Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

pymc(pymc 命令行)

pymc 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

pymc 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 2,053。

总安装 1,929周安装 82GitHub Stars 19,679下载 676核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:pymc(pymc 命令行)
来源仓库:https://github.com/k-dense-ai/claude-scientific-skills
仓库路径:skills/pymc
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/k-dense-ai/claude-scientific-skills --skill pymc
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/k-dense-ai/claude-scientific-skills --skill pymc

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 等协作信息。适合围绕代码变更和仓库状态进行整理。通过 GitHub 安装,需结合原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态。pymc 属于待分类类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

注意是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/pymc

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/k-dense-ai/claude-scientific-skills --skill py…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

pymc 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/k-dense-ai/claude-scientific-skills --skill pymc。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

pymc 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

pymc 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

pymc 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

pymc 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,929 次,近一周安装 82 次,下载 676 次,GitHub 19,679 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

pymc 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 19,679 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
pymc

pymc 命令行 · 本页

1,92919,679需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

PyMC Bayesian Modeling

Overview

PyMC is a Python library for Bayesian modeling and probabilistic programming. Build, fit, validate, and compare Bayesian models using PyMC's modern API (version 5.x+), including hierarchical models, MCMC sampling (NUTS), variational inference, and model comparison (LOO, WAIC).

When to Use This Skill

This skill should be used when:

  • Building Bayesian models (linear/logistic regression, hierarchical models, time series, etc.)
  • Performing MCMC sampling or variational inference
  • Conducting prior/posterior predictive checks
  • Diagnosing sampling issues (divergences, convergence, ESS)
  • Comparing multiple models using information criteria (LOO, WAIC)
  • Implementing uncertainty quantification through Bayesian methods
  • Working with hierarchical/multilevel data structures
  • Handling missing data or measurement error in a principled way

Standard Bayesian Workflow

Follow this workflow for building and validating Bayesian models:

1. Data Preparation

import pymc as pm
import arviz as az
import numpy as np

# Load and prepare data
X = ...  # Predictors
y = ...  # Outcomes

# Standardize predictors for better sampling
X_mean = X.mean(axis=0)
X_std = X.std(axis=0)
X_scaled = (X - X_mean) / X_std

Key practices:

  • Standardize continuous predictors (improves sampling efficiency)
  • Center outcomes when possible
  • Handle missing data explicitly (treat as parameters)
  • Use named dimensions with coords for clarity

2. Model Building

coords = {
    'predictors': ['var1', 'var2', 'var3'],
    'obs_id': np.arange(len(y))
}

with pm.Model(coords=coords) as model:
    # Priors
    alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=1)
    beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=1, dims='predictors')
    sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)

    # Linear predictor
    mu = alpha + pm.math.dot(X_scaled, beta)

    # Likelihood
    y_obs = pm.Normal('y_obs', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y, dims='obs_id')

Key practices:

  • Use weakly informative priors (not flat priors)
  • Use HalfNormal or Exponential for scale parameters
  • Use named dimensions (dims) instead of shape when possible
  • Use pm.Data() for values that will be updated for predictions

3. Prior Predictive Check

Always validate priors before fitting:

with model:
    prior_pred = pm.sample_prior_predictive(samples=1000, random_seed=42)

# Visualize
az.plot_ppc(prior_pred, group='prior')

Check:

  • Do prior predictions span reasonable values?
  • Are extreme values plausible given domain knowledge?
  • If priors generate implausible data, adjust and re-check

4. Fit Model

with model:
    # Optional: Quick exploration with ADVI
    # approx = pm.fit(n=20000)

    # Full MCMC inference
    idata = pm.sample(
        draws=2000,
        tune=1000,
        chains=4,
        target_accept=0.9,
        random_seed=42,
        idata_kwargs={'log_likelihood': True}  # For model comparison
    )

Key parameters:

  • draws=2000: Number of samples per chain
  • tune=1000: Warmup samples (discarded)
  • chains=4: Run 4 chains for convergence checking
  • target_accept=0.9: Higher for difficult posteriors (0.95-0.99)
  • Include log_likelihood=True for model comparison

5. Check Diagnostics

Use the diagnostic script:

from scripts.model_diagnostics import check_diagnostics

results = check_diagnostics(idata, var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma'])

Check:

  • R-hat < 1.01: Chains have converged
  • ESS > 400: Sufficient effective samples
  • No divergences: NUTS sampled successfully
  • Trace plots: Chains should mix well (fuzzy caterpillar)

If issues arise:

  • Divergences → Increase target_accept=0.95, use non-centered parameterization
  • Low ESS → Sample more draws, reparameterize to reduce correlation
  • High R-hat → Run longer, check for multimodality

6. Posterior Predictive Check

Validate model fit:

with model:
    pm.sample_posterior_predictive(idata, extend_inferencedata=True, random_seed=42)

# Visualize
az.plot_ppc(idata)

Check:

  • Do posterior predictions capture observed data patterns?
  • Are systematic deviations evident (model misspecification)?
  • Consider alternative models if fit is poor

7. Analyze Results

# Summary statistics
print(az.summary(idata, var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma']))

# Posterior distributions
az.plot_posterior(idata, var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma'])

# Coefficient estimates
az.plot_forest(idata, var_names=['beta'], combined=True)

8. Make Predictions

X_new = ...  # New predictor values
X_new_scaled = (X_new - X_mean) / X_std

with model:
    pm.set_data({'X_scaled': X_new_scaled})
    post_pred = pm.sample_posterior_predictive(
        idata.posterior,
        var_names=['y_obs'],
        random_seed=42
    )

# Extract prediction intervals
y_pred_mean = post_pred.posterior_predictive['y_obs'].mean(dim=['chain', 'draw'])
y_pred_hdi = az.hdi(post_pred.posterior_predictive, var_names=['y_obs'])

Common Model Patterns

Linear Regression

For continuous outcomes with linear relationships:

with pm.Model() as linear_model:
    alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
    beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=10, shape=n_predictors)
    sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)

    mu = alpha + pm.math.dot(X, beta)
    y = pm.Normal('y', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y_obs)

Use template: assets/linear_regression_template.py

Logistic Regression

For binary outcomes:

with pm.Model() as logistic_model:
    alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
    beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=10, shape=n_predictors)

    logit_p = alpha + pm.math.dot(X, beta)
    y = pm.Bernoulli('y', logit_p=logit_p, observed=y_obs)

Hierarchical Models

For grouped data (use non-centered parameterization):

with pm.Model(coords={'groups': group_names}) as hierarchical_model:
    # Hyperpriors
    mu_alpha = pm.Normal('mu_alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
    sigma_alpha = pm.HalfNormal('sigma_alpha', sigma=1)

    # Group-level (non-centered)
    alpha_offset = pm.Normal('alpha_offset', mu=0, sigma=1, dims='groups')
    alpha = pm.Deterministic('alpha', mu_alpha + sigma_alpha * alpha_offset, dims='groups')

    # Observation-level
    mu = alpha[group_idx]
    sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)
    y = pm.Normal('y', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y_obs)

Use template: assets/hierarchical_model_template.py

Critical: Always use non-centered parameterization for hierarchical models to avoid divergences.

Poisson Regression

For count data:

with pm.Model() as poisson_model:
    alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
    beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=10, shape=n_predictors)

    log_lambda = alpha + pm.math.dot(X, beta)
    y = pm.Poisson('y', mu=pm.math.exp(log_lambda), observed=y_obs)

For overdispersed counts, use NegativeBinomial instead.

Time Series

For autoregressive processes:

with pm.Model() as ar_model:
    sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)
    rho = pm.Normal('rho', mu=0, sigma=0.5, shape=ar_order)
    init_dist = pm.Normal.dist(mu=0, sigma=sigma)

    y = pm.AR('y', rho=rho, sigma=sigma, init_dist=init_dist, observed=y_obs)

Model Comparison

Comparing Models

Use LOO or WAIC for model comparison:

from scripts.model_comparison import compare_models, check_loo_reliability

# Fit models with log_likelihood
models = {
    'Model1': idata1,
    'Model2': idata2,
    'Model3': idata3
}

# Compare using LOO
comparison = compare_models(models, ic='loo')

# Check reliability
check_loo_reliability(models)

Interpretation:

  • Δloo < 2: Models are similar, choose simpler model
  • 2 < Δloo < 4: Weak evidence for better model
  • 4 < Δloo < 10: Moderate evidence
  • Δloo > 10: Strong evidence for better model

Check Pareto-k values:

  • k < 0.7: LOO reliable
  • k > 0.7: Consider WAIC or k-fold CV

Model Averaging

When models are similar, average predictions:

from scripts.model_comparison import model_averaging

averaged_pred, weights = model_averaging(models, var_name='y_obs')

Distribution Selection Guide

For Priors

Scale parameters (σ, τ):

  • pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1) - Default choice
  • pm.Exponential('sigma', lam=1) - Alternative
  • pm.Gamma('sigma', alpha=2, beta=1) - More informative

Unbounded parameters:

  • pm.Normal('theta', mu=0, sigma=1) - For standardized data
  • pm.StudentT('theta', nu=3, mu=0, sigma=1) - Robust to outliers

Positive parameters:

  • pm.LogNormal('theta', mu=0, sigma=1)
  • pm.Gamma('theta', alpha=2, beta=1)

Probabilities:

  • pm.Beta('p', alpha=2, beta=2) - Weakly informative
  • pm.Uniform('p', lower=0, upper=1) - Non-informative (use sparingly)

Correlation matrices:

  • pm.LKJCorr('corr', n=n_vars, eta=2) - eta=1 uniform, eta>1 prefers identity

For Likelihoods

Continuous outcomes:

  • pm.Normal('y', mu=mu, sigma=sigma) - Default for continuous data
  • pm.StudentT('y', nu=nu, mu=mu, sigma=sigma) - Robust to outliers

Count data:

  • pm.Poisson('y', mu=lambda) - Equidispersed counts
  • pm.NegativeBinomial('y', mu=mu, alpha=alpha) - Overdispersed counts
  • pm.ZeroInflatedPoisson('y', psi=psi, mu=mu) - Excess zeros

Binary outcomes:

  • pm.Bernoulli('y', p=p) or pm.Bernoulli('y', logit_p=logit_p)

Categorical outcomes:

  • pm.Categorical('y', p=probs)

See: references/distributions.md for comprehensive distribution reference

Sampling and Inference

MCMC with NUTS

Default and recommended for most models:

idata = pm.sample(
    draws=2000,
    tune=1000,
    chains=4,
    target_accept=0.9,
    random_seed=42
)

Adjust when needed:

  • Divergences → target_accept=0.95 or higher
  • Slow sampling → Use ADVI for initialization
  • Discrete parameters → Use pm.Metropolis() for discrete vars

Variational Inference

Fast approximation for exploration or initialization:

with model:
    approx = pm.fit(n=20000, method='advi')

    # Use for initialization
    start = approx.sample(return_inferencedata=False)[0]
    idata = pm.sample(start=start)

Trade-offs:

  • Much faster than MCMC
  • Approximate (may underestimate uncertainty)
  • Good for large models or quick exploration

See: references/sampling_inference.md for detailed sampling guide

Diagnostic Scripts

Comprehensive Diagnostics

from scripts.model_diagnostics import create_diagnostic_report

create_diagnostic_report(
    idata,
    var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma'],
    output_dir='diagnostics/'
)

Creates:

  • Trace plots
  • Rank plots (mixing check)
  • Autocorrelation plots
  • Energy plots
  • ESS evolution
  • Summary statistics CSV

Quick Diagnostic Check

from scripts.model_diagnostics import check_diagnostics

results = check_diagnostics(idata)

Checks R-hat, ESS, divergences, and tree depth.

Common Issues and Solutions

Divergences

Symptom: idata.sample_stats.diverging.sum() > 0

Solutions:

  1. Increase target_accept=0.95 or 0.99
  2. Use non-centered parameterization (hierarchical models)
  3. Add stronger priors to constrain parameters
  4. Check for model misspecification

Low Effective Sample Size

Symptom: ESS < 400

Solutions:

  1. Sample more draws: draws=5000
  2. Reparameterize to reduce posterior correlation
  3. Use QR decomposition for regression with correlated predictors

High R-hat

Symptom: R-hat > 1.01

Solutions:

  1. Run longer chains: tune=2000, draws=5000
  2. Check for multimodality
  3. Improve initialization with ADVI

Slow Sampling

Solutions:

  1. Use ADVI initialization
  2. Reduce model complexity
  3. Increase parallelization: cores=8, chains=8
  4. Use variational inference if appropriate

Best Practices

Model Building

  1. Always standardize predictors for better sampling
  2. Use weakly informative priors (not flat)
  3. Use named dimensions (dims) for clarity
  4. Non-centered parameterization for hierarchical models
  5. Check prior predictive before fitting

Sampling

  1. Run multiple chains (at least 4) for convergence
  2. Use target_accept=0.9 as baseline (higher if needed)
  3. Include log_likelihood=True for model comparison
  4. Set random seed for reproducibility

Validation

  1. Check diagnostics before interpretation (R-hat, ESS, divergences)
  2. Posterior predictive check for model validation
  3. Compare multiple models when appropriate
  4. Report uncertainty (HDI intervals, not just point estimates)

Workflow

  1. Start simple, add complexity gradually
  2. Prior predictive check → Fit → Diagnostics → Posterior predictive check
  3. Iterate on model specification based on checks
  4. Document assumptions and prior choices

Resources

This skill includes:

References (references/)

  • distributions.md: Comprehensive catalog of PyMC distributions organized by category (continuous, discrete, multivariate, mixture, time series). Use when selecting priors or likelihoods.
  • sampling_inference.md: Detailed guide to sampling algorithms (NUTS, Metropolis, SMC), variational inference (ADVI, SVGD), and handling sampling issues. Use when encountering convergence problems or choosing inference methods.
  • workflows.md: Complete workflow examples and code patterns for common model types, data preparation, prior selection, and model validation. Use as a cookbook for standard Bayesian analyses.

Scripts (scripts/)

  • model_diagnostics.py: Automated diagnostic checking and report generation. Functions: check_diagnostics() for quick checks, create_diagnostic_report() for comprehensive analysis with plots.
  • model_comparison.py: Model comparison utilities using LOO/WAIC. Functions: compare_models(), check_loo_reliability(), model_averaging().

Templates (assets/)

  • linear_regression_template.py: Complete template for Bayesian linear regression with full workflow (data prep, prior checks, fitting, diagnostics, predictions).
  • hierarchical_model_template.py: Complete template for hierarchical/multilevel models with non-centered parameterization and group-level analysis.

Quick Reference

Model Building

with pm.Model(coords={'var': names}) as model:
    # Priors
    param = pm.Normal('param', mu=0, sigma=1, dims='var')
    # Likelihood
    y = pm.Normal('y', mu=..., sigma=..., observed=data)

Sampling

idata = pm.sample(draws=2000, tune=1000, chains=4, target_accept=0.9)

Diagnostics

from scripts.model_diagnostics import check_diagnostics
check_diagnostics(idata)

Model Comparison

from scripts.model_comparison import compare_models
compare_models({'m1': idata1, 'm2': idata2}, ic='loo')

Predictions

with model:
    pm.set_data({'X': X_new})
    pred = pm.sample_posterior_predictive(idata.posterior)

Additional Notes

  • PyMC integrates with ArviZ for visualization and diagnostics
  • Use pm.model_to_graphviz(model) to visualize model structure
  • Save results with idata.to_netcdf('results.nc')
  • Load with az.from_netcdf('results.nc')
  • For very large models, consider minibatch ADVI or data subsampling

平台分布

Codex

36.55%
按下载量换算247

Claude

32.21%
按下载量换算218

Cursor

19.02%
按下载量换算129

Gemini CLI

10.06%
按下载量换算68

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills