Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

r-bayes(r 贝叶斯)

r-bayes 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

r-bayes 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 19,381。

总安装 275周安装 11GitHub Stars 134下载 89核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:r-bayes(r 贝叶斯)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ab604/claude-code-r-skills
仓库路径:skills/r-bayes
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ab604/claude-code-r-skills --skill r-bayes
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ab604/claude-code-r-skills --skill r-bayes

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中整理仓库状态与代码变更。通过 npx 安装,需确认权限范围和维护状态后再使用。可能触发联网、命令执行或文件读写,建议提前评估风险。

可结合原始 README 进一步核验具体功能与使用方式。

来源仓库内路径:skills/r-bayes

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/ab604/claude-code-r-skills --skill r-bayes;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

r-bayes 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/ab604/claude-code-r-skills --skill r-bayes。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

r-bayes 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

r-bayes 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

r-bayes 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

r-bayes 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 275 次,近一周安装 11 次,下载 89 次,GitHub 134 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

r-bayes 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
r-bayes

r 贝叶斯 · 本页

275134权限未标注未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Core Packages

library(brms)
library(cmdstanr)
library(dagitty)
library(ggdag)
library(marginaleffects)
library(tidybayes)
library(bayesplot)

Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs)

Prior to causal inference, create and validate DAGs with dagitty and ggdag.

Define DAG Structure

dag <- dagitty('
dag {
  # Node positions for visualization
  exposure [pos="0,1"]
  mediator [pos="1,1"]
  outcome [pos="2,1"]
  confounder [pos="1,0"]

  # Edges (arrows)
  confounder -> exposure
  confounder -> outcome
  exposure -> mediator
  mediator -> outcome
  exposure -> outcome
}
')

Identify Adjustment Sets

# For direct effect
adjustmentSets(dag, exposure = "treatment", outcome = "outcome", effect = "direct")

# For total effect
adjustmentSets(dag, exposure = "treatment", outcome = "outcome", effect = "total")

Validate DAG Against Data

# Get implied conditional independencies
implied_cis <- impliedConditionalIndependencies(dag)

# Test against data
ci_results <- localTests(dag, data = analysis_data, type = "cis")

# Assess validation
ci_df <- as.data.frame(ci_results)
ci_df$independent <- ci_df$p.value > 0.05
pct_supported <- 100 * mean(ci_df$independent, na.rm = TRUE)

cat(sprintf("DAG support: %.1f%% of implied CIs hold\n", pct_supported))

Visualize DAG

dag_tidy <- tidy_dagitty(dag)

ggplot(dag_tidy, aes(x = x, y = y, xend = xend, yend = yend)) +
  geom_dag_edges(edge_colour = "grey50") +
  geom_dag_point(size = 20) +
  geom_dag_text(size = 3.5, color = "black") +
  theme_dag() +
  labs(title = "Causal DAG")

Bayesian Regression with brms

Standard Configuration

options(mc.cores = 4)

# Standard brms model call
model <- brm(
  formula = outcome ~ predictor1 + predictor2 + (1 | group_id),
  data = model_data,
  family = bernoulli(link = "logit"),  # For binary outcomes
  prior = priors,
  sample_prior = "yes",  # For prior-posterior comparison
  chains = 4,
  cores = 4,
  iter = 4000,
  warmup = 1000,
  control = list(
    adapt_delta = 0.95,
    max_treedepth = 15
  ),
  seed = 123,  # Set seed for reproducibility
  backend = "cmdstanr",
  file = "models/model_name",         # Cache compiled model
  file_refit = "on_change"            # Only refit if formula/data change
)

Priors

Store priors separately and define explicitly:

priors <- c(
  prior(normal(0, 2), class = "Intercept"),
  prior(normal(0, 1), class = "b"),                    # Fixed effects
  prior(exponential(1), class = "sd"),                 # Random effect SD
  prior(lkj(2), class = "cor")                         # Correlation priors
)

# Get default priors for a formula
get_prior(outcome ~ predictor + (1 | id), data = data, family = bernoulli())

Common Families

# Binary outcome
family = bernoulli(link = "logit")

# Count data
family = poisson(link = "log")
family = negbinomial(link = "log")

# Continuous
family = gaussian()
family = student()  # Robust to outliers

# Ordinal
family = cumulative(link = "logit")

Multilevel Models

Random Intercepts

# Random intercept per participant
outcome ~ predictors + (1 | participant_id)

Random Slopes

# Random intercept and slope for time
outcome ~ time + predictors + (1 + time | participant_id)

Crossed Random Effects

# Participants nested in groups, items crossed
response ~ predictors + (1 | participant_id) + (1 | item_id)

Within-Person Centering

For longitudinal data, separate between-person and within-person effects:

# Create person-centered variables
model_data <- data |>
  group_by(participant_id) |>
  mutate(
    # Between-person means (stable trait)
    predictor_mean = mean(predictor, na.rm = TRUE),

    # Within-person deviations (dynamic change)
    predictor_dev = predictor - predictor_mean,

    # Volatility (person-level SD)
    predictor_sd = sd(predictor, na.rm = TRUE)
  ) |>
  ungroup() |>
  # Standardize
  mutate(
    predictor_mean_z = scale(predictor_mean)[, 1],
    predictor_dev_z = scale(predictor_dev)[, 1]
  )

# Model with both components
model <- brm(
  outcome ~ predictor_mean_z + predictor_dev_z + (1 | participant_id),
  data = model_data,
  family = bernoulli()
)

Lagged Predictors for Temporal Precedence

# Create lagged predictors within person
model_data <- data |>
  group_by(participant_id) |>
  arrange(time) |>
  mutate(
    # Lagged values (from previous timepoint)
    predictor_lag = lag(predictor, order_by = time),
    predictor_dev_lag = lag(predictor_dev, order_by = time)
  ) |>
  ungroup()

# Test if t-1 predicts outcome at t (establishes temporal precedence)
model_lagged <- brm(
  outcome ~ predictor_dev_lag_z + predictor_mean_z + (1 | participant_id),
  ...
)

Extracting and Interpreting Results

Extract Posterior Samples

posterior <- as_draws_df(model)

# Access specific parameter
samples <- posterior$b_predictor_z

# Summary statistics
tibble(
  estimate = median(samples),
  lower_95 = quantile(samples, 0.025),
  upper_95 = quantile(samples, 0.975),
  lower_80 = quantile(samples, 0.10),
  upper_80 = quantile(samples, 0.90),
  prob_negative = mean(samples < 0),
  prob_positive = mean(samples > 0)
)

Odds Ratios (for logistic models)

# Convert log-odds to odds ratios
effects_df <- effects_df |>
  mutate(
    OR = exp(estimate),
    OR_lower = exp(lower_95),
    OR_upper = exp(upper_95)
  )

Posterior Probability of Direction

# P(effect is protective)
prob_protective <- mean(posterior$b_predictor < 0)

# P(effect is harmful)
prob_harmful <- mean(posterior$b_predictor > 0)

# P(|effect| > some threshold)
prob_meaningful <- mean(abs(posterior$b_predictor) > 0.1)

Compare Effect Magnitudes

# Test if within-person effect is larger than between-person
diff <- abs(posterior$b_predictor_dev_z) - abs(posterior$b_predictor_mean_z)
prob_within_larger <- mean(diff > 0)

cat(sprintf("P(|within| > |between|) = %.1f%%\n", 100 * prob_within_larger))

Marginal Effects with marginaleffects

Average Marginal Effects (AME)

# Change in P(outcome) per 1 unit change in predictor
ame <- avg_slopes(
  model,
  variables = c("predictor1_z", "predictor2_z"),
  type = "response"  # Probability scale
)

print(ame)

Predictions at Specific Values

# Predictions at low (-1 SD), mean (0), and high (+1 SD)
predictions <- predictions(
  model,
  newdata = datagrid(
    model = model,
    predictor_z = c(-1, 0, 1)
  ),
  type = "response",
  re_formula = NA  # Population-level (ignore random effects)
)

as.data.frame(predictions) |>
  select(predictor_z, estimate, conf.low, conf.high)

Marginal Effect Plots

plot_predictions(
  model,
  by = "predictor_z",
  type = "response",
  re_formula = NA
) +
  labs(
    title = "Effect of Predictor on Outcome",
    x = "Predictor (standardized)",
    y = "P(Outcome)"
  ) +
  scale_y_continuous(labels = scales::percent) +
  theme_minimal()

Comparing Slopes Across Models

# Extract AME from multiple models
ame_model1 <- avg_slopes(model1, variables = "predictor_z", type = "response")
ame_model2 <- avg_slopes(model2, variables = "predictor_z", type = "response")

comparison <- bind_rows(
  as.data.frame(ame_model1) |> mutate(model = "Full"),
  as.data.frame(ame_model2) |> mutate(model = "Simple")
)

Model Diagnostics

Check MCMC Convergence

# Trace plots
mcmc_trace(model, pars = c("b_Intercept", "b_predictor_z"))

# R-hat (should be < 1.01)
summary(model)$fixed$Rhat

# Effective sample size (should be > 400)
summary(model)$fixed$Bulk_ESS
summary(model)$fixed$Tail_ESS

Posterior Predictive Checks

pp_check(model)
pp_check(model, type = "stat", stat = "mean")
pp_check(model, type = "stat_2d", stat = c("mean", "sd"))

Prior-Posterior Comparison

# Requires sample_prior = "yes" in brm()
prior_summary(model)

# Plot prior vs posterior
mcmc_areas(model, pars = "b_predictor_z", prob = 0.95)

tidybayes for Posterior Manipulation

# Extract draws in tidy format
draws <- model |>
  spread_draws(b_predictor1_z, b_predictor2_z) |>
  mutate(
    OR_predictor1 = exp(b_predictor1_z),
    OR_predictor2 = exp(b_predictor2_z)
  )

# Summarize
draws |>
  median_qi(OR_predictor1, OR_predictor2, .width = c(0.80, 0.95))

# Visualize
draws |>
  ggplot(aes(x = OR_predictor1)) +
  stat_halfeye() +
  geom_vline(xintercept = 1, linetype = "dashed") +
  labs(x = "Odds Ratio", y = NULL)

Workflow Summary

  1. Define causal DAG with dagitty
  2. Validate DAG against data with localTests()
  3. Identify adjustment sets for target effects
  4. Specify priors based on domain knowledge
  5. Fit brms model with random effects for nested data
  6. Check diagnostics (convergence, PPCs)
  7. Extract posteriors for inference
  8. Compute marginal effects on interpretable scale
  9. Visualize effects with uncertainty

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

# WRONG: Using contemporaneous predictors when temporal order matters
outcome_t ~ predictor_t  # Shows co-occurrence, not temporal precedence

# CORRECT: Use lagged predictors to establish temporal precedence
outcome_t ~ predictor_t_minus_1

# WRONG: Ignoring clustering
brm(outcome ~ predictor, data = longitudinal_data)

# CORRECT: Account for repeated measures
brm(outcome ~ predictor + (1 | participant_id), data = longitudinal_data)

# WRONG: Interpreting within-person effects from between-person variation
# Using person aggregates when you have time-varying data

# CORRECT: Person-mean centering to separate effects
outcome ~ predictor_mean_z + predictor_dev_z + (1 | id)

平台分布

Codex

35.7%
按下载量换算32

Claude

28.98%
按下载量换算26

Cursor

17.74%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

8.44%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills