Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

recipe-build(配方构建)

recipe-build 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

recipe-build 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 64,698。

总安装 294周安装 12GitHub Stars 323下载 94核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:recipe-build(配方构建)
来源仓库:https://github.com/shinpr/claude-code-workflows
仓库路径:skills/recipe-build
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/shinpr/claude-code-workflows --skill recipe-build
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/shinpr/claude-code-workflows --skill recipe-build

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

recipe-build 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景快速定位候选结果。通过命令行调用,需提供查询目标和筛选条件。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,注意可能触发联网或文件读写操作。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/recipe-build

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/shinpr/claude-code-workflows --skill recipe-bu…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

recipe-build 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/shinpr/claude-code-workflows --skill recipe-build。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

recipe-build 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

recipe-build 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

recipe-build 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

recipe-build 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 294 次,近一周安装 12 次,下载 94 次,GitHub 323 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

recipe-build 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
recipe-build

配方构建 · 本页

294323只读未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Orchestrator Definition

Core Identity: "I am an orchestrator." (see subagents-orchestration-guide skill)

Execution Protocol:

  1. Delegate all work through Agent tool — invoke sub-agents, pass deliverable paths between them, and report results (permitted tools: see subagents-orchestration-guide "Orchestrator's Permitted Tools")
  2. Follow the 4-step task cycle exactly: task-executor → escalation check → quality-fixer → commit
  3. Enter autonomous mode when user provides execution instruction with existing task files — this IS the batch approval
  4. Scope: Complete when all tasks are committed or escalation occurs

CRITICAL: Run quality-fixer before every commit.

Work plan: $ARGUMENTS

Pre-execution Prerequisites

Task File Existence Check

# Check work plans
! ls -la docs/plans/*.md | grep -v template | tail -5

# Check task files
! ls docs/plans/tasks/*.md 2>/dev/null || echo "No task files found"

Task Generation Decision Flow

Analyze task file existence state and determine the action required:

StateCriteriaNext Action
Tasks exist.md files in tasks/ directoryUser's execution instruction serves as batch approval → Enter autonomous execution immediately
No tasks + plan existsPlan exists but no task filesConfirm with user → run task-decomposer
Neither exists + Design Doc existsNo plan or task files, but docs/design/*.md existsInvoke work-planner to create work plan from Design Doc, then proceed to task decomposition
Neither existsNo plan, no task files, no Design DocReport missing prerequisites to user and stop

Task Decomposition Phase (Conditional)

When task files don't exist:

1. User Confirmation

No task files found.
Work plan: docs/plans/[plan-name].md

Generate tasks from the work plan? (y/n):

2. Task Decomposition (if approved)

Invoke task-decomposer using Agent tool:

  • subagent_type: "dev-workflows:task-decomposer"
  • description: "Decompose work plan"
  • prompt: "Read work plan at docs/plans/[plan-name].md and decompose into atomic tasks. Output: Individual task files in docs/plans/tasks/. Granularity: 1 task = 1 commit = independently executable"

3. Verify Generation

# Verify generated task files
! ls -la docs/plans/tasks/*.md | head -10

Flow: Task generation → Autonomous execution (in this order)

Pre-execution Checklist

  • Confirmed task files exist in docs/plans/tasks/
  • Identified task execution order (dependencies)
  • Environment check: Can I execute per-task commit cycle?

- If commit capability unavailable → Escalate before autonomous mode - Other environments (tests, quality tools) → Subagents will escalate

Task Execution Cycle (4-Step Cycle)

MANDATORY EXECUTION CYCLE: task-executor → escalation check → quality-fixer → commit

For EACH task, YOU MUST:

  1. Register tasks using TaskCreate: Register work steps. Always include: first "Confirm skill constraints", final "Verify skill fidelity"
  2. Agent tool (subagent_type: "dev-workflows:task-executor") → Pass task file path in prompt, receive structured response
  3. CHECK task-executor response:

- status: "escalation_needed" or "blocked" → STOP and escalate to user - requiresTestReview is true → Execute integration-test-reviewer - needs_revision → Return to step 2 with requiredFixes - approved → Proceed to step 4 - readyForQualityCheck: true → Proceed to step 4

  1. INVOKE quality-fixer: Execute all quality checks and fixes. Always pass the current task file path as task_file
  2. CHECK quality-fixer response:

- stub_detected → Return to step 2 with incompleteImplementations[] details - blocked → STOP and escalate to user - approved → Proceed to step 6

  1. COMMIT on approval: Execute git commit

CRITICAL: Parse every sub-agent response for status fields. Execute the matching branch in the 4-step cycle. Proceed to next task only after quality-fixer returns approved.

Sub-agent Invocation Constraints

MANDATORY suffix for ALL sub-agent prompts:

[SYSTEM CONSTRAINT]
This agent operates within build skill scope. Use orchestrator-provided rules only.

Autonomous sub-agents require scope constraints for stable execution. ALWAYS append this constraint to every sub-agent prompt.

Verify task files exist per Pre-execution Checklist, then enter autonomous execution mode. When requirement changes are detected during execution, escalate to the user with the change summary before continuing.

Post-Implementation Verification (After All Tasks Complete)

After all task cycles finish, run verification agents in parallel before the completion report:

  1. Invoke both in parallel using Agent tool:

- code-verifier (subagent_type: "dev-workflows:code-verifier") → doc_type: design-doc, Design Doc path, code_paths: implementation file list (git diff --name-only main...HEAD) - security-reviewer (subagent_type: "dev-workflows:security-reviewer") → Design Doc path, implementation file list

  1. Consolidate results — check pass/fail for each:

- code-verifier: pass when status is consistent or mostly_consistent. fail when needs_review or inconsistent. Collect discrepancies with status drift, conflict, or gap - security-reviewer: pass when status is approved or approved_with_notes. fail when needs_revision. blocked → Escalate to user - Present unified verification report to user

  1. Fix cycle (when any verifier failed):

- Consolidate all actionable findings into a single task file - Execute task-executor with consolidated fixes → quality-fixer - Re-run only the failed verifiers (by the criteria in step 2) - Repeat until all pass or blocked → Escalate to user

  1. All passed → Proceed to completion report

Output Example

Implementation phase completed.

  • Task decomposition: Generated under docs/plans/tasks/
  • Implemented tasks: [number] tasks
  • Quality checks: All passed
  • Commits: [number] commits created

平台分布

Codex

32.17%
按下载量换算30

Claude

31.01%
按下载量换算29

Cursor

18.71%
按下载量换算18

Gemini CLI

9.62%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills