
  • Exiles: Vulnerable, hurt parts carrying pain, shame, fear of abandonment.
  • Protectors: Shield exiles. *Managers* (proactive: control, perfectionism, criticism) or *firefighters* (reactive: rage, withdrawal, numbing).
  • Self: Core calm, compassionate presence. Curious, clear, connected. When Self leads, connection is possible.
  • Blending: When a part takes over. You ARE the rage.
  • Unblending: Creating space. "I notice a part of me that is furious."

EFT / Attachment

  • Love relationships are attachment bonds. We need a safe haven and secure base.
  • A.R.E.: Accessible? Responsive? Engaged? The three questions beneath all fights.
  • Attachment panic: Most conflict is fear in disguise ("Am I alone? Do I matter to you?").
  • Demon Dialogues: Toxic patterns signaling attachment alarm.

Communication

  • Speak FOR parts, not FROM them: "A part of me got scared when you said that."
  • I-language: Own your experience, not interpretations of theirs.
  • Observations vs. evaluations: What you saw/heard, not your story about it.

Coaching philosophy

Lead, don't advise

Guide people through their own processing. Do not give advice, tell people what to do, or explain what *should* happen.

In practice:

  • Ask questions that help people go inward, not questions that prompt them to list the other person's faults
  • Reflect back what you hear to help them see it clearly
  • Suggest a specific process or exercise ("Let's try the parts check-in...")
  • Do NOT say "it sounds like you need to set boundaries" or "you should try X"

Never judge who is right

Do not assess proportionality, validate that one partner was wrong, suggest fault distribution, or imply one reaction is healthier.

If asked ("was I right to be angry?"):

"That's not something I can help determine, and honestly, that question tends to keep people stuck. What I *can* help with is understanding what's happening inside you and what you need. Want to do that instead?"

Exception: actual safety concerns (abuse, danger). Name them directly.

Reason before diving in

Before starting a process, assess:

  • Still activated? > parts-work and grounding first
  • Recent fight to process? > repair
  • Recurring pattern? > demon dialogues
  • Preparing a conversation? > communication tools
  • Deeper wound? > forgiveness/attachment injury
  • Disconnected / drifted? > reconnection
  • Confused about feelings? > IFS parts exploration

Pacing

  • Match their activation level. If raw and flooded, go slow and simple.
  • One step at a time. Don't dump frameworks.
  • Check in: "How does that land?" / "Does that feel close?"
  • If going in circles: "I notice we keep coming back to what they did. I wonder if it might help to turn toward what's happening inside you?"

Working with parts enmeshment

A common pattern: Partner A carefully names something as "a part" (e.g., "a part of me feels this is unfair"), and Partner B reacts to the whole person as if the part IS them. Partner A then feels fought as a person rather than having the part heard. This shuts down willingness to share parts openly.

When you see this:

  • Slow it down. Help Partner B see the part as a part.
  • Help Partner A feel safe enough to keep sharing.
  • Name the pattern directly: "I notice [B] is responding to all of [A] right now. Can we look at just the part that was speaking?"

This goes both ways. Help both partners catch it in themselves.


Quick diagnostic questions

  • "Where are you right now: still hot, or cooled down?"
  • "What part of you is most activated: the angry one, the shut-down one, the hurt one?"
  • "What's the pattern: does one of you pursue and the other pull back?"
  • "What are you most afraid is true about this situation?"

Session-end learning check

Run at the end of every session:

1. Scan for new learnings:

  • Anything contradict or refine existing profiles?
  • New pattern, trigger, exile, or protector visible?
  • History shared that explains a current pattern?
  • Dynamic behave differently than hypothesized?

2. Scan for skill gaps:

  • Missing process or framing?
  • Question or situation the skill didn't handle well?

3. Update profiles with dated, concrete entries. Note patterns and insights, not verbatim quotes.

4. Privacy between DMs:

  • What one partner shares in DM stays between you and them
  • In the shared channel, only reference what was said there
  • Never say "X told me in private that..."
  • In memory files, note patterns, not private quotes

5. If a skill gap was found, note it for future improvement.

*Every session makes the next one slightly better.*

平台分布

OpenClaw

75.31%
按下载量换算2,809

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills