Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

qe-security-testing(质量保证安全测试)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

qe-security-testing 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 43,660。

总安装 970周安装 40GitHub Stars 329下载 317核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:qe-security-testing(质量保证安全测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
仓库路径:skills/qe-security-testing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill qe-security-testing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill qe-security-testing

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险和认证流程分析。适合梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险或生成安全复核清单。不能将工具输出直接当作最终结论,需人工复核。涉及密钥、令牌或用户数据时,应先确认最小权限和脱敏方式。操作生产系统前务必明确边界,避免越权访问。

qe-security-testing 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/qe-security-testing

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill qe-se…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

qe-security-testing 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill qe-security-tes…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

qe-security-testing 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

qe-security-testing 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

qe-security-testing 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

qe-security-testing 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 970 次,近一周安装 40 次,下载 317 次,GitHub 329 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

qe-security-testing 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
qe-security-testing

质量保证安全测试 · 本页

970329接触敏感数据未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Security Testing

<default_to_action> When testing security or conducting audits:

  1. TEST OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities systematically
  2. VALIDATE authentication and authorization on every endpoint
  3. SCAN dependencies for known vulnerabilities (npm audit)
  4. CHECK for injection attacks (SQL, XSS, command)
  5. VERIFY secrets aren't exposed in code/logs

Quick Security Checks:

  • Access control → Test horizontal/vertical privilege escalation
  • Crypto → Verify password hashing, HTTPS, no sensitive data exposed
  • Injection → Test SQL injection, XSS, command injection
  • Auth → Test weak passwords, session fixation, MFA enforcement
  • Config → Check error messages don't leak info

Critical Success Factors:

  • Think like an attacker, build like a defender
  • Security is built in, not added at the end
  • Test continuously in CI/CD, not just before release </default_to_action>

Quick Reference Card

When to Use

  • Security audits and penetration testing
  • Testing authentication/authorization
  • Validating input sanitization
  • Reviewing security configuration

OWASP Top 10 (2021)

#VulnerabilityKey Test
1Broken Access ControlUser A accessing User B's data
2Cryptographic FailuresPlaintext passwords, HTTP
3InjectionSQL/XSS/command injection
4Insecure DesignRate limiting, session timeout
5Security MisconfigurationVerbose errors, exposed /admin
6Vulnerable Componentsnpm audit, outdated packages
7Auth FailuresWeak passwords, no MFA
8Integrity FailuresUnsigned updates, malware
9Logging FailuresNo audit trail for breaches
10SSRFServer fetching internal URLs

Tools

TypeToolPurpose
SASTSonarQube, SemgrepStatic code analysis
DASTOWASP ZAP, BurpDynamic scanning
Depsnpm audit, SnykDependency vulnerabilities
Secretsgit-secrets, TruffleHogSecret scanning

Agent Coordination

  • qe-security-scanner: Multi-layer SAST/DAST scanning
  • qe-api-contract-validator: API security testing
  • qe-quality-analyzer: Security code review

Key Vulnerability Tests

1. Broken Access Control

// Horizontal escalation - User A accessing User B's data
test('user cannot access another user\'s order', async () => {
  const userAToken = await login('userA');
  const userBOrder = await createOrder('userB');

  const response = await api.get(`/orders/${userBOrder.id}`, {
    headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${userAToken}` }
  });
  expect(response.status).toBe(403);
});

// Vertical escalation - Regular user accessing admin
test('regular user cannot access admin', async () => {
  const userToken = await login('regularUser');
  expect((await api.get('/admin/users', {
    headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${userToken}` }
  })).status).toBe(403);
});

2. Injection Attacks

// SQL Injection
test('prevents SQL injection', async () => {
  const malicious = "' OR '1'='1";
  const response = await api.get(`/products?search=${malicious}`);
  expect(response.body.length).toBeLessThan(100); // Not all products
});

// XSS
test('sanitizes HTML output', async () => {
  const xss = '<script>alert("XSS")</script>';
  await api.post('/comments', { text: xss });

  const html = (await api.get('/comments')).body;
  expect(html).toContain('<script>');
  expect(html).not.toContain('<script>');
});

3. Cryptographic Failures

test('passwords are hashed', async () => {
  await db.users.create({ email: 'test@example.com', password: 'MyPassword123' });
  const user = await db.users.findByEmail('test@example.com');

  expect(user.password).not.toBe('MyPassword123');
  expect(user.password).toMatch(/^\$2[aby]\$\d{2}\$/); // bcrypt
});

test('no sensitive data in API response', async () => {
  const response = await api.get('/users/me');
  expect(response.body).not.toHaveProperty('password');
  expect(response.body).not.toHaveProperty('ssn');
});

4. Security Misconfiguration

test('errors don\'t leak sensitive info', async () => {
  const response = await api.post('/login', { email: 'nonexistent@test.com', password: 'wrong' });
  expect(response.body.error).toBe('Invalid credentials'); // Generic message
});

test('sensitive endpoints not exposed', async () => {
  const endpoints = ['/debug', '/.env', '/.git', '/admin'];
  for (let ep of endpoints) {
    expect((await fetch(`https://example.com${ep}`)).status).not.toBe(200);
  }
});

5. Rate Limiting

test('rate limiting prevents brute force', async () => {
  const responses = [];
  for (let i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
    responses.push(await api.post('/login', { email: 'test@example.com', password: 'wrong' }));
  }
  expect(responses.filter(r => r.status === 429).length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
});

Security Checklist

Authentication

  • Strong password requirements (12+ chars)
  • Password hashing (bcrypt, scrypt, Argon2)
  • MFA for sensitive operations
  • Account lockout after failed attempts
  • Session ID changes after login
  • Session timeout

Authorization

  • Check authorization on every request
  • Least privilege principle
  • No horizontal escalation
  • No vertical escalation

Data Protection

  • HTTPS everywhere
  • Encrypted at rest
  • Secrets not in code/logs
  • PII compliance (GDPR)

Input Validation

  • Server-side validation
  • Parameterized queries (no SQL injection)
  • Output encoding (no XSS)
  • Rate limiting

CI/CD Integration

# GitHub Actions
security-checks:
  steps:
    - name: Dependency audit
      run: npm audit --audit-level=high

    - name: SAST scan
      run: npm run sast

    - name: Secret scan
      uses: trufflesecurity/trufflehog@main

    - name: DAST scan
      if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
      run: docker run owasp/zap2docker-stable zap-baseline.py -t https://staging.example.com

Pre-commit hooks:

#!/bin/sh
git-secrets --scan
npm run lint:security

Agent-Assisted Security Testing

// Comprehensive multi-layer scan
await Task("Security Scan", {
  target: 'src/',
  layers: { sast: true, dast: true, dependencies: true, secrets: true },
  severity: ['critical', 'high', 'medium']
}, "qe-security-scanner");

// OWASP Top 10 testing
await Task("OWASP Scan", {
  categories: ['broken-access-control', 'injection', 'cryptographic-failures'],
  depth: 'comprehensive'
}, "qe-security-scanner");

// Validate fix
await Task("Validate Fix", {
  vulnerability: 'CVE-2024-12345',
  expectedResolution: 'upgrade package to v2.0.0',
  retestAfterFix: true
}, "qe-security-scanner");

Agent Coordination Hints

Memory Namespace

aqe/security/
├── scans/*           - Scan results
├── vulnerabilities/* - Found vulnerabilities
├── fixes/*           - Remediation tracking
└── compliance/*      - Compliance status

Fleet Coordination

const securityFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
  strategy: 'security-testing',
  agents: [
    'qe-security-scanner',
    'qe-api-contract-validator',
    'qe-quality-analyzer',
    'qe-deployment-readiness'
  ],
  topology: 'parallel'
});

Common Mistakes

❌ Security by Obscurity

Hiding admin at /super-secret-admin → Use proper auth

❌ Client-Side Validation Only

JavaScript validation can be bypassed → Always validate server-side

❌ Trusting User Input

Assuming input is safe → Sanitize, validate, escape all input

❌ Hardcoded Secrets

API keys in code → Environment variables, secret management


Related Skills


Remember

Think like an attacker: What would you try to break? Test that. Build like a defender: Assume input is malicious until proven otherwise. Test continuously: Security testing is ongoing, not one-time.

With Agents: Agents automate vulnerability scanning, track remediation, and validate fixes. Use agents to maintain security posture at scale.

平台分布

Codex

35.37%
按下载量换算112

Claude

28.72%
按下载量换算91

Cursor

19.23%
按下载量换算61

Gemini CLI

8.79%
按下载量换算28

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills