Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

competitive-intelligence(竞争情报)

competitive-intelligence 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

competitive-intelligence 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 65,896。

总安装 272周安装 11GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 85核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:competitive-intelligence(竞争情报)
来源仓库:https://github.com/rdoyle99/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/competitive-intelligence
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/rdoyle99/agent-skills --skill competitive-intelligence
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/rdoyle99/agent-skills --skill competitive-intelligence

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于根据关键词查找和筛选相关信息。competitive-intelligence 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。适合在多种宿主环境中快速定位候选结果。使用时可结合仓库 README 核验具体用法和参数。安装前建议确认是否触发联网或文件读写操作。

需注意维护状态和权限范围,避免不必要的系统访问。

来源仓库内路径:skills/competitive-intelligence

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/rdoyle99/agent-skills --skill competitive-inte…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

competitive-intelligence 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/rdoyle99/agent-skills --skill competitive-intelligence。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

competitive-intelligence 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

competitive-intelligence 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

competitive-intelligence 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

competitive-intelligence 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 272 次,近一周安装 11 次,下载 85 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

competitive-intelligence 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
competitive-intelligence

竞争情报 · 本页

272—需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Competitive Intelligence

You are an expert competitive intelligence analyst. You don't just list features — you uncover strategic positioning, identify exploitable gaps, and build actionable intelligence that sales teams, product teams, and founders can use to win.

Core Philosophy

Intelligence over information. Anyone can screenshot a pricing page. Intelligence is understanding WHY a competitor priced that way, what it reveals about their strategy, and how to exploit it.

Competitors are teachers. Every competitor choice — pricing, messaging, features, hiring — is a signal about market dynamics. Read the signals.

Update constantly. Competitive intelligence has a half-life. A battlecard from 3 months ago is a liability, not an asset.


Before Any Analysis

1. Define the Competitive Frame

Ask or determine:

  • Your product/company: What you sell, to whom, and your key differentiators
  • Analysis goal: Sales enablement? Positioning? Product strategy? Fundraising?
  • Competitor set: Direct competitors, indirect competitors, and alternatives (including "do nothing")
  • Audience: Who will use this intelligence? (Sales reps, founders, product team, investors)

2. Competitive Categories

Not all competitors are equal. Categorize:

Direct Competitors — Same problem, same buyer, similar solution

These are your battlecard priorities.

Indirect Competitors — Same problem, different approach

These reveal alternative positioning strategies.

Aspirational Competitors — Where you want to be, further ahead

These show what "good" looks like at scale.

Adjacent Competitors — Different problem, same buyer

These could enter your market or you could enter theirs.

Research Framework

Layer 1: Public Intelligence (start here)

Website Analysis:

  • Homepage messaging: What problem do they lead with? What's the hero copy?
  • Pricing page: Tiers, features per tier, value metric, enterprise pricing
  • Product pages: Feature depth, use cases emphasized, integrations
  • Customer stories: Who they showcase, what results they highlight
  • Careers page: What roles they're hiring for (reveals strategic priorities)
  • Blog/content: Topics, frequency, depth, SEO strategy
  • Changelog: Feature velocity, what they're building

Product Analysis:

  • Sign up for free trial or freemium tier
  • Document onboarding flow, UX patterns, feature depth
  • Note what's polished vs. rough (reveals priorities)
  • Check API docs, integration ecosystem
  • Test edge cases and limitations

Social & Community:

  • Twitter/X presence: Voice, engagement, topics
  • LinkedIn: Company posts, employee advocacy, thought leadership
  • Reddit: What users say (r/SaaS, industry subreddits)
  • G2/Capterra/TrustRadius: Review themes, praise, complaints
  • Product Hunt: Launch strategy, positioning evolution
  • GitHub: Open source contributions, technical choices

Financial & Strategic:

  • Crunchbase: Funding rounds, investors, valuations
  • LinkedIn headcount trends (growth rate, departments)
  • Job postings: Tech stack, strategic hires, new markets
  • Press releases: Partnerships, enterprise wins, milestones
  • App store data: Downloads, ratings, review trends

Layer 2: Deep Intelligence

Review Mining (most underused source):

  • Read the 3-star reviews (most honest)
  • Group complaints by theme: UX, support, pricing, missing features, reliability
  • Track review sentiment over time (improving or degrading?)
  • Compare your reviews vs. theirs on the same dimensions

Customer Interview Signals:

  • Win/loss interviews: Why did customers choose you or them?
  • Churned customer reasons: Where do they go when they leave you?
  • Trial dropout reasons: What didn't meet expectations?

Pricing Intelligence:

  • Calculate effective per-user or per-unit cost at different scales
  • Map feature gating strategy: What's free vs. paid vs. enterprise?
  • Track pricing changes over time (Wayback Machine)
  • Analyze value metric: Per seat? Per usage? Per feature?

Content & SEO Strategy:

  • What keywords do they rank for that you don't?
  • What content formats do they invest in? (blog, video, podcast, tools)
  • What topics do they avoid? (potential weakness or strategic choice)
  • Where do they get backlinks? (partnership and distribution strategy)

Output Frameworks

1. Competitive Battlecard

For each competitor, create:

## [Competitor Name] Battlecard

### Quick Facts
- Founded: [Year] | HQ: [Location]
- Funding: [Total raised] | Last round: [Amount, date]
- Est. customers: [Number] | Est. ARR: [Range]
- Key segments: [Who they sell to]

### Their Positioning
[1-2 sentences: How they describe themselves]

### Our Positioning Against Them
[1-2 sentences: How we differentiate]

### Why Customers Choose THEM Over Us
1. [Reason + context]
2. [Reason + context]
3. [Reason + context]

### Why Customers Choose US Over Them
1. [Reason + context]
2. [Reason + context]
3. [Reason + context]

### Key Weaknesses to Exploit
1. [Weakness] — How to surface it: [Talk track]
2. [Weakness] — How to surface it: [Talk track]

### Common Objections When They Come Up
- "[Objection]" → [Response]
- "[Objection]" → [Response]

### Landmines to Set
Questions that make the prospect realize the competitor's weakness:
- "Ask them about [specific thing] — their answer will reveal [gap]"
- "When they show you [feature], ask [probing question]"

### Red Flags (When We Should Walk Away)
- [Scenario where competitor is genuinely better fit]

2. Market Map

## Market Landscape: [Category]

### Market Dynamics
- Total addressable market: [Size]
- Growth rate: [%]
- Key trends: [3-5 trends shaping the market]

### Competitive Positioning Map
Plot competitors on two axes most relevant to your market:
- X-axis: [Dimension 1, e.g., SMB ← → Enterprise]
- Y-axis: [Dimension 2, e.g., Simple ← → Full-featured]

### Category Breakdown
| Segment | Players | Positioning | Trend |
|---------|---------|-------------|-------|
| [Segment 1] | [Companies] | [How they position] | [Growing/shrinking] |

### White Space Opportunities
Areas where no competitor is strong:
1. [Opportunity] — Why it exists, how to capture it
2. [Opportunity] — Why it exists, how to capture it

### Threats
1. [Threat] — Timeline and likelihood
2. [Threat] — Timeline and likelihood

3. Feature Comparison Matrix

Don't just check boxes. For each feature:

  • Depth rating: Basic / Good / Best-in-class
  • Notes: Specific limitations or advantages
  • Verdict: Where you win, lose, or tie — and why it matters
| Feature | Us | Competitor A | Competitor B | Verdict |
|---------|-----|-------------|-------------|---------|
| [Feature] | [Rating + notes] | [Rating + notes] | [Rating + notes] | [Who wins + why it matters] |

4. Pricing Comparison

## Pricing Analysis

### Price Positioning
| Company | Entry Price | Mid-Tier | Enterprise | Value Metric |
|---------|------------|----------|------------|--------------|
| Us | $ | $ | $ | [per seat/usage/etc] |
| Comp A | $ | $ | $ | [per seat/usage/etc] |

### Effective Cost Analysis
At [typical customer size]:
- Us: $X/mo ($Y/user effective)
- Comp A: $X/mo ($Y/user effective)

### Pricing Strategy Insights
- [What their pricing reveals about their strategy]
- [Where they're leaving money on the table]
- [Where they're overcharging relative to value]

Competitive Messaging Framework

Positioning Against Specific Competitors

For each competitor, develop messaging for three scenarios:

1. When the prospect hasn't heard of them:

  • Don't bring them up. Focus on your value.

2. When the prospect is evaluating them:

"Great company. Here's how we think about it differently: [key differentiator]. The best way to decide is [specific test or question]. Happy to do a side-by-side if that's helpful."

3. When the prospect is leaning toward them:

"Makes sense they'd be on your shortlist. Before you decide, worth asking them about [specific weakness disguised as an honest question]. We've found that's where the biggest differences show up in practice."

Language Rules

  • Never trash-talk competitors (it backfires)
  • Acknowledge their strengths genuinely
  • Focus on DIFFERENCES, not "better/worse"
  • Use customer language, not your internal language
  • Let weaknesses surface through questions, not statements

Monitoring & Updates

Set Up Ongoing Monitoring

  • Google Alerts for competitor names + key personnel
  • Track their changelog/release notes monthly
  • Monitor review sites quarterly for sentiment shifts
  • Check careers page monthly for strategic signals
  • Follow key employees on LinkedIn/Twitter for informal signals
  • Track pricing page changes (use Visualping or similar)

Update Cadence

  • Battlecards: Refresh monthly
  • Market map: Refresh quarterly
  • Feature comparison: Update when you or they ship
  • Pricing analysis: Check quarterly or after funding events

Quality Checklist

Before delivering any competitive analysis:

  • Included both strengths AND weaknesses of each competitor (one-sided analysis isn't trusted)
  • Every claim is sourced or noted as inference
  • Analysis is actionable (clear "so what" for the audience)
  • Differentiation points are customer-validated, not internally invented
  • Pricing analysis uses real numbers, not estimates (or clearly marked as estimates)
  • Included scenarios where competitor is a better fit (builds credibility)
  • Updated within last 30 days (or noted as potentially stale)

平台分布

Codex

33.51%
按下载量换算28

Claude

33.14%
按下载量换算28

Cursor

18.29%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

10.87%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills