Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维和基础设施

recovering-from-bad-git-state(从错误的 git 状态中恢复)

recovering-from-bad-git-state 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

recovering-from-bad-git-state 是运维和基础设施类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在运维和基础设施类的 2,449 个 Skill 里排第 2,227。

总安装 238周安装 10GitHub Stars 9下载 83核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:recovering-from-bad-git-state(从错误的 git 状态中恢复)
来源仓库:https://github.com/delorenj/skills
仓库路径:skills/recovering-from-bad-git-state
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/delorenj/skills --skill recovering-from-bad-git-state
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/delorenj/skills --skill recovering-from-bad-git-state

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维和基础设施类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

recovering-from-bad-git-state 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中整理仓库状态和协作事项。适用于围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行信息整理的任务。

可查询仓库状态、Issue 详情、PR 内容和协作历史。安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/delorenj/skills --skill recovering-from-bad-git-state。建议确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否触发联网或文件操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/recovering-from-bad-git-state

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/delorenj/skills --skill recovering-from-bad-gi…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

recovering-from-bad-git-state 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/delorenj/skills --skill recovering-from-bad-git-state。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

recovering-from-bad-git-state 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

recovering-from-bad-git-state 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

recovering-from-bad-git-state 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

recovering-from-bad-git-state 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 238 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 83 次,GitHub 9 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

recovering-from-bad-git-state 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维和基础设施类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维和基础设施类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
brainstorming

头脑风暴 · Codex、Claude

3,148,776173,131操作浏览器MIT通过
copywriting

文案写作 · Codex、Claude

1,996,72425,583需要联网MIT通过
openclaw-secure-linux-cloud

OpenClaw secure linux cloud 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,853,08840接触敏感数据未明确未通过
xget

xget 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,799,28040执行命令未明确未通过
requesting-code-review

代码审查请求 · Codex、Claude

1,590,144173,103权限未标注MIT通过
recovering-from-bad-git-state

从错误的 git 状态中恢复 · 本页

2389需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Git State Recovery Specialist

Use this skill when encountering corrupted git state, orphaned worktrees, or inconsistent branch references that prevent normal git operations.

When to Use

Invoke proactively when you observe:

  • git worktree list showing 00000000 commit hashes
  • git branch --show-current contradicting actual HEAD state
  • Worktree operations failing with "already used by worktree" errors
  • HEAD pointing to non-existent branch refs
  • Branch deletion failing due to phantom worktree claims
  • git status showing "HEAD detached" unexpectedly

Core Diagnostic Sequence

1. State Validation

# Check HEAD integrity
cat .git/HEAD
# Should show: ref: refs/heads/<branch-name>

# Verify worktree consistency
git worktree list
# Look for: invalid commit hashes (00000000), missing paths

# Cross-check branch state
git branch --show-current
git symbolic-ref HEAD
# These should agree

2. Identify Corruption Type

Type A: Corrupted HEAD Reference

  • Symptoms: HEAD points to non-existent branch, operations fail with "unknown revision"
  • Cause: Incomplete checkout or branch deletion while HEAD pointed to it
  • Recovery: Force reset HEAD to known good branch

Type B: Orphaned Worktree Metadata

  • Symptoms: git worktree list shows worktree but directory doesn't exist
  • Cause: Manual directory deletion without git worktree remove
  • Recovery: Prune stale worktree references

Type C: Branch Lock Conflict

  • Symptoms: "branch is already used by worktree" but git worktree list shows different branch
  • Cause: Worktree checked out branch, then had HEAD forcibly changed
  • Recovery: Align HEAD with actual branch or force checkout

Recovery Operations

Fix Corrupted HEAD

# Identify correct branch from remote
git branch -r | grep main  # or master, develop, etc.

# Force reset HEAD (bypasses git safety checks)
echo "ref: refs/heads/main" > .git/HEAD

# Verify fix
git status
git branch --show-current

Prune Orphaned Worktrees

# Standard prune (removes references to deleted directories)
git worktree prune -v

# If prune fails, manual cleanup
rm -rf .git/worktrees/<worktree-name>

# Verify cleanup
git worktree list

Resolve Branch Lock Conflicts

# Option 1: Align HEAD with intended branch
git reset --hard origin/main

# Option 2: Force delete phantom worktree claim
# First ensure you're on a different branch
git checkout main
# Then force delete the locked branch
git branch -D <locked-branch>
git push origin --delete <locked-branch>  # if pushed

Nuclear Option: Rebuild Branch Refs

# When refs are completely corrupted
git fetch --all --prune

# Recreate local branch from remote
git branch -D <branch-name>
git checkout -b <branch-name> origin/<branch-name>

# Verify state
git log --oneline -5

Prevention Patterns

Safe Worktree Operations

# Always use git worktree commands, never manual directory operations
git worktree add <path> <branch>    # Create
git worktree remove <path>          # Delete (not rm -rf)
git worktree prune                  # Clean stale refs

Validate State Before Operations

// Example: iMi worktree manager
fn validate_repo_state(&self, repo: &Repository) -> Result<()> {
    let head = repo.head()?;

    // Ensure HEAD points to valid commit
    if head.target().is_none() {
        return Err(anyhow::anyhow!(
            "Repository HEAD is corrupted. Run git-state-recovery."
        ));
    }

    // Verify worktree list consistency
    let worktrees = repo.worktrees()?;
    for wt in worktrees.iter().flatten() {
        let wt_path = repo.workdir()
            .unwrap()
            .parent()
            .unwrap()
            .join(wt);
        if !wt_path.exists() {
            eprintln!("Warning: Orphaned worktree detected: {}", wt);
        }
    }

    Ok(())
}

Integration with iMi

When building worktree management tools, add state validation hooks:

// Before any worktree operation
pub async fn create_worktree(&self, ...) -> Result<PathBuf> {
    // Validate repository state first
    self.validate_repo_state(&repo)?;

    // Proceed with operation
    self.git.create_worktree(...)?;

    // Verify post-operation state
    self.validate_worktree_created(&worktree_path)?;

    Ok(worktree_path)
}

Common Edge Cases

Case 1: Trunk Directory Checked Out to PR Branch

Symptom: imi pr <num> switches trunk to PR branch instead of creating separate worktree

Root Cause: gh pr checkout checks out in current directory as side effect

Fix: Fetch PR without checkout

# Get PR head ref
PR_REF=$(gh pr view <num> --json headRefName -q .headRefName)

# Fetch without checkout
git fetch origin $PR_REF:pr-<num>

# Create worktree from fetched ref
git worktree add ../pr-<num> pr-<num>

Case 2: Multiple Repos with Same Worktree Name

Symptom: Creating pr-123 in repo B fails because repo A has pr-123

Root Cause: Git worktree names are globally unique per repository

Fix: Use repo-prefixed worktree names

let worktree_name = format!("{}-pr-{}", repo_name, pr_number);

Testing Recovery Procedures

Before deploying worktree automation:

# Create test scenario
git init test-repo && cd test-repo
git commit --allow-empty -m "init"
git worktree add ../test-wt

# Corrupt state
rm -rf ../test-wt
# Don't run git worktree prune yet

# Verify corruption detection
git worktree list  # Should show test-wt but invalid path

# Test recovery
git worktree prune -v
git worktree list  # Should be clean

Escalation Path

If recovery procedures fail:

  1. Backup corrupted repository: tar -czf repo-backup.tar.gz.git/
  2. Clone fresh from remote: git clone <url> repo-fresh
  3. Manually recreate worktrees from backup database/records
  4. Document failure mode for future prevention

Related Skills

  • ecosystem-patterns: Composable git operations section
  • mise-task-managing: Git workflow automation patterns

平台分布

Claude Code

30.8%
按下载量换算26

windsurf

24.62%
按下载量换算20

OpenCode

16.59%
按下载量换算14

Codex

13.37%
按下载量换算11

Antigravity

8.57%
按下载量换算7

Gemini CLI

3.28%
按下载量换算3

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills