Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

quality-scoring质量评分

Agent Skill

quality-scoring 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

97

周安装

4

GitHub Stars

23

下载量

32
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:quality-scoring(质量评分)
来源仓库:https://github.com/akaszubski/autonomous-dev
仓库路径:skills/quality-scoring
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/akaszubski/autonomous-dev --skill quality-scoring
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/akaszubski/autonomous-dev --skill quality-scoring

简介

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态或协作事项进行整理。

  • 适用于质量评分相关的多维度评估与权重分配场景,支持基于代码变更的质量度量。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需结合原始 README 确认具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。
  • quality-scoring 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Quality Scoring

Multi-dimensional assessment for training data quality.

When Activates

Quality assessment, data scoring, multi-dimensional evaluation, IFD scoring, factuality checks, reasoning validation, training data prep


Core Concepts

Quality Scorers (6 Types)

Fast to comprehensive scoring approaches:

  1. FastIFD - Instruction-following difficulty (10-20x faster)
  2. Quality - LLM-based quality (Qwen3-30B, 0.85 ex/s)
  3. MultiDimensional - 5-dimension composite
  4. LLMQuality - Multi-backend (MLX/OpenRouter)
  5. Ensemble - Cross-model ensemble
  6. Tulu3 - Multi-dimensional reference (training_metrics.py)

Quality Dimensions (6 Metrics)

  1. IFD Score (0.0-1.0) - Instruction-following difficulty
  2. Factuality (0.0-1.0) - Hallucination detection
  3. Reasoning (0.0-1.0) - Step-by-step logic quality
  4. Diversity (0.0-1.0) - Dataset-level diversity
  5. Domain (0.0-1.0) - Domain-specific relevance
  6. LLM Quality (1-10) - Tulu3 comprehensive score

Training Thresholds

TypeQualityIFDUse Case
SFT≥8.0≥0.3Base training
DPO chosen≥9.0≥0.5High quality only
DPO rejected≤6.0anyLow quality
RLVR≥9.0≥0.5Verified solutions
Calibration≥8.0≥0.4Uncertainty examples

Quick Reference

ConceptDetailsReference
Scorers6 types (FastIFD to Ensemble)quality-scorers.md
Dimensions6 metrics (IFD to LLM Quality)quality-dimensions.md
ThresholdsBy training type (SFT, DPO, RLVR)training-thresholds.md
Librarytraining_metrics.pyIntegration functions

IFD Score Calculation

from training_metrics import calculate_ifd_score

# IFD = PPL(response) / PPL(response|instruction)
ifd_score = calculate_ifd_score(
    instruction="Explain quantum computing",
    response="Quantum computing uses qubits..."
)
# Higher score = more challenging

DPO Pair Validation

from training_metrics import validate_dpo_pairs

# Validate chosen/rejected quality gap
is_valid = validate_dpo_pairs(
    chosen_score=9.2,  # High quality
    rejected_score=5.8  # Low quality
)
# Ensures quality gap ≥0.15

REQUIRED: DPO Multi-Dimensional Scoring

Every DPO pair MUST have multi-dimensional quality scores before training.

This is a hard requirement — DPO data without quality scores will learn shortcuts (e.g., "longer = better") instead of genuine preference signal.

Required output fields per pair:

  • chosen_score (float): Composite quality score for chosen response
  • rejected_score (float): Composite quality score for rejected response
  • margin (float): chosen_score - rejected_score (must be ≥3.0)

Length bias audit (MUST run before DPO training):

from pathlib import Path
from training_metrics import validate_dpo_pairs

metrics = validate_dpo_pairs(dpo_path=Path("dpo_pairs.jsonl"))

# Check length bias
longer_chosen = sum(1 for p in metrics.pairs if len(p.chosen) > len(p.rejected))
length_bias = longer_chosen / metrics.total_pairs

if length_bias > 0.70:
    raise ValueError(
        f"DPO length bias {length_bias:.0%} > 70% threshold.\n"
        f"Model will learn 'longer = better' shortcut.\n"
        f"Fix: Score by quality dimensions, not length."
    )

# Check quality scores present
missing = sum(1 for p in metrics.pairs if p.chosen_score is None)
if missing > 0:
    raise ValueError(f"{missing} pairs missing quality scores — run scoring first")

Scoring workflow:

  1. Generate DPO pairs (dpo-rlvr-generation skill)
  2. Score all pairs with multi-dimensional scorer (this skill)
  3. Filter by quality margin ≥3.0
  4. Audit length bias ≤70%
  5. Only then proceed to training

RLVR Verifiability

from training_metrics import assess_rlvr_verifiability

# Assess reasoning trace verifiability
verifiable = assess_rlvr_verifiability(
    reasoning_trace="Step 1: ...\nStep 2: ...",
    domain="math"
)
# Math/coding: 90%+ verifiable required

Progressive Disclosure

Detailed guides: See docs/*.md

  • docs/quality-scorers.md - 6 scorer implementations
  • docs/quality-dimensions.md - 6 dimension definitions
  • docs/training-thresholds.md - Thresholds, CLI, distributed performance

Security Considerations

Input Validation (CWE-20)

  • Validate score ranges (0.0-1.0 or 1-10)
  • Sanitize data inputs before scoring
  • Check threshold values before application

Path Traversal (CWE-22)

  • Sanitize file paths for data loading
  • Whitelist directories for training data
  • Validate output paths for scored datasets

Security Patterns (training_metrics.py)

from pathlib import Path

def safe_load_data(data_path: str) -> dict:
    """Load data with path validation."""
    # Validate path within allowed directory
    path = Path(data_path).resolve()
    if not str(path).startswith('/allowed/data/'):
        raise ValueError(f"Path outside allowed directory: {path}")

    # Load safely
    return json.loads(path.read_text())

Distributed Performance

Single Machine Performance

  • M4 Max: ~0.85 ex/s (Qwen3-30B)
  • M3 Ultra: ~0.85 ex/s (Qwen3-30B)

Parallel Processing

  • Combined throughput: ~1.7 ex/s (50/50 split)
  • Scaling: Linear with machine count
  • Bottleneck: Model inference, not I/O

CLI Commands

# Score dataset with FastIFD
python -m training_metrics score \
  --input data/train.jsonl \
  --output data/scored.jsonl \
  --scorer fastifd \
  --threshold 0.3

# Multi-dimensional scoring
python -m training_metrics score \
  --input data/train.jsonl \
  --output data/scored.jsonl \
  --scorer multidim \
  --quality-threshold 8.0 \
  --ifd-threshold 0.5

# DPO pair filtering
python -m training_metrics filter_dpo \
  --input data/dpo_pairs.jsonl \
  --output data/filtered_pairs.jsonl \
  --chosen-threshold 9.0 \
  --rejected-threshold 6.0

# RLVR verifiability check
python -m training_metrics assess_rlvr \
  --input data/rlvr_traces.jsonl \
  --output data/verified.jsonl \
  --domain math \
  --threshold 0.9

Related Skills

  • data-distillation - IFD methodology and KenLM filtering
  • preference-data-quality - DPO and RLVR metrics
  • python-standards - Code quality standards

Library Integration

Primary library: training_metrics.py

Key functions:

  • calculate_ifd_score() - IFD calculation
  • validate_dpo_pairs() - DPO pair validation
  • assess_rlvr_verifiability() - RLVR assessment
  • score_quality() - Multi-dimensional scoring
  • ensemble_score() - Cross-model ensemble

Key Takeaways

  1. 6 scorers - FastIFD (fast) to Ensemble (comprehensive)
  2. 6 dimensions - IFD, Factuality, Reasoning, Diversity, Domain, LLM Quality
  3. Training thresholds - SFT ≥8.0, DPO chosen ≥9.0, RLVR ≥9.0
  4. IFD score - PPL(response) / PPL(response|instruction), higher = harder
  5. Security - CWE-20 (input validation), CWE-22 (path traversal)
  6. Distributed - ~1.7 ex/s with 2 machines (linear scaling)
  7. CLI commands - training_metrics module for all operations
  8. Integration - Use training_metrics library functions
  9. DPO pairs - Chosen ≥9.0, Rejected ≤6.0, gap ≥0.15
  10. RLVR - Math/coding 90%+ verifiable, general 80%+
  11. DPO scoring REQUIRED - Every pair must have chosen_score, rejected_score, margin before training
  12. Length bias audit - ≤70% of pairs where chosen is longer (prevents "longer = better" shortcut)

适合场景

01

调用多模型

02

代码和文本生成

03

Agent 推理流程

04

OpenRouter 模型接入

能力概览

能力 1

统一调用多种 LLM

能力 2

支持 Claude、Gemini、Kimi 等模型

能力 3

适合聊天、代码和推理任务

能力 4

可作为 Agent 模型调用入口

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.54%
按下载量换算11

Claude

28.34%
按下载量换算9

Cursor

17.62%
按下载量换算6

Gemini CLI

8.64%
按下载量换算3

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills