Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

refining-android-requirements(完善 Android 要求)

refining-android-requirements 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

refining-android-requirements 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 9,208。

总安装 225周安装 9GitHub Stars 8,667下载 73核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:refining-android-requirements(完善 Android 要求)
来源仓库:https://github.com/bitwarden/android
仓库路径:skills/refining-android-requirements
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/android --skill refining-android-requirements
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/android --skill refining-android-requirements

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

refining-android-requirements 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。

适用于代码协作管理、项目进度跟踪和开发流程梳理,尤其适合团队协作场景下的信息归纳。通过指定仓库、Issue 编号或 PR 链接生成结构化列表,支持按状态、类型或时间排序输出。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。

来源仓库内路径:skills/refining-android-requirements

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/android --skill refining-android-req…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

refining-android-requirements 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/bitwarden/android --skill refining-android-requirements。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

refining-android-requirements 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

refining-android-requirements 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

refining-android-requirements 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

refining-android-requirements 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 225 次,近一周安装 9 次,下载 73 次,GitHub 8,667 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

refining-android-requirements 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 8,667 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
refining-android-requirements

完善 Android 要求 · 本页

2258,667需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Requirements Refinement

This skill takes raw requirements (from Jira tickets, Confluence pages, or free-text descriptions) and produces a structured, implementation-ready specification through systematic gap analysis.

Key principle: This skill identifies gaps and produces specifications. It does NOT propose solutions or architecture — that is the responsibility of the planning-android-implementation skill.


Step 1: Source Consolidation

Combine all input sources into a single working document. For each requirement, note its source:

- [Source: PM-12345] User must be able to configure timeout
- [Source: Confluence] Timeout range is 1-60 minutes
- [Source: User] Default timeout should be 15 minutes

Flag any contradictions between sources for immediate resolution.


Step 2: Gap Analysis

Evaluate the consolidated requirements against the following 5-category rubric. For each category, check every item and note whether it is covered, partially covered, or missing.

A. Functional Requirements

CheckQuestion to Ask If Missing
User actions defined?What specific user actions trigger this feature?
All states covered? (empty, loading, error, success)What should the user see in [empty/loading/error] state?
Edge cases identified?What happens when [boundary condition]?
Cancellation/back navigation flows?Can the user cancel mid-flow? What happens to partial data?
Input validation rules?What are the valid ranges/formats for [input]?
Success/failure criteria?How does the user know the operation succeeded or failed?
Offline behavior?What happens if this is attempted offline?

B. Technical Requirements

CheckQuestion to Ask If Missing
Module scope identified? (:app, :authenticator, shared)Which module(s) does this feature belong to?
SDK dependencies?Does this require Bitwarden SDK operations? Which ones?
Data storage approach? (Room, DataStore, in-memory)Where is the data for this feature persisted?
Network API endpoints?Which API endpoints are involved? Are they existing or new?
Process death handling?What state needs to survive process death?
Migration requirements?Does existing data need migration?
Feature flag needed?Should this be behind a feature flag for staged rollout?
Product flavors (standard vs fdroid)?Does this feature depend on Google Play Services? Available on F-Droid?
Data layer tier?Does this need a new Manager (single-responsibility) or only Repository/DataSource? Consult docs/ARCHITECTURE.md Data Layer section.
Streaming vs discrete data?Is data continuously observed (DataState<T> + StateFlow) or a one-shot operation (custom sealed class)? See docs/ARCHITECTURE.md Repositories section.

C. Security Requirements

CheckQuestion to Ask If Missing
Data sensitivity classified?What sensitivity level does this data have? (vault-level, account-level, non-sensitive)
Storage encryption required?Must this data be encrypted at rest? Via SDK or Android Keystore?
Logout cleanup behavior?What must be cleared when the user logs out?
Auth-gating?Does accessing this feature require active authentication?
Input sanitization?Are there URL or credential inputs that need validation?
Sensitive data in ViewModel state?Will passwords, tokens, or keys appear in state? Must use @IgnoredOnParcel. See implementing-android-code skill Section F.
SDK crypto context isolation?Does this use vault encryption? Must use ScopedVaultSdkSource for multi-account safety. See CLAUDE.md Security Rules.

D. UX/UI Requirements

CheckQuestion to Ask If Missing
UI copy/strings defined?What text should appear for [label/button/message]?
Error messages specified?What should the error message say when [failure case]?
Loading states designed?Should loading show a spinner, skeleton, or shimmer?
Navigation flow clear?Where does the user go after [action]? Back stack behavior?
Accessibility considerations?Are there content descriptions or focus order requirements?
Toast/snackbar/dialog for feedback?What feedback mechanism for [action result]?

E. Cross-Cutting Concerns

CheckQuestion to Ask If Missing
Multi-account behavior?How does this behave with multiple accounts? Per-account or global?
Backwards compatibility?Does this affect existing users? Migration path?
Feature flag strategy?Is this behind a server-side or local feature flag?
Analytics/logging?Are there analytics events to track?
Bitwarden Authenticator impact?Does this affect the :authenticator module?
F-Droid compatibility?Does this degrade gracefully without Google Play Services (no push notifications, no Play Integrity)?

Step 3: Present Gaps

Organize all identified gaps into two categories:

Blocking Questions

Questions that must be answered before implementation can begin because they change the architecture, data model, or core flow.

Format each question as:

**G[N]** ([Category]) — [Question text]
  Context: [Why this matters / what depends on the answer]

Non-Blocking Questions

Questions that have reasonable defaults and can be resolved during implementation. Note the assumed default.

Format each question as:

**G[N]** ([Category]) — [Question text]
  Default assumption: [What we'll assume if not answered]
  Context: [Why this matters]

Step 4: Produce Specification

After the user answers blocking questions (and optionally non-blocking ones), produce a structured specification:

## Overview

[1-2 paragraph summary of the feature, its purpose, and scope]

## Functional Requirements

| ID | Requirement | Source | Notes |
|----|------------|--------|-------|
| FR1 | [requirement] | [source] | [any notes] |
| FR2 | ... | ... | ... |

## Technical Requirements

| ID | Requirement | Source | Notes |
|----|------------|--------|-------|
| TR1 | [requirement] | [source] | [any notes] |
| TR2 | ... | ... | ... |

## Security Requirements

| ID | Requirement | Source | Notes |
|----|------------|--------|-------|
| SR1 | [requirement] | [source] | [any notes] |

## UX Requirements

| ID | Requirement | Source | Notes |
|----|------------|--------|-------|
| UX1 | [requirement] | [source] | [any notes] |

## Open Items

Non-blocking items with assumed defaults that may be revisited:

| ID | Question | Assumed Default | Category |
|----|----------|----------------|----------|
| G[N] | [question] | [default] | [category] |

## Source Documentation

| Source | Type | Link |
|--------|------|------|
| [name] | Jira / Confluence / User-provided | [link if available] |

Output Guidelines

  • Requirements use numbered IDs (FR1, TR1, SR1, UX1) for traceability through implementation
  • Each requirement cites its source (ticket, page, or user-provided)
  • Technical requirements use table format for structured key/value data
  • Interface signatures are included as fenced code blocks when applicable
  • Open items preserve the gap ID (G[N]) for cross-referencing

平台分布

Codex

36.05%
按下载量换算26

Claude

29.4%
按下载量换算21

Cursor

19.64%
按下载量换算14

Gemini CLI

8.39%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills