Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

react-code-reviewer(React 代码 reviewer)

用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑的开发与维护。它适合让 Agent 生成或审查 React、Next.js、Vue、Tailwind、CSS 等相关代码,整理组件结构,或定位布局和性能问题。使用时需要结合项目现有设计系统、路由和构建方式,避免只生成孤立片段;涉及页面改动时,应配合本地预览和构建检查确认视觉效果。

react-code-reviewer 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 8,006。

总安装 321周安装 13GitHub Stars 2下载 101核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:react-code-reviewer(React 代码 reviewer)
来源仓库:https://github.com/masanao-ohba/claude-manifests
仓库路径:skills/react-code-reviewer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/masanao-ohba/claude-manifests --skill react-code-reviewer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/masanao-ohba/claude-manifests --skill react-code-reviewer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

专注于 React 代码审查,帮助发现潜在问题和改进点。适合审查组件实现、交互逻辑及样式一致性。可集成到 Next.js、Vue 等框架项目中辅助开发。建议结合 Tailwind CSS 等工具链进行完整验证。输出结果需人工复核以确保符合业务需求。

react-code-reviewer 属于前端设计类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/react-code-reviewer

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/masanao-ohba/claude-manifests --skill react-co…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

react-code-reviewer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/masanao-ohba/claude-manifests --skill react-code-reviewe…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

react-code-reviewer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

react-code-reviewer 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

react-code-reviewer 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

react-code-reviewer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 321 次,近一周安装 13 次,下载 101 次,GitHub 2 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

react-code-reviewer 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
react-code-reviewer

React 代码 reviewer · 本页

3212操作浏览器未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

React Code Review Guidelines

Review Categories

Component Architecture

Server vs Client

Red Flags:

  • 'use client' on component that doesn't use hooks or browser APIs
  • Server Component trying to use hooks
  • Client Component doing data fetching that should be on server

Good Practices:

  • Server Components for data fetching and static content
  • 'use client' only when necessary (hooks, events, browser APIs)
  • Client Components receive data as props from Server Components
Component Structure

Issues:

  • Component exceeds 300 lines (consider splitting)
  • Multiple responsibilities in one component
  • Deeply nested component tree (> 5 levels)
  • Repeated code that could be extracted to hook

Look For:

  • Single responsibility principle
  • Proper component composition
  • Extracted custom hooks for reusable logic

TypeScript Usage

Type Safety

Issues:

  • Use of 'any' without explanation comment
  • Type assertions (as Type) without justification
  • Non-null assertions (!) without null checks
  • Missing prop types (implicit any)
  • Missing return type on exported functions

Best Practices:

  • All props have interface definitions
  • Generic types for reusable components
  • Discriminated unions for complex state
  • Proper utility type usage (Partial, Pick, Omit)
Naming

Check:

  • PascalCase for components and types
  • camelCase for variables and functions
  • Descriptive names (avoid single letters except in maps)
  • Hooks prefixed with 'use'

State Management

React State

Issues:

  • Using state for derived values (should use useMemo)
  • Prop drilling more than 2 levels (consider Context)
  • State that could be computed from props
  • Missing useCallback for functions passed to children

Patterns:

  • useState for local UI state
  • useReducer for complex state logic
  • Context for deeply nested props
  • Zustand for global client state
  • React Query for server state
Side Effects

Common Issues:

  • useEffect with missing dependencies
  • useEffect without cleanup function (subscriptions)
  • Infinite loops from state updates in useEffect
  • Side effects in render (should be in useEffect)

Verify:

  • All useEffect dependencies listed correctly
  • Cleanup functions for subscriptions/timers
  • No state updates during render

Performance

Optimization

Unnecessary Optimization:

  • React.memo on simple components
  • useMemo for cheap calculations
  • useCallback everywhere (premature optimization)

Missing Optimization:

  • Expensive calculations without useMemo
  • Functions recreated on every render passed to children
  • Large lists without virtualization
  • No code splitting for large components
Re-renders

Check:

  • Inline object creation in props ({} in JSX)
  • Inline array creation in props ([] in JSX)
  • Inline function definitions in JSX
  • Context value not memoized

Error Handling

Coverage

Missing:

  • No error handling for async operations
  • No loading states for data fetching
  • Missing error boundaries
  • Silent error catching (empty catch blocks)

Good Practices:

  • Loading, error, and success states all handled
  • Error boundaries around route segments
  • User-friendly error messages
  • Retry mechanisms for failed requests

Accessibility

Requirements

Critical Issues:

  • Interactive elements without keyboard support
  • Missing alt text on images
  • Poor color contrast ratios
  • Missing ARIA labels on custom controls
  • Improper heading hierarchy

Verify:

  • All buttons/links keyboard accessible
  • Form inputs have labels
  • Semantic HTML used appropriately
  • Focus management in modals/dialogs

Styling

Tailwind

Issues:

  • Extremely long className strings (extract to component)
  • Repeated utility combinations (create component)
  • Hard-coded colors not from theme
  • Magic numbers in spacing (use spacing scale)

Best Practices:

  • Use theme colors and spacing
  • Responsive classes for mobile-first design
  • Conditional classes with clsx/classnames
CSS Modules

Check:

  • Scoped styles don't leak globally
  • No!important flags (indicates specificity issue)
  • Consistent naming convention

Data Fetching

React Query

Issues:

  • Fetching in useEffect instead of React Query
  • Query keys not unique or not arrays
  • Missing error handling in queries
  • Not using mutation for state-changing operations

Verify:

  • Proper query key structure
  • Mutations for POST/PUT/DELETE
  • Query invalidation after mutations
  • Loading and error states handled
Server Components

Check:

  • Direct data fetching (no useEffect)
  • Async function declaration
  • Proper error handling with try-catch
  • Loading states via Suspense boundaries

Testing

Coverage

Missing:

  • No tests for components with logic
  • Only happy path tested
  • Implementation details tested instead of behavior
  • Missing edge case tests

Verify:

  • User interactions tested
  • Loading and error states tested
  • Accessibility in tests (query by role/label)
  • Integration over unit tests

Security

Common Issues:

  • Dangerously setting innerHTML without sanitization
  • Unvalidated user input in URLs
  • Sensitive data in client components (should be server)
  • API keys/secrets exposed in client code

Verify:

  • User input sanitized before rendering
  • Authentication checks in appropriate places
  • Secrets kept on server side

Code Quality

Readability

Issues:

  • Unclear variable names
  • Complex nested ternaries
  • Large boolean expressions without extraction
  • No comments for complex logic

Improvements:

  • Extract complex conditions to variables
  • Use early returns to reduce nesting
  • Add JSDoc for public APIs
Consistency

Verify:

  • Consistent component declaration style (function vs const)
  • Consistent import order
  • Consistent naming conventions
  • Follows project conventions in CLAUDE.md

Review Process

Checklist

  • Component uses correct Server/Client designation
  • TypeScript types complete and accurate
  • State management appropriate for use case
  • Performance optimizations justified
  • Error handling comprehensive
  • Accessibility requirements met
  • Tests cover main user flows
  • Code follows project conventions

Severity Levels

Critical:

  • Security vulnerabilities
  • Accessibility blocking issues
  • Data loss possibilities

Major:

  • Type safety violations
  • Performance problems
  • Missing error handling

Minor:

  • Code style inconsistencies
  • Missing comments
  • Minor optimization opportunities

平台分布

Codex

36.15%
按下载量换算37

Claude

28.33%
按下载量换算29

Cursor

18.68%
按下载量换算19

Gemini CLI

10.74%
按下载量换算11

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills