Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

recipe-add-integration-tests(配方添加集成测试)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

recipe-add-integration-tests 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 63,891。

总安装 309周安装 13GitHub Stars 323下载 108核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:recipe-add-integration-tests(配方添加集成测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/shinpr/claude-code-workflows
仓库路径:skills/recipe-add-integration-tests
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/shinpr/claude-code-workflows --skill recipe-add-integration-tests
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/shinpr/claude-code-workflows --skill recipe-add-integration-tests

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

recipe-add-integration-tests 用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。适合编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。需确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑。涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/recipe-add-integration-tests

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/shinpr/claude-code-workflows --skill recipe-ad…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

recipe-add-integration-tests 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/shinpr/claude-code-workflows --skill recipe-add-integrat…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

recipe-add-integration-tests 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

recipe-add-integration-tests 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

recipe-add-integration-tests 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

recipe-add-integration-tests 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 309 次,近一周安装 13 次,下载 108 次,GitHub 323 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

recipe-add-integration-tests 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
recipe-add-integration-tests

配方添加集成测试 · 本页

309323权限未标注未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Context: Test addition workflow for existing implementations (backend, frontend, or fullstack)

Orchestrator Definition

Core Identity: "I am an orchestrator."

First Action: Register Steps 0-8 using TaskCreate before any execution.

Why Delegate: Orchestrator's context is shared across all steps. Direct implementation consumes context needed for review and quality check phases. Task files create context boundaries. Subagents work in isolated context.

Execution Method:

  • Skeleton generation → delegate to acceptance-test-generator
  • Task file creation → orchestrator creates directly (minimal context usage)
  • Test implementation → delegate to task-executor
  • Test review → delegate to integration-test-reviewer
  • Quality checks → delegate to quality-fixer

Document paths: $ARGUMENTS

Prerequisites

  • At least one Design Doc must exist (created manually or via reverse-engineer)
  • Existing implementation to test

Execution Flow

Step 0: Execute Skill

Execute Skill: documentation-criteria (for task file template in Step 3)

Step 1: Discover and Validate Documents

# Verify at least one document path was provided
test -n "$ARGUMENTS" || { echo "ERROR: No document paths provided"; exit 1; }

# Verify provided paths exist
ls $ARGUMENTS

# Discover additional documents
ls docs/design/*.md 2>/dev/null | grep -v template
ls docs/ui-spec/*.md 2>/dev/null

Classify discovered documents by filename:

  • Filename contains backend → Design Doc (backend)
  • Filename contains frontend → Design Doc (frontend)
  • Located in docs/ui-spec/ → UI Spec (optional)
  • None of the above → treat as single-layer Design Doc

Step 2: Skeleton Generation

Invoke acceptance-test-generator using Agent tool:

  • subagent_type: "dev-workflows:acceptance-test-generator"
  • description: "Generate test skeletons"
  • prompt: List only the documents that exist from Step 1: Generate test skeletons from the following documents: - Design Doc (backend): [path] ← include only if exists - Design Doc (frontend): [path] ← include only if exists - UI Spec: [path] ← include only if exists

Expected output: generatedFiles containing integration and e2e paths

Step 3: Create Task Files [GATE]

Create one task file per layer, using the monorepo-flow.md naming convention for deterministic agent routing:

  • Backend skeletons exist → docs/plans/tasks/integration-tests-backend-task-YYYYMMDD.md
  • Frontend skeletons exist → docs/plans/tasks/integration-tests-frontend-task-YYYYMMDD.md
  • Single-layer (no backend/frontend distinction) → docs/plans/tasks/integration-tests-backend-task-YYYYMMDD.md

Template (per task file):

---
name: Implement [layer] integration tests for [feature name]
type: test-implementation
---

## Objective

Implement test cases defined in skeleton files.

## Target Files

- Skeleton: [layer-specific paths from Step 2 generatedFiles]
- Design Doc: [layer-specific Design Doc from Step 1]

## Tasks

- [ ] Implement each test case in skeleton
- [ ] Verify all tests pass
- [ ] Ensure coverage meets requirements

## Acceptance Criteria

- All skeleton test cases implemented
- All tests passing
- quality-fixer reports approved

Output: "Task file(s) created at [path(s)]. Ready for Step 4."

Step 4: Test Implementation

For each task file from Step 3, invoke task-executor routed by filename pattern (per monorepo-flow.md):

  • *-backend-task-* → subagent_type: "dev-workflows:task-executor"
  • *-frontend-task-* → subagent_type: "dev-workflows-frontend:task-executor-frontend"
  • description: "Implement integration tests"
  • prompt: "Task file: [task file path from Step 3]. Implement tests following the task file."

Execute one task file at a time through Steps 4→5→6→7 before starting the next.

Expected output: status, testsAdded

Step 5: Test Review

Invoke integration-test-reviewer using Agent tool:

  • subagent_type: "dev-workflows:integration-test-reviewer"
  • description: "Review test quality"
  • prompt: "Review test quality. Test files: [paths from Step 4 testsAdded]. Skeleton files: [layer-specific paths from Step 2 generatedFiles matching current task's layer]"

Expected output: status (approved/needs_revision), requiredFixes

Step 6: Apply Review Fixes

Check Step 5 result:

  • status: approved → Mark complete, proceed to Step 7
  • status: needs_revision → Invoke task-executor with requiredFixes, then return to Step 5

Invoke task-executor routed by task filename pattern:

  • *-backend-task-* → subagent_type: "dev-workflows:task-executor"
  • *-frontend-task-* → subagent_type: "dev-workflows-frontend:task-executor-frontend"
  • description: "Fix review findings"
  • prompt: "Fix the following issues in test files: [requiredFixes from Step 5]"

Step 7: Quality Check

Invoke quality-fixer routed by task filename pattern:

  • *-backend-task-* → subagent_type: "dev-workflows:quality-fixer"
  • *-frontend-task-* → subagent_type: "dev-workflows-frontend:quality-fixer-frontend"
  • description: "Final quality assurance"
  • prompt: "Final quality assurance for test files added in this workflow. Run all tests and verify coverage."

Expected output: status (approved/stub_detected/blocked)

Check quality-fixer response:

  • stub_detected → Return to Step 4 with incompleteImplementations[] details, then re-execute Steps 4→5→6→7
  • blocked → Escalate to user
  • approved → Proceed to Step 8

Step 8: Commit

On approved from quality-fixer:

  • Commit test files using Bash with message format: "test: add [layer] integration tests for [feature name]"

平台分布

Codex

35.37%
按下载量换算38

Claude

31.61%
按下载量换算34

Cursor

17.27%
按下载量换算19

Gemini CLI

9.44%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills