Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

profile-investigator(简介调查员)

profile-investigator 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

profile-investigator 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 16,566。

总安装 490周安装 20GitHub Stars 2下载 158核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:profile-investigator(简介调查员)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lytics/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/profile-investigator
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/lytics/agent-skills --skill profile-investigator
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/lytics/agent-skills --skill profile-investigator

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

profile-investigator 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。适用于代码审查、项目进度跟踪或团队协作分析等开发相关任务。

通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围和联网能力。建议核实维护状态,避免触发不必要的文件读写或命令执行操作。可结合原始 README 进一步了解具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/profile-investigator

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/lytics/agent-skills --skill profile-investigat…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

profile-investigator 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/lytics/agent-skills --skill profile-investigator。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

profile-investigator 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

profile-investigator 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

profile-investigator 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

profile-investigator 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 490 次,近一周安装 20 次,下载 158 次,GitHub 2 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

profile-investigator 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
profile-investigator

简介调查员 · 本页

4902需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Profile Investigator

Purpose

Deep diagnostic profile exploration. Answers questions like:

  • "Why is this user in segment X?"
  • "Why isn't this user in segment Y?"
  • "What happened to this user?" (data lineage)
  • "What does this user look like?" (full profile + memberships)

Goes beyond basic profile lookup by cross-referencing profile data against segment FilterQL to show exactly which conditions match or fail.

Environment

Requires authenticated API access. See ../references/auth.md for credential resolution.

Inputs

  • Identity field and value (e.g., email, user@example.com)
  • Segment name or ID (for membership diagnosis)
  • Or a diagnostic question in natural language

Diagnostic Flows

Flow A: "Why is/isn't this user in segment X?"

Step 1: Look Up the Profile

Fetch the full profile with segment memberships:

curl -s "${LYTICS_API_URL:-https://api.lytics.io}/api/entity/user/${FIELD}/${VALUE}?segments=true&allsegments=true" \
  -H "Authorization: ${LYTICS_API_TOKEN}"

This returns:

  • All profile fields and their values
  • segments -- list of segment names the user belongs to
  • segments_all -- list of all segment IDs

Check immediately: is the target segment in the membership list?

Step 2: Fetch the Segment's FilterQL

Get the segment with its fully resolved FilterQL (all INCLUDE directives inlined):

curl -s "${LYTICS_API_URL:-https://api.lytics.io}/v2/segment/${SEGMENT_ID}?inline=true" \
  -H "Authorization: ${LYTICS_API_TOKEN}"

The ql_resolved field contains the complete filter expression with nested segments expanded.

Step 3: Evaluate Each Condition Against the Profile

Parse the FilterQL into individual conditions and check each one against the profile's actual field values.

For each condition in the FilterQL, report:

If the user IS in the segment:

## Why user@example.com IS in "High Value Customers"

FilterQL: FILTER AND (visit_count >= 5, email_engagement > 0.3, country = "US") FROM user

All conditions PASS:
  visit_count >= 5        PASS  (actual: 12)
  email_engagement > 0.3  PASS  (actual: 0.72)
  country = "US"          PASS  (actual: "US")

If the user is NOT in the segment:

## Why user@example.com is NOT in "High Value Customers"

FilterQL: FILTER AND (visit_count >= 5, email_engagement > 0.3, country = "US") FROM user

Condition results:
  visit_count >= 5        PASS  (actual: 12)
  email_engagement > 0.3  FAIL  (actual: 0.15, required: > 0.3)
  country = "US"          PASS  (actual: "US")

The user fails the email_engagement condition. Their value (0.15) is below
the threshold (0.3). This is the reason they are excluded from the segment.
Step 4: Check Included Segments

If the FilterQL references other segments via INCLUDE, check those memberships too:

Segment "High Value Customers" includes "Email Subscribers":
  Email Subscribers membership: YES

  Combined evaluation:
    INCLUDE Email Subscribers   PASS
    visit_count >= 5            PASS  (actual: 12)
    last_purchase > "now-90d"   FAIL  (actual: 2025-01-15, ~63 days ago -- outside 90d window)

Flow B: "What happened to this user?" (Data Lineage)

Step 1: Fetch Entity with Explain Mode
curl -s "${LYTICS_API_URL:-https://api.lytics.io}/api/entity/user/${FIELD}/${VALUE}?explain=true" \
  -H "Authorization: ${LYTICS_API_TOKEN}"

This returns:

  • entity -- the resolved profile
  • fragments -- array of data fragments showing where each piece of data came from
  • keys -- source references (fragment aliases)
Step 2: Present Data Lineage
## Data Lineage: user@example.com

### Identity Resolution
Linked identities:
  email: user@example.com
  _uid: abc-def-123
  user_id: 98765

### Data Sources (N fragments)
Fragment 1: stream "web_events" (last seen: 2026-03-18)
  -> visit_count, pages_viewed, last_visit, referrer

Fragment 2: stream "salesforce_contacts" (last seen: 2026-03-15)
  -> first_name, last_name, company, phone

Fragment 3: stream "email_events" (last seen: 2026-03-19)
  -> email_engagement, newsletters, last_email_open

Flow C: Full Profile Summary

Step 1: Fetch Profile + Segments
curl -s "${LYTICS_API_URL:-https://api.lytics.io}/api/entity/user/${FIELD}/${VALUE}?segments=true&allsegments=true&meta=true" \
  -H "Authorization: ${LYTICS_API_TOKEN}"
Step 2: Present Structured Summary
## Profile: user@example.com

### Identity
  email: user@example.com
  _uid: abc-def-123

### Key Attributes
  Name: Jane Smith
  Country: US
  Created: 2024-01-15
  Last Active: 2026-03-18
  Visit Count: 12

### Segment Memberships (5 segments)
  - High Value Customers (segment)
  - Email Subscribers (aspect)
  - US Users (aspect)
  - Q1 Campaign (list)
  - Active Last 30 Days (segment)

### NOT in these commonly-checked segments
  [If the user asks about specific segments, show which they're not in and why]

Condition Evaluation

When cross-referencing FilterQL conditions against profile data, handle each operator type:

FilterQL ConditionHow to Check
field = "value"Compare profile's field value to literal
field > NNumeric comparison against profile value
field > "now-Nd"Compare profile's date field to calculated threshold
EXISTS fieldCheck if field exists and has a non-empty value in profile
NOT EXISTS fieldCheck if field is missing or empty
field INTERSECTS ("a", "b")Check if profile's set field contains any listed values
field NOT INTERSECTS ("a")Check if profile's set field contains none of the listed values
field CONTAINS "substr"Check if profile's string field contains the substring
field IN ("a", "b")Check if profile's value is in the list
INCLUDE segment_slugCheck if user is a member of the referenced segment

For each condition, always show:

  • The condition itself
  • PASS or FAIL
  • The actual value from the profile (or "field not present" if missing)
  • For FAIL: what value would be needed to pass

Error Handling

  • Profile not found: Try alternative identity fields, suggest checking spelling. URL-encode values with special characters.
  • Segment not found: List segments with similar names, suggest checking the slug.
  • Complex FilterQL: For deeply nested expressions, evaluate the top-level conditions first, then drill into failing branches.
  • Missing fields: If a profile field referenced in FilterQL doesn't exist on the profile, report it clearly -- this is often the root cause.

Dependencies

  • Composes: entity-lookup skill, segment-manager skill
  • References: ../references/filterql-grammar.md, ../references/auth.md, ../references/api-client.md

平台分布

Codex

37.14%
按下载量换算59

Claude

29.14%
按下载量换算46

Cursor

19.59%
按下载量换算31

Gemini CLI

10.01%
按下载量换算16

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills