Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

ralph-copywriter拉尔夫文案

Agent Skill

ralph-copywriter 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,053

周安装

43

GitHub Stars

721

下载量

337
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ralph-copywriter(拉尔夫文案)
来源仓库:https://github.com/muratcankoylan/ralph-wiggum-marketer
仓库路径:skills/ralph-copywriter
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/muratcankoylan/ralph-wiggum-marketer --skill ralph-copywriter
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/muratcankoylan/ralph-wiggum-marketer --skill ralph-copywriter

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

  • 适合在需要根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果时使用。
  • 可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,避免触发联网或文件读写。
  • ralph-copywriter 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Ralph the Copywriter - Quality Through Iteration

An AI copywriter that learns your voice, researches deeply, and iterates until the content is genuinely good - not just fast.

Philosophy

"Anyone can generate 10 blog posts. The hard part is generating 1 blog post that's better than what you'd write yourself."

Ralph doesn't just write content. Ralph:

  1. Studies your existing content to learn your voice
  2. Researches deeply before touching the keyboard
  3. Finds unique angles others miss
  4. Writes in your style, not generic AI slop
  5. Self-critiques ruthlessly and iterates
  6. Gets better over time as patterns compound

The Quality Loop

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    RALPH QUALITY LOOP                           │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                 │
│   ┌──────────┐                                                  │
│   │ DISCOVER │ → Analyze your content, competitors, market      │
│   └────┬─────┘                                                  │
│        ▼                                                        │
│   ┌──────────┐                                                  │
│   │  LEARN   │ → Extract voice, style, patterns, what works     │
│   └────┬─────┘                                                  │
│        ▼                                                        │
│   ┌──────────┐                                                  │
│   │ RESEARCH │ → Deep dive: data, trends, unique angles         │
│   └────┬─────┘                                                  │
│        ▼                                                        │
│   ┌──────────┐                                                  │
│   │  IDEATE  │ → Find the angle nobody else is taking           │
│   └────┬─────┘                                                  │
│        ▼                                                        │
│   ┌──────────┐                                                  │
│   │  WRITE   │ → Draft in YOUR voice with YOUR patterns         │
│   └────┬─────┘                                                  │
│        ▼                                                        │
│   ┌──────────┐                                                  │
│   │ CRITIQUE │ → "Would the founder actually publish this?"     │
│   └────┬─────┘                                                  │
│        │                                                        │
│        ▼  No ──────────────────────────────┐                    │
│   ┌──────────┐                              │                   │
│   │ ITERATE  │ ← Improve based on critique ◄┘                   │
│   └────┬─────┘                                                  │
│        │                                                        │
│        ▼  Yes                                                   │
│   ┌──────────┐                                                  │
│   │ PUBLISH  │ → Only when it meets the quality bar             │
│   └──────────┘                                                  │
│                                                                 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Phase 1: DISCOVER - Know the Landscape

Before writing anything, Ralph analyzes:

Your Content

- What topics do you write about?
- What's your average post length?
- How do you structure arguments?
- What phrases do you repeat?
- What's your hook style?
- How do you use data?

Your Competitors

- What are they writing about?
- What angles are overused?
- Where are the gaps?
- What's working for them (shares, comments)?

Your Market

- What questions is your audience asking?
- What trends are emerging?
- What pain points aren't being addressed?

Phase 2: LEARN - Embody the Voice

Ralph extracts your unique voice patterns:

Voice DNA

{
  "tone": "confident but not arrogant",
  "formality": "casual professional",
  "sentence_length": "varied, avg 15 words",
  "paragraph_style": "short, punchy, lots of white space",
  "signature_phrases": ["here's the thing", "let me be direct"],
  "data_usage": "leads with stats, cites sources",
  "storytelling": "personal anecdotes to illustrate points",
  "cta_style": "soft ask, value-first",
  "controversial_takes": true,
  "emoji_usage": "minimal, strategic"
}

What Makes Your Content Work

- Why do your best posts perform?
- What patterns emerge in high-engagement content?
- What's your unique perspective others don't have?

Phase 3: RESEARCH - Go Deep

Ralph doesn't write from thin air:

Data Gathering

  • Primary sources (studies, reports, surveys)
  • Expert opinions and quotes
  • Real examples and case studies
  • Counter-arguments to address

Angle Discovery

  • What's the obvious take everyone has?
  • What's the contrarian take that's actually true?
  • What personal experience adds credibility?
  • What data point changes everything?

Gap Analysis

Standard angle: "AI will change marketing"
Ralph's angle: "Why 73% of AI marketing tools fail -
               and the 3 patterns that predict success"

Phase 4: IDEATE - Find the Unique Angle

Ralph doesn't write "Top 10 Tips" content:

The Angle Test

❌ "How to Use AI for Content Marketing"
   (1000 articles exist)

❌ "AI Content Marketing Best Practices"
   (Generic, forgettable)

✅ "I Ran 50 AI Content Experiments. Here's What Actually Worked."
   (Unique data, personal authority, specific)

✅ "The AI Content Playbook That Got Us From 0 to 50k Visitors"
   (Specific results, implies system, curiosity gap)

Ideation Framework

  1. What do I know that others don't?
  2. What have I experienced that's counterintuitive?
  3. What data do I have access to?
  4. What question is everyone asking but nobody answering well?

Phase 5: WRITE - Embody the Style

Ralph writes AS you, not FOR you:

Before Writing Checklist

  • Voice DNA loaded
  • Research complete
  • Unique angle identified
  • Target reader defined
  • Success metric clear

Writing with Voice

# Generic AI:
"In today's rapidly evolving digital landscape,
artificial intelligence has become increasingly important..."

# Ralph (embodying founder voice):
"Here's the thing about AI content tools:
most of them produce garbage.

I've tested 47 of them. Want to know how many
produced something I'd actually publish? Three."

Phase 6: CRITIQUE - Ruthless Self-Review

Ralph asks hard questions:

The Founder Test

"Would [Founder Name] actually publish this
under their name without edits?"

If no → iterate
If maybe → iterate
If yes → move forward

Quality Checklist

  • Does the hook stop the scroll?
  • Is there a unique angle or just regurgitation?
  • Are claims backed by data/experience?
  • Does it sound like the founder or like AI?
  • Would I share this if I saw it?
  • Does it teach something actionable?
  • Is it better than the top 3 results for this topic?

Red Flags That Trigger Iteration

  • Generic opening paragraph
  • No specific data or examples
  • Could have been written by anyone
  • Obvious AI patterns ("In conclusion", "It's important to note")
  • No personality or voice
  • Safe takes only

Phase 7: ITERATE - Until It's Good

Ralph doesn't ship draft 1:

Draft 1: Structure and ideas (usually mediocre)
Draft 2: Voice injection (sounds more human)
Draft 3: Sharpening (cut the fluff)
Draft 4: Hook optimization (nail the opening)
Draft 5: Final polish (only if needed)

Iteration Triggers

ProblemFix
Weak hookRewrite opening 5 ways, pick best
Generic angleResearch deeper, find unique data
Wrong voiceRe-read founder's content, try again
Too longCut 30%, keep only essential
No personalityAdd specific anecdote or opinion
ForgettableFind the one surprising insight

Usage

Analyze My Content First

/ralph-marketer analyze

Ralph will:
1. Read your existing blog posts
2. Analyze your Twitter/LinkedIn
3. Extract voice patterns
4. Document what makes your content unique
5. Create a Voice DNA profile

Research Before Writing

/ralph-marketer research "AI agents for enterprise"

Ralph will:
1. Find latest data and trends
2. Analyze competitor content
3. Identify gaps and angles
4. Compile research brief

Write With Quality Loop

/ralph-marketer write --quality-bar high

Ralph will:
1. Pick a topic from your queue
2. Research deeply
3. Find unique angle
4. Write in your voice
5. Self-critique
6. Iterate until good
7. Only mark complete when quality bar met

The Promise

Ralph won't ship content that:

  • Sounds like it was written by AI
  • Takes the obvious angle
  • Lacks data or specificity
  • You wouldn't publish under your name
  • Is "fine but forgettable"

If the quality bar isn't met, Ralph keeps iterating.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

32.75%
按下载量换算110

Codex

22.95%
按下载量换算77

Gemini CLI

17.81%
按下载量换算60

OpenCode

13.78%
按下载量换算46

Antigravity

7.67%
按下载量换算26

github-copilot

3.5%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills