Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
前端设计需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

refining-android-requirements完善 Android 要求

Agent Skill

refining-android-requirements 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

225

周安装

9

GitHub Stars

8,667

下载量

73
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:refining-android-requirements(完善 Android 要求)
来源仓库:https://github.com/bitwarden/android
仓库路径:skills/refining-android-requirements
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/android --skill refining-android-requirements
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/android --skill refining-android-requirements

简介

refining-android-requirements 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。

  • 适用于代码协作管理、项目进度跟踪和开发流程梳理,尤其适合团队协作场景下的信息归纳。
  • 通过指定仓库、Issue 编号或 PR 链接生成结构化列表,支持按状态、类型或时间排序输出。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。
  • 可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。

SKILL.md

Requirements Refinement

This skill takes raw requirements (from Jira tickets, Confluence pages, or free-text descriptions) and produces a structured, implementation-ready specification through systematic gap analysis.

Key principle: This skill identifies gaps and produces specifications. It does NOT propose solutions or architecture — that is the responsibility of the planning-android-implementation skill.


Step 1: Source Consolidation

Combine all input sources into a single working document. For each requirement, note its source:

- [Source: PM-12345] User must be able to configure timeout
- [Source: Confluence] Timeout range is 1-60 minutes
- [Source: User] Default timeout should be 15 minutes

Flag any contradictions between sources for immediate resolution.


Step 2: Gap Analysis

Evaluate the consolidated requirements against the following 5-category rubric. For each category, check every item and note whether it is covered, partially covered, or missing.

A. Functional Requirements

CheckQuestion to Ask If Missing
User actions defined?What specific user actions trigger this feature?
All states covered? (empty, loading, error, success)What should the user see in [empty/loading/error] state?
Edge cases identified?What happens when [boundary condition]?
Cancellation/back navigation flows?Can the user cancel mid-flow? What happens to partial data?
Input validation rules?What are the valid ranges/formats for [input]?
Success/failure criteria?How does the user know the operation succeeded or failed?
Offline behavior?What happens if this is attempted offline?

B. Technical Requirements

CheckQuestion to Ask If Missing
Module scope identified? (:app, :authenticator, shared)Which module(s) does this feature belong to?
SDK dependencies?Does this require Bitwarden SDK operations? Which ones?
Data storage approach? (Room, DataStore, in-memory)Where is the data for this feature persisted?
Network API endpoints?Which API endpoints are involved? Are they existing or new?
Process death handling?What state needs to survive process death?
Migration requirements?Does existing data need migration?
Feature flag needed?Should this be behind a feature flag for staged rollout?
Product flavors (standard vs fdroid)?Does this feature depend on Google Play Services? Available on F-Droid?
Data layer tier?Does this need a new Manager (single-responsibility) or only Repository/DataSource? Consult docs/ARCHITECTURE.md Data Layer section.
Streaming vs discrete data?Is data continuously observed (DataState<T> + StateFlow) or a one-shot operation (custom sealed class)? See docs/ARCHITECTURE.md Repositories section.

C. Security Requirements

CheckQuestion to Ask If Missing
Data sensitivity classified?What sensitivity level does this data have? (vault-level, account-level, non-sensitive)
Storage encryption required?Must this data be encrypted at rest? Via SDK or Android Keystore?
Logout cleanup behavior?What must be cleared when the user logs out?
Auth-gating?Does accessing this feature require active authentication?
Input sanitization?Are there URL or credential inputs that need validation?
Sensitive data in ViewModel state?Will passwords, tokens, or keys appear in state? Must use @IgnoredOnParcel. See implementing-android-code skill Section F.
SDK crypto context isolation?Does this use vault encryption? Must use ScopedVaultSdkSource for multi-account safety. See CLAUDE.md Security Rules.

D. UX/UI Requirements

CheckQuestion to Ask If Missing
UI copy/strings defined?What text should appear for [label/button/message]?
Error messages specified?What should the error message say when [failure case]?
Loading states designed?Should loading show a spinner, skeleton, or shimmer?
Navigation flow clear?Where does the user go after [action]? Back stack behavior?
Accessibility considerations?Are there content descriptions or focus order requirements?
Toast/snackbar/dialog for feedback?What feedback mechanism for [action result]?

E. Cross-Cutting Concerns

CheckQuestion to Ask If Missing
Multi-account behavior?How does this behave with multiple accounts? Per-account or global?
Backwards compatibility?Does this affect existing users? Migration path?
Feature flag strategy?Is this behind a server-side or local feature flag?
Analytics/logging?Are there analytics events to track?
Bitwarden Authenticator impact?Does this affect the :authenticator module?
F-Droid compatibility?Does this degrade gracefully without Google Play Services (no push notifications, no Play Integrity)?

Step 3: Present Gaps

Organize all identified gaps into two categories:

Blocking Questions

Questions that must be answered before implementation can begin because they change the architecture, data model, or core flow.

Format each question as:

**G[N]** ([Category]) — [Question text]
  Context: [Why this matters / what depends on the answer]

Non-Blocking Questions

Questions that have reasonable defaults and can be resolved during implementation. Note the assumed default.

Format each question as:

**G[N]** ([Category]) — [Question text]
  Default assumption: [What we'll assume if not answered]
  Context: [Why this matters]

Step 4: Produce Specification

After the user answers blocking questions (and optionally non-blocking ones), produce a structured specification:

## Overview

[1-2 paragraph summary of the feature, its purpose, and scope]

## Functional Requirements

| ID | Requirement | Source | Notes |
|----|------------|--------|-------|
| FR1 | [requirement] | [source] | [any notes] |
| FR2 | ... | ... | ... |

## Technical Requirements

| ID | Requirement | Source | Notes |
|----|------------|--------|-------|
| TR1 | [requirement] | [source] | [any notes] |
| TR2 | ... | ... | ... |

## Security Requirements

| ID | Requirement | Source | Notes |
|----|------------|--------|-------|
| SR1 | [requirement] | [source] | [any notes] |

## UX Requirements

| ID | Requirement | Source | Notes |
|----|------------|--------|-------|
| UX1 | [requirement] | [source] | [any notes] |

## Open Items

Non-blocking items with assumed defaults that may be revisited:

| ID | Question | Assumed Default | Category |
|----|----------|----------------|----------|
| G[N] | [question] | [default] | [category] |

## Source Documentation

| Source | Type | Link |
|--------|------|------|
| [name] | Jira / Confluence / User-provided | [link if available] |

Output Guidelines

  • Requirements use numbered IDs (FR1, TR1, SR1, UX1) for traceability through implementation
  • Each requirement cites its source (ticket, page, or user-provided)
  • Technical requirements use table format for structured key/value data
  • Interface signatures are included as fenced code blocks when applicable
  • Open items preserve the gap ID (G[N]) for cross-referencing

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.05%
按下载量换算26

Claude

29.4%
按下载量换算21

Cursor

19.64%
按下载量换算14

Gemini CLI

8.39%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills