Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

debugging(调试)

debugging 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

debugging 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 46,976。

总安装 753周安装 32GitHub Stars 35下载 264核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:debugging(调试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ratacat/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/debugging
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ratacat/claude-skills --skill debugging
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ratacat/claude-skills --skill debugging

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

debugging 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词快速定位结果。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 继续核验具体用法,建议确认权限范围。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/ratacat/claude-skills --skill debugging 安装前建议检查维护状态及是否涉及文件读写或网络请求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/debugging

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/ratacat/claude-skills --skill debugging;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

debugging 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/ratacat/claude-skills --skill debugging。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

debugging 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

debugging 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

debugging 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

debugging 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 753 次,近一周安装 32 次,下载 264 次,GitHub 35 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

debugging 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
debugging

调试 · 本页

75335只读MIT有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Debugging

Quickstart

  1. Capture exact repro, scope, and recent changes
  2. Isolate components/files; trace path to failure
  3. Research exact error; check official docs
  4. Compare failing vs working patterns; form a testable hypothesis
  5. Verify with minimal test; apply minimal fix across all instances; validate

When to Use This Skill

Use debugging when:

  • A bug has no obvious cause or has been "fixed" before but returned
  • Error messages are unclear or misleading
  • Multiple attempted fixes have failed
  • The issue might affect multiple locations in the codebase
  • Understanding the root cause is critical for proper resolution

Skip this skill for:

  • Simple syntax errors with obvious fixes
  • Trivial typos or missing imports
  • Well-understood, isolated bugs with clear solutions

Core Anti-Patterns to Avoid

Based on documented failures in AI debugging, explicitly avoid:

  1. Circular Reasoning: Never propose the same fix twice without learning why it failed
  2. Premature Victory: Always verify fixes were actually implemented and work
  3. Pattern Amnesia: Maintain awareness of established code patterns throughout the session
  4. Context Overload: Use the 50% rule - restart conversation when context reaches 50%
  5. Symptom Chasing: Resist fixing error messages without understanding root causes
  6. Implementation Before Understanding: Never jump to code changes before examining existing patterns

UNDERSTAND (10-step checklist)

  • Understand: capture exact repro, scope, and recent changes
  • Narrow: isolate components/files; trace path to failure
  • Discover: research exact error (WebSearch → Parallel Search, Context7:get-library-docs)
  • Examine: compare against known-good patterns in the codebase
  • Reason: use SequentialThinking:process_thought and 5 Whys to reach root cause
  • Synthesize: write a falsifiable hypothesis with predictions
  • Test: add logs/tests to confirm the mechanism
  • Apply: minimal fix for root cause, across all occurrences, following patterns
  • Note: record insights, warnings, decisions
  • Document: update comments/docs/tests as needed

Progress Tracking with TodoWrite

Use TodoWrite to track debugging progress through the UNDERSTAND checklist:

  1. At start: Create todos for each applicable step: ☐ U - Capture exact repro and scope ☐ N - Isolate failing component ☐ D - Research error message ☐ E - Compare with working patterns ☐ R - Root cause analysis (5 Whys) ☐ S - Write falsifiable hypothesis ☐ T - Verify with minimal test ☐ A - Apply fix across all occurrences ☐ N - Record insights ☐ D - Update docs/tests
  2. During debugging: Mark steps in_progress → completed as you work through them
  3. When stuck: TodoWrite makes it visible which step is blocked - helps identify if you're skipping steps or going in circles
  4. Skip steps only if: Bug is simple enough that checklist is overkill (see "Skip this skill for" above)

Tool Decision Tree

  • Know exact text/symbol? → grep
  • Need conceptual/semantic location? → codebase_search
  • Need full file context? → read_file
  • Unfamiliar error/behavior? → Context7:get-library-docs, then WebSearch → Parallel Search
  • Complex multi-hypothesis analysis? → SequentialThinking:process_thought

Context Management

  • Restart at ~50% context usage to avoid degraded reasoning
  • Before restart: summarize facts, hypothesis, ruled-outs, next step
  • Start a fresh chat with just that summary; continue

Decision Framework

IF same fix proposed twice → Stop; use SequentialThinking:process_thought IF error is unclear → Research via WebSearch → Parallel Search; verify with docs IF area is unfamiliar → Explore with codebase_search; don't guess IF fix seems too easy → Confirm it addresses root cause (not symptom) IF context is cluttered → Restart at 50% with summary IF multiple hypotheses exist → Evaluate explicitly (evidence for/against) IF similar code works → Find and diff via codebase_search/read_file IF declaring success → Show changed lines; test fail-before/pass-after IF fix spans multiple files → Search and patch all occurrences IF library behavior assumed → Check Context7:get-library-docs

Quality Checks Before Finishing

Before declaring a bug fixed, verify:

  • Root cause identified and documented
  • Fix addresses cause, not symptom
  • All occurrences fixed (searched project-wide)
  • Follows existing code patterns
  • Original symptom eliminated
  • No regressions introduced
  • Tests/logs verify under relevant conditions
  • Docs/tests updated (comments, docs, regression tests)

References

  • reference/root-cause-framework.md
  • reference/antipatterns.md

平台分布

Claude Code

30.55%
按下载量换算81

Antigravity

24.38%
按下载量换算64

trae

16.65%
按下载量换算44

OpenCode

12.36%
按下载量换算33

Gemini CLI

6.99%
按下载量换算18

windsurf

3.39%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills