Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

reef-negotiation(珊瑚礁谈判)

reef-negotiation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

reef-negotiation 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 5,756。

总安装 24,480周安装 1,046GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 7,840核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:reef-negotiation(珊瑚礁谈判)
来源仓库:https://github.com/staybased/reef-negotiation
安装命令:
openclaw skills install reef-negotiation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install reef-negotiation

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

使用 Chris Voss 受 FBI 支持的策略来协商自由职业费率、范围和条款,以完成交易、处理价格回落、范围蔓延和股权安排。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install reef-negotiation;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

reef-negotiation 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install reef-negotiation。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

reef-negotiation 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

reef-negotiation 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

reef-negotiation 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

reef-negotiation 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 24,480 次,近一周安装 1,046 次,下载 7,840 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

reef-negotiation 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
reef-negotiation

珊瑚礁谈判 · 本页

24,480—权限未标注MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Negotiation — Close Deals and Protect Your Value

Negotiate rates, scope, and terms using Chris Voss's FBI-proven frameworks adapted for freelance and consulting deals. Sources: Chris Voss (Never Split the Difference), Gong.io, NAHC, Klenty, Aviso. All outputs go to workspace/artifacts/.

Use when

  • Negotiating rates with a client (Upwork, direct, retainer)
  • Client pushes back on pricing after proposal
  • Scope creep discussion — client wants more without paying more
  • Contract terms negotiation (payment schedules, milestones, IP)
  • Equity/revenue share deals (like Alfred)
  • Any conversation where money or terms are on the table

Don't use when

  • Initial discovery (use client-discovery skill — negotiate AFTER you understand their needs)
  • Writing the proposal itself (use proposal-writing skill)
  • Handling generic objections before the money talk (use objection-handling skill)
  • Internal team disagreements (different dynamic entirely)

Negative examples

  • "Help me find clients" → No. This is for deal-closing, not lead gen.
  • "Write my Upwork proposal" → No. Use proposal-writing skill.
  • "A client is unhappy with the work" → No. That's service recovery, not negotiation.

Edge cases

  • Upwork client asks for lower rate → YES. Price defense framework applies.
  • Client wants to add scope without budget increase → YES. Scope protection.
  • Revenue share structure (Alfred) → YES. Partnership term negotiation.
  • Negotiating with yourself (pricing confidence) → Borderline but useful — the inner game section helps.

Chris Voss's Core Principles

1. Tactical Empathy

Understand their perspective BEFORE pushing yours. Not fake empathy — genuine curiosity about their constraints.

In practice:

  • "It sounds like budget is tight this quarter." (labeling)
  • "How can we structure this so it works for both of us?" (calibrated question)
  • "What would make you feel confident moving forward?" (their terms, not yours)

2. Go for "No"

Stop chasing "yes." People feel trapped by yes. When they say "no," they feel safe and in control — then they'll actually listen.

In practice:

  • Instead of "Would you like to move forward?" → "Would it be a terrible idea to start with a pilot?"
  • Instead of "Can we agree on $500?" → "Is $500 unreasonable for this scope?"
  • After their "no": "What would you need to change to make this work?"

3. Get to "That's Right"

"That's right" = genuine alignment. "You're right" = they're dismissing you. Know the difference.

How to trigger it: Summarize their situation so accurately they say "that's right": "So if I understand correctly — you need this done by March, your budget is around $300, and your main concern is that the last developer left the project half-done. That's a lot of risk to take on again."

When they say "that's right," you own the conversation.

4. Mirroring

Repeat the last 1-3 words they said. It feels like magic — they'll elaborate, reveal more information, and feel heard.

Example:

  • Client: "We've been burned before by freelancers who disappear."
  • You: "...who disappear?"
  • Client: "Yeah, our last developer took the deposit and stopped responding after week 2."
  • Now you know the REAL objection and can address it directly.

5. Labeling

Name their emotion or concern out loud. "It seems like..." / "It sounds like..." / "It feels like..."

Example:

  • "It seems like you're worried about committing to a monthly retainer."
  • "It sounds like the previous experience made you cautious about paying upfront."

Labeling defuses negative emotions and amplifies positive ones.


The Ackerman Model (Price Negotiation)

When you MUST negotiate on price (not ideal — hold value first):

  1. Set your target price
  2. First offer: 65% of your target (if they're offering first, let them anchor)
  3. Second offer: 85% of target
  4. Third offer: 95% of target
  5. Final offer: 100% of target + throw in a non-monetary perk

Example (your target: $500):

  • They say: "Can you do it for $300?"
  • You: "Based on the scope, I'd normally be at $700 for this. (anchor high) I could do $425 if we trim [specific thing]."
  • They push back: "Still high."
  • You: "$475, and I'll include documentation + 1 week of support."
  • Final: "$500 flat, includes everything, and I'll start today."

The non-round number trick: $487 feels more calculated and credible than $500. Use precise numbers in final offers.


Rate Defense Framework

When a client says "your rate is too high":

Step 1: Don't React

Silence is power. Pause for 3 seconds. Let the discomfort sit. Most people fill silence with concessions — don't be that person.

Step 2: Acknowledge

"I appreciate you being upfront about that." (builds trust)

Step 3: Reframe Value

"Let me walk you through what this investment delivers: [specific outcomes from discovery]. For context, agencies charge $150-200/hr for this. My rate reflects [your specific edge]."

Step 4: Offer Structure, Not Discount

  • "Would it help to split into milestones? Pay $250 now, $250 on completion."
  • "We could reduce scope to fit $X — I'd remove [specific item]. Which matters most to you?"
  • "I can offer a 10% discount on a 3-month retainer." (trades discount for commitment)

Step 5: Walk Away (If Needed)

"I want to make sure you get the right fit. If $X doesn't work for your budget, I totally understand. Would you like me to recommend someone in a different price range?"

Walking away with grace often brings them back at your price.


Scope Creep Defense

When "just one more thing" keeps happening:

Prevention (in proposal):

  • Explicit "What's NOT included" section
  • "Additional requests billed at $X/hr or scoped separately"
  • Milestone-based payments tied to specific deliverables

In the moment:

  1. Acknowledge: "Great idea — I can see why that'd be valuable."
  2. Scope it: "That would take approximately X hours to add."
  3. Option: "Want me to include it in a Phase 2 scope, or add it to this project at $Y?"
  4. Never: Just absorb it silently. Every "free" addition trains them to expect more.

Revenue Share / Equity Negotiation

For deals like Alfred (equity/rev share):

Protect yourself:

  • Define exactly what "revenue" means (gross? net? after expenses?)
  • Set a minimum monthly guarantee if possible
  • Time-box the agreement (12 months, then renegotiate)
  • Define what happens if the client stops using the service
  • Get it in writing — even a simple email agreement

Fair structures:

  • 10-20% of revenue generated by your automation (directly attributable)
  • $0 upfront + rev share (higher risk for you = higher % justified)
  • Monthly retainer + smaller rev share (balanced risk)

The Inner Game

The biggest negotiation is with yourself:

  • Don't apologize for your price. "My rate is $49/hr" not "My rate is, um, $49... if that works?"
  • Silence is your weapon. State your price and stop talking. The first person to speak after the number loses.
  • You're a peer, not a supplicant. Discovery-first selling positions you as an expert diagnosing their problem, not an applicant hoping for work.
  • Walk-away power is real. If you're willing to lose the deal, you negotiate from strength. If you're desperate, they smell it.
  • Raise your rate. If you're winning 100% of proposals, you're too cheap. Aim for 30-50% win rate — that means your price is in the right zone.

Key Principles

  • Negotiation is not combat — it's collaborative problem-solving
  • Tactical empathy > aggressive tactics (every time)
  • "No" is the start of negotiation, not the end
  • Never split the difference — find creative solutions instead of meeting in the middle
  • Non-round numbers ($487 vs $500) signal precision and credibility
  • If you win 100% of negotiations, you're leaving money on the table

平台分布

OpenClaw

89.1%
按下载量换算6,985

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills