Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

qbr-preparation(QBR 准备)

qbr-preparation 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

qbr-preparation 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 2,043。

总安装 1,934周安装 79GitHub Stars 85下载 626核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:qbr-preparation(QBR 准备)
来源仓库:https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
仓库路径:skills/qbr-preparation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill qbr-preparation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill qbr-preparation

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

qbr-preparation 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue 和 Pull Request。适合围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

适用于需要自动化处理 Git 协作流程的场景。

来源仓库内路径:skills/qbr-preparation

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill qbr-prepar…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

qbr-preparation 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill qbr-preparation。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

qbr-preparation 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

qbr-preparation 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

qbr-preparation 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

qbr-preparation 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,934 次,近一周安装 79 次,下载 626 次,GitHub 85 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

qbr-preparation 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
qbr-preparation

QBR 准备 · 本页

1,93485只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

QBR Preparation

Generate comprehensive Quarterly Business Review materials including account history, success metrics, challenges, and strategic recommendations.

When to Use This Skill

  • Preparing quarterly customer reviews
  • Executive business reviews (EBRs)
  • Annual planning sessions with customers
  • Renewal discussions
  • Strategic account planning

Methodology Foundation

Based on Gainsight QBR Best Practices and Strategic Account Management, structuring reviews around:

  • Value delivered (backward-looking)
  • Current health and engagement
  • Future opportunities and risks
  • Strategic recommendations

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Compiles account historyStrategic positioning
Calculates success metricsRecommendations to present
Identifies risks and opportunitiesPricing and terms
Drafts talking pointsRelationship dynamics
Creates presentation structureMeeting facilitation

What This Skill Does

  1. Account summary - Key facts and history
  2. Value documentation - Metrics and achievements
  3. Health assessment - Current status and trends
  4. Risk/opportunity analysis - What to watch and pursue
  5. Strategic recommendations - Next quarter priorities

How to Use

Prepare QBR materials for:

Account: [Company Name]
Contract: $[ARR], Started: [Date], Renewal: [Date]
Primary Contact: [Name, Title]
CSM: [Your name]

Account History:
- [Major milestones, implementations, expansions]
- [Key wins and challenges]

Usage/Success Metrics:
- [Key metrics with current values and trends]
- [Goals they set vs. achieved]

Recent Activity:
- [Support tickets, calls, meetings last quarter]
- [Any escalations or issues]

Relationship Status:
- Champion: [Name, engagement level]
- Exec Sponsor: [Status]
- Other stakeholders: [List]

Known Opportunities/Risks:
- [Expansion potential, concerns mentioned, competitors]

Instructions

Step 1: Compile Account Overview

Key Facts Section:

Account Snapshot
- Company: [Name]
- Industry: [Sector]
- Size: [Employees/Revenue]
- Product: [What they bought]
- Contract: $X ARR | Since [Date] | Renews [Date]
- Health: [Score] | [Status]

Step 2: Document Value Delivered

The Win Section (Critical):

CategoryFormat
Quantified ROI"Saved X hours, $Y dollars, Z%"
Goals achievedTheir stated goals → our impact
MilestonesMajor accomplishments
Testimonial-worthyQuote-able successes

Structure:

"When you started with us, you wanted to [GOAL].
In Q[X], you achieved [RESULT]."

Step 3: Assess Current Health

Health Dashboard:

| Dimension | Score | Trend | Notes |
|-----------|-------|-------|-------|
| Product | X/25 | ↗️↘️→ | Key metric |
| Support | X/25 | ↗️↘️→ | CSAT, tickets |
| Financial | X/25 | ↗️↘️→ | Payment, growth |
| Relationship | X/25 | ↗️↘️→ | Engagement |
| **Overall** | **X/100** | | |

Step 4: Identify Risks and Opportunities

Risk Assessment:

RiskLikelihoodImpactMitigation
[Risk]H/M/LH/M/L[Action]

Opportunity Assessment:

OpportunityValueTimelineNext Step
[Opp]$XQ1/Q2[Action]

Step 5: Develop Recommendations

Strategic Recommendations Framework:

  1. Continue - What's working, keep doing
  2. Start - New initiatives for next quarter
  3. Stop - What should we change or deprioritize

Examples

Example 1: Full QBR Prep

Input:

Prepare QBR for CloudTech Industries:

Account: CloudTech Industries (Manufacturing)
Contract: $180K ARR, Started: Jan 2024, Renewal: Jan 2027
Primary: Sarah Chen, VP Operations
CSM: Alex

History:
- Implemented in 60 days (target was 90)
- Added 50 seats in Q2 ($30K expansion)
- Had a major support escalation in Q3 (resolved)
- Reduced production downtime by 35%

Metrics:
- DAU: 145/200 seats (73%)
- Key feature (alerts): 89% adoption
- CSAT: 4.3 (was 3.8 during escalation)
- NPS: 8

Recent Activity:
- 3 support tickets (minor)
- Monthly check-in calls
- Sarah attended user conference

Relationship:
- Champion: Sarah Chen (strong)
- Exec Sponsor: COO Mike Johnson (met once)
- Also engaged: IT Director, 3 plant managers

Opportunities/Risks:
- They're opening 2 new plants (expansion?)
- Competitor demo'd to IT last month
- Sarah mentioned "budget review" for next year

Output:

## QBR Preparation: CloudTech Industries
### Q4 2025 Business Review

---

## 📋 Executive Summary

**Account Health: 78/100 🟢 Healthy**

CloudTech has achieved significant operational improvements, including **35% reduction in production downtime**. The Q3 support escalation was resolved and CSAT has recovered. Two key opportunities: **new plant expansion** and **deepening executive relationship**. One risk to monitor: competitor activity and budget review timing.

**Recommended QBR Focus:**
1. Celebrate the 35% downtime reduction (ROI story)
2. Discuss new plant rollout plan
3. Secure executive sponsor re-engagement

---

## 🏢 Account Snapshot

| Attribute | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| Company | CloudTech Industries |
| Industry | Manufacturing |
| Contract Value | $180,000 ARR |
| Customer Since | January 2024 (11 months) |
| Renewal Date | January 2027 |
| Health Score | 78/100 🟢 |
| CSM | Alex |

**Key Contacts:**
| Name | Title | Role | Engagement |
|------|-------|------|------------|
| Sarah Chen | VP Operations | Champion | High |
| Mike Johnson | COO | Exec Sponsor | Low (1 meeting) |
| [IT Director] | IT Director | Technical | Medium |
| 3 Plant Managers | Operations | Users | High |

---

## 📈 Value Delivered

### Headline Metric
> **35% reduction in production downtime**
> *"Before [Product], we were losing 12 hours/month to unplanned downtime. Now it's under 8 hours."*

### Quarterly Achievements

| Goal | Target | Achieved | Status |
|------|--------|----------|--------|
| Reduce downtime | 25% | 35% | ✅ Exceeded |
| Implementation | 90 days | 60 days | ✅ Exceeded |
| User adoption | 70% | 73% | ✅ Met |
| Alert response time | <15 min | 11 min avg | ✅ Exceeded |

### ROI Calculation (Talking Point)

Downtime cost: ~$5,000/hour Hours saved: 4 hours/month × 11 months = 44 hours Value delivered: 44 × $5,000 = $220,000 Contract value: $180,000 ROI: 122% (already paid for itself)

### Journey Milestones
- ✅ Jan 2024: Implementation (30 days early!)
- ✅ Q2 2024: Added 50 seats ($30K expansion)
- ⚠️ Q3 2024: Support escalation (resolved)
- ✅ Q4 2024: 35% downtime reduction achieved

---

## 🎯 Current Health

### Score Breakdown

| Dimension | Score | Trend | Notes |
|-----------|-------|-------|-------|
| Product | 29/40 | → | 73% DAU, strong adoption |
| Support | 12/15 | ↗️ | Recovered from escalation |
| Financial | 20/25 | → | Current, expanded once |
| Relationship | 17/20 | → | Strong champion, weak exec |
| **Total** | **78/100** | | 🟢 Healthy |

### Engagement Metrics

| Metric | Q3 | Q4 | Trend |
|--------|----|----|-------|
| DAU | 140 | 145 | ↗️ +4% |
| Feature adoption | 85% | 89% | ↗️ |
| CSAT | 3.8 | 4.3 | ↗️ Recovering |
| Support tickets | 8 | 3 | ↗️ Improved |
| NPS | 6 | 8 | ↗️ |

---

## ⚠️ Risks & Opportunities

### Risks to Discuss

| Risk | Level | Details | Mitigation |
|------|-------|---------|------------|
| Competitor | 🟡 Medium | Demo'd to IT last month | Competitive defense, exec engagement |
| Budget review | 🟡 Medium | Sarah mentioned "budget discussions" | Reinforce ROI before budget cycle |
| Exec relationship | 🟡 Medium | COO met only once | Request exec-to-exec call |

### Opportunities to Pursue

| Opportunity | Value | Probability | Next Step |
|-------------|-------|-------------|-----------|
| 2 new plants | $60-90K | 60% | Discuss rollout timeline |
| Additional modules | $40K | 40% | Demo predictive features |
| Case study | N/A | 80% | Request with 35% stat |

---

## 💬 QBR Agenda (Suggested)

**Duration: 60 minutes**

| Time | Topic | Lead |
|------|-------|------|
| 0:00 | Welcome, agenda | CSM |
| 0:05 | Their priorities for 2026 | Sarah |
| 0:15 | Value recap: 35% downtime story | CSM |
| 0:25 | Health dashboard review | CSM |
| 0:35 | New plant expansion discussion | Both |
| 0:45 | Product roadmap preview | CSM |
| 0:55 | Next steps and actions | Both |

---

## 📝 Talking Points

### Opening
"Sarah, before we dive in, I want to acknowledge the incredible progress your team has made. A 35% reduction in downtime is exceptional—most customers see 20-25% in their first year."

### Competitive Defense (if needed)
"I heard [Competitor] came by. Happy to do a side-by-side comparison, but I'd also point out: you've already achieved ROI with us. Switching has real costs—time, retraining, risk. Let's talk about what's driving the evaluation."

### Budget Concern
"You mentioned budget reviews coming up. Would it help if I prepared a one-page ROI summary your team could use internally? The 35% downtime number plus the $220K in savings is a strong story."

### Expansion Ask
"With two new plants opening, I want to make sure we're ahead of the curve. What's the timeline? We could do a phased rollout to minimize disruption."

### Executive Engagement
"I'd love to get Mike more involved. Would it make sense to schedule a brief executive update—maybe 20 minutes—where we share the ROI story and get his input on strategic priorities?"

---

## ✅ Pre-QBR Checklist

- [ ] Confirm attendees (Sarah + who else?)
- [ ] Send agenda 3 days before
- [ ] Prepare one-page health summary
- [ ] Update ROI calculation with latest numbers
- [ ] Review competitor battle card
- [ ] Prepare new plant rollout options
- [ ] Draft follow-up email template

---

## 📊 Supporting Materials

### Attachment 1: Health Score Trend
[Include chart showing Q1-Q4 trend]

### Attachment 2: ROI One-Pager
[One-page summary of 35% stat + dollar value]

### Attachment 3: Product Roadmap Preview
[2-3 upcoming features relevant to their use case]

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Structuring QBR content
  • Calculating ROI and metrics
  • Identifying risks and opportunities
  • Drafting talking points

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Know internal customer politics
  • Access your CRM/analytics directly
  • Facilitate the actual meeting
  • Make pricing decisions

When to Escalate to Human

  • Pricing/contract negotiations
  • Escalation-level issues
  • Executive relationship strategy
  • Competitive positioning

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts

  • "Draft the one-page ROI summary for their CFO."
  • "Create a competitive defense script for this QBR."
  • "What questions should I ask about the new plants?"
  • "Write the follow-up email after this QBR."

Checklists & Templates

QBR Prep Checklist

  • Account overview verified
  • Metrics pulled and validated
  • ROI calculated
  • Risks/opportunities identified
  • Agenda drafted
  • Talking points prepared
  • Materials attached
  • Calendar confirmed

References

  • Gainsight QBR Best Practices
  • Miller Heiman Strategic Selling
  • Customer Success QBR Templates
  • Executive Business Review Guide

Related Skills

  • account-health - Health scoring input
  • expansion-signals - Opportunity identification
  • churn-prediction - Risk assessment

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: Customer Success
  • Complexity: Intermediate
  • Mode: cyborg
  • Time to Value: 30-60 min per QBR
  • Prerequisites: Account history, metrics, relationship context

平台分布

Codex

36.23%
按下载量换算227

Claude

30.26%
按下载量换算189

Cursor

17.98%
按下载量换算113

Gemini CLI

9.4%
按下载量换算59

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills