Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

react-performance-optimizer(React 性能优化器)

用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑的开发与维护。它适合让 Agent 生成或审查 React、Next.js、Vue、Tailwind、CSS 等相关代码,整理组件结构,或定位布局和性能问题。使用时需要结合项目现有设计系统、路由和构建方式,避免只生成孤立片段;涉及页面改动时,应配合本地预览和构建检查确认视觉效果。

react-performance-optimizer 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 32,538。

总安装 2,497周安装 103GitHub Stars 98下载 816核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:react-performance-optimizer(React 性能优化器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills
仓库路径:skills/react-performance-optimizer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill react-performance-optimizer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill react-performance-optimizer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

智能识别 React 应用性能瓶颈,自动推荐针对性优化策略与代码改造方向。适用于缺乏经验的新手开发者快速掌握性能调优核心技巧与工具使用方法。可扫描代码库生成优化报告,标注高风险区域并提供具体修改示例。需人工复核 AI 建议的可行性,避免盲目优化破坏原有功能逻辑。

结合自动化测试保障每次优化后行为不变,形成安全可靠的迭代闭环。

来源仓库内路径:skills/react-performance-optimizer

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill react-pe…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

react-performance-optimizer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/erichowens/some_claude_skills --skill react-performance-…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

react-performance-optimizer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

react-performance-optimizer 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

react-performance-optimizer 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

react-performance-optimizer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,497 次,近一周安装 103 次,下载 816 次,GitHub 98 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

react-performance-optimizer 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
react-performance-optimizer

React 性能优化器 · 本页

2,49798需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

React Performance Optimizer

Expert in diagnosing and fixing React performance issues to achieve buttery-smooth 60fps experiences.

When to Use

✅ Use for:

  • Slow component re-renders
  • Large lists (>100 items) causing lag
  • Bundle size >500KB (gzipped)
  • Time to Interactive >3 seconds
  • Janky scrolling or animations
  • Memory leaks from unmounted components

❌ NOT for:

  • Apps with <10 components (premature optimization)
  • Backend API slowness (fix the API)
  • Network latency (use caching/CDN)
  • Non-React frameworks (use framework-specific tools)

Quick Decision Tree

Is your React app slow?
├── Profiler shows >16ms renders? → Use memoization
├── Lists with >100 items? → Use virtualization
├── Bundle size >500KB? → Code splitting
├── Lighthouse score <70? → Multiple optimizations
└── Feels fast enough? → Don't optimize yet

Technology Selection

Performance Tools (2024)

ToolPurposeWhen to Use
React DevTools ProfilerFind slow componentsAlways start here
LighthouseOverall performance scoreBefore/after comparison
webpack-bundle-analyzerIdentify large dependenciesBundle >500KB
why-did-you-renderUnnecessary re-rendersDebug re-render storms
React Compiler (2024+)Automatic memoizationReact 19+

Timeline:

  • 2018: React.memo, useMemo, useCallback introduced
  • 2020: Concurrent Mode (now Concurrent Rendering)
  • 2022: Automatic batching in React 18
  • 2024: React Compiler (automatic optimization)
  • 2025+: React Compiler expected to replace manual memoization

Common Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern 1: Premature Memoization

Novice thinking: "Wrap everything in useMemo for speed"

Problem: Adds complexity and overhead for negligible gains.

Wrong approach:

// ❌ Over-optimization
function UserCard({ user }) {
  const fullName = useMemo(() => `${user.first} ${user.last}`, [user]);
  const age = useMemo(() => new Date().getFullYear() - user.birthYear, [user]);

  return <div>{fullName}, {age}</div>;
}

Why wrong: String concatenation is faster than useMemo overhead.

Correct approach:

// ✅ Simple is fast
function UserCard({ user }) {
  const fullName = `${user.first} ${user.last}`;
  const age = new Date().getFullYear() - user.birthYear;

  return <div>{fullName}, {age}</div>;
}

Rule of thumb: Only memoize if:

  1. Computation takes >5ms (use Profiler to measure)
  2. Result used in dependency array
  3. Prevents child re-renders

Anti-Pattern 2: Not Memoizing Callbacks

Problem: New function instance on every render breaks React.memo.

Wrong approach:

// ❌ Child re-renders on every parent render
function Parent() {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0);

  return (
    <Child onUpdate={() => setCount(count + 1)} />
  );
}

const Child = React.memo(({ onUpdate }) => {
  return <button onClick={onUpdate}>Update</button>;
});

Why wrong: Arrow function creates new reference → React.memo useless.

Correct approach:

// ✅ Stable callback reference
function Parent() {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0);

  const handleUpdate = useCallback(() => {
    setCount(c => c + 1);  // Updater function avoids dependency
  }, []);

  return <Child onUpdate={handleUpdate} />;
}

const Child = React.memo(({ onUpdate }) => {
  return <button onClick={onUpdate}>Update</button>;
});

Anti-Pattern 3: Rendering Large Lists Without Virtualization

Problem: Rendering 1000+ DOM nodes causes lag.

Symptom: Scrolling feels janky, initial render slow.

Wrong approach:

// ❌ Renders all 10,000 items
function UserList({ users }) {
  return (
    <div>
      {users.map(user => (
        <UserCard key={user.id} user={user} />
      ))}
    </div>
  );
}

Correct approach:

// ✅ Only renders visible items
import { FixedSizeList } from 'react-window';

function UserList({ users }) {
  return (
    <FixedSizeList
      height={600}
      itemCount={users.length}
      itemSize={50}
      width="100%"
    >
      {({ index, style }) => (
        <div style={style}>
          <UserCard user={users[index]} />
        </div>
      )}
    </FixedSizeList>
  );
}

Impact: 10,000 items: 5 seconds → 50ms render time.


Anti-Pattern 4: No Code Splitting

Problem: 2MB bundle downloaded upfront, slow initial load.

Wrong approach:

// ❌ Everything in main bundle
import AdminPanel from './AdminPanel';  // 500KB
import Dashboard from './Dashboard';
import Settings from './Settings';

function App() {
  return (
    <Routes>
      <Route path="/admin" element={<AdminPanel />} />
      <Route path="/dashboard" element={<Dashboard />} />
      <Route path="/settings" element={<Settings />} />
    </Routes>
  );
}

Correct approach:

// ✅ Lazy load routes
import { lazy, Suspense } from 'react';

const AdminPanel = lazy(() => import('./AdminPanel'));
const Dashboard = lazy(() => import('./Dashboard'));
const Settings = lazy(() => import('./Settings'));

function App() {
  return (
    <Suspense fallback={<Loading />}>
      <Routes>
        <Route path="/admin" element={<AdminPanel />} />
        <Route path="/dashboard" element={<Dashboard />} />
        <Route path="/settings" element={<Settings />} />
      </Routes>
    </Suspense>
  );
}

Impact: Initial bundle: 2MB → 300KB.


Anti-Pattern 5: Expensive Operations in Render

Problem: Heavy computation on every render.

Wrong approach:

// ❌ Sorts on every render (even when data unchanged)
function ProductList({ products }) {
  const sorted = products.sort((a, b) => b.price - a.price);

  return <div>{sorted.map(p => <Product product={p} />)}</div>;
}

Correct approach:

// ✅ Memoize expensive operation
function ProductList({ products }) {
  const sorted = useMemo(
    () => [...products].sort((a, b) => b.price - a.price),
    [products]
  );

  return <div>{sorted.map(p => <Product product={p} />)}</div>;
}

Implementation Patterns

Pattern 1: React.memo for Pure Components

// Prevent re-render when props unchanged
const ExpensiveComponent = React.memo(({ data }) => {
  // Complex rendering logic
  return <div>{/* ... */}</div>;
});

// With custom comparison
const UserCard = React.memo(
  ({ user }) => <div>{user.name}</div>,
  (prevProps, nextProps) => {
    // Return true if props equal (skip re-render)
    return prevProps.user.id === nextProps.user.id;
  }
);

Pattern 2: useMemo for Expensive Calculations

function DataTable({ rows, columns }) {
  const sortedAndFiltered = useMemo(() => {
    console.log('Recomputing...');  // Only logs when rows/columns change

    return rows
      .filter(row => row.visible)
      .sort((a, b) => a.timestamp - b.timestamp);
  }, [rows, columns]);

  return <Table data={sortedAndFiltered} />;
}

Pattern 3: useCallback for Stable References

function SearchBox({ onSearch }) {
  const [query, setQuery] = useState('');

  // Stable reference, doesn't break child memoization
  const handleSubmit = useCallback(() => {
    onSearch(query);
  }, [query, onSearch]);

  return (
    <form onSubmit={handleSubmit}>
      <input value={query} onChange={e => setQuery(e.target.value)} />
    </form>
  );
}

Pattern 4: Virtualization (react-window)

import { VariableSizeList } from 'react-window';

function MessageList({ messages }) {
  const getItemSize = (index) => {
    // Dynamic heights based on content
    return messages[index].text.length > 100 ? 80 : 50;
  };

  return (
    <VariableSizeList
      height={600}
      itemCount={messages.length}
      itemSize={getItemSize}
      width="100%"
    >
      {({ index, style }) => (
        <div style={style}>
          <Message message={messages[index]} />
        </div>
      )}
    </VariableSizeList>
  );
}

Pattern 5: Code Splitting with React.lazy

// Route-based splitting
const routes = [
  { path: '/home', component: lazy(() => import('./Home')) },
  { path: '/about', component: lazy(() => import('./About')) },
  { path: '/contact', component: lazy(() => import('./Contact')) }
];

// Component-based splitting
const HeavyChart = lazy(() => import('./HeavyChart'));

function Dashboard() {
  const [showChart, setShowChart] = useState(false);

  return (
    <div>
      <button onClick={() => setShowChart(true)}>Show Chart</button>

      {showChart && (
        <Suspense fallback={<Spinner />}>
          <HeavyChart />
        </Suspense>
      )}
    </div>
  );
}

Production Checklist

□ Profiler analysis completed (identified slow components)
□ Large lists use virtualization (>100 items)
□ Routes code-split with React.lazy
□ Heavy components lazy-loaded
□ Callbacks memoized with useCallback
□ Expensive computations use useMemo
□ Pure components wrapped in React.memo
□ Bundle analyzed (no duplicate dependencies)
□ Tree-shaking enabled (ESM imports)
□ Images optimized and lazy-loaded
□ Lighthouse score >90
□ Time to Interactive <3 seconds

When to Use vs Avoid

ScenarioOptimize?
Rendering 1000+ list items✅ Yes - virtualize
Sorting/filtering large arrays✅ Yes - useMemo
Passing callbacks to memoized children✅ Yes - useCallback
String concatenation❌ No - fast enough
Simple arithmetic❌ No - don't memoize
10-item list❌ No - premature optimization

References

  • /references/profiling-guide.md - How to use React DevTools Profiler
  • /references/bundle-optimization.md - Reduce bundle size strategies
  • /references/memory-leaks.md - Detect and fix memory leaks

Scripts

  • scripts/performance_audit.ts - Automated performance checks
  • scripts/bundle_analyzer.sh - Analyze and visualize bundle

This skill guides: React performance optimization | Memoization | Virtualization | Code splitting | Bundle optimization | Profiling

平台分布

windsurf

28.58%
按下载量换算233

Claude Code

23.19%
按下载量换算189

Codex

16.82%
按下载量换算137

Antigravity

12.32%
按下载量换算101

OpenCode

7.21%
按下载量换算59

Cursor

2.85%
按下载量换算23

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills