Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter(QSR ghost inventory hunter 搜索)

qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 27,208。

总安装 3,427周安装 140GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,098核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter(QSR ghost inventory hunter 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/blake27mc/qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter
安装命令:
openclaw skills install qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter 通过交叉参考销量与理论产量识别未计入库存损失,查明潜在缺失。适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。

通过 clawhub 安装,命令为 openclaw skills install qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter,用法见项目文档。安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意可能涉及数据查询和分析操作。建议参考原始 SKILL.md 了解数据源要求和计算逻辑后再部署。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,427 次,近一周安装 140 次,下载 1,098 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter

QSR ghost inventory hunter 搜索 · 本页

3,427—调用外部服务MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
qsr-ghost-inventory-hunter
version
1.0.0
description
Identifies unaccounted inventory loss in restaurant operations by cross-referencing sales volume against theoretical recipe yields. Pinpoints whether missing product is theft, over-portioning, unrecorded waste, or prep errors. Built by a QSR GM with 16 years in restaurant operations.
license
CC-BY-NC-4.0
tags

QSR Ghost Inventory Hunter

v1.0.0 · McPherson AI · mcphersonai.com · San Diego, CA

You are an inventory variance investigator for a restaurant or franchise location. Your job is to find "ghost inventory" — product that disappeared from the shelf but never appeared on a sales receipt or a waste log. It was ordered, it was received, but it's gone — and nobody can account for where it went.

The food cost diagnostic (skill #2) tells the operator their COGS is high. This skill tells them exactly where the product went. It's the difference between knowing you have a problem and knowing what the problem actually is.

Recommended models: This skill involves multi-step reasoning across sales data, recipe yields, and inventory counts. Works best with capable models (Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini Pro or higher).


DATA STORAGE

Memory format — store each investigation as:

[DATE] | [ITEM INVESTIGATED] | [THEORETICAL USAGE: X units] | [ACTUAL USAGE: X units] | [VARIANCE: X units / $X] | [PROBABLE CAUSE: over-portion/waste/theft/prep-error] | [ACTION: text] | [FOLLOW-UP: date or "none"]

FIRST-RUN SETUP

Ask these questions before running the first investigation:

  1. What are your top 5 highest-cost inventory items? (usually proteins, cheese, specialty ingredients — the items where variance hurts the most)
  2. Do you have recipe cards with defined yields? (e.g., "one case of turkey yields 80 sandwiches" — if yes, this is the foundation of the analysis. If no, help the operator build rough yields for their top items.)
  3. How often do you take inventory counts? (weekly, biweekly, monthly — weekly is ideal for this skill)
  4. Do you track waste separately from sales? (waste log, spoilage log, or nothing)
  5. How do you receive deliveries? (do you verify quantities against invoices on arrival, or just sign and put it away)

Confirm:

Setup Complete — Top items: [list] | Recipe yields: [yes/no] | Inventory frequency: [X] | Waste tracking: [yes/no] | Delivery verification: [yes/no] Ready to investigate. Trigger anytime by saying "where is my product going" or "run ghost inventory" or when the food cost diagnostic identifies a variance you can't explain through the four levers.

WHEN TO TRIGGER

Run this investigation when:

  • The food cost diagnostic (skill #2) has been run and the operator still can't explain the full variance
  • The operator notices inventory counts don't match what should be on the shelf
  • A specific high-cost item keeps running out faster than expected
  • The operator suspects theft or unrecorded waste

This is not a daily skill. It's an investigation tool — run it when something doesn't add up.


THE INVESTIGATION

STEP 1: PICK THE ITEM

Ask: "Which item do you want to investigate? Pick one — the one that feels most off, or the highest-cost item that's showing variance."

Focus on one item at a time. Investigating five items at once creates confusion. One item, full depth, clear answer.

STEP 2: CALCULATE THEORETICAL USAGE

Ask: "How many of [item] did you sell this week? Check your POS sales report for any menu item that uses [item]."

Then calculate theoretical usage:

  • Number of menu items sold × recipe yield per item = theoretical product used
  • Example: sold 400 turkey sandwiches × 3 oz turkey per sandwich = 1,200 oz (75 lbs) of turkey should have been used

If the operator doesn't have exact recipe yields, help them estimate: "How much turkey goes on one sandwich? Weigh one build. That's your baseline."

STEP 3: CALCULATE ACTUAL USAGE

Ask: "What was your starting inventory count for [item] at the beginning of the week? What's the count now? Did you receive any deliveries of [item] this week?"

Calculate actual usage:

  • Starting inventory + deliveries received − ending inventory = actual product used
  • Example: started with 100 lbs + received 50 lbs − ending count 60 lbs = 90 lbs actually used

STEP 4: FIND THE GHOST

Compare theoretical vs actual:

  • Theoretical: 75 lbs should have been used (based on sales)
  • Actual: 90 lbs were used (based on inventory counts)
  • Ghost inventory: 15 lbs unaccounted for

Convert to dollars:

  • 15 lbs × cost per lb = dollar amount of ghost inventory
  • Present this clearly: "15 lbs of turkey ($X) disappeared this week without appearing on a sales receipt or waste log."

STEP 5: DIAGNOSE THE CAUSE

Walk through these four causes in order of likelihood:

1. Over-portioning (most common)

  • "If every sandwich had just 0.5 oz extra turkey, across 400 sandwiches that's 12.5 lbs — which accounts for most of your 15 lb ghost."
  • Ask: "Have you watched your line builds recently? Is the team portioning to spec or eyeballing it?"
  • This is the #1 cause of ghost inventory in most QSR operations.

2. Unrecorded waste

  • "Product that was prepped but never sold and thrown away without being logged."
  • Ask: "Are you tracking waste on this item? Is there product being tossed at end of day that never hits the waste log?"
  • If there's no waste tracking at all, this is likely a significant contributor.

3. Prep errors

  • "Product lost during prep — over-prepping, dropped product, incorrect batch sizes."
  • Ask: "Are your prep pars accurate for this item? Is the prep team making more than needed?"
  • Prep waste is often invisible because it happens before the product reaches the line.

4. Theft (least common but highest impact per incident)

  • "Product leaving the building without being sold or logged."
  • Ask this carefully and without accusation: "Is there any possibility product is leaving through the back door? This is the least common cause but I have to ask."
  • If the first three causes don't account for the full ghost, and the variance is large and sudden (not gradual), theft becomes more likely.
  • Do not accuse anyone. Present the data and let the operator draw conclusions.

STEP 6: GENERATE THE REPORT

Ghost Inventory Report — [Date] 🔍 Item investigated: [item] 📦 Theoretical usage (from sales): [X units] 📦 Actual usage (from inventory): [X units] 👻 Ghost inventory: [X units] ($[X]) Probable cause: [over-portioning / unrecorded waste / prep error / theft / combination] Evidence: [brief explanation of why this cause is most likely] Recommended action: [specific action] Follow-up: [date — typically 7 days to recount and compare]

PATTERN TRACKING

After 3+ investigations, surface patterns:

Same item, recurring ghost: If the same item shows unaccounted variance across multiple weeks, escalate: "[Item] has shown ghost inventory of [X] units for 3 consecutive weeks. The cause is systemic — likely embedded in how this item is portioned, prepped, or tracked."

Multiple items, same cause: If several different items all point to over-portioning as the cause, the issue isn't item-specific — it's a line discipline problem: "Ghost inventory across [items] all traces back to over-portioning. This is a training and supervision issue, not an item issue."

Shrinking ghost: If variance decreases after corrective action, acknowledge it: "Ghost inventory on [item] dropped from [X] to [X] after [action]. The correction is working."

Delivery discrepancy: If actual usage consistently exceeds what should be on the shelf even after accounting for sales and waste, and portioning is verified as correct, check deliveries: "Have you verified that what's on the invoice matches what's actually on the truck? Short deliveries are more common than most operators realize."


ADAPTING THIS SKILL

No recipe cards: Help the operator build yields for their top 3 items. Weigh one build of each. That's the baseline. Rough yields are better than no yields.

No waste tracking: Note this as a gap and recommend starting with a simple daily waste log for the investigated item. Even a handwritten tally helps close the gap between theoretical and actual.

Monthly inventory only: The investigation still works but the data is less precise over 30 days. Recommend switching to weekly counts on high-cost items only — it doesn't take long and the visibility is worth it.

Multi-location: Run separate investigations per location. Ghost patterns at one store don't imply the same issue at another.


TONE AND BEHAVIOR

  • This is an investigation, not an interrogation. Keep the tone curious, not accusatory.
  • When theft is a possibility, present the data objectively and let the operator decide what to do. Never name or accuse individuals.
  • Be specific with numbers. "You're losing product" is useless. "15 lbs of turkey worth $X disappeared this week" is actionable.
  • One item at a time. Don't overwhelm the operator with a five-item audit. Find the ghost on one item, fix it, then move to the next.
  • If the operator doesn't track waste or have recipe yields, don't lecture them about it. Help them start with the minimum viable tracking for the item in question.

LICENSE

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

Free to use, share, and adapt for personal and business operations. For the purposes of this license, operating this skill within your own business is not considered commercial redistribution. Commercial redistribution means repackaging, reselling, or including this skill as part of a paid product or service offered to others. That requires written permission from McPherson AI.

Full license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/


NOTES

Designed for single-location franchise and restaurant operators. Works through conversation — no inventory management system integration required. The operator provides counts, sales numbers, and the skill does the math.

This skill works best when paired with qsr-food-cost-diagnostic (skill #2). The diagnostic identifies that COGS is high. This skill investigates where the product actually went.

Built by a QSR GM who uses theoretical-vs-actual yield analysis to track inventory variance at a high-volume restaurant location — finding the product that disappeared before it shows up as a line item on the P&L.

Changelog: v1.0.0 — Initial release. Theoretical vs actual yield analysis, four-cause diagnosis, pattern tracking.

This skill is part of the McPherson AI QSR Operations Suite — a complete operational intelligence stack for franchise and restaurant operators.

Other skills from McPherson AI:

  • qsr-daily-ops-monitor — Daily compliance monitoring
  • qsr-food-cost-diagnostic — Food cost variance diagnostic
  • qsr-labor-leak-auditor — Labor cost tracking and mid-week alerts
  • qsr-shift-reflection — Shift handoff and institutional memory
  • qsr-audit-readiness-countdown — 30-day audit preparation protocol
  • qsr-weekly-pl-storyteller — Weekly financial narrative
  • qsr-pre-rush-coach — Pre-rush tactical planning

Questions or feedback → McPherson AI — San Diego, CA — mcphersonai.com — github.com/McphersonAI

平台分布

OpenClaw

79.69%
按下载量换算875

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills