Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

product-strategy-session(产品策略会议)

product-strategy-session 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

product-strategy-session 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 5,756。

总安装 24,480周安装 1,036GitHub Stars 3,868下载 7,920核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:product-strategy-session(产品策略会议)
来源仓库:https://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-skills
仓库路径:skills/product-strategy-session
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-skills --skill product-strategy-session
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-skills --skill product-strategy-session

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

在 2-4 周内将定位、发现和路线图规划协调成经过验证的产品策略。

指导团队完成六个结构化阶段:定位和市场背景、问题框架和验证、解决方案探索、优先级和路线图规划、利益相关者协调和执行规划 包括问题验证和解决方案探索后的决策点,以根据不确定性调整工作流程;如果假设已经得到验证,则跳过发现或实验 将 15 多个组件和交互技能(定位研讨会、问题框架画布、机会解决方案树、优先级顾问、史诗分解等)编排成一个有凝聚力的端到端流程 专为跨职能参与(PM、设计、工程、领导力、销售、客户成功)而设计,以建立共享的心理模型并防止缺乏团队支持的单独 PM 练习

来源仓库内路径:skills/product-strategy-session

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-skills --skill prod…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

product-strategy-session 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-skills --skill product-strate…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

product-strategy-session 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

product-strategy-session 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

product-strategy-session 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

product-strategy-session 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 24,480 次,近一周安装 1,036 次,下载 7,920 次,GitHub 3,868 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

product-strategy-session 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 3,868 星,维护活跃度相对可查。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
product-strategy-session

产品策略会议 · 本页

24,4803,868只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Purpose

Guide product managers through a comprehensive product strategy session by orchestrating positioning, problem framing, customer discovery, and roadmap planning skills into a cohesive end-to-end process. Use this to move from vague strategic direction to concrete, validated product strategy with clear positioning, target customers, problem statements, and prioritized roadmap—ensuring alignment across stakeholders before committing to execution.

This is not a one-time workshop—it's a repeatable process for establishing or refreshing product strategy, typically spanning 2-4 weeks with multiple touchpoints.

Key Concepts

What is a Product Strategy Session?

A product strategy session is a structured, multi-phase process that takes a product from strategic ambiguity to validated direction. It orchestrates:

  1. Positioning & Market Context — Define who you serve, what problem you solve, and how you're differentiated
  2. Problem Discovery & Validation — Frame and validate customer problems through research
  3. Solution Exploration — Generate opportunity solutions and prioritize based on impact
  4. Roadmap Planning — Sequence epics and releases based on strategy

Why This Works

  • Structured discovery: Prevents jumping to solutions before understanding problems
  • Stakeholder alignment: Creates shared mental model across exec, product, design, engineering
  • Validated strategy: Tests assumptions before committing resources
  • Executable roadmap: Connects high-level strategy to concrete work

Anti-Patterns (What This Is NOT)

  • Not a feature brainstorm: Strategy sessions frame problems, not just list features
  • Not waterfall planning: Builds in feedback loops and iteration
  • Not a solo PM exercise: Requires cross-functional participation

When to Use This

  • Launching a new product or major initiative
  • Annual/quarterly strategic planning cycles
  • Repositioning an existing product
  • Onboarding new product leaders (align on strategy)

When NOT to Use This

  • When strategy is already clear and validated
  • For tactical feature additions (no strategic shift needed)
  • When you lack executive sponsorship (strategy won't stick)

Facilitation Source of Truth

When running this workflow as a guided conversation, use workshop-facilitation as the interaction protocol.

It defines:

  • session heads-up + entry mode (Guided, Context dump, Best guess)
  • one-question turns with plain-language prompts
  • progress labels (for example, Context Qx/8 and Scoring Qx/5)
  • interruption handling and pause/resume behavior
  • numbered recommendations at decision points
  • quick-select numbered response options for regular questions (include Other (specify) when useful)

This file defines the workflow sequence and domain-specific outputs. If there is a conflict, follow this file's workflow logic.

Application

Use template.md for the full fill-in structure.

This workflow orchestrates 6 phases over 2-4 weeks, using multiple component and interactive skills.


Phase 1: Positioning & Market Context (Week 1, Days 1-2)

Goal: Define target customer, problem space, and differentiation.

Activities

1. Run Positioning Workshop

  • Use: skills/positioning-workshop/SKILL.md (interactive)
  • Participants: PM, product leadership, marketing, sales
  • Duration: 90 minutes
  • Output: Draft positioning statement

2. Define Proto-Personas

  • Use: skills/proto-persona/SKILL.md (component)
  • Participants: PM, design, customer-facing teams
  • Duration: 60 minutes
  • Output: 1-3 proto-personas (hypothesis-driven)

3. Map Jobs-to-be-Done

  • Use: skills/jobs-to-be-done/SKILL.md (component)
  • Participants: PM, design
  • Duration: 60 minutes
  • Output: JTBD statements for each persona

Decision Point 1: Do we have enough customer context?

If YES: Proceed to Phase 2 (Problem Framing)

If NO: Run additional discovery:

  • Use: skills/discovery-interview-prep/SKILL.md (interactive)
  • Schedule 5-10 customer interviews
  • Validate positioning assumptions before proceeding
  • Time impact: +1 week

Phase 2: Problem Framing & Validation (Week 1, Days 3-5)

Goal: Frame the core customer problem and validate it's worth solving.

Activities

1. Run Problem Framing Canvas

  • Use: skills/problem-framing-canvas/SKILL.md (interactive - MITRE)
  • Participants: PM, design, engineering lead, customer success
  • Duration: 120 minutes
  • Output: Refined problem statement + "How Might We" question

2. Create Formal Problem Statement

  • Use: skills/problem-statement/SKILL.md (component)
  • Participants: PM
  • Duration: 30 minutes
  • Output: Structured problem statement for PRD/roadmap

3. Map Customer Journey (Optional)

  • Use: skills/customer-journey-mapping-workshop/SKILL.md (interactive)
  • When to use: If problem spans multiple touchpoints or phases
  • Participants: PM, design, customer success
  • Duration: 90 minutes
  • Output: Journey map with pain points and opportunities

Decision Point 2: Is the problem validated?

If YES: Proceed to Phase 3 (Solution Exploration)

If NO: Run customer discovery interviews:

  • Use: skills/discovery-interview-prep/SKILL.md (interactive)
  • Validate problem hypothesis with 5-10 customers
  • Iterate problem statement based on findings
  • Time impact: +1 week

Phase 3: Solution Exploration (Week 2, Days 1-3)

Goal: Generate solution options, prioritize based on feasibility/impact, and select POC.

Activities

1. Generate Opportunity Solution Tree

  • Use: skills/opportunity-solution-tree/SKILL.md (interactive)
  • Participants: PM, design, engineering lead
  • Duration: 90 minutes
  • Output: 3 opportunities, 3 solutions per opportunity, POC recommendation

Alternative: Use Lean UX Canvas

  • Use: skills/lean-ux-canvas/SKILL.md (interactive)
  • When to use: If you prefer hypothesis-driven approach over OST
  • Output: Business problem, hypotheses, experiments

2. Define Epic Hypotheses

  • Use: skills/epic-hypothesis/SKILL.md (component)
  • Participants: PM
  • Duration: 60 minutes per epic
  • Output: Epic hypothesis statements for top 3-5 initiatives

3. Create User Story Map (Optional)

  • Use: skills/user-story-mapping-workshop/SKILL.md (interactive)
  • When to use: For complex features requiring release planning
  • Participants: PM, design, engineering
  • Duration: 120 minutes
  • Output: Story map with backbone, release slices

Decision Point 3: Do we need to test solutions before committing?

If YES (high uncertainty): Run experiments:

  • Design POC experiments per skills/opportunity-solution-tree/SKILL.md output
  • Test with 10-20 customers (prototype, concierge, landing page test)
  • Time impact: +1-2 weeks

If NO (low uncertainty): Proceed to Phase 4 (Prioritization)


Phase 4: Prioritization & Roadmap Planning (Week 2, Days 4-5)

Goal: Prioritize initiatives and sequence into executable roadmap.

Activities

1. Choose Prioritization Framework

  • Use: skills/prioritization-advisor/SKILL.md (interactive)
  • Participants: PM
  • Duration: 30 minutes
  • Output: Recommended prioritization framework (RICE, ICE, Value/Effort, etc.)

2. Score & Prioritize Epics

  • Use: Prioritization framework from step 1
  • Participants: PM, engineering lead, product leadership
  • Duration: 90 minutes
  • Output: Ranked backlog of epics

3. Sequence Roadmap by Release

  • Participants: PM, engineering lead
  • Duration: 60 minutes
  • Output: Quarterly or release-based roadmap (Q1: Epics A, B; Q2: Epics C, D, E)

4. Map TAM/SAM/SOM (Optional)

  • Use: skills/tam-sam-som-calculator/SKILL.md (interactive)
  • When to use: For exec presentations, fundraising, or market sizing
  • Participants: PM, business ops
  • Duration: 60 minutes
  • Output: Market size projections with citations

Phase 5: Stakeholder Alignment & Communication (Week 3)

Goal: Present strategy to stakeholders, gather feedback, refine.

Activities

1. Create Visionary Press Release (Optional)

  • Use: skills/press-release/SKILL.md (component)
  • When to use: For major product launches or exec buy-in
  • Participants: PM, marketing
  • Duration: 60 minutes
  • Output: Amazon Working Backwards-style press release

2. Present Strategy to Stakeholders

  • Format: 60-min presentation covering:

- Positioning statement (Phase 1) - Problem statement (Phase 2) - Solution options & prioritization (Phase 3-4) - Roadmap (Phase 4)

  • Participants: Execs, product leadership, key stakeholders
  • Output: Feedback, open questions, approval to proceed

3. Refine Based on Feedback

  • Duration: 1-2 days
  • Output: Updated strategy artifacts

Phase 6: Execution Planning (Week 4)

Goal: Break epics into user stories, plan first sprint/release.

Activities

1. Break Down Top Epic

  • Use: skills/epic-breakdown-advisor/SKILL.md (interactive - with Richard Lawrence's 9 patterns)
  • Participants: PM, design, engineering
  • Duration: 90 minutes
  • Output: User stories split by patterns (workflow, CRUD, business rules, etc.)

2. Write User Stories

  • Use: skills/user-story/SKILL.md (component)
  • Participants: PM
  • Duration: 30 minutes per story
  • Output: User stories with acceptance criteria

3. Plan First Sprint/Release

  • Participants: PM, engineering
  • Duration: 60 minutes
  • Output: Sprint backlog or release plan

Complete Workflow: End-to-End Summary

Week 1:
├─ Day 1-2: Positioning & Market Context
│  ├─ skills/positioning-workshop/SKILL.md (90 min)
│  ├─ skills/proto-persona/SKILL.md (60 min)
│  └─ skills/jobs-to-be-done/SKILL.md (60 min)
│
├─ Day 3-5: Problem Framing & Validation
│  ├─ skills/problem-framing-canvas/SKILL.md (120 min)
│  ├─ skills/problem-statement/SKILL.md (30 min)
│  └─ [Optional] skills/customer-journey-mapping-workshop/SKILL.md (90 min)
│
└─ Decision: Validate problem? (if NO, +1 week discovery)

Week 2:
├─ Day 1-3: Solution Exploration
│  ├─ skills/opportunity-solution-tree/SKILL.md (90 min)
│  ├─ skills/epic-hypothesis/SKILL.md (60 min per epic)
│  └─ [Optional] skills/user-story-mapping-workshop/SKILL.md (120 min)
│
├─ Decision: Test solutions? (if YES, +1-2 weeks experiments)
│
└─ Day 4-5: Prioritization & Roadmap
   ├─ skills/prioritization-advisor/SKILL.md (30 min)
   ├─ Score & prioritize epics (90 min)
   ├─ Sequence roadmap (60 min)
   └─ [Optional] skills/tam-sam-som-calculator/SKILL.md (60 min)

Week 3:
└─ Stakeholder Alignment
   ├─ [Optional] skills/press-release/SKILL.md (60 min)
   ├─ Present strategy (60 min)
   └─ Refine based on feedback (1-2 days)

Week 4:
└─ Execution Planning
   ├─ skills/epic-breakdown-advisor/SKILL.md (90 min)
   ├─ skills/user-story/SKILL.md (30 min per story)
   └─ Plan first sprint (60 min)

Total Time Investment:

  • Minimum: 2 weeks (no discovery/experiments)
  • Typical: 3 weeks (includes 1 round of validation)
  • Maximum: 4-6 weeks (includes discovery interviews + experiments)

Examples

See examples/sample.md for a full strategy session example.

Mini example excerpt:

**Target:** Non-technical SMB owners
**Problem:** Onboarding drop-off due to jargon
**Priority:** Guided onboarding (RICE)

Common Pitfalls

Pitfall 1: Skipping Problem Validation

Symptom: Jump from positioning to solution exploration without validating problem

Consequence: Build solutions to unvalidated problems

Fix: Force decision point after Phase 2: "Is problem validated?" If NO, run discovery interviews.


Pitfall 2: Solo PM Exercise

Symptom: PM runs strategy session alone, presents finished strategy to team

Consequence: No buy-in, team doesn't understand rationale

Fix: Include cross-functional participants in workshops (design, eng, sales, CS)


Pitfall 3: Strategy Session Without Executive Sponsorship

Symptom: Run full strategy session, execs don't show up for Phase 5 alignment

Consequence: Strategy doesn't get resourced or prioritized

Fix: Secure exec commitment upfront; schedule Phase 5 presentation before starting.


Pitfall 4: No Decision Points (Run All Phases Regardless)

Symptom: Blindly follow all 6 phases without checking if discovery/experiments are needed

Consequence: Waste time on low-uncertainty activities

Fix: Use decision points after Phase 2 and Phase 3 to adapt workflow.


Pitfall 5: Strategy Session Becomes Permanent Process

Symptom: Team spends 6 weeks in strategy mode, never executes

Consequence: Analysis paralysis, no delivery

Fix: Time-box strategy session to 2-4 weeks; after Phase 6, move to execution.


References

Related Skills (Orchestrated by This Workflow)

Phase 1:

  • skills/positioning-workshop/SKILL.md (interactive)
  • skills/proto-persona/SKILL.md (component)
  • skills/jobs-to-be-done/SKILL.md (component)

Phase 2:

  • skills/problem-framing-canvas/SKILL.md (interactive)
  • skills/problem-statement/SKILL.md (component)
  • skills/customer-journey-mapping-workshop/SKILL.md (interactive, optional)
  • skills/discovery-interview-prep/SKILL.md (interactive, if validation needed)

Phase 3:

  • skills/opportunity-solution-tree/SKILL.md (interactive)
  • skills/lean-ux-canvas/SKILL.md (interactive, alternative)
  • skills/epic-hypothesis/SKILL.md (component)
  • skills/user-story-mapping-workshop/SKILL.md (interactive, optional)

Phase 4:

  • skills/prioritization-advisor/SKILL.md (interactive)
  • skills/tam-sam-som-calculator/SKILL.md (interactive, optional)

Phase 5:

  • skills/press-release/SKILL.md (component, optional)

Phase 6:

  • skills/epic-breakdown-advisor/SKILL.md (interactive)
  • skills/user-story/SKILL.md (component)

External Frameworks

  • Teresa Torres, *Continuous Discovery Habits* (2021) — Opportunity solution tree framework
  • Jeff Gothelf, *Lean UX* (2016) — Hypothesis-driven product development
  • Marty Cagan, *Inspired* (2017) — Product discovery process

Dean's Work

  • Productside Blueprint — Strategic product discovery
  • [If Dean has strategy session resources, link here]

Skill type: Workflow Suggested filename: product-strategy-session.md Suggested placement: /skills/workflows/ Dependencies: Orchestrates 15+ component and interactive skills across 6 phases

平台分布

Codex

34.83%
按下载量换算2,759

Claude

31.14%
按下载量换算2,466

Cursor

21.32%
按下载量换算1,689

Gemini CLI

8.84%
按下载量换算700

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills