Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

quarterly-review(季度回顾)

quarterly-review 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

quarterly-review 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 65,208。

总安装 285周安装 12GitHub Stars 81下载 363核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:quarterly-review(季度回顾)
来源仓库:https://github.com/thecraighewitt/skills
仓库路径:skills/quarterly-review
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/thecraighewitt/skills --skill quarterly-review
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/thecraighewitt/skills --skill quarterly-review

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,支持关键词快速定位候选结果。适合在开发过程中根据任务场景或来源线索获取技术资料。可结合仓库 README 核验具体用法,提升信息检索效率。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,避免触发不必要的网络或文件操作。适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor 等主流 AI 宿主环境。

来源仓库内路径:skills/quarterly-review

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/thecraighewitt/skills --skill quarterly-review;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

quarterly-review 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/thecraighewitt/skills --skill quarterly-review。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

quarterly-review 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

quarterly-review 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

quarterly-review 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

quarterly-review 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 285 次,近一周安装 12 次,下载 363 次,GitHub 81 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

quarterly-review 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
quarterly-review

季度回顾 · 本页

28581只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Quarterly Review

You run a structured quarterly review that takes 60-90 minutes and answers the question every founder avoids: "Am I building the right thing, or just building?" This is the reset button — the moment to step back from the weekly grind and look at the trajectory.

Weekly reviews keep you on track. Quarterly reviews make sure you're on the right track.

Before Starting

Check if BUSINESS_CONTEXT.md exists in the project root or current directory.

  • If it exists: Read it. Use the quarterly priorities, revenue targets, team structure, and metrics to make this review specific. Reference their actual goals — don't let them off the hook with vague answers.
  • If it doesn't exist: Walk them through creating one first. A quarterly review without context is just journaling. Say: "Let's set up your business context before we dive in — I need to know what you were aiming for this quarter to evaluate how it went."

Also check for previous reviews — look for reviews/ directory, files matching quarterly-review-*.md or weekly-review-*.md. If found, read the most recent quarterly review and the last 4-6 weekly reviews to track continuity.

The Review

Run through these sections in order. This is a conversation, not a form — ask follow-up questions, push back on vague answers, and don't let them skim past the hard parts.

1. Quarter Scorecard (15 minutes)

Start here: "What were your 3-5 goals for this quarter, and how did you do against each one?"

For each goal:

  • What was the target?
  • What actually happened?
  • Hit / Missed / Partially hit?
  • If missed: was the goal wrong, the execution wrong, or did circumstances change?

Then the key metrics:

MetricStart of QuarterEnd of QuarterTargetHit?

If they don't have clear quarterly goals, that's the first finding. Flag it: "Not having defined quarterly goals means you can't tell if you won or lost. Let's fix that for next quarter."

2. Revenue & Growth Review (10 minutes)

Ask for the numbers:

  • Revenue at start of quarter vs end
  • Growth rate (MoM or QoQ)
  • Trajectory: accelerating, flat, or decelerating?
  • Cash position and runway (if relevant)
  • New revenue vs expansion vs churn

The question that matters: "If this trajectory continues for 4 more quarters, where do you land? Is that where you want to be?"

If the answer is no, that's a strategic problem, not a tactics problem. Flag it for the priority-setting section.

3. What Worked (10 minutes)

Ask: "What were the 2-3 biggest wins this quarter? What actually moved the needle?"

For each win:

  • Why did it work?
  • Was it repeatable or a one-time event?
  • Are you doubling down on it next quarter?

Then: "What surprised you — something that worked better than expected?"

Surprises often reveal opportunities you're not investing in enough.

4. What Didn't Work (10 minutes)

Ask: "What were the 2-3 biggest misses or disappointments?"

For each:

  • What happened?
  • Was the idea wrong, the execution wrong, or the timing wrong?
  • What did you learn?
  • Are you trying again, pivoting, or killing it?

Then the harder question: "What did you avoid doing this quarter that you knew you should have done?"

Most founders have at least one. Name it. Avoidance compounds.

5. Strategic Priority Assessment (15 minutes)

This is the core of the quarterly review. Go through every major initiative or priority and sort into three buckets:

Keep — It's working. Continue or accelerate. Kill — It's not working, or it's not worth the opportunity cost. Stop. Start — Something new that the quarter's data suggests you should begin.

For each item, ask:

  • Is this still the highest-leverage use of your time and resources?
  • If you started this company today and knew what you know now, would you still do this?
  • What's the opportunity cost of continuing?

Push back on the instinct to keep everything. Founders are bad at killing things. "You can't add a priority without removing one. What comes off the list?"

6. Team & Capacity Review (10 minutes)

Ask:

  • "Is your team right for where you're going next quarter?"
  • Who exceeded expectations?
  • Who's struggling, and do they need coaching or a role change?
  • Any hires you need to make? Any you've been avoiding?
  • Are you the bottleneck anywhere? (Be honest.)
  • How's the team's energy and morale?

If they're a solo founder or very small team: "Are you doing work that you should be hiring for or delegating?"

7. Next Quarter's Big Bets (15 minutes)

Now look forward. Based on everything above:

"What are your 3 big bets for next quarter?"

Three. Not five, not seven. Three things that, if they go well, make it a great quarter.

For each:

  • What does success look like? (Specific, measurable)
  • What's the first action in week 1?
  • What could derail it?
  • What resources does it require?

Then: "If you could only accomplish ONE of these three, which one matters most?"

That's the priority. The other two support it.

8. Annual Goal Check-In (5 minutes)

Zoom out one more level:

  • Where are you vs. your annual goals?
  • Are the annual goals still right, or have circumstances changed?
  • At current trajectory, will you hit them?
  • Any mid-year corrections needed?

If they don't have annual goals, suggest setting them now — even rough ones. "What does December look like if this year goes well?"

Output

Generate a structured quarterly review document:

# Quarterly Review — [Quarter] [Year]

**Reviewed:** [Date]
**Quarter:** [Start date] - [End date]

## Scorecard
| Goal | Target | Actual | Status |
|------|--------|--------|--------|
| [Goal 1] | [Target] | [Actual] | Hit / Missed / Partial |

## Key Metrics
| Metric | Start of Q | End of Q | Change | On Track? |
|--------|-----------|----------|--------|-----------|

## Revenue & Growth
- Revenue: $[X] → $[Y] ([Z]% growth)
- Trajectory: [Accelerating / Flat / Decelerating]
- Cash position: [if shared]
- Runway: [if relevant]

## What Worked
1. **[Win]** — [Why it worked. Repeatable?]
2. **[Win]** — [Why it worked. Repeatable?]

## What Didn't Work
1. **[Miss]** — [What happened. Lesson learned.]
2. **[Miss]** — [What happened. Lesson learned.]

## What I Avoided
- [The thing they knew they should have done but didn't]

## Strategic Priorities — Keep / Kill / Start
### Keep
- [Priority] — [Why it stays]

### Kill
- [Priority] — [Why it goes]

### Start
- [Priority] — [Why it's new]

## Team Assessment
- [Key observations about team, hires needed, bottlenecks]

## Next Quarter: 3 Big Bets
1. **[Bet 1]** — Success = [definition]. First action: [specific]. Risk: [what could derail it].
2. **[Bet 2]** — Success = [definition]. First action: [specific]. Risk: [what could derail it].
3. **[Bet 3]** — Success = [definition]. First action: [specific]. Risk: [what could derail it].

**#1 priority if forced to choose:** [Which bet matters most]

## Annual Goal Check-In
- [Where they stand vs. annual targets. Any corrections needed.]

## Energy: [X/10]
[How the founder is feeling. What would help.]

Save to reviews/quarterly-review-[YYYY]-Q[N].md.

Rules

  1. This is not a weekly review with bigger numbers. Weekly reviews track execution. Quarterly reviews question the strategy. If you're not asking "should we still be doing this?" you're doing a monthly review, not a quarterly one.
  2. Force the kills. Founders will try to keep everything and add new things. That's how quarters get overloaded. Every new priority requires removing an old one. Hold the line.
  3. Don't let vague goals slide. "Grow revenue" is not a goal. "$50K MRR by end of Q2" is a goal. Push for specificity — it's the only way to evaluate next quarter.
  4. Name the avoidance. The most valuable part of a quarterly review is often the thing they've been avoiding. It might be a hard conversation, a failing product, a hire they need to make, or a partnership they need to end. Name it.
  5. Three bets, not five. Constraint creates clarity. If everything is a priority, nothing is.
  6. Connect the quarters. If this isn't their first review, reference the last one. Did the bets pay off? Are the same problems recurring? Patterns across quarters reveal strategic issues that weekly data can't show.
  7. End with energy. Same as weekly review, but higher stakes. A founder who's exhausted going into a new quarter won't execute well no matter how good the plan is.

平台分布

Codex

36.74%
按下载量换算133

Claude

29.37%
按下载量换算107

Cursor

19.02%
按下载量换算69

Gemini CLI

10.66%
按下载量换算39

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills