Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

protocol-deviation-classifier(协议偏差分类器)

protocol-deviation-classifier 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

protocol-deviation-classifier 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 15,734。

总安装 7,638周安装 312GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 2,471核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
0.1.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:protocol-deviation-classifier(协议偏差分类器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ewankeynes/protocol-deviation-classifier
安装命令:
openclaw skills install protocol-deviation-classifier
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install protocol-deviation-classifier

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

protocol-deviation-classifier 可自动判断临床试验中的事件属于“重大偏差”还是“轻微偏差”。适用于临床研究监控场景,辅助识别需上报或干预的关键偏离项。通过 clawhub 安装后接入 OpenClaw,接收文本描述即可返回分类结果与依据摘要。

实际应用中应结合人工复核,因模型可能存在误判,尤其涉及安全相关事件时。适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install protocol-deviation-classifier;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

protocol-deviation-classifier 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install protocol-deviation-classifier。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

protocol-deviation-classifier 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

protocol-deviation-classifier 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

protocol-deviation-classifier 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

protocol-deviation-classifier 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 7,638 次,近一周安装 312 次,下载 2,471 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

protocol-deviation-classifier 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
protocol-deviation-classifier

协议偏差分类器 · 本页

7,638—调用外部服务MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
protocol-deviation-classifier
description
Determine whether an incident in a clinical trial is a "major deviation
Function
Automatically classify protocol deviations in clinical trials based on
Trigger
When classification assessment of protocol deviations is needed, input
version
1.0.0
category
Pharma
tags
author
AIPOCH
license
MIT
status
Draft
risk_level
Medium
skill_type
Tool/Script
owner
AIPOCH
reviewer
last_updated
2026-02-06

Protocol Deviation Classifier

Clinical trial protocol deviation classification tool, based on GCP and ICH E6 guidelines, automatically determines whether deviations belong to "major deviations" or "minor deviations".

Features

  • Automatic Classification: Automatically determines severity based on deviation description
  • Risk Assessment: Assesses impact on subject safety, data integrity, and scientific validity
  • Regulatory Basis: Classification basis complies with GCP, ICH E6, and FDA/EMA guidelines
  • Report Generation: Generates deviation classification reports that meet regulatory requirements
  • Chinese Support: Full support for Chinese clinical trial scenarios

Deviation Classification Standards

Major/Critical Deviation

Deviations that may affect trial data integrity, subject safety, or trial scientific validity:

CategoryExamples
Informed ConsentPerforming research procedures without informed consent, using expired/incorrect informed consent forms
Inclusion/Exclusion CriteriaEnrolling subjects who don't meet inclusion criteria, enrolling subjects who meet exclusion criteria
Investigational ProductOverdose administration, contraindicated concomitant medication, incorrect route of administration, randomization error
SafetyNot performing safety monitoring as required by protocol, missing SAE/SUSAR reports, delayed reporting
BlindingUnblinding by unauthorized personnel, unrecorded emergency unblinding procedures
Data IntegrityFalsifying/fabricating data, systematic missing of critical data
Prohibited OperationsViolating key operational procedures of trial protocol, not performing key efficacy assessments

Minor Deviation

Deviations unlikely to affect trial data integrity, subject safety, or trial scientific validity:

CategoryExamples
Visit WindowSlightly exceeding visit time window (e.g., within a few days), delay of non-critical visits
Sample CollectionMinor timing deviations in non-critical sample collection, slight delays in sample processing
Questionnaire CompletionQuality of life questionnaires/diary cards submitted a few days late
Data RecordingDelays in non-critical data recording, spelling/formatting errors
Procedure ExecutionAdjustment of secondary procedure execution order, omission of non-critical assessments (e.g., height measurement)
DocumentationDelays in source document signatures, missing secondary documents (e.g., non-critical examination reports)

Usage

Python API

from scripts.main import DeviationClassifier

# Initialize classifier
classifier = DeviationClassifier()

# Classify single deviation
result = classifier.classify(
    description="Subject visit delayed by 2 days",
    deviation_type="Visit Window"
)
print(result.classification)  # "Minor Deviation"
print(result.confidence)      # 0.92
print(result.rationale)       # Classification rationale explanation

# Batch classification
deviations = [
    {"description": "Blood sample collected without informed consent", "type": "Informed Consent"},
    {"description": "Quality of life questionnaire submitted 3 days late", "type": "Data Collection"}
]
batch_results = classifier.classify_batch(deviations)

# Generate report
report = classifier.generate_report(batch_results)

CLI Usage

# Classify single deviation
python scripts/main.py classify --description "Subject visit delayed by 2 days" --type "Visit Window"

# Batch classification from file
python scripts/main.py batch --input deviations.json --output report.json

# Interactive classification
python scripts/main.py interactive

# Assess deviation impact
python scripts/main.py assess \
  --description "Subject accidentally took double dose of investigational drug" \
  --safety-impact high \
  --data-impact medium \
  --scientific-impact medium

Input Format

JSON Input File Format:

[
  {
    "id": "DEV-001",
    "description": "Subject visit delayed by 2 days",
    "type": "Visit Window",
    "occurrence_date": "2024-01-15",
    "severity_factors": {
      "safety_impact": "none",
      "data_impact": "low",
      "scientific_impact": "low"
    }
  },
  {
    "id": "DEV-002",
    "description": "Blood collection performed without informed consent",
    "type": "Informed Consent",
    "severity_factors": {
      "safety_impact": "high",
      "data_impact": "high",
      "scientific_impact": "high"
    }
  }
]

Output Format

Classification Result:

{
  "id": "DEV-001",
  "classification": "Minor Deviation",
  "classification_en": "Minor Deviation",
  "confidence": 0.92,
  "rationale": "Visit time window slightly delayed (2 days), does not affect subject safety, data integrity, or trial scientific validity.",
  "risk_factors": {
    "safety_risk": "none",
    "data_integrity_risk": "low",
    "scientific_validity_risk": "none"
  },
  "regulatory_basis": [
    "ICH E6(R2) Section 4.5",
    "GCP Section 6.4.4"
  ],
  "recommended_actions": [
    "Document in file",
    "Track trends"
  ]
}

Classification Algorithm

Classification based on the following assessment dimensions:

  1. Subject Safety Impact (Safety Impact)

- None: No impact - Low: Minor impact - Medium: Moderate impact - High: Serious impact

  1. Data Integrity Impact (Data Integrity Impact)

- None: No impact - Low: Minor impact on non-critical data - Medium: Partial impact on critical data - High: Serious damage to critical data

  1. Trial Scientific Validity Impact (Scientific Validity Impact)

- None: No impact - Low: Minor impact on statistical power - Medium: May affect primary endpoint - High: Seriously affects trial conclusion

Classification Rules:

  • Any dimension is High → Major Deviation
  • Safety dimension is Medium and Data/Science either is Medium+ → Major Deviation
  • Other cases → Minor Deviation

Regulatory Basis

  • ICH E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice Guideline
  • ICH E6(R3) Good Clinical Practice Guideline (Draft)
  • FDA 21 CFR Part 312 (IND Regulations)
  • FDA Guidance for Industry: Oversight of Clinical Investigations
  • EMA Reflection Paper on Risk Based Quality Management
  • NMPA Good Clinical Practice for Drug Clinical Trials

Dependencies

  • Python 3.8+
  • No third-party dependencies (pure Python standard library implementation)

Notes

  1. This tool provides classification recommendations, final determination must be confirmed by clinical quality assurance personnel
  2. Serious/critical deviations must be reported to sponsor and ethics committee immediately
  3. It is recommended to regularly review deviation trends and implement CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Actions)
  4. Classification standards may vary by regulatory agency, trial type, and protocol requirements

Risk Assessment

Risk IndicatorAssessmentLevel
Code ExecutionPython/R scripts executed locallyMedium
Network AccessNo external API callsLow
File System AccessRead input files, write output filesMedium
Instruction TamperingStandard prompt guidelinesLow
Data ExposureOutput files saved to workspaceLow

Security Checklist

  • [ ] No hardcoded credentials or API keys
  • [ ] No unauthorized file system access (../)
  • [ ] Output does not expose sensitive information
  • [ ] Prompt injection protections in place
  • [ ] Input file paths validated (no ../ traversal)
  • [ ] Output directory restricted to workspace
  • [ ] Script execution in sandboxed environment
  • [ ] Error messages sanitized (no stack traces exposed)
  • [ ] Dependencies audited

Prerequisites

# Python dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt

Evaluation Criteria

Success Metrics

  • [ ] Successfully executes main functionality
  • [ ] Output meets quality standards
  • [ ] Handles edge cases gracefully
  • [ ] Performance is acceptable

Test Cases

  1. Basic Functionality: Standard input → Expected output
  2. Edge Case: Invalid input → Graceful error handling
  3. Performance: Large dataset → Acceptable processing time

Lifecycle Status

  • Current Stage: Draft
  • Next Review Date: 2026-03-06
  • Known Issues: None
  • Planned Improvements:

- Performance optimization - Additional feature support

平台分布

OpenClaw

74.28%
按下载量换算1,835

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills