Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

react-composition-2026(React composition 2026 搜索)

用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑的开发与维护。它适合让 Agent 生成或审查 React、Next.js、Vue、Tailwind、CSS 等相关代码,整理组件结构,或定位布局和性能问题。使用时需要结合项目现有设计系统、路由和构建方式,避免只生成孤立片段;涉及页面改动时,应配合本地预览和构建检查确认视觉效果。

react-composition-2026 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 14,594。

总安装 8,446周安装 345GitHub Stars 173下载 2,732核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:react-composition-2026(React composition 2026 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/patternsdev/skills
仓库路径:skills/react-composition-2026
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/patternsdev/skills --skill react-composition-2026
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/patternsdev/skills --skill react-composition-2026

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

探索 React 未来组件组合模式趋势。关注新提案如 use() 钩子等特性。适用于前瞻性架构设计参考。react-composition-2026 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。当前生产环境需谨慎采用实验性方案。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。建议跟踪官方 RFC 进展再决策。

来源仓库内路径:skills/react-composition-2026

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/patternsdev/skills --skill react-composition-2…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

react-composition-2026 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/patternsdev/skills --skill react-composition-2026。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

react-composition-2026 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

react-composition-2026 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

react-composition-2026 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

react-composition-2026 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 8,446 次,近一周安装 345 次,下载 2,732 次,GitHub 173 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

react-composition-2026 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
react-composition-2026

React composition 2026 搜索 · 本页

8,446173需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Modern React Composition Patterns

Table of Contents

Composition patterns for building flexible, maintainable React components that scale. These patterns replace boolean-prop proliferation, rigid component APIs, and tangled state with composable, explicit designs.

When to Use

Reference these patterns when:

  • A component has more than 3-4 boolean props controlling its behavior
  • Building reusable UI components or a shared component library
  • Refactoring components that are difficult to extend
  • Designing component APIs that other teams will consume
  • Reviewing component architecture for flexibility and maintainability

Instructions

  • Apply these patterns during component design, code generation, and review. When you see boolean prop accumulation or rigid component APIs, suggest the appropriate composition pattern.

Details

Overview

The core principle: composition over configuration. Instead of adding boolean props and conditional branches to handle every variant, compose smaller, focused components together. This makes components easier to understand, test, and extend — for both humans and AI agents.


1. Replace Boolean Props with Composition

Impact: HIGH — Prevents combinatorial explosion and makes intent explicit.

Boolean props multiply complexity: 4 booleans = 16 possible states, most of which are untested. Replace them with composable children.

Avoid — boolean prop accumulation:

<Card
  showHeader
  showFooter
  collapsible
  bordered
  withShadow
  headerAction="close"
  size="large"
/>

Prefer — explicit composition:

<Card variant="bordered" shadow="md">
  <Card.Header>
    <h3>Title</h3>
    <Card.CloseButton />
  </Card.Header>
  <Card.Body collapsible>
    <p>Content here</p>
  </Card.Body>
  <Card.Footer>
    <Button>Save</Button>
  </Card.Footer>
</Card>

Each piece is explicit, testable, and independently optional.


2. Build Compound Components with Context

Impact: HIGH — Shared implicit state without prop drilling.

Compound components are a group of components that work together, sharing state through context rather than props. The parent owns the state; children consume it.

Avoid — parent manages everything through props:

<Select
  options={options}
  value={value}
  onChange={onChange}
  renderOption={(opt) => <span>{opt.icon} {opt.label}</span>}
  renderSelected={(opt) => <b>{opt.label}</b>}
  placeholder="Choose..."
  clearable
  searchable
  maxHeight={300}
/>

Prefer — compound components:

const SelectContext = createContext<SelectState | null>(null)

function Select({ children, value, onChange }: SelectProps) {
  const [open, setOpen] = useState(false)
  const ctx = useMemo(() => ({ value, onChange, open, setOpen }), [value, onChange, open])

  return (
    <SelectContext.Provider value={ctx}>
      <div className="select-root">{children}</div>
    </SelectContext.Provider>
  )
}

function Trigger({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
  const { open, setOpen } = useSelectContext()
  return <button onClick={() => setOpen(!open)}>{children}</button>
}

function Options({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
  const { open } = useSelectContext()
  if (!open) return null
  return <ul role="listbox">{children}</ul>
}

function Option({ value, children }: OptionProps) {
  const { value: selected, onChange, setOpen } = useSelectContext()
  return (
    <li
      role="option"
      aria-selected={value === selected}
      onClick={() => { onChange(value); setOpen(false) }}
    >
      {children}
    </li>
  )
}

Select.Trigger = Trigger
Select.Options = Options
Select.Option = Option

Usage:

<Select value={color} onChange={setColor}>
  <Select.Trigger>Pick a color</Select.Trigger>
  <Select.Options>
    <Select.Option value="red">Red</Select.Option>
    <Select.Option value="blue">Blue</Select.Option>
  </Select.Options>
</Select>

3. Create Explicit Variant Components

Impact: MEDIUM — Makes each mode a clear, focused component.

When a component has distinct "modes" (dialog vs drawer, inline vs modal, card vs list-item), create explicit variant components instead of toggling with props.

Avoid — one component with mode props:

function MediaDisplay({ type, src, title, showControls, autoPlay, loop }: Props) {
  if (type === 'video') {
    return <video src={src} controls={showControls} autoPlay={autoPlay} loop={loop} />
  }
  if (type === 'audio') {
    return <audio src={src} controls={showControls} />
  }
  return <img src={src} alt={title} />
}

Prefer — explicit variants:

function VideoPlayer({ src, controls, autoPlay, loop }: VideoProps) {
  return <video src={src} controls={controls} autoPlay={autoPlay} loop={loop} />
}

function AudioPlayer({ src, controls }: AudioProps) {
  return <audio src={src} controls={controls} />
}

function Image({ src, alt }: ImageProps) {
  return <img src={src} alt={alt} />
}

Each variant has exactly the props it needs — no impossible states, no unused props.


4. Use Children Over Render Props for Composition

Impact: MEDIUM — Simpler API, better readability.

Render props (renderHeader, renderItem) were essential before hooks, but today children provides cleaner composition for most cases.

Avoid — render prop proliferation:

<DataTable
  data={users}
  renderHeader={() => <h2>Users</h2>}
  renderRow={(user) => <UserRow user={user} />}
  renderEmpty={() => <EmptyState />}
  renderFooter={() => <Pagination />}
/>

Prefer — children composition:

<DataTable data={users}>
  <DataTable.Header>
    <h2>Users</h2>
  </DataTable.Header>
  <DataTable.Body>
    {users.map(user => <UserRow key={user.id} user={user} />)}
  </DataTable.Body>
  <DataTable.Empty>
    <EmptyState />
  </DataTable.Empty>
  <DataTable.Footer>
    <Pagination />
  </DataTable.Footer>
</DataTable>

Reserve render props for cases where the parent needs to provide data to the renderer (e.g., virtualized list items).


5. Decouple State Implementation from UI

Impact: MEDIUM — Swap state management without changing components.

Define a generic interface for your state shape (value, actions, metadata), then let providers implement it. Components consume the interface, not the implementation.

Define the interface:

interface CounterState {
  count: number
  increment: () => void
  decrement: () => void
  isLoading: boolean
}

const CounterContext = createContext<CounterState | null>(null)

function useCounter() {
  const ctx = useContext(CounterContext)
  if (!ctx) throw new Error('useCounter must be used within a CounterProvider')
  return ctx
}

Implement with local state:

function LocalCounterProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0)
  const value = useMemo(() => ({
    count,
    increment: () => setCount(c => c + 1),
    decrement: () => setCount(c => c - 1),
    isLoading: false,
  }), [count])
  return <CounterContext.Provider value={value}>{children}</CounterContext.Provider>
}

Swap to API-backed state without changing consumers:

function ApiCounterProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
  const { data, mutate } = useSWR('/api/counter', fetcher)
  const value = useMemo(() => ({
    count: data?.count ?? 0,
    increment: () => mutate(patch('/api/counter', { delta: 1 })),
    decrement: () => mutate(patch('/api/counter', { delta: -1 })),
    isLoading: !data,
  }), [data, mutate])
  return <CounterContext.Provider value={value}>{children}</CounterContext.Provider>
}

The useCounter() consumers never change.


6. Lift State to Provider Components

Impact: MEDIUM — Enables sibling communication without prop threading.

When two sibling components need shared state, lift it into a provider rather than threading callbacks through the parent.

Avoid — parent threads state to siblings:

function Page() {
  const [selected, setSelected] = useState<string | null>(null)
  return (
    <div>
      <Sidebar selected={selected} onSelect={setSelected} />
      <Detail selected={selected} />
    </div>
  )
}

Prefer — provider manages shared state:

function SelectionProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
  const [selected, setSelected] = useState<string | null>(null)
  return (
    <SelectionContext.Provider value={{ selected, setSelected }}>
      {children}
    </SelectionContext.Provider>
  )
}

function Page() {
  return (
    <SelectionProvider>
      <Sidebar />
      <Detail />
    </SelectionProvider>
  )
}

Both Sidebar and Detail consume useSelection() directly.


7. Use Polymorphic as Props for Flexible Elements

Impact: MEDIUM — One component, any underlying element or component.

The as prop pattern lets consumers control the rendered element while keeping your component's styles and behavior.

type BoxProps<C extends React.ElementType = 'div'> = {
  as?: C
  children: React.ReactNode
} & Omit<React.ComponentPropsWithoutRef<C>, 'as' | 'children'>

function Box<C extends React.ElementType = 'div'>({
  as,
  children,
  ...props
}: BoxProps<C>) {
  const Component = as || 'div'
  return <Component {...props}>{children}</Component>
}

Usage:

<Box>Default div</Box>
<Box as="section">A section</Box>
<Box as="a" href="/about">A link</Box>
<Box as={Link} to="/about">Router link</Box>

8. React 19: Drop forwardRef, Use ref as a Prop

Impact: MEDIUM — Simpler component definitions.

React 19 passes ref as a regular prop. No more forwardRef wrapper.

React 18 (deprecated pattern):

const Input = forwardRef<HTMLInputElement, InputProps>(function Input(props, ref) {
  return <input ref={ref} {...props} />
})

React 19:

function Input({ ref, ...props }: InputProps & { ref?: React.Ref<HTMLInputElement> }) {
  return <input ref={ref} {...props} />
}

Similarly, use() can read either promises or context and can be called conditionally:

import { use } from 'react'

function Panel({ themePromise }: { themePromise: Promise<Theme> }) {
  const theme = use(themePromise)  // unwraps promise
  const user = use(UserContext)    // conditional context read
  return <div className={theme.bg}>{user.name}</div>
}

9. Slot Pattern for Layout Components

Impact: MEDIUM — Named insertion points without render props.

For layout components with multiple content areas, use a slot pattern based on child type detection or named sub-components.

function AppLayout({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
  const slots = React.Children.toArray(children)
  const header = slots.find(
    (child): child is React.ReactElement => React.isValidElement(child) && child.type === AppLayout.Header
  )
  const content = slots.filter(
    (child) => !React.isValidElement(child) || child.type !== AppLayout.Header
  )

  return (
    <div className="app-layout">
      <header>{header}</header>
      <main>{content}</main>
    </div>
  )
}

AppLayout.Header = function Header({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {
  return <>{children}</>
}

Usage:

<AppLayout>
  <AppLayout.Header>
    <Logo />
    <Nav />
  </AppLayout.Header>
  <Dashboard />
</AppLayout>

10. Headless Components for Maximum Flexibility

Impact: HIGH — Logic without opinions about rendering.

Headless components provide behavior (state, keyboard handling, ARIA attributes) without any markup. Consumers supply the rendering.

function useToggle(initial = false) {
  const [on, setOn] = useState(initial)
  const toggle = useCallback(() => setOn(o => !o), [])
  const buttonProps = {
    'aria-pressed': on,
    onClick: toggle,
    role: 'switch' as const,
  }
  return { on, toggle, buttonProps }
}

Usage — consumer controls all rendering:

function DarkModeSwitch() {
  const { on, buttonProps } = useToggle(false)
  return (
    <button {...buttonProps} className={on ? 'dark' : 'light'}>
      {on ? 'Dark' : 'Light'} Mode
    </button>
  )
}

Libraries like Radix UI, Headless UI, and React Aria follow this pattern. Prefer them over fully-styled component libraries when you need design flexibility.


Source

Patterns from patterns.dev — composition guidance for the broader React community.

平台分布

Codex

35.1%
按下载量换算959

Claude

29.73%
按下载量换算812

Cursor

20.07%
按下载量换算548

Gemini CLI

10.58%
按下载量换算289

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills