Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

qe-testability-scoring(qe 可测试性评分)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

qe-testability-scoring 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 43,484。

总安装 979周安装 40GitHub Stars 329下载 317核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:qe-testability-scoring(qe 可测试性评分)
来源仓库:https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
仓库路径:skills/qe-testability-scoring
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill qe-testability-scoring
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill qe-testability-scoring

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助测试设计和可测试性评估。qe-testability-scoring 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。适合让 Agent 编写测试计划或分析失败日志。使用时需确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据。涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟与生产环境。避免为了通过测试而修改真实业务逻辑。

来源仓库内路径:skills/qe-testability-scoring

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill qe-te…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

qe-testability-scoring 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill qe-testability-…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

qe-testability-scoring 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

qe-testability-scoring 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

qe-testability-scoring 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

qe-testability-scoring 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 979 次,近一周安装 40 次,下载 317 次,GitHub 329 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

qe-testability-scoring 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
qe-testability-scoring

qe 可测试性评分 · 本页

979329操作浏览器未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Testability Scoring

<default_to_action> When assessing testability:

  1. RUN assessment against target URL
  2. ANALYZE all 10 principles automatically
  3. GENERATE HTML report with radar chart
  4. PRIORITIZE improvements by impact/effort
  5. INTEGRATE with QX Partner for holistic view

Quick Assessment:

# Run assessment on any URL
TEST_URL='https://example.com/' npx playwright test tests/testability-scoring/testability-scoring.spec.js --project=chromium --workers=1

# Or use shell script wrapper
.claude/skills/testability-scoring/scripts/run-assessment.sh https://example.com/

The 10 Principles at a Glance:

PrincipleWeightKey Question
Observability15%Can we see what's happening?
Controllability15%Can we control the application?
Algorithmic Simplicity10%Are behaviors predictable?
Algorithmic Transparency10%Can we understand what it does?
Algorithmic Stability10%Does behavior remain consistent?
Explainability10%Is the interface understandable?
Unbugginess10%How error-free is it?
Smallness10%Are components appropriately sized?
Decomposability5%Can we test parts in isolation?
Similarity5%Is the tech stack familiar?

Grade Scale:

  • A (90-100): Excellent testability
  • B (80-89): Good testability
  • C (70-79): Adequate testability
  • D (60-69): Below average
  • F (0-59): Poor testability </default_to_action>

Quick Reference Card

Running Assessments

MethodCommandWhen to Use
Shell Script./scripts/run-assessment.sh URLOne-time assessment
ENV OverrideTEST_URL='URL' npx playwright test...CI/CD integration
Config FileUpdate tests/testability-scoring/config.jsRepeated runs

Principle Details

High Weight (15% each)
PrincipleMeasuresIndicators
ObservabilityState visibility, logging, monitoringConsole output, network tracking, error visibility
ControllabilityInput control, state manipulationAPI access, test data injection, determinism
Medium Weight (10% each)
PrincipleMeasuresIndicators
SimplicityPredictable behaviorClear I/O relationships, low complexity
TransparencyUnderstanding what system doesVisible processes, readable code
StabilityConsistent behaviorChange resilience, maintainability
ExplainabilityInterface understandingGood docs, semantic structure, help text
UnbugginessError-free operationConsole errors, warnings, runtime issues
SmallnessComponent sizeElement count, script bloat, page complexity
Low Weight (5% each)
PrincipleMeasuresIndicators
DecomposabilityIsolation testingComponent separation, modular design
SimilarityTechnology familiarityStandard frameworks, known patterns

Assessment Workflow

1. Navigate to URL → 2. Collect Metrics → 3. Score Principles
                                              ↓
4. Generate JSON ← 5. Calculate Grades ← 6. Apply Weights
         ↓
7. Generate HTML Report with Radar Chart
         ↓
8. Open in Browser (auto-opens)

Output Files

tests/reports/
├── testability-results-<timestamp>.json  # Raw data
├── testability-report-<timestamp>.html   # Visual report
└── latest.json                           # Symlink

Integration Examples

CI/CD Integration

# GitHub Actions
- name: Testability Assessment
  run: |
    timeout 180 .claude/skills/testability-scoring/scripts/run-assessment.sh ${{ env.APP_URL }}

- name: Upload Reports
  uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
  with:
    name: testability-reports
    path: tests/reports/testability-*.html

QX Partner Integration

// Combine testability with QX analysis
const qxAnalysis = await Task("QX Analysis", {
  target: 'https://example.com',
  integrateTestability: true
}, "qx-partner");

// Returns combined insights:
// - QX Score: 78/100
// - Testability Integration: Observability 72/100
// - Combined Insight: Low observability may mask UX issues

Programmatic Usage

import { runTestabilityAssessment } from './testability';

const results = await runTestabilityAssessment('https://example.com');
console.log(`Overall: ${results.overallScore}/100 (${results.grade})`);
console.log('Recommendations:', results.recommendations);

Agent Integration

// Run testability assessment
const assessment = await Task("Testability Assessment", {
  url: 'https://example.com',
  generateReport: true,
  openBrowser: true
}, "qe-quality-analyzer");

// Use with QX Partner for holistic analysis
const qxReport = await Task("Full QX Analysis", {
  target: 'https://example.com',
  integrateTestability: true,
  detectOracleProblems: true
}, "qx-partner");

Vibium Integration (Optional)

Overview

Vibium browser automation can be used alongside Playwright for enhanced testability assessment. While Playwright remains the primary engine, Vibium offers complementary capabilities for certain metrics.

Installation:

claude mcp add vibium -- npx -y vibium

Vibium-Enhanced Metrics

PrincipleVibium EnhancementBenefit
ObservabilityAuto-wait duration trackingMeasures DOM stability (30s timeout, 100ms polling)
ControllabilityElement interaction success rateValidates automation readiness via MCP
StabilityScreenshot consistencyVisual regression detection for layout stability
ExplainabilityElement attribute extractionARIA labels, semantic HTML validation

When to Use Vibium

✅ USE Vibium for:

  • Element stability metrics (auto-wait duration analysis)
  • Visual consistency checks (screenshot comparison)
  • MCP-native AI agent integration
  • Lightweight Docker images (400MB vs 1.2GB)

❌ USE Playwright for:

  • Console error detection (Vibium V1 lacks console API)
  • Network performance metrics (BiDi network APIs coming in V2)
  • Comprehensive browser coverage (Firefox, Safari)
  • Production-proven stability (Vibium V1 released Dec 2024)

Hybrid Assessment Example

// Testability assessment using both engines
const assessment = {
  // Playwright: Comprehensive metrics
  playwright: await runPlaywrightAssessment(url),

  // Vibium: Stability metrics
  vibium: {
    elementStability: await measureAutoWaitDuration(url),
    visualConsistency: await compareScreenshots(url),
    accessibilityAttributes: await extractARIALabels(url)
  }
};

// Enhanced Observability Score
const observability =
  (assessment.playwright.consoleErrors * 0.6) +
  (assessment.vibium.elementStability * 0.4);

Vibium MCP Tools for Testability

// 1. Element Stability Measurement
const browser = await browser_launch();
await browser_navigate({ url });
const startTime = Date.now();
const element = await browser_find({ selector: ".critical-element" });
const autoWaitDuration = Date.now() - startTime;
// Lower duration = better stability

// 2. Visual Consistency Check
const screenshot1 = await browser_screenshot();
await browser_navigate({ url }); // Reload
const screenshot2 = await browser_screenshot();
const visualDiff = compareImages(screenshot1.png, screenshot2.png);
// Lower diff = better stability

// 3. Accessibility Attribute Extraction
const elements = await browser_find({ selector: "button, a, input" });
const ariaLabels = elements.map(el => el.attributes["aria-label"]);
const semanticScore = (ariaLabels.filter(Boolean).length / elements.length) * 100;

Migration Strategy

Current (V2.2): Hybrid approach

  • Playwright: Primary engine for all 10 principles
  • Vibium: Optional enhancement for stability metrics

Future (V3.0): When Vibium V2 ships

  • Evaluate Vibium as primary engine if:

- Console/Network APIs available - Production stability proven - Community adoption increases

Agent Coordination Hints

Memory Namespace

aqe/testability/
├── assessments/*       - Assessment results by URL
├── historical/*        - Historical scores for trend analysis
├── recommendations/*   - Improvement recommendations
├── integration/*       - QX integration data
└── vibium/*           - Vibium-specific metrics (optional)

Fleet Coordination

const testabilityFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
  strategy: 'testability-assessment',
  agents: [
    'qe-quality-analyzer',  // Primary assessment
    'qx-partner',           // UX integration
    'qe-visual-tester'      // Visual validation
  ],
  topology: 'sequential'
});

Common Issues & Solutions

IssueSolution
Tests timing outIncrease timeout: timeout 300./scripts/run-assessment.sh URL
Partial resultsCheck console errors, increase network timeout
Report not openingUse AUTO_OPEN=false, open manually
Config not updatingUse TEST_URL env var instead
Vibium not availableInstall via claude mcp add vibium -- npx -y vibium (optional)
Hybrid mode errorsVibium is optional; assessments work without it

Related Skills


Credits & References

Framework Origin

Implementation

Vibium Resources


Remember

Testability is an investment, not an afterthought.

Good testability:

  • Reduces debugging time
  • Enables faster feedback loops
  • Makes defects easier to find
  • Supports continuous testing

Low scores = High risk. Prioritize improvements by weight × impact.

平台分布

Codex

36.46%
按下载量换算116

Claude

30.09%
按下载量换算95

Cursor

18.28%
按下载量换算58

Gemini CLI

8.02%
按下载量换算25

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills