Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

provider-pattern(提供者模式)

provider-pattern 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

provider-pattern 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 5,698。

总安装 5,880周安装 250GitHub Stars 173下载 2,060核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:provider-pattern(提供者模式)
来源仓库:https://github.com/patternsdev/skills
仓库路径:skills/provider-pattern
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/patternsdev/skills --skill provider-pattern
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/patternsdev/skills --skill provider-pattern

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

provider-pattern 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。

安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/provider-pattern

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/patternsdev/skills --skill provider-pattern;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

provider-pattern 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/patternsdev/skills --skill provider-pattern。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

provider-pattern 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

provider-pattern 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

provider-pattern 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

provider-pattern 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 5,880 次,近一周安装 250 次,下载 2,060 次,GitHub 173 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

provider-pattern 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
provider-pattern

提供者模式 · 本页

5,880173只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Provider Pattern

Table of Contents

In some cases, we want to make available data to many (if not all) components in an application. Although we can pass data to components using props, this can be difficult to do if almost all components in your application need access to the value of the props.

We often end up with something called *prop drilling*, which is the case when we pass props far down the component tree. Refactoring the code that relies on the props becomes almost impossible, and knowing where certain data comes from is difficult.

When to Use

  • Use this when many components need access to the same data (themes, auth, locale)
  • This is helpful when prop drilling becomes unwieldy across multiple component layers

Instructions

  • Create a Context with React.createContext() and wrap components with its Provider
  • Use the useContext hook in consuming components to access provided values
  • Create custom hooks (e.g., useThemeContext) to encapsulate context consumption logic
  • Avoid overusing context for frequently updated values as all consumers re-render on change
  • Split contexts by concern to minimize unnecessary re-renders

Details

Let's say that we have one App component that contains certain data. Far down the component tree, we have a ListItem, Header and Text component that all need this data. In order to get this data to these components, we'd have to pass it through multiple layers of components.

In our codebase, that would look something like the following:

function App() {
  const data = { ... }

  return (
    <div>
      <SideBar data={data} />
      <Content data={data} />
    </div>
  )
}

const SideBar = ({ data }) => <List data={data} />
const List = ({ data }) => <ListItem data={data} />
const ListItem = ({ data }) => <span>{data.listItem}</span>

const Content = ({ data }) => (
  <div>
    <Header data={data} />
    <Block data={data} />
  </div>
)
const Header = ({ data }) => <div>{data.title}</div>
const Block = ({ data }) => <Text data={data} />
const Text = ({ data }) => <h1>{data.text}</h1>

Passing props down this way can get quite messy. If we want to rename the data prop in the future, we'd have to rename it in all components. The bigger your application gets, the trickier prop drilling can be.

It would be optimal if we could skip all the layers of components that don't need to use this data. We need to have something that gives the components that need access to the value of data direct access to it, without relying on prop drilling.

This is where the Provider Pattern can help us out! With the Provider Pattern, we can make data available to multiple components. Rather than passing that data down each layer through props, we can wrap all components in a Provider. A Provider is a higher order component provided to us by the Context object. We can create a Context object, using the createContext method that React provides for us.

The Provider receives a value prop, which contains the data that we want to pass down. *All* components that are wrapped within this provider have access to the value of the value prop.

const DataContext = React.createContext()

function App() {
  const data = { ... }

  return (
    <div>
      <DataContext.Provider value={data}>
        <SideBar />
        <Content />
      </DataContext.Provider>
    </div>
  )
}

We no longer have to manually pass down the data prop to each component! Each component can get access to the data, by using the useContext hook. This hook receives the context that data has a reference with, DataContext in this case. The useContext hook lets us read and write data to the context object.

const DataContext = React.createContext();

function App() {
  const data = { ... }

  return (
    <div>
      <DataContext.Provider value={data}>
        <SideBar />
        <Content />
      </DataContext.Provider>
    </div>
  )
}

const SideBar = () => <List />
const List = () => <ListItem />
const Content = () => <div><Header /><Block /></div>

function ListItem() {
  const { data } = React.useContext(DataContext);
  return <span>{data.listItem}</span>;
}

function Text() {
  const { data } = React.useContext(DataContext);
  return <h1>{data.text}</h1>;
}

function Header() {
  const { data } = React.useContext(DataContext);
  return <div>{data.title}</div>;
}

The components that aren't using the data value won't have to deal with data at all. We no longer have to worry about passing props down several levels through components that don't need the value of the props, which makes refactoring a lot easier.

The Provider pattern is very useful for sharing global data. A common usecase for the provider pattern is sharing a theme UI state with many components.

Say we have a simple app that shows a list. We want the user to be able to switch between lightmode and darkmode, by toggling the switch. When the user switches from dark- to lightmode and vice versa, the background color and text color should change! Instead of passing the current theme value down to each component, we can wrap the components in a ThemeProvider, and pass the current theme colors to the provider.

export const ThemeContext = React.createContext();

const themes = {
  light: {
    background: "#fff",
    color: "#000",
  },
  dark: {
    background: "#171717",
    color: "#fff",
  },
};

export default function App() {
  const [theme, setTheme] = useState("dark");

  function toggleTheme() {
    setTheme(theme === "light" ? "dark" : "light");
  }

  const providerValue = {
    theme: themes[theme],
    toggleTheme,
  };

  return (
    <div className={`App theme-${theme}`}>
      <ThemeContext.Provider value={providerValue}>
        <Toggle />
        <List />
      </ThemeContext.Provider>
    </div>
  );
}

Since the Toggle and List components are both wrapped within the ThemeContext provider, we have access to the values theme and toggleTheme that are passed as a value to the provider.

Within the Toggle component, we can use the toggleTheme function to update the theme accordingly.

import React, { useContext } from "react";
import { ThemeContext } from "./App";

export default function Toggle() {
  const theme = useContext(ThemeContext);

  return (
    <label className="switch">
      <input type="checkbox" onClick={theme.toggleTheme} />
      <span className="slider round" />
    </label>
  );
}

The List component itself doesn't care about the current value of the theme. However, the ListItem components do! We can use the theme context directly within the ListItem.

import React, { useContext } from "react";
import { ThemeContext } from "./App";

export default function TextBox() {
  const theme = useContext(ThemeContext);

  return <li style={theme.theme}>...</li>;
}

Perfect! We didn't have to pass down any data to components that didn't care about the current value of the theme.

Hooks

We can create a hook to provide context to components. Instead of having to import useContext and the Context in each component, we can use a hook that returns the context we need.

function useThemeContext() {
  const theme = useContext(ThemeContext);
  return theme;
}

To make sure that it's a valid theme, let's throw an error if useContext(ThemeContext) returns a falsy value.

function useThemeContext() {
  const theme = useContext(ThemeContext);
  if (!theme) {
    throw new Error("useThemeContext must be used within ThemeProvider");
  }
  return theme;
}

Instead of wrapping the components directly with the ThemeContext.Provider component, we can extract a dedicated provider component. This keeps the context logic separate from the rendering components and improves reusability.

function ThemeProvider({ children }) {
  const [theme, setTheme] = useState("dark");

  function toggleTheme() {
    setTheme(theme === "light" ? "dark" : "light");
  }

  const providerValue = {
    theme: themes[theme],
    toggleTheme,
  };

  return (
    <ThemeContext.Provider value={providerValue}>
      {children}
    </ThemeContext.Provider>
  );
}

export default function App() {
  return (
    <ThemeProvider>
      <div className="App">
        <Toggle />
        <List />
      </div>
    </ThemeProvider>
  );
}

Each component that needs to have access to the ThemeContext, can now simply use the useThemeContext hook.

export default function TextBox() {
  const theme = useThemeContext();

  return <li style={theme.theme}>...</li>;
}

By creating hooks for the different contexts, it's easy to separate the providers's logic from the components that render the data.

Case Study

Some libraries provide built-in providers, which values we can use in the consuming components. A good example of this, is styled-components.

The styled-components library provides a ThemeProvider for us. Each *styled component* will have access to the value of this provider! Instead of creating a context API ourselves, we can use the one that's been provided to us!

import { ThemeProvider } from "styled-components";

export default function App() {
  const [theme, setTheme] = useState("dark");

  function toggleTheme() {
    setTheme(theme === "light" ? "dark" : "light");
  }

  return (
    <div className={`App theme-${theme}`}>
      <ThemeProvider theme={themes[theme]}>
        <Toggle toggleTheme={toggleTheme} />
        <List />
      </ThemeProvider>
    </div>
  );
}

Instead of passing an inline style prop to the ListItem component, we'll make it a styled.li component. Since it's a styled component, we can access the value of theme!

import styled from "styled-components";

export default function ListItem() {
  return (
    <Li>
      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod
      tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim
      veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
      commodo consequat.
    </Li>
  );
}

const Li = styled.li`
  ${({ theme }) => `
     background-color: ${theme.backgroundColor};
     color: ${theme.color};
  `}
`;

We can now easily apply styles to all our styled components with the ThemeProvider!

Tradeoffs

Pros

The Provider pattern/Context API makes it possible to pass data to many components, without having to manually pass it through each component layer.

It reduces the risk of accidentally introducing bugs when refactoring code. Previously, if we later on wanted to rename a prop, we had to rename this prop throughout the entire application where this value was used.

We no longer have to deal with *prop-drilling*, which could be seen as an anti-pattern. Previously, it could be difficult to understand the dataflow of the application, as it wasn't always clear where certain prop values originated. With the Provider pattern, we no longer have to unnecessarily pass props to component that don't care about this data.

Keeping some sort of global state is made easy with the Provider pattern, as we can give components access to this global state.

Cons

In some cases, overusing the Provider pattern can result in performance issues. All components that *consume* the context re-render on each state change.

Let's look at an example. We have a simple counter which value increases every time we click on the Increment button in the Button component. We also have a Reset button in the Reset component, which resets the count back to 0.

The Reset component also re-rendered since it consumed the useCountContext. In smaller applications, this won't matter too much. In larger applications, passing a frequently updated value to many components can affect the performance negatively.

To make sure that components aren't consuming providers that contain unnecessary values which may update, you can create several providers for each separate usecase.

Source

References

平台分布

Codex

35.48%
按下载量换算731

Claude

31.94%
按下载量换算658

Cursor

19.06%
按下载量换算393

Gemini CLI

11.21%
按下载量换算231

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills