Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

promo-reviewer(促销评论员)

promo-reviewer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

promo-reviewer 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 43,402。

总安装 988周安装 42GitHub Stars 138下载 346核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:promo-reviewer(促销评论员)
来源仓库:https://github.com/bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills
仓库路径:skills/promo-reviewer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills --skill promo-reviewer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills --skill promo-reviewer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

promo-reviewer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于广告素材审核、文案合规检查和品牌一致性保障场景。支持图像 OCR 识别和敏感词过滤规则引擎。

使用前应配置行业特定的审核策略模板。建议保留审核日志,满足审计追溯要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/promo-reviewer

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills --…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

promo-reviewer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills --skill prom…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

promo-reviewer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

promo-reviewer 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

promo-reviewer 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

promo-reviewer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 988 次,近一周安装 42 次,下载 346 次,GitHub 138 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

promo-reviewer 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
promo-reviewer

促销评论员 · 本页

988138调用外部服务未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Promo Reviewer Skill

Interactive review and polish of social media copy in album promo/ files. Walk through each post, approve or revise, and write polished results back to the file.

Purpose

After promo templates are populated with platform-specific copy, this skill provides structured review before release. Each post is presented with character counts, hashtag counts, and platform limit compliance. The user chooses actions (approve, revise, shorten, punch up, etc.) and polished copy is written back.

When to Use

  • After /bitwize-music:promo-writer generates initial copy
  • After populating promo/ templates (manually or during release prep)
  • Before release — final polish pass on social media copy
  • User says "review promo copy" or "polish the twitter posts for [album]"
  • When promo copy exists but hasn't been reviewed

Position in Workflow

Promo Videos (optional) → [Promo Writer] (or manual) → **[Promo Review]** → Release

Between populating promo templates and release-director.

Supporting Files


Workflow

1. Album Resolution

Resolve the album from arguments:

Use MCP find_album with the album name from $ARGUMENTS. If no album specified, check get_session for last album context.

Locate promo directory:

{content_root}/artists/{artist}/albums/{genre}/{album}/promo/

Check which promo files exist and have content:

Glob for promo/*.md in the album directory. For each file, check if it contains populated content (not just template placeholders). A file is "populated" if it contains text beyond the template markers — look for content inside code blocks that isn't [placeholder text].

Report status:

## Promo Copy Status

| Platform | File | Status |
|----------|------|--------|
| Campaign | campaign.md | Populated |
| Twitter/X | twitter.md | Populated |
| Instagram | instagram.md | Template only |
| TikTok | tiktok.md | Not found |
| Facebook | facebook.md | Populated |
| YouTube | youtube.md | Template only |

3 of 6 platforms have copy ready for review.

If no promo files are populated:

No promo copy found to review.

Options:
1. Generate promo copy: /bitwize-music:promo-writer <album-name>
2. Populate promo templates manually (fill in promo/ files)
3. Skip promo review and proceed to release

2. Platform Selection

If platform specified in arguments, review only that platform.

Otherwise, ask:

Which platforms to review?

[A] All populated platforms (campaign, twitter, facebook)
[1] Campaign strategy
[2] Twitter/X posts
[3] Facebook posts

List only populated platforms as numbered options.

3. Section Parsing

For each selected platform file:

  1. Read the full file using the Read tool
  2. Split at heading boundaries — ## and ### headings delineate sections
  3. Extract code blocks — content inside ``` fences is the actual post copy
  4. Identify reviewable sections — sections with code blocks containing non-placeholder text
  5. Count metrics for each post:

- Character count (hashtags count toward the limit on all platforms) - Hashtag count - Line count - Platform limit compliance (from platform-rules.md)

  1. Thread detection — if a code block contains numbered tweets (1/, 2/, 3/), split into individual tweets and review each separately with per-tweet char counts

4. Per-Post Review Loop

For each reviewable section, present the post with context:

## Twitter/X — Track 01: Track Title
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Track one tells the story of [concept].

Listen now: [link]

#NewMusic #HipHop

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Chars: 87/280 | Hashtags: 2 | Status: Within limits
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Actions:
  [A] Approve — keep as-is
  [R] Revise — give feedback for rewrite
  [S] Shorten — make more concise
  [P] Punch up — make more engaging/attention-grabbing
  [H] Add hashtags — suggest relevant hashtags
  [T] Rewrite tone — specify tone (casual, professional, hype, etc.)
  [K] Skip — move to next without changes

After any revision action (R, S, P, H, T):

  1. Generate the revised version
  2. Present it with updated metrics
  3. Offer follow-up:
Revised version:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

[revised copy here]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Chars: 142/280 | Hashtags: 3 | Status: Within limits
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  [A] Approve this version
  [R] Revise again — more feedback
  [D] Discard — revert to original

5. Campaign.md Special Handling

Campaign files contain strategy tables and messaging, not code-block posts. Adjust the review approach:

  • Present each section (Overview, Key Messages, Schedule, etc.) as a reviewable unit
  • Replace "Punch up" with "[M] Strengthen messaging" — tighten the strategic language
  • Skip character limits — campaign docs have no platform limits
  • Focus on: clarity, consistency with album themes, actionable schedule entries, complete metadata fields

6. Write-Back

After all sections for a platform are reviewed:

  1. Reconstruct the file with approved/revised content in place
  2. Use the Edit tool to apply changes to the promo file
  3. Confirm write:
Updated twitter.md — 4 posts revised, 2 approved as-is, 1 skipped

Only write back if at least one section was revised. If all sections were approved as-is or skipped, skip the write step.

7. Progress Tracking

Between platforms, show a running summary:

## Review Progress

| Platform | Approved | Revised | Skipped | Limit Issues |
|----------|----------|---------|---------|--------------|
| Twitter  | 4        | 2       | 1       | 0            |
| Facebook | —        | —       | —       | —            |

Next: Facebook (5 sections to review)
Continue? [Y/n]

8. Session Summary

After all platforms reviewed:

## Promo Review Complete

| Platform | Approved | Revised | Skipped |
|----------|----------|---------|---------|
| Campaign | 3        | 1       | 0       |
| Twitter  | 4        | 2       | 1       |
| Facebook | 3        | 2       | 0       |
| **Total** | **10** | **5** | **1** |

Char limit compliance: All posts within platform limits

Files updated:
  - promo/campaign.md (1 revision)
  - promo/twitter.md (2 revisions)
  - promo/facebook.md (2 revisions)

Next steps:
  1. Review any skipped posts if needed
  2. Add streaming links when available (replace [Streaming Link] placeholders)
  3. Ready for release: /bitwize-music:release-director <album>

Revision Guidelines

When revising posts, follow these principles:

Shorten (S)

  • Cut filler words ("really", "very", "just")
  • Combine sentences where possible
  • Prioritize the hook — lead with the most compelling element
  • Respect platform limits (see platform-rules.md)

Punch Up (P)

  • Stronger verbs, more vivid language
  • Add urgency or curiosity
  • Open with a hook, not a description
  • Keep the core message — just make it hit harder

Add Hashtags (H)

  • Suggest 3-5 relevant hashtags based on genre, album themes, platform norms
  • Present options — user picks which to include
  • Follow platform-specific hashtag conventions (see platform-rules.md)
  • Never exceed platform maximum

Rewrite Tone (T)

  • Ask user for target tone before rewriting
  • Common tones: casual, professional, hype, mysterious, storytelling, urgent
  • Preserve factual content — only change voice and style
  • Match tone to platform expectations

Strengthen Messaging (M) — Campaign only

  • Tighten strategic language
  • Make key messages more memorable and quotable
  • Ensure schedule entries are specific and actionable
  • Verify consistency between messaging and album themes

Platform-Specific Review Focus

Twitter/X

  • Every post under 280 chars (hard limit)
  • Thread tweets: each tweet standalone but connected
  • 1-2 hashtags max (more looks spammy)
  • Streaming link in release posts

Instagram

  • Caption can be long (2,200 chars) but first 125 visible before "more"
  • Hook in first line — it's the only thing people see
  • Hashtags as separate block at end
  • 15-20 hashtags is optimal (30 max)

TikTok

  • Under 150 chars ideal (visible without tap)
  • 4,000 char max but shorter is better
  • 3-5 hashtags, trending ones if applicable
  • Casual, authentic tone

Facebook

  • Longer storytelling works well
  • First 2-3 lines visible before "See more"
  • 3-5 hashtags (less hashtag-driven platform)
  • Include call to action

YouTube

  • Description supports timestamps, credits, links
  • First 2-3 lines visible in collapsed view
  • Include streaming links, social links, credits
  • 3-5 hashtags (shown above title)

Remember

  1. Read platform-rules.md at invocation start for current limits
  2. Present one post at a time — don't batch review
  3. Show metrics with every post — chars, hashtags, limit compliance
  4. Never auto-approve — every post gets user review
  5. Write back only changed files — don't touch files with no revisions
  6. Track progress — running counts between platforms
  7. Campaign is different — strategy doc, not social posts
  8. Preserve user voice — revisions should enhance, not replace the user's style
  9. Flag limit violations — highlight posts over platform char limits
  10. Placeholder detection — flag remaining [placeholder] text that needs real content

平台分布

Codex

38.28%
按下载量换算132

Claude

28.63%
按下载量换算99

Cursor

18.83%
按下载量换算65

Gemini CLI

10.2%
按下载量换算35

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills