Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

pymc-bayesian-modeling(pymc 贝叶斯建模)

pymc-bayesian-modeling 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

pymc-bayesian-modeling 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 60,316。

总安装 371周安装 15GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 116核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:pymc-bayesian-modeling(pymc 贝叶斯建模)
来源仓库:https://github.com/microck/ordinary-claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/pymc-bayesian-modeling
安装命令:
npx skills add microck/ordinary-claude-skills --skill "pymc-bayesian-modeling"
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

AgentSkills.tonpx skills
npx skills add microck/ordinary-claude-skills --skill "pymc-bayesian-modeling"

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

pymc-bayesian-modeling 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于需要基于关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果的 AI 代理环境。

通过 npx skills add microck/ordinary-claude-skills --skill "pymc-bayesian-modeling" 命令安装使用。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/pymc-bayesian-modeling

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add microck/ordinary-claude-skills --skill "pymc-bayesian-modeling";命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

pymc-bayesian-modeling 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add microck/ordinary-claude-skills --skill "pymc-bayesian-modeling"。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

pymc-bayesian-modeling 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

pymc-bayesian-modeling 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

pymc-bayesian-modeling 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

pymc-bayesian-modeling 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 371 次,近一周安装 15 次,下载 116 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

pymc-bayesian-modeling 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
pymc-bayesian-modeling

pymc 贝叶斯建模 · 本页

371—需要联网MIT未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

PyMC Bayesian Modeling

Overview

PyMC is a Python library for Bayesian modeling and probabilistic programming. Build, fit, validate, and compare Bayesian models using PyMC's modern API (version 5.x+), including hierarchical models, MCMC sampling (NUTS), variational inference, and model comparison (LOO, WAIC).

When to Use This Skill

This skill should be used when:

  • Building Bayesian models (linear/logistic regression, hierarchical models, time series, etc.)
  • Performing MCMC sampling or variational inference
  • Conducting prior/posterior predictive checks
  • Diagnosing sampling issues (divergences, convergence, ESS)
  • Comparing multiple models using information criteria (LOO, WAIC)
  • Implementing uncertainty quantification through Bayesian methods
  • Working with hierarchical/multilevel data structures
  • Handling missing data or measurement error in a principled way

Standard Bayesian Workflow

Follow this workflow for building and validating Bayesian models:

1. Data Preparation

import pymc as pm
import arviz as az
import numpy as np

# Load and prepare data
X = ...  # Predictors
y = ...  # Outcomes

# Standardize predictors for better sampling
X_mean = X.mean(axis=0)
X_std = X.std(axis=0)
X_scaled = (X - X_mean) / X_std

Key practices:

  • Standardize continuous predictors (improves sampling efficiency)
  • Center outcomes when possible
  • Handle missing data explicitly (treat as parameters)
  • Use named dimensions with coords for clarity

2. Model Building

coords = {
    'predictors': ['var1', 'var2', 'var3'],
    'obs_id': np.arange(len(y))
}

with pm.Model(coords=coords) as model:
    # Priors
    alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=1)
    beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=1, dims='predictors')
    sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)

    # Linear predictor
    mu = alpha + pm.math.dot(X_scaled, beta)

    # Likelihood
    y_obs = pm.Normal('y_obs', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y, dims='obs_id')

Key practices:

  • Use weakly informative priors (not flat priors)
  • Use HalfNormal or Exponential for scale parameters
  • Use named dimensions (dims) instead of shape when possible
  • Use pm.Data() for values that will be updated for predictions

3. Prior Predictive Check

Always validate priors before fitting:

with model:
    prior_pred = pm.sample_prior_predictive(samples=1000, random_seed=42)

# Visualize
az.plot_ppc(prior_pred, group='prior')

Check:

  • Do prior predictions span reasonable values?
  • Are extreme values plausible given domain knowledge?
  • If priors generate implausible data, adjust and re-check

4. Fit Model

with model:
    # Optional: Quick exploration with ADVI
    # approx = pm.fit(n=20000)

    # Full MCMC inference
    idata = pm.sample(
        draws=2000,
        tune=1000,
        chains=4,
        target_accept=0.9,
        random_seed=42,
        idata_kwargs={'log_likelihood': True}  # For model comparison
    )

Key parameters:

  • draws=2000: Number of samples per chain
  • tune=1000: Warmup samples (discarded)
  • chains=4: Run 4 chains for convergence checking
  • target_accept=0.9: Higher for difficult posteriors (0.95-0.99)
  • Include log_likelihood=True for model comparison

5. Check Diagnostics

Use the diagnostic script:

from scripts.model_diagnostics import check_diagnostics

results = check_diagnostics(idata, var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma'])

Check:

  • R-hat < 1.01: Chains have converged
  • ESS > 400: Sufficient effective samples
  • No divergences: NUTS sampled successfully
  • Trace plots: Chains should mix well (fuzzy caterpillar)

If issues arise:

  • Divergences → Increase target_accept=0.95, use non-centered parameterization
  • Low ESS → Sample more draws, reparameterize to reduce correlation
  • High R-hat → Run longer, check for multimodality

6. Posterior Predictive Check

Validate model fit:

with model:
    pm.sample_posterior_predictive(idata, extend_inferencedata=True, random_seed=42)

# Visualize
az.plot_ppc(idata)

Check:

  • Do posterior predictions capture observed data patterns?
  • Are systematic deviations evident (model misspecification)?
  • Consider alternative models if fit is poor

7. Analyze Results

# Summary statistics
print(az.summary(idata, var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma']))

# Posterior distributions
az.plot_posterior(idata, var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma'])

# Coefficient estimates
az.plot_forest(idata, var_names=['beta'], combined=True)

8. Make Predictions

X_new = ...  # New predictor values
X_new_scaled = (X_new - X_mean) / X_std

with model:
    pm.set_data({'X_scaled': X_new_scaled})
    post_pred = pm.sample_posterior_predictive(
        idata.posterior,
        var_names=['y_obs'],
        random_seed=42
    )

# Extract prediction intervals
y_pred_mean = post_pred.posterior_predictive['y_obs'].mean(dim=['chain', 'draw'])
y_pred_hdi = az.hdi(post_pred.posterior_predictive, var_names=['y_obs'])

Common Model Patterns

Linear Regression

For continuous outcomes with linear relationships:

with pm.Model() as linear_model:
    alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
    beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=10, shape=n_predictors)
    sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)

    mu = alpha + pm.math.dot(X, beta)
    y = pm.Normal('y', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y_obs)

Use template: assets/linear_regression_template.py

Logistic Regression

For binary outcomes:

with pm.Model() as logistic_model:
    alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
    beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=10, shape=n_predictors)

    logit_p = alpha + pm.math.dot(X, beta)
    y = pm.Bernoulli('y', logit_p=logit_p, observed=y_obs)

Hierarchical Models

For grouped data (use non-centered parameterization):

with pm.Model(coords={'groups': group_names}) as hierarchical_model:
    # Hyperpriors
    mu_alpha = pm.Normal('mu_alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
    sigma_alpha = pm.HalfNormal('sigma_alpha', sigma=1)

    # Group-level (non-centered)
    alpha_offset = pm.Normal('alpha_offset', mu=0, sigma=1, dims='groups')
    alpha = pm.Deterministic('alpha', mu_alpha + sigma_alpha * alpha_offset, dims='groups')

    # Observation-level
    mu = alpha[group_idx]
    sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)
    y = pm.Normal('y', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y_obs)

Use template: assets/hierarchical_model_template.py

Critical: Always use non-centered parameterization for hierarchical models to avoid divergences.

Poisson Regression

For count data:

with pm.Model() as poisson_model:
    alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
    beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=10, shape=n_predictors)

    log_lambda = alpha + pm.math.dot(X, beta)
    y = pm.Poisson('y', mu=pm.math.exp(log_lambda), observed=y_obs)

For overdispersed counts, use NegativeBinomial instead.

Time Series

For autoregressive processes:

with pm.Model() as ar_model:
    sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)
    rho = pm.Normal('rho', mu=0, sigma=0.5, shape=ar_order)
    init_dist = pm.Normal.dist(mu=0, sigma=sigma)

    y = pm.AR('y', rho=rho, sigma=sigma, init_dist=init_dist, observed=y_obs)

Model Comparison

Comparing Models

Use LOO or WAIC for model comparison:

from scripts.model_comparison import compare_models, check_loo_reliability

# Fit models with log_likelihood
models = {
    'Model1': idata1,
    'Model2': idata2,
    'Model3': idata3
}

# Compare using LOO
comparison = compare_models(models, ic='loo')

# Check reliability
check_loo_reliability(models)

Interpretation:

  • Δloo < 2: Models are similar, choose simpler model
  • 2 < Δloo < 4: Weak evidence for better model
  • 4 < Δloo < 10: Moderate evidence
  • Δloo > 10: Strong evidence for better model

Check Pareto-k values:

  • k < 0.7: LOO reliable
  • k > 0.7: Consider WAIC or k-fold CV

Model Averaging

When models are similar, average predictions:

from scripts.model_comparison import model_averaging

averaged_pred, weights = model_averaging(models, var_name='y_obs')

Distribution Selection Guide

For Priors

Scale parameters (σ, τ):

  • pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1) - Default choice
  • pm.Exponential('sigma', lam=1) - Alternative
  • pm.Gamma('sigma', alpha=2, beta=1) - More informative

Unbounded parameters:

  • pm.Normal('theta', mu=0, sigma=1) - For standardized data
  • pm.StudentT('theta', nu=3, mu=0, sigma=1) - Robust to outliers

Positive parameters:

  • pm.LogNormal('theta', mu=0, sigma=1)
  • pm.Gamma('theta', alpha=2, beta=1)

Probabilities:

  • pm.Beta('p', alpha=2, beta=2) - Weakly informative
  • pm.Uniform('p', lower=0, upper=1) - Non-informative (use sparingly)

Correlation matrices:

  • pm.LKJCorr('corr', n=n_vars, eta=2) - eta=1 uniform, eta>1 prefers identity

For Likelihoods

Continuous outcomes:

  • pm.Normal('y', mu=mu, sigma=sigma) - Default for continuous data
  • pm.StudentT('y', nu=nu, mu=mu, sigma=sigma) - Robust to outliers

Count data:

  • pm.Poisson('y', mu=lambda) - Equidispersed counts
  • pm.NegativeBinomial('y', mu=mu, alpha=alpha) - Overdispersed counts
  • pm.ZeroInflatedPoisson('y', psi=psi, mu=mu) - Excess zeros

Binary outcomes:

  • pm.Bernoulli('y', p=p) or pm.Bernoulli('y', logit_p=logit_p)

Categorical outcomes:

  • pm.Categorical('y', p=probs)

See: references/distributions.md for comprehensive distribution reference

Sampling and Inference

MCMC with NUTS

Default and recommended for most models:

idata = pm.sample(
    draws=2000,
    tune=1000,
    chains=4,
    target_accept=0.9,
    random_seed=42
)

Adjust when needed:

  • Divergences → target_accept=0.95 or higher
  • Slow sampling → Use ADVI for initialization
  • Discrete parameters → Use pm.Metropolis() for discrete vars

Variational Inference

Fast approximation for exploration or initialization:

with model:
    approx = pm.fit(n=20000, method='advi')

    # Use for initialization
    start = approx.sample(return_inferencedata=False)[0]
    idata = pm.sample(start=start)

Trade-offs:

  • Much faster than MCMC
  • Approximate (may underestimate uncertainty)
  • Good for large models or quick exploration

See: references/sampling_inference.md for detailed sampling guide

Diagnostic Scripts

Comprehensive Diagnostics

from scripts.model_diagnostics import create_diagnostic_report

create_diagnostic_report(
    idata,
    var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma'],
    output_dir='diagnostics/'
)

Creates:

  • Trace plots
  • Rank plots (mixing check)
  • Autocorrelation plots
  • Energy plots
  • ESS evolution
  • Summary statistics CSV

Quick Diagnostic Check

from scripts.model_diagnostics import check_diagnostics

results = check_diagnostics(idata)

Checks R-hat, ESS, divergences, and tree depth.

Common Issues and Solutions

Divergences

Symptom: idata.sample_stats.diverging.sum() > 0

Solutions:

  1. Increase target_accept=0.95 or 0.99
  2. Use non-centered parameterization (hierarchical models)
  3. Add stronger priors to constrain parameters
  4. Check for model misspecification

Low Effective Sample Size

Symptom: ESS < 400

Solutions:

  1. Sample more draws: draws=5000
  2. Reparameterize to reduce posterior correlation
  3. Use QR decomposition for regression with correlated predictors

High R-hat

Symptom: R-hat > 1.01

Solutions:

  1. Run longer chains: tune=2000, draws=5000
  2. Check for multimodality
  3. Improve initialization with ADVI

Slow Sampling

Solutions:

  1. Use ADVI initialization
  2. Reduce model complexity
  3. Increase parallelization: cores=8, chains=8
  4. Use variational inference if appropriate

Best Practices

Model Building

  1. Always standardize predictors for better sampling
  2. Use weakly informative priors (not flat)
  3. Use named dimensions (dims) for clarity
  4. Non-centered parameterization for hierarchical models
  5. Check prior predictive before fitting

Sampling

  1. Run multiple chains (at least 4) for convergence
  2. Use target_accept=0.9 as baseline (higher if needed)
  3. Include log_likelihood=True for model comparison
  4. Set random seed for reproducibility

Validation

  1. Check diagnostics before interpretation (R-hat, ESS, divergences)
  2. Posterior predictive check for model validation
  3. Compare multiple models when appropriate
  4. Report uncertainty (HDI intervals, not just point estimates)

Workflow

  1. Start simple, add complexity gradually
  2. Prior predictive check → Fit → Diagnostics → Posterior predictive check
  3. Iterate on model specification based on checks
  4. Document assumptions and prior choices

Resources

This skill includes:

References (references/)

  • distributions.md: Comprehensive catalog of PyMC distributions organized by category (continuous, discrete, multivariate, mixture, time series). Use when selecting priors or likelihoods.
  • sampling_inference.md: Detailed guide to sampling algorithms (NUTS, Metropolis, SMC), variational inference (ADVI, SVGD), and handling sampling issues. Use when encountering convergence problems or choosing inference methods.
  • workflows.md: Complete workflow examples and code patterns for common model types, data preparation, prior selection, and model validation. Use as a cookbook for standard Bayesian analyses.

Scripts (scripts/)

  • model_diagnostics.py: Automated diagnostic checking and report generation. Functions: check_diagnostics() for quick checks, create_diagnostic_report() for comprehensive analysis with plots.
  • model_comparison.py: Model comparison utilities using LOO/WAIC. Functions: compare_models(), check_loo_reliability(), model_averaging().

Templates (assets/)

  • linear_regression_template.py: Complete template for Bayesian linear regression with full workflow (data prep, prior checks, fitting, diagnostics, predictions).
  • hierarchical_model_template.py: Complete template for hierarchical/multilevel models with non-centered parameterization and group-level analysis.

Quick Reference

Model Building

with pm.Model(coords={'var': names}) as model:
    # Priors
    param = pm.Normal('param', mu=0, sigma=1, dims='var')
    # Likelihood
    y = pm.Normal('y', mu=..., sigma=..., observed=data)

Sampling

idata = pm.sample(draws=2000, tune=1000, chains=4, target_accept=0.9)

Diagnostics

from scripts.model_diagnostics import check_diagnostics
check_diagnostics(idata)

Model Comparison

from scripts.model_comparison import compare_models
compare_models({'m1': idata1, 'm2': idata2}, ic='loo')

Predictions

with model:
    pm.set_data({'X': X_new})
    pred = pm.sample_posterior_predictive(idata.posterior)

Additional Notes

  • PyMC integrates with ArviZ for visualization and diagnostics
  • Use pm.model_to_graphviz(model) to visualize model structure
  • Save results with idata.to_netcdf('results.nc')
  • Load with az.from_netcdf('results.nc')
  • For very large models, consider minibatch ADVI or data subsampling

平台分布

trae

28.21%
按下载量换算33

Antigravity

26.68%
按下载量换算31

windsurf

18.25%
按下载量换算21

Claude Code

12.75%
按下载量换算15

Codex

9.08%
按下载量换算11

Gemini CLI

4%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills