Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

product-antifraud(product antifraud 搜索)

product-antifraud 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

product-antifraud 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 62,001。

总安装 343周安装 14GitHub Stars 60下载 111核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:product-antifraud(product antifraud 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public
仓库路径:skills/product-antifraud
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public --skill product-antifraud
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public --skill product-antifraud

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选反欺诈相关的策略与技术方案。适合在风控模型、规则引擎或审计流程中调用。product-antifraud 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。通过 GitHub 安装,支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor 和 Gemini CLI 等宿主环境。

使用时需明确风险类型与检测阈值等关键参数。安装前建议确认权限范围,防止访问客户敏感行为数据。

来源仓库内路径:skills/product-antifraud

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public --skill product-a…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

product-antifraud 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/vasilyu1983/ai-agents-public --skill product-antifraud。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

product-antifraud 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

product-antifraud 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

product-antifraud 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

product-antifraud 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 343 次,近一周安装 14 次,下载 111 次,GitHub 60 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

product-antifraud 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
product-antifraud

product antifraud 搜索 · 本页

34360需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Product Antifraud -- Log-Based Fraud Detection

AspectDetail
PurposeRule-based fraud detection from application logs (registration + auth flows)
ApproachPure Python + pandas -- counting, grouping, threshold problems
Not forML classification -- use at moderate volumes (~50K entries/day)
OutputsMarkdown report + CSV alerts for security teams

When to Use This Skill

TaskThis Skill Applies
Building fraud detection scripts for registration or auth logsYes
Analyzing K8s application logs for suspicious behavioral patternsYes
Detecting bots, credential stuffing, or velocity abuse from structured logsYes
Auditing logs for GDPR PII exposure (unmasked emails, phones, names)Yes
Designing tunable threshold-based rule engines with JSON configYes
Reviewing or extending existing antifraud detection rulesYes
Building fraud alerting reports (Markdown + CSV) for security teamsYes
ML-based fraud scoring (real-time model inference)No -- use ai-ml-data-science
Application security hardening (OWASP, auth implementation)No -- use software-security-appsec
Infrastructure log analysis (access logs, firewall, WAF)No -- use ops-devops-platform
Real-time streaming fraud detectionNo -- use data-lake-platform

Quick-Start Checklist

StepActionNotes
1Identify log typeRegistration (.txt.gz/.debug.gz) or auth (.log/.log.gz)
2Create directory structureconfig/, reports/, script file
3Build LogParserCorrect timestamp format: , for registration ms, . for auth ms
4Implement SessionAggregatorpandas groupby for key dimensions (token, IP, device, email)
5Create JSON configDefault thresholds (see Configuration Pattern below)
6Implement velocity rulesR1-R12 or A1-A13 -- highest signal-to-noise ratio
7Add bot detection rulesR13-R17 or A14-A19
8Add behavioral analysis rulesR18-R22 or A20-A25
9Enable PIIScannerGDPR compliance pass on all log lines
10Test in discover mode--mode discover against example data
11Tune thresholdsReduce false positives, verify known fraud patterns surface
12Cross-node correlationMerge by token/session_id before aggregation

Quick Reference

Architecture (4 Layers)

Every fraud detection script follows this pattern:

Log Files (.gz, .log)
    |
    v
[1] LogFileReader       -- Walk dirs, handle .gz decompression, iterate lines
    |
    v
[2] LogParser           -- Regex extraction -> dataclass (RegistrationEvent / AuthEvent)
    |
    v
[3] SessionAggregator   -- Group by token/IP/device/email, compute features
    |
    v
[4] RuleEngine + Report -- Evaluate rules, produce Markdown + CSV alerts

Detection Rule Categories

CategoryRegistration (R)Authentication (A)Reference
Fraud velocityR1-R12A1-A13references/registration-fraud-rules.md, references/auth-fraud-rules.md
Bot vs humanR13-R17A14-A19references/bot-detection-patterns.md
Behavioral analysisR18-R22A20-A25references/behavioral-analysis-rules.md
GDPR PII scanningBoth scriptsBoth scriptsreferences/gdpr-pii-scanning.md

Rule Severity Quick Map

SeverityRegistration ExamplesAuth Examples
CRITICALJNDI injection (R10), national ID exposurePersonal data API response leaks
HIGHEmail/device velocity (R1-R2), IP hopping (R6)Brute force (A1), credential stuffing (A2), session hijack (A4)
MEDIUMPartial phone masking, confirmation brute force (R8)Captcha trigger rate (A8), off-hours surge (A10)
LOWSequential email patterns (R17)Auth method escalation (A21)

Decision Tree

New fraud detection task:
    |
    +-- Registration logs?
    |   +-- .txt.gz / .debug.gz format?
    |   |   -> Use RegistrationEvent parser (references/log-parser-architecture.md)
    |   +-- What signals available?
    |       +-- Token, IP, DeviceSerial, Email, Phone -> R1-R12 velocity rules
    |       +-- Timing data -> R13-R15 bot detection
    |       +-- Platform field -> R12, R16 device fingerprinting
    |
    +-- Authentication logs?
    |   +-- .log / .log.gz format?
    |   |   -> Use AuthEvent parser (references/log-parser-architecture.md)
    |   +-- What signals available?
    |       +-- user_id, IP, device_id -> A1-A6 velocity rules
    |       +-- Fraud check weights -> A5, A11 risk scoring
    |       +-- Country field -> A4, A20 impossible travel
    |       +-- Auth type field -> A12, A21 method switching
    |
    +-- GDPR compliance audit?
        -> Run PIIScanner pass on both log types
        -> See references/gdpr-pii-scanning.md

CLI Interface Pattern

# Discover mode: analyze example logs, output pattern statistics
python registration_fraud.py examples/epa-registration/ --mode discover --output reports/

# Detect mode: apply rules to new logs, generate alerts
python registration_fraud.py /path/to/new-day-logs/ \
  --config config/registration_rules.json --output reports/

# Auth fraud (same pattern)
python auth_fraud.py examples/epa-identity-auth-publicapi/ --mode discover --output reports/

Output Format

OutputFilenameContents
Markdown reportreport_YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS.mdSummary table, severity breakdown, detailed alerts with log line evidence
CSV exportalerts_YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS.csvOne row per alert, importable into SIEM/ticketing

Tech Stack

ComponentToolNotes
RuntimePython 3.10+Standard library: re, gzip, json, csv, argparse, dataclasses, collections, datetime, pathlib, statistics
Data analysispandasTime-window grouping and aggregation (only pip dependency)
Report formattingtabulate (optional)Pretty markdown tables

Configuration Pattern

Rules use external JSON configs for tunable thresholds (no code changes needed):

{
  "gdpr_pii_scanner": {
    "enabled": true,
    "check_emails": true,
    "check_phones": true,
    "check_names": true,
    "check_national_ids": true
  },
  "bot_detection": {
    "timing_variance_threshold_ms": 50,
    "min_human_step_interval_seconds": 2,
    "known_emulator_serials": ["000000000000000", "emulator-5554"],
    "scripting_user_agents": ["python-requests", "curl", "Go-http-client"]
  },
  "behavioral": {
    "impossible_travel_speed_kmh": 900,
    "burst_silence_ratio_threshold": 5.0,
    "session_abandonment_rate_threshold": 0.8
  }
}

Common Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsInstead
Hardcoded thresholds in codeCannot tune without redeploymentExternal JSON config per rule
Single-dimension rules onlyEasy to evade by changing one variableCross-correlate IP + device + email + timing
No deduplicationDuplicate log lines inflate countsDeduplicate by (timestamp, request_id, message hash)
Ignoring multi-line entriesAuth logs have stack traces across linesParser must detect continuation lines
Treating all timestamps alikeRegistration uses , for ms; auth uses .Normalize timestamp parsing per log type
Cross-node blind spotsSame session spans K8s nodesMerge by token/session_id before aggregation
PII in fraud reportsGDPR violation in the detection output itselfMask PII in report output, reference by hash/ID

Known Challenges

ChallengeImpactMitigation
Multi-line log entriesAuth logs have stack traces across linesDetect continuation lines (leading whitespace, at, Caused by:)
Duplicate log linesRegistration logs inflate countsDeduplicate by (timestamp, request_id, message hash)
Masked data (***MASKED***)Auth logs limit email/phone correlationIP/device/user_id analysis still works
Different timestamp formatsRegistration , for ms; auth . for msNormalize parsing per log type
Cross-node correlationSame session spans K8s nodesMerge by token/session_id before aggregation
Internal scanner noiseQualys scanner IP 10.7.2.171 triggers R10Flag but annotate as likely internal scan

Trend Awareness Protocol

When users ask about current fraud detection approaches, search before answering:

#Search QueryDomain
1"fintech fraud detection patterns 2026"Fraud patterns
2"application log fraud analysis tools 2026"Tooling
3"GDPR log compliance requirements 2026"Compliance
4"bot detection registration abuse 2026"Bot detection

Navigation

Reference Guides

FileCoverage
references/registration-fraud-rules.mdRegistration fraud rules R1-R12: thresholds, signals, detection logic
references/auth-fraud-rules.mdAuth fraud rules A1-A13: thresholds, signals, detection logic
references/bot-detection-patterns.mdBot vs human: timing analysis, UA fingerprinting, speed checks, emulators
references/behavioral-analysis-rules.mdBehavioral: impossible travel, session abandonment, burst-then-silence
references/gdpr-pii-scanning.mdGDPR PII scanner: regex patterns, severity levels, config, report format
references/log-parser-architecture.md4-layer architecture: LogFileReader, LogParser, SessionAggregator, RuleEngine
data/sources.json18 curated antifraud, OWASP, GDPR, and log analysis resources

Related Skills

SkillUse For
software-security-appsecApplication security patterns, OWASP Top 10
ai-ml-data-scienceML-based fraud classification (when rule-based is insufficient)
data-analytics-engineeringData pipeline patterns for log aggregation
qa-observabilityObservability, structured logging, SIEM integration

平台分布

Codex

33.22%
按下载量换算37

Claude

32.51%
按下载量换算36

Cursor

17.36%
按下载量换算19

Gemini CLI

9.12%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills